The advisor robot: Tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes

HRI 2006: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 218-225

  Powers, Aaron ^a   Kiesler, Sara ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

Dialogue; Gender; Human robot interaction; Humanoids; Knowledge estimation; Mental model; Perception; Social robots

Indexed keywords

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

DIALOGUE; GENDER; HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; HUMANOIDS; KNOWLEDGE ESTIMATION; MENTAL MODEL; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

ROBOTS;

EID: 33745815157     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M. and Burrows, L. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1996, 230-244.
2. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1986, 1173-1182.
3. Bem, S.L., Bem Sex-Role Inventory, Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., 1976.
4. Berry, D. S. and McArthur, L. Z. Some components and consequences of a baby face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1985, 312-323.
5. Breazeal, C., Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 2003, 119-155.
6. Breazeal, C., Emotive qualities in robot speech, Proceedings of the 2001IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Hawaii, USO, 2001, 1388-1394.
7. Campbell, M. http://BehindTheName.com
8. DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., and Kiesler, S. All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads. Designing Interactive Systems (DIS 2002). London, England. June 2002, 321-326.
9. Epley, J., and Kruger, J. When what you type isn't what they read: The perseverance of stereotypes and expectancies over e-mail Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41 (2005) 414-422.
10. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., and Xu, J., A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82, 2002, 878-902.
11. Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., and Hagman, J., Hardware companions? - What online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI, 2003, 273-280.
12. Gentner, D. and Markman, A. Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 1997, 45-56.
13. Gemperle, F., Disalvo, C., Forlizzi, J., and Yonkers, K., The Hug: a new form for communication. Designing for User Experiences, November 2003, (DUX 2005).
14. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., Powers, A., Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2003), vol. IXX. (Milbrae, CA., Oct. 31-Nov, 2, 2003) 55-60.
15. Hassin, R. and Trope, Y. Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 2000, 837-852.
16. Hintzman, D. Scheme abstraction in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 1986, 441-428.
17. Judd, C, M., Kenny, D. A., and McClelland, G.H. Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs, Psychological Methods. 6, 2, Jun2001, 115-134.
18. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., Ishiguro H., Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children; A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 1&2, 2004, 61-84.
19. Kiesler, S, Fostering common ground in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2005), (Nashville, TO, USA, August 2005), 158-163.
20. Kim, D.H., Lee, H.S., and Chung, MJ., Biologically inspired models and hardware for emotive facial expressions. 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2005), 679-685.
21. Kubinyi, E., Miklosi, A. Kaplan, F. Gacsi, M. Topal, J. Csnayi, V. Social behaviour of dogs encountering AIBO, an animal-like robot in a neutral and in a feeding situation. Behavioural Processes, 65, 3, 2004, 231-239.
22. Lenzo, K.A., and Black, A.W., Theta, Cepstral, http://www.cepstral.com
23. Lockerd Thomaz, A., Berlin, M., and Breazeal, C., An embodied computational model of social referencing. 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2005), 591-598.
24. Mayo Clinic Staff, Physical activity plays key role in controlling blood pressure, Mayo Clinic Website, MayoClinic.com.
25. Minato, T., Shimada, M., Ishiguro, H., and Itakura, S., Development of an android robot for studying human-robot interaction. Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence: 17th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems (IEA/AIE 2004), 2004, 424-434.
26. Moreno, R. and Mayer, R. E. Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 2004, 165-173.
27. Nass, C. and Brave, S. Wired for Speech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
28. Nass, C. and Lee, K.M., Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7,3 (2001), 171-181.
29. Nass, C. and Moon, Y. Machines and mindlessness. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 2000, 81-103.
30. Nass, C., Moon, Y., and Carney, P. Are respondents polite to computers? Social desirability and direct responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1999, 1093-1110.
31. National Institute of Health Staff, Aim for a healthy weight: information for patients and the public, National Institute of Health Website, nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/obesity/lose_wt/risk.htm
32. Nickerson, R.S. How we know-and sometimes misjudge-what others know: Imputing one's own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 6, 1999, 737-759.
33. Paffenbarger, R.S. Jr., Hyde, R.T., Wing, A.L., Hsieh C.C., Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni, New England Journal of Medicine, 314 (Marcho, 1986), 605-613.
34. Powers, A., Kramer, A.D.I., Lim, S., Kuo, J., Lee, S-L., and Kiesler, S., Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2005), (Nashville, TN, USA, August 2005), 158-163.
35. Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., te Boekhorst, R. and Billard, A., Effects of repeated exposure of a humanoid robot on children with autism. In S. Keates, J. Clarkson, P. Langdon and P. Robinson (eds), Designing a More Inclusive World, London: Springer-Verlag, 2004, 225-236.
36. Scholl, B. J., and Tremoulet, P. D. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Science. 4, 2000, 200-309.
37. Shrout, P. E., and Bolger, N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods. 7(4), Dec 2002, 422-445.
38. Simmons, R., et al., GRACE: An autonomous robot for the AAAI Robot Challenge, AAAI Magazine, 24, 2, 2003, 51-72.
39. Stiel, W.D., Lieberman, J., Breazeal, C., Basel, L., Lalla, L., and Wolf, M., Design of a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2005), 408-415.
40. Tanaka, F., Noda, K., Sawada, T., and Fujita., M., Associated emotion and its expression in an entertainment robot QRIO. International Conference on Entertainment Computing, 2004.
41. Torrey, C., Powers, A., Marge, M., Fussell, S., Kiesler, S., Effects of adaptive robot dialogue on information uxchange and social relations. Unpublished ms., 2005, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
42. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Sakamoto, K., and Tanie, K., Quantitative analysis of utterance of elderly people in longterm robot assisted activity. 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2005), 267-272.
43. Zebrowitz, L. A., Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., and Rhodes, G. Looking smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 2002, 238-249.
44. Zebrowitz, L. A., Voinescu, L., and Collins, M. A. "Wide-eyed" and "crooked-faced": Determinants of perceived and real honesty across the life span. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1996, 1258-1269.