Bringing academics on board: Encouraging institution-wide diffusion of e-learning environments

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 117-134

  Birch, Dawn ^a   Burnett, Bruce ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65449187575     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1184     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bates, T. (2006). Technology, e-Learning and distance education. New York: Abingdon.
2. Benson, R. & Palaskas, T. (2006). Introducing a new management learning system: An institutional case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 548-567. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ ajet/ajet22/benson.html
3. Betts, K. S. (1998). An institutional overview: Factors influencing faculty participation in distance education in the United States: An institutional study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 1(3). [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://www.westga.edu/ ~distance/betts13.html
4. Birch, D. & Sankey, M. (2008). Drivers for and obstacles to academics' development of interactive multimodal technology-mediated distance education courses. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 4(1). [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=375&layout=html
5. Bonk, C. J. (2001). Online teaching in an online world. Bloomington: CourseShare.com. [viewed 10 May 2005, verified 12 Feb 2009] http://publicationshare.com/docs/faculty_survey_report.pdf
6. Brogden, L. & Couros, A. (2002). Contemplating the virtual campus: Pedagogical and administrative considerations. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 68(3), 22-30.
7. Carroll-Barefield, A., Smith, S. P., Prince, L. H. & Campbell, C. A. (2005). Transitioning from brick and mortar to online: A faculty perspective. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1). [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/ spring81/carroll81.htm
8. Capobianco, B. & Lehman, J. (2004). Using technology to promote inquiry in elementary science teacher education: A case study of one teacher educators initiatives. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2004, (1), 4625-4630.
9. Chizmar, J. F. & Williams, D. B. (2001). What do faculty want? EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 1, 18-24. [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0112.pdf
10. Covington, D., Petherbridge, D. & Warren, S. E. (2005). Best practices: A triangulated support approach in transitioning academic to online teaching. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1). [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://www.westga.edu/ ~distance/ojdla/spring81/covington81.htm
11. Cowan, J. (2006). On becoming an innovative university teacher. New York: Open University Press.
12. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H. & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
13. Daugherty, M. & Funke, B. L. (1998). University faculty and student perceptions of web-based instruction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 21-39.
14. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
15. Eastman, J. K. & Swift, C. O. (2001). New horizons in distance education: The online learner-centered marketing class. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(1), 25-34.
16. Ebersole, S. & Vorndam, M. (2003). Adoption of computer-based instructional methodologies: A case study. International Journal on E-Learning, 2(2), 15-20.
17. Fleming, N. (2001). VARK: A guide to learning styles. [viewed 30 Nov 2004, verified 12 Feb 2009] http://www.vark-learn.com/english/ page.asp?p=questionnaire
18. Gulbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap for successful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 49, 943-956.
19. Howell, S. L., Williams, P. B. & Lindsay, N. K. (2005). Thirty-two trends affecting distance education: An informed foundation for strategic planning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6(3). [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://www.westga.edu/ ~distance/ojdla/fall63/howell63.html
20. Hunt, L., Eagle, L. & Kitchen, P. J. (2004). Balancing marketing education and information technology: Matching needs or needing a better match. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(1), 75-88.
21. Irani, T. & Telg, R. (2002). Building it so they will come: Assessing universities' distance education faculty training and development programs. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 36-46.
22. Jacobsen, D. M. (1998). Adoption patterns of faculty who integrate computer technology for teaching and learning in higher education. Proceedings of the Ed-Media and Ed-Telecom 98: World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on Educational Telecommunications, Freiburg, Germany, June 20-25.
23. Jafari, A., McGee, P. & Carmean, C. (2006). Managing courses, defining learning: What faculty, students, and administrators want. EDUCAUSE, July-August 2006, 50-70. http://net.educause.edu/ir/ library/pdf/ERM0643.pdf
24. Jochems, W., van Merrienboer, J. & Koper, R. (2004). Integrated e-learning: Implications for pedagogy, technology and organisation. London: Routledge Falmer.
25. Jones, A. & Moller, L. (2002). A comparison of continuing education and resident faculty attitudes towards distance education in a higher education institution in Pennsylvania. College and University Media Review, 9(1), 11-37.
26. Jones, K. O. & Kelley, C. A. (2003). Teaching marketing via the Web: Lessons learned and challenges to be met. Marketing Education Review, 13(1), 81-89.
27. Kavanagh, M. (2001). Managing change to flexible learning using online technologies: Bridges to cross, lessons to learn. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2001, (511-516).
28. Lee, J. (2001). Instructional support for distance education and faculty motivation, commitment, satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 153-160.
29. Maguire, L. L. (2005). Literature review: Faculty participation in online distance education: Barriers and motivators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1). [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring81/maguire81.htm
30. McAlpine, L. & Gandell, T. (2003). Teaching improvement grants: What they tell us about professors' instructional choices for the use of technology in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 281-293.
31. McCorkle, D. E., Alexander, J. F. & Reardon, J. (2001). Integrating business technology and marketing education: Enhancing the diffusion process through technology champions. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(1), 16-24.
32. McGee, P. & Diaz, V. (2007). Wikis and podcasts and blogs! Oh, my! What is a faculty member supposed to do? EDUCAUSE, September-October, 2007, 28-40. [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://net.educause.edu/ir/ library/pdf/ERM0751.pdf
33. McLean, J. (2005). Addressing faculty concerns about distance learning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4). [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter84/ mclean84.htm
34. McLoughlin, C. (2002). Learner support in distance and networked learning environments: Ten dimensions for successful design. Distance Education, 23(2), 149-162.
35. McPhail, J. & McDonald, J. (2004). Predicting undergraduate students' acceptance and use of learning resources on CD-ROM: Test of an extended technology acceptance model. Proceedings of the Academy of World Business, Marketing and Management Development Conference, July 13-16, 2004, Gold Coast, Australia.
36. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
37. Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309-326.
38. Moser, F. Z. (2007). Faculty adoption of educational technology. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 1, 66-69. [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm07111.pdf
39. O'Quinn, L. & Corry, M. (2002). Factors that deter faculty from participating in distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(4), 1-18. [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter54/Quinn54.htm
40. Rockwell, S. K., Schauer, J., Fritz, S. M. & Marx, D. B. (1999). Incentives and obstacles influencing higher education faculty and administrators to teach via distance. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3(2). [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://www.westga.edu/~distance/rockwell32.html
41. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
42. Sankey, M. & St Hill, R. (2005). Multimodal design for hybrid learning materials in a second level economics course. Proceedings of 11th Australasian Teaching Economics Conference: Innovation for Student Engagement in Economics, July 11-12, 2005, University of Sydney, Australia (98-106). [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://eprints.usq.edu.au/267/ 1/Sankey_StHill_05.pdf
43. Schifter, C. C. (2000). Faculty motivators and inhibitors for participation in distance education. Educational Technology, 40(2), 43-6.
44. Schifter, C. C. (2002). Perception differences about participating in distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(1). [verified 12 Feb 2009] http://www.westga.edu/ ~distance/ojdla/spring51/schifter51.html
45. Smith, L. J. (2001). Content and delivery: A comparison and contrast of electronic and traditional MBA marketing planning courses. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(1), 35-44.
46. Surry, D. W., Ensminger, D. C. & Haab, M. (2005). A model for integrating instructional technology into higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 327-329.
47. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell. Australia: ACER Press.
48. Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A. & Newby, T. (2004). Increasing pre-service teachers' self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231-50.
49. Weston, T. J. (2005). Why faculty did - or did not - integrate instructional software in their undergraduate classrooms. Innovative Higher Education, 30(2), 99-115.
50. Wolcott, L. L. & Betts, K. S. (1999). What's in it for me? Incentives for faculty participation in distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 34-49.
51. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
52. Zhao, Y. & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807-841. [verified 12 Feb 2009] https://www.msu.edu/ ~kenfrank/papers/Factors%20affecting%20technology%20uses%20in%20 schools.pdf