Wine purchase decisions and consumption behaviours: Insights from a probability sample drawn in Auckland, New Zealand

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 312-319

  Jaeger, Sara R ^a,b   Danaher, Peter J ^b   Brodie, Roderick J ^b  

^a THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE FOR PLANT AND FOOD RESEARCH LIMITED   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Best worst scaling; Involvement; Retail locations; Systematic random sample

Indexed keywords

VITACEAE;

EID: 63049127009     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Areni C.S., and Kim D. The influence of in-store lighting on consumers' examination of merchandise in a wine store. International Journal of Research in Marketing 11 2 (1994) 117-125
2. Armstrong J.S., and Overton T.S. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14 3 (1977) 396-402
3. Atkin, T., Garcia, R., & Lockshin, L. (2005). Adaptation of wine innovation. In Proceedings of the 2nd international wine marketing symposium, 8-9 July, Rohnert Park, Sonoma County, USA [CD-ROM].
4. Auger P., Devinney T.M., and Louviere J.J. Using best-worst scaling methodology to investigate consumer ethical beliefs across countries. Journal of Business Ethics 70 3 (2007) 299-326
5. Backstrom K., and Johansson U. Creating and consuming experiences in retail store environments: Comparing retailer and consumer perspectives. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 13 (2006) 417-430
6. Bacon L., Lenk P., Seryakova K., and Veccia E. Comparing apples to oranges. To produce useful insight, between-subject comparisons must have a common origin. Marketing Research 20 1 (2008) 29-34
7. Basnet C. Production management in New Zealand: Is education relevant to practice?. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 20 6 (2000) 730-745
8. Batt P., and Dean A. Factors influencing the consumer's decision. Australian and New Zealand Wine Industry Journal 15 4 (2000) 34-41
9. Bolton R.N. Covering the market. Marketing Research 6 (1994) 30-35
10. Bruwer J., and Li E. Wine-related lifestyle (WRL) market segmentation: Demographic and behavioural factors. Journal of Wine Research 18 1 (2007) 19-34
11. Carr B.T. Commentary: Two types of sensory panels or are there more?. Journal of Sensory Studies 20 (2005) 546-549
12. Churchill G.A., and Iacobucci D. Marketing research: Methodological foundations. 8th ed. (2002), The Dryden Press, Sydney
13. Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1957). Balanced and partially balanced incomplete block designs. In Experimental designs (2nd ed.) (pp. 439-482). New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
14. Cowan C.D. Using multiple sample frames to improve survey coverage quality and costs. Marketing Research 3 (1991) 66-69
15. Danaher P.J., Conroy D.M., and McColl-Kennedy J.R. Who wants a relationship anyway? Conditions when consumers expect a relationship with their service provider. Journal of Service Research 11 (2008) 43-62
16. Dillman D.A. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method (1978), Wiley, New York
17. Etter J. Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50 10 (1997) 1123-1128
18. Filion F.L. Estimating bias due to non-response in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 39 4 (1975) 482-492
19. Finn A., and Louviere J.J. Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: The case of food safety. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 11 2 (1992) 12-15
20. Flynn T.N., Louviere J.J., Peters T.J., and Coast J. Best-worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it. Journal of Health Economics 26 1 (2007) 171-189
21. Fowler Jr. J.F., Gallagher P.M., Stringfellow V.L., Zaslavsky A.M., Thompson J.W., and Cleary P.D. Using telephone interviews to reduce non-response bias to mail surveys of health plan members. Medical Care 40 3 (2002) 190-200
22. Garlin F.V., and Owen K. Setting the tone with the tune: A meta-analytic review of the effects of background music in retail settings. Journal of Business Research 59 (2006) 755-764
23. Glover M., Paynter J., Bullen C., and Kristensen K. Supporting pregnant women to quit smoking: A postal survey of New Zealand general practitioners and midwives' smoking cessation knowledge and practices. New Zealand Medical Journal 121 1270 (2008) 53-65
24. Goodman, S., Lockshin, L., Cohen, E., Fenterseifer, J., Ma, H., d'Hauteville, F. et al. (2008). International comparison of consumer choice for wine: A twelve country comparison. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference of the academy of wine business research [CD-ROM].
25. Goodman S., Lockshin L., and Cohen E. Influences of consumer choice in a retail setting - More international comparisons. Wine Industry Journal 22 6 (2007) 42-48
26. Goodman S., Lockshin L., and Cohen E. Influences of consumer choice - Comparing international markets. Wine Industry Journal 22 3 (2007) 91-95
27. Gray, A. (2005). Strategies for New Zealand household surveys which oversample Māori and Pasifika. Wellington: Statistics Research Associates Ltd., Statistics New Zealand.
28. Hair J.F., Bush R.P., and Ortinau D.J. Marketing research within a changing information environment (2003), McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston
29. Hall J., and Lockshin L. Understanding wine purchasing. It is not the consumer, it is the occasion. Australian and New Zealand Wine Industry Journal 14 3 (1999) 69-78
30. Hein K.A., Jaeger S.R., Carr T.B., and Delahunty C.M. Comparison of five common acceptance and preference methods. Food Quality and Preference 19 7 (2008) 561-661
31. Helgeson J.G., Voss K.E., and Terpening W.D. Determinants of mail-survey response: Survey design and respondent factors. Psychology and Marketing 19 3 (2002) 303-328
32. Hoffmann C.A. When consumers buy wine, what factors decide the final purchase?. Australian and New Zealand Wine Industry Journal 19 2 (2004) 88-91
33. Hollebeek L.D., Jaeger S.R., Brodie R.J., and Balemi A. The influence of involvement on purchase intention for new world wine. Food Quality and Preference 18 8 (2007) 1033-1049
34. Howell, S. C., Quine, S., & Talley, N. J. (2003). Ethics review and use of reminder letters in postal surveys: Are current practices compromising an evidence-based approach? The Medical Journal of Australia, 178(1), 43.
35. Ibrahim M.F., and Ng C.W. The importance of entertainment in the shopping centre experience. Evidence from Singapore. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management 8 3 (2002) 239-254
36. Jaeger S.R., and Cardello A.V. Comparison of labelled affective magnitude (LAM) and best-worst scaling for hedonic assessments. Food Quality and Preference 29 3 (2009) 249-258
37. Jaeger S.R., Jørgensen A.S., Aaslyng M.D., and Bredie W.L.P. Comparison of best-worst scaling and monadic rating for preference elicitation with food products: A case study. Food Quality and Preference 19 6 (2008) 579-588
38. Jenster P., and Jenster L. The European wine industry. International Journal of Wine Marketing 5 1 (1993) 30-74
39. Kalantar J.S., and Talley N.J. The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: A randomised study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52 (1999) 1117-1122
40. Kanuk L., and Berenson C. Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research 12 (1975) 440-453
41. Koewn C., and Casey M. Purchasing behaviour in the Northern Ireland wine market. British Food Journal 97 11 (1995) 17-20
42. Koloski N., Talley N.J., Boyce P.M., and Morris-Yates A.D. The effects of questionnaire length and lottery ticket inducement on the response rate in mail surveys. Psychology and Health 16 (2001) 67-75
43. Lange C., Issanchou S., and Combris P. Expected versus experienced quality: Trade-off with price. Food Quality and Preference 11 4 (2000) 289-297
44. Lange C., Martin C., Chabanet C., Combris P., and Issanchou S. Impact of the information provided to consumers on their willingness to pay for Champagne: Comparison with hedonic scores. Food Quality and Preference 13 7-8 (2002) 597-608
45. Laurent G., and Kapferer J.N. Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research 22 1 (1985) 41-53
46. Laurent G., and Kapferer J.N. Consumer involvement profiles: A new practical approach to consumer involvement. Journal of Advertising Research 25 6 (1985) 48-57
47. Lee J.A., Soutar G., and Louviere J.J. The best-worst scaling approach: An alternative to Schwartz's values survey. Journal of Personality Assessment 90 4 (2008) 335-347
48. Lee J.A., Soutar G.N., and Louviere J.J. Measuring values using best-worst scaling: The LOV example. Psychology and Marketing 24 12 (2007) 1043-1058
49. Lockshin, L., & Hall, J. (2003). Consumer purchasing behaviour for wine: What we know and where we are going. International Wine Marketing Colloquium, Adelaide, July [CD-ROM].
50. Lockshin, L., & Halstead, L. (2005). A comparison of Australian and Canadian wine buyers using discrete choice analysis. In Proceedings of the 2nd international wine marketing symposium, 8-9 July, Rohnert Park, Sonoma County, USA [CD-ROM].
51. Lockshin L., Jarvis W., d'Hauteville F., and Perrouty J.P. Using simulations from discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sensitivity to brand, region, price, and awards in wine choice. Food Quality and Preference 17 3-4 (2006) 166-178
52. Lockshin L., Quester P., and Spawton T. Segmentation by involvement or nationality for global retailing: A cross-national comparative study of wine shopping behaviours. Journal of Wine Research 12 3 (2001) 223-236
53. Lockshin L.S., Spawton A.L., and MacIntosh G. Using product, brand and purchasing involvement for retail segmentation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 4 3 (1997) 171-183
54. Louviere J.J., and Islam T. A comparison of importance weights and willingness-to-pay measures derived from choice-based conjoint, constant sum scales and best-worst scaling. Journal of Business Research 61 9 (2008) 903-911
55. Marley A.A.J., and Louviere J.J. Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best-worst choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 49 (2005) 464-480
56. Mitchell D.J., Kahn B.E., and Knasko S.C. There's something in the air: Effects of ambient odor on consumer decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research 22 (1995) 229-238
57. Mitchell E.A. Wrapping a cot mattress in plastic does not explain the continuing fall in SIDS mortality. European Journal of Paediatrics 167 2 (2008) 251-252
58. Moye L.N., and Kincade D.H. Influence of usage situations and consumer orientations on the importance of retail store environment. International Journal of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 12 1 (2002) 59-79
59. Mueller, S., & Lockshin, L. (2008). How important is wine packaging for consumers? On the reliability of measuring attribute importance via direct verbal scaling versus indirect visual methods. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference of the academy of wine business research [CD-ROM].
60. Olsen J.E., Thach L., and Nowak L. Wine for my generation: Exploring how US wine consumers are socialised to wine. Journal of Wine Research 18 1 (2007) 1-18
61. Pirotta M., Gunn J., Farish S., and Karabatsos G. Primer postcard improves postal survey response rates. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 23 2 (1999) 196-197
62. Qenanri-Petrela E., Wolf M., and Zuckerman B. Generational differences in wine consumption. Journal of Food Distribution Research 38 1 (2007) 119-127
63. Quester P.G., and Smart J. The influence of consumption situation and product involvement over consumers' use of product attribute. Journal of Consumer Marketing 15 3 (1998) 220-238
64. Robertson M.M., Verrill M., Mercer M., James B., and Pauls D.L. Tourette's syndrome in New Zealand. A postal survey. The British Journal of Psychiatry 164 (1994) 263-266
65. Scott K.M., McGee M.A., Wells J.E., and Oakley Browne M.A. Obesity and mental disorders in the adult general population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 64 (2008) 97-195
66. Scherrer A.M., Pomroy W.E., and Charleston W.A.G. Anthelmintic usage on goat farms in New Zealand. Results of a postal survey. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 38 4 (1990) 133-135
67. Scriven F. Two types of sensory panels or are there more?. Journal of Sensory Studies 20 (2005) 526-538
68. Sherif M., and Cantril H. The psychology of ego involvement (1947), Wiley, New York
69. Speed R. Choosing between line extensions and second brands: The case of the Australian and New Zealand wine industries. Journal of Product and Brand Management 7 6 (1998) 519-539
70. Sudman N. Sampling. In: Bagozzi R. (Ed). Principles of marketing research (1996), Oxford, Blackwell 73-115
71. Summers T.A., and Hebert P.R. Shedding some light on store atmospherics: Influence of illumination on consumer behaviour. Journal of Business Research 54 2 (2001) 145-150
72. Thomas, A. (2005). What a difference a sample makes? In Proceedings of the 2nd international wine marketing symposium, 8-9 July, Rohnert Park, Sonoma County, USA [CD-ROM].
73. Tustin M., and Lockshin L. Region of origin. Does it really count?. Australian and New Zealand Wine Industry Journal 16 5 (2001) 139-143
74. van Toor R.F., and Teulon D.A.J. Insecticide practise for aphid control in potatoes. New Zealand Plant Protection 59 (2006) 235-341
75. Yalch R.F., and Spangenberg E.R. The effects of music in a retail section on real and perceived shopping times. Journal of Business Research 49 2 (2000) 139-147
76. Yammarino F., Skinner S.J., and Childers T.L. Understanding mail survey response behaviour. Public Opinion Quarterly 55 (1991) 613-639
77. Yu J., and Cooper H. A quantitative review of research design: Effects on response rates to questionnaires. Journal of Marketing Research 20 (1983) 36-44
78. Zaichkowsky J.L. Involvement and the price cue. Advances in Consumer Research 15 (1988) 323-327