Why faculty did-and did not-integrate instructional software in their undergraduate classrooms

Innovative Higher Education

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 99-115

  Weston, Timothy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational technology; Software implementation; Technology integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544433765     PISSN: 07425627     EISSN: 15731758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10755-005-5013-4     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Bates, T. (2000). Managing technological change: Strategies for college and university leaders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Bates, T. (2003). Effective teaching with technology in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Beatty, I. (2004). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Educause Research Bulletin, Volume 2004, Issue 3. Retrieved September 1, 2004 at http://www.utexas.edu/academic/cit/services/cps/ ECARCRS.pdf
4. Becker, H. J. (2000). Access to classroom computers. Communications of the ACM, 43, 24-25.
5. Carneville, D. (2004, July 1). Report says educational technology has failed to deliver on its promise. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 14.
6. Center for Human Simulation. (2004). Overview. Retrieved March 1, 2004 from.www.uchsc.edu/sm/chs/open.html.
7. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 813-834.
8. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 8, 391-450.
9. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
10. Green, T. (2001). The 2000 campus computing survey. Retrieved March 1, 2004 from www.campuscomputing.net/
11. Grice, G. (2001, July 30). Slice of life. The New Yorker, 77, 36-41.
12. Johnson, D. J. (2000). Levels of success in implementing information technologies. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 59-76.
13. Miller, J. W., Martineau, L. P., & Clark, R. C. (2000). Technology infusion and higher education: Changing teaching and learning. Innovative Higher Education, 24, 227-241.
14. Mills, S., & Ragan, T. (2000). A tool for analyzing implementation fidelity of an integrated learning system. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 48, 21-41.
15. Oliver, K. M. (2000). Methods for developing constructivist learning on the web. Educational Technology, 40, 5-16.
16. Partee, M. H. (2002). Cyberteaching: Instructional technology on the modern campus. New York, NY: University Press of America.
17. Rice, M. L., & Miller, M. T. (2001). Faculty involvement in planning for the use and integration instructional and administrative technologies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 328-336.
18. Seidel, R. J., & Perez, R. S. (1994). An evaluation model for investigating the impact of innovation education technology. In H. F. O'Neil and E. L. Baker (Eds.), Technology assessment in software applications (pp. 151-172). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Spodark, E. (2003). Five obstacles to technology integration at a small liberal arts university. T.H.E. Journal Online. Retrieved March 1, 2004 at http://www.thejounial.com/
20. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
21. Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Warschauer, M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday: Peer Reviewed Journal on the Internet. Retrieved September 1, 2004 at http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue7_7/warschauer/
23. Weston, T. J., & Barker, L. J. (2001). Designing, implementing, and evaluating web-based learning modules for university students. Educational Technology, 41(4), 15-22.
24. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807-841.