The structure of SHH in complex with HHIP reveals a recognition role for the Shh pseudo active site in signaling

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 691-697

  Bosanac, Ivan ^a   Maun, Henry R ^a   Scales, Suzie J ^a   Wen, Xiaohui ^a   Lingel, Andreas ^a   Bazan, J Fernando ^a   De Sauvage, Frederic J ^a   Hymowitz, Sarah G ^a   Lazarus, Robert A ^a  

^a GENENTECH INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEDGEHOG INTERACTING PROTEIN; PROTEIN PATCHED 1; SONIC HEDGEHOG PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CARRIER PROTEINS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; HEDGEHOG PROTEINS; HUMANS; MEMBRANE GLYCOPROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ERINACEIDAE; MAMMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 67650337273     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1632     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ingham, P.W. & McMahon, A.P. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 15, 3059-3087 (2001).
2. Jiang, J. & Hui, C.C. Hedgehog signaling in development and cancer. Dev. Cell 15, 801-812 (2008).
3. Beachy, P.A., Karhadkar, S.S. & Berman, D.M. Tissue repair and stem cell renewal in carcinogenesis. Nature 432, 324-331 (2004).
4. Scales, S.J. & de Sauvage, F.J. Mechanisms of Hedgehog pathway activation in cancer and implications for therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 30, 303-312 (2009).
5. Lee, J.J. et al. Autoproteolysis in hedgehog protein biogenesis. Science 266, 1528-1537 (1994).
6. Porter, J.A. et al. The product of hedgehog autoproteolytic cleavage active in local and long-range signalling. Nature 374, 363-366 (1995).
7. Porter, J.A. et al. Hedgehog patterning activity: role of a lipophilic modification mediated by the carboxy-terminal autoprocessing domain. Cell 86, 21-34 (1996).
8. Porter, J.A., Young, K.E. & Beachy, P.A. Cholesterol modification of hedgehog signaling proteins in animal development. Science 274, 255-259 (1996).
9. Pepinsky, R.B. et al. Identification of a palmitic acid-modified form of human Sonic hedgehog. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14037-14045 (1998).
10. Fuse, N. et al. Sonic hedgehog protein signals not as a hydrolytic enzyme but as an apparent ligand for Patched. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10992-10999 (1999).
11. Chen, Y. & Struhl, G. Dual roles for patched in sequestering and transducing Hedgehog. Cell 87, 553-563 (1996).
12. Marigo, V., Davey, R.A., Zuo, Y., Cunningham, J.M. & Tabin, C.J. Biochemical evidence that Patched is the Hedgehog receptor. Nature 384, 176-179 (1996).
13. Stone, D.M. et al. The tumour-suppressor gene patched encodes a candidate receptor for Sonic hedgehog. Nature 384, 129-134 (1996).
14. Rohatgi, R. & Scott, M.P. Patching the gaps in Hedgehog signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 1005-1009 (2007).
15. Lum, L. et al. Identification of Hedgehog pathway components by RNAi in Drosophila cultured cells. Science 299, 2039-2045 (2003).
16. Yao, S., Lum, L. & Beachy, P. The Ihog cell-surface proteins bind Hedgehog and mediate pathway activation. Cell 125, 343-357 (2006).
17. Kang, J.S. et al. CDO: an oncogene-, serum-, and anchorage-regulated member of the Ig/fibronectin type III repeat family. J. Cell Biol. 138, 203-213 (1997).
18. Zhang, W., Kang, J.S., Cole, F., Yi, M.J. & Krauss, R.S. Cdo functions at multiple points in the Sonic Hedgehog pathway, and Cdo-deficient mice accurately model human holoprosencephaly. Dev. Cell 10, 657-665 (2006).
19. Kang, J.S., Mulieri, P.J., Hu, Y., Taliana, L. & Krauss, R.S. BOC, an Ig superfamily member, associates with CDO to positively regulate myogenic differentiation. EMBO J. 21, 114-124 (2002).
20. Tenzen, T. et al. The cell surface membrane proteins Cdo and Boc are components and targets of the Hedgehog signaling pathway and feedback network in mice. Dev. Cell 10, 647-656 (2006).
21. Allen, B.L., Tenzen, T. & McMahon, A.P. The Hedgehog-binding proteins Gas1 and Cdo cooperate to positively regulate Shh signaling during mouse development. Genes Dev. 21, 1244-1257 (2007).
22. McLellan, J.S. et al. Structure of a heparin-dependent complex of Hedgehog and Ihog. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17208-17213 (2006).
23. McLellan, J.S. et al. The mode of Hedgehog binding to Ihog homologues is not conserved across different phyla. Nature 455, 979-983 (2008).
24. Chuang, P.T. & McMahon, A.P. Vertebrate Hedgehog signalling modulated by induction of a Hedgehog-binding protein. Nature 397, 617-621 (1999).
25. Chuang, P.T., Kawcak, T. & McMahon, A.P. Feedback control of mammalian Hedgehog signaling by the Hedgehog-binding protein, Hip1, modulates Fgf signaling during branching morphogenesis of the lung. Genes Dev. 17, 342-347 (2003).
26. Olsen, C.L., Hsu, P.P., Glienke, J., Rubanyi, G.M. & Brooks, A.R. Hedgehog-interacting protein is highly expressed in endothelial cells but down-regulated during angiogenesis and in several human tumors. BMC Cancer 4, 43 (2004).
27. Pathi, S. et al. Comparative biological responses to human Sonic, Indian, and Desert hedgehog. Mech. Dev. 106, 107-117 (2001).
28. Frank-Kamenetsky, M. et al. Small-molecule modulators of Hedgehog signaling: identification and characterization of Smoothened agonists and antagonists. J. Biol. 1, 10 (2002).
29. Yauch, R.L. et al. A paracrine requirement for hedgehog signalling in cancer. Nature 455, 406-410 (2008).
30. Jeon, H. et al. Implications for familial hypercholesterolemia from the structure of the LDL receptor YWTD-EGF domain pair. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 499-504 (2001).
31. Oubrie, A. Structure and mechanism of soluble glucose dehydrogenase and other PQQ- dependent enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1647, 143-151 (2003).
32. Southall, S.M., Doel, J.J., Richardson, D.J. & Oubrie, A. Soluble aldose sugar dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli: a highly exposed active site conferring broad substrate specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 30650-30659 (2006).
33. Oubrie, A., Rozeboom, H.J. & Dijkstra, B.W. Active-site structure of the soluble quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase complexed with methylhydrazine: a covalent cofactor-inhibitor complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11787-11791 (1999).
34. Hall, T.M., Porter, J.A., Beachy, P.A. & Leahy, D.J. A potential catalytic site revealed by the 1.7-Å crystal structure of the amino-terminal signalling domain of Sonic hedgehog. Nature 378, 212-216 (1995).
35. Briscoe, J., Chen, Y., Jessell, T.M. & Struhl, G. A hedgehog-insensitive form of patched provides evidence for direct long-range morphogen activity of sonic hedgehog in the neural tube. Mol. Cell 7, 1279-1291 (2001).
36. Taipale, J., Cooper, M.K., Maiti, T. & Beachy, P.A. Patched acts catalytically to suppress the activity of Smoothened. Nature 418, 892-897 (2002).
37. Ericson, J., Morton, S., Kawakami, A., Roelink, H. & Jessell, T.M. Two critical periods of Sonic hedgehog signaling required for the specification of motor neuron identity. Cell 87, 661-673 (1996).
38. Rawlings, N.D., Morton, F.R., Kok, C.Y., Kong, J. & Barrett, A.J. MEROPS: the peptidase database. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D320-D325 (2008).
39. Bochtler, M., Odintsov, S.G., Marcyjaniak, M. & Sabala, I. Similar active sites in lysostaphins and D-Ala-D-Ala metallopeptidases. Protein Sci. 13, 854-861 (2004).
40. Bussiere, D.E. et al. The structure of VanX reveals a novel amino-dipeptidase involved in mediating transposon-based vancomycin resistance. Mol. Cell 2, 75-84 (1998).
41. Gomis-Rüth, F.X. et al. Mechanism of inhibition of the human matrix metalloproteinase stromelysin-1 by TIMP-1. Nature 389, 77-81 (1997).
42. Stamos, J., Lazarus, R.A., Yao, X., Kirchhofer, D. & Wiesmann, C. Crystal structure of the HGF β-chain in complex with the Sema domain of the Met receptor. EMBO J. 23, 2325-2335 (2004).
43. Kirchhofer, D. et al. Structural and functional basis of the serine protease-like hepatocyte growth factor β-chain in Met binding and signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 39915-39924 (2004).
44. Kawahira, H. et al. Combined activities of hedgehog signaling inhibitors regulate pancreas development. Development 130, 4871-4879 (2003).
45. Dubourg, C. et al. Molecular screening of SHH, ZIC2, SIX3, and TGIF genes in patients with features of holoprosencephaly spectrum: mutation review and genotype-pheno-type correlations. Hum. Mutat. 24, 43-51 (2004).
46. Gao, B. et al. Mutations in IHH, encoding Indian hedgehog, cause brachydactyly type A-1. Nat. Genet. 28, 386-388 (2001).
47. McCready, M.E. et al. A novel mutation in the IHH gene causes brachydactyly type A1: a 95-year-old mystery resolved. Hum. Genet. 111, 368-375 (2002).
48. Kirkpatrick, T.J. et al. Identification of a mutation in the Indian Hedgehog (IHH) gene causing brachydactyly type A1 and evidence for a third locus. J. Med. Genet. 40, 42-44 (2003).
49. Gao, B. & He, L. Answering a century old riddle: Brachydactyly type A1. Cell Res. 14, 179-187 (2004).
50. Liu, M. et al. A novel heterozygous mutation in the Indian hedgehog gene (IHH) is associated with brachydactyly type A1 in a Chinese family. J. Hum. Genet. 51, 727-731 (2006).
51. Gao, B. et al. A mutation in Ihh that causes digit abnormalities alters its signalling capacity and range. Nature 458, 1196-1200 (2009).
52. Byrnes, A.M. et al. Brachydactyly A-1 mutations restricted to the central region of the N-terminal active fragment of Indian hedgehog. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. published online, doi:10.1038/ejhg.2009.18 (11 March 2009).
53. St-Jacques, B., Hammerschmidt, M. & McMahon, A.P. Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation. Genes Dev. 13, 2072-2086 (1999).
54. Kiselyov, A.S., Tkachenko, S.E., Balakin, K.V. & Ivachtchenko, A.V. Small-molecule modulators of Hh and Wnt signaling pathways. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 11, 1087-1101 (2007).
55. Stanton, B.Z. et al. A small molecule that binds Hedgehog and blocks its signaling in human cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 154-156 (2009).
56. Pepinsky, R.B. et al. Mapping sonic hedgehog-receptor interactions by steric interference. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 10995-11001 (2000).
57. Carpenter, D. et al. Characterization of two Patched receptors for the vertebrate Hedgehog protein family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13630-13634 (1998).
58. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 (1997).
59. Bricogne, G., Vonrhein, C., Flensburg, C., Schiltz, M. & Paciorek, W. Generation, representation and flow of phase information in structure determination: recent developments in and around SHARP 2.0. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 59, 2023-2030 (2003).
60. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
61. McCoy, A.J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W., Storoni, L.C. & Read, R.J. Likelihood-enhanced fast translation functions. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 61, 458-464 (2005).
62. Winn, M.D., Isupov, M.N. & Murshudov, G.N. Use of TLS parameters to model anisotropic displacements in macromolecular refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 57, 122-133 (2001).