Detecting clusters of mutations

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 11, 2008, Pages

  Zhou, Tong ^a   Enyeart, Peter J ^a   Wilke, Claus O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; PROTEIN; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENOME; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FLY; GENE CLUSTER; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIMATE; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; RODENT; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONFORMATION; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTATION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

MAMMALIA;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENOME; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SOLVENTS;

EID: 56649123164     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003765     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. McDonald JH, Kreitman M (1991) Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351: 652-654.
2. Nielsen R, Yang Z (1998) Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics 148: 929-936.
3. Suzuki Y, Gojobori T (1999) A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. Mol Biol Evol 16: 1315-1328.
4. Kreitman M (2000) Methods to detect selection in populations with applications to the human. Annual Rev Genomics Human Gen 1: 539-559.
5. Smith NGC, Eyre-Walker A (2002) Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Nature 415: 1022-1024.
6. Sabeti PC, Reich DE, Higgins JM, Levine HZP, Richter DJ, et al. (2002) Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 419: 832-837.
7. Suzuki Y (2004) Three-dimensional window analysis for detecting positive selection at structural regions of proteins. Mol Biol Evol 21: 2352-2359.
8. Bustamante CD, Fledel-Alon A, Williamson S, Nielsen R, Hubisz MT, et al. (2005) Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome. Nature 437: 1153-1157.
9. Yang Z, Wong WSW, Nielsen R (2005) Bayes empirical bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol Biol Evol 22: 1107-1118.
10. Wagner A (2007) Rapid detection of positive selection in genes and genomes through variation clusters. Genetics 176: 2451-2463.
11. Ikemura T (1981) Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. J Mol Biol 151: 389-409.
12. Akashi H (1994) Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: Natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics 136: 927-935.
13. Stenico M, Lloyd AT, Sharp PM (1994) Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases. Nucl Acids Res 22: 2437-2446.
14. Stoletzki N, Eyre-Walker A (2007) Synonymous codon usage in Escherichia coli: Selection for translational accuracy. Mol Biol Evol 24: 374-381.
15. Hirsh AE, Fraser HB, Wall DP (2005) Adjusting for selection on synonymous sites in estimates of evolutionary distance. Mol Biol Evol 22: 174-177.
16. Drummond DA, Raval A, Wilke CO (2006) A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol 23: 327-337.
17. Drummond DA, Wilke CO (2008) Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134: 341-352.
18. Chamary JV, Hurst LD (2005) Evidence for selection on synonymous mutations affecting stability of mRNA secondary structure in mammals. Genome Biology 6: R75.
19. Parmley JL, Chamary JV, Hurst LD (2006) Evidence for purifying selection against synonymous mutations in mammalian exonic splicing enhancers. Mol Biol Evol 23: 301-309.
20. Hughes AL (2007) Looking for Darwin in all the wrong places: The misguided quest for positive selection at the nucleotide sequence level. Heredity 99: 364-373.
21. Hughes AL (2008) The origin of adaptive phenotypes. Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 13193-13194.
22. Hughes AL, Friedman R (2008) Codon-based tests of positive selection, branch lengths, and the evolution of mammalian immune system genes. Immunogenetics 60: 495-506.
23. Yokoyama S, Tada T, Zhang H, Britt L (2008) Elucidation of phenotypic adaptations: Molecular analyses of dim-light vision proteins in vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 13480-13485.
24. Fu Y (1996) New statistical tests of neutrality for DNA samples from a population. Genetics 143: 557-570.
25. Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
26. Wall JD, Przeworski M (2000) When did the human population size start increasing? Genetics 155: 1865-1874.
27. Bamshad M, Wooding SP (2003) Signatures of natural selection in the human genome. Nature Rev Genet 4: 99-111.
28. Ometto L, Glinka S, De Lorenzo D, Stephan W (2005) Inferring the effects of demography and selection on Drosophila melanogaster populations from a chromosome-wide scan of DNA variation. Mol Biol Evol 22: 2119-2130.
29. Koshi JM, Goldstein RA (1995) Context-dependent optimal substitution matrices. Protein Engineering 8: 641-645.
30. Goldman N, Thorne JL, Jones DT (1998) Assessing the impact of secondary structure and solvent accessibility on protein evolution. Genetics 149: 445-458.
31. Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI (1999) Universally conserved positions in protein folds: reading evolutionary signals about stability, folding kinetics and function. J Mol Biol 291: 177-196.
32. Dean AM, Neuhauser C, Grenier E, Golding GB (2002) The pattern of amino acid replacements in χ/β-barrels. Mol Biol Evol 19: 1846-1864.
33. Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilke CO (2006) Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol Biol Evol 23: 1751-1761.
34. Choi SC, Hobolth A, Robinson DM, Kishino H, Thorne JL (2007) Quantifying the impact of protein tertiary structure on molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1769-1782.
35. Kim PM, Lu LJ, Gerstein MB (2006) Relating three-dimensional structures to protein networks provides evolutionary insights. Science 314: 1882-1883.
36. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc B 57: 289-300.
37. Hughes AL, Ota T, Nei M (1990) Positive Darwinian selection promotes charge profile diversity in the antigen-binding cleft of class I major-histocompatibility-complex molecules. Mol Biol Evol 7: 515-524.
38. Zhang J (2000) Rates of conservative and radical nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions in mammalian nuclear genes. J Mol Evol 50: 56-68.
39. Dagan T, Talmor Y, Graur D (2002) Ratios of radical to conservative amino acid replacement are affected by mutational and compositional factors and may not be indicative of positive Darwinian selection. Mol Biol Evol 19: 1022-1025.
40. Smith NGC (2003) Are radical and conservative substitution rates useful statistics in molecular evolution? J Mol Evol 57: 467-478.
41. Hanada K, Gojobori T, Li WH (2006) Radical amino acid change versus positive selection in the evolution of viral envelope proteins. Gene 385: 83-88.
42. Xia X, Li WH (1998) What amino acid properties affect protein evolution? J Mol Evol 47: 557-564.
43. McClellan DA, McCracken KG (2001) Estimating the influence of selection on the variable amino acid sites of the cytochrome b protein functional domains. Mol Biol Evol 18: 917-925.
44. Grantham R (1974) Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science 185: 862-864.
45. Kyte J, Doolittle RF (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 157: 105-132.
46. Zimmerman JM, Eliezer N, Simha R (1968) The characterization of amino acid sequences in proteins by statistical methods. J Theor Biol 21: 170-201.
47. Christopher JA, Baldwin TO (1996) Implications of N and C-terminal proximity for protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 1053-1158.
48. Chung JJ, Shikano S, Hanyu Y, Li M (2002) Functional diversity of protein C-termini: more than zipcoding. Trends Cell Biol 12: 146-150.
49. Jacob E, Unger R (2006) A tale of two tails: why are terminal residues of proteins exposed? Bioinformatics 23: e225-e230.
50. Oppermann U (2007) Carbonyl reductases: The complex relationships of mammalian carbonyl- and quinone-reducing enzymes and their role in physiology. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 47: 293-322.
51. Matsunaga T, Shintani S, Hara A (2006) Multiplicity of mammalian reductases for xenobiotic carbonyl compounds. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 21: 1-18.
52. Ghosh D, Sawicki M, Pletnev V, Erman M, Ohno S, et al. (2001) Porcine carbonyl reductase. structural basis for a functional monomer in short chain dehydrogenases/reductases. J Biol Chem 276: 18457-18463.
53. Ghosh D, Wawrzak Z, Weeks C, Duax W, Erman M (1994) The refined three-dimensional structure of 3 alpha, 20 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and possible roles of the residues conserved in short-chain dehydrogenases. Structure 2: 629-640.
54. Tanaka N, Nonaka T, Tanabe T, Yoshimoto T, Tsuru D, et al. (1996) Crystal structures of the binary and ternary complexes of 7 alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 35: 7715-7730.
55. +. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 840-845.
56. Sukhwinder SL, Ghosh D, Blanco JG (2005) Functional significance of a natural allelic variant of human carbonyl reductase 3 (CBR3). Drug Metab Dispos 33: 254-257.
57. Fukushima M, Kakinuma K, Kawaguchi R (2002) Phylogenetic analysis of Salmonella, Shigella, and Escherichia coli strains on the basis of the gyrB gene sequence. J Clin Microbiol 40: 2779-2785.
58. 1 components in nitrate reduction. J Bacteriol 99: 720-729.
59. Giordani R, Buc J (2004) Evidence for two different electron transfer pathways in the same enzyme, nitrate reductase a from Escherichia coli. Eur J Biochem 271: 2400-2407.
60. Bertero MG, Rothery RA, Palak M, Hou C, Lim D, et al. (2003) Insights into the respiratory electron transfer pathway from the structure of nitrate reductase A. Nat Struct Biol 10: 681-687.
61. Ito K, Nakajima Y, Onohara Y, Takeo M, Nakashima K, et al. (2006) Crystal structure of aminopeptidase N (proteobacteria alanyl aminopeptidase) from Escherichia coli and conformational change of methionine 260 involved in substrate recognition. J Biol Chem 281: 33664-33676.
62. Niefind K, Guerra B, Ermakowa I, Issinger OG (2001) Crystal structure of human protein kinase CK2: insights into basic properties of the CK2 holoenzyme. EMBO J 20: 5320-5331.
63. Rao-Naik C, delaCruz W, Laplaza JM, Tan S, Callis J, et al. (1998) The Rub family of ubiquitin-like proteins. J Biol Chem 273: 34976-34982.
64. Nickel GC, Tefft D, Adams MD (2008) Human PAML browser: a database of positive selection on human genes using phylogenetic methods. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D800-D808.
65. Berglund AC, Wallner B, Elofsson A, Liberles DA (2005) Tertiary windowing to detect positive diversifying selection. J Mol Evol 60: 499-504.
66. Liang H, Zhou W, Landweber LF (2006) SWAKK: a web server for detecting positive selection in proteins using a sliding window substitution rate analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 34: W382-W384.
67. Rost B, Sander C (1994) Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins 20: 216-226.
68. Thompson MJ, Goldstein RA (1996) Predicting solvent accessibility: higher accuracy using Bayesian statistics and optimized residue substitution classes. Proteins 25: 38-47.
69. Pollastri G, Baldi P, Fariselli P, Casadio R (2002) Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 47: 142-153.
70. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J (2004) Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks based regression. Proteins 56: 753-767.
71. Nguyen MN, Rajapakse JC (2005) Prediction of protein relative solvent accessibility with a two-stage SVM approach. Proteins 59: 30-37.
72. Mintseris J, Weng Z (2005) Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 10930-10935.
73. Eames M, Kortemme T (2007) Structural mapping of protein interactions reveals differences in evolutionary pressures correlated to mRNA level and protein abundance. Structure 15: 1442-1451.
74. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE (1996) An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 257: 342-358.
75. Jörnvall H, Persson B, Du Bois GC, Lavers GC, Chen JH, et al. (1993) ζ-crystallin versus other members of the alcohol dehydrogenase super-family. FEBS Lett 322: 240-244.
76. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792-1797.
77. Kawabata T, Fukuchi S, Homma K, Ota M, Araki J, et al. (2002) GTOP: a database of protein structures predicted from genome sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 294-298.
78. Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
79. Creighton TE (1992) Proteins: Structures and Molecular Properties. New York: Freeman, 2 edition. 142 p.
80. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1965) Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York: Dover, 2 edition. 263 p.