Prediction of protein relative solvent accessibility with a two-stage SVM approach

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 30-37

  Nguyen, Minh N ^a   Rajapakse, Jagath C ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Protein structure prediction; PSI BLAST; Solvent accessibility; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; GLOBULAR PROTEIN; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; INTERNET; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

AMINO ACIDS; BAYES THEOREM; DATABASES, PROTEIN; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOLUBILITY; SOLVENTS;

EID: 14644440766     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20404     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Mount DW. Bioinformatics: sequence and genome analysis. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.
2. Chandonia J, Karplus M. New methods for accurate prediction of protein secondary structure. Protein Eng 1999;35:293-306.
3. Rost B, Sander C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins 1994;20:216-226.
4. Ooi T, Oobatake M, Nemethy G, Scheraga HA. Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:3086-3090.
5. Chan HS, Dill KA. Origins of structure in globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:6388-6392.
6. Ehrlich L, Reczko M, Bohr H, Wade RC. Prediction of water-binding sites on proteins using neural networks. Protein Eng 1998;11:11-19.
7. Andrade MA, O'Donoghue SI, Rost B. Adaptation of protein surfaces to subcellular location. J Mol Biol 1998;276:517-525.
8. Thompson MJ, Goldstein RA. Predicting solvent accessibility: higher accuracy using Bayesian statistics and optimized residue substitution classes. Proteins 1996;47:142-153.
9. Pascarella S, Persio RD, Bossa F, Argos P. Easy method to predict solvent accessibility from multiple protein sequence alignments. Proteins 1999;32:190-199.
10. Li X, Pan XM. New method for accurate prediction of solvent accessibility from protein sequence. Proteins 2001;42:1-5.
11. Pollastri G, Baldi P, Fariselli P, Casadio R. Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 2002;47:142-153.
12. Ahmad S, Gromiha MM. NETASA: neural network based prediction of solvent accessibility. Bioinformatics 2002;18:819-824.
13. Naderi-Manesh H, Sadeghi M, Araf S, Movahedi AAM. Predicting of protein surface accessibility with information theory. Proteins 2001;42:452-459.
14. Gianese G, Bossa F, Pascarella S. Improvement in prediction of solvent accessibility by probability profiles. Protein Eng 2003;16:987-992.
15. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J. Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks based regression. Proteins 2004;56:753-767.
16. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support vector machines. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
17. Yuan Z, Burrage K, Mattick J. Prediction of protein solvent accessibility using support vector machines. Proteins 2002;48:566-570.
18. Kim H, Park H. Prediction of protein relative solvent accessibility with support vector machines. Proteins 2004;54:557-562.
19. Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995.
20. Vapnik V. Statistical learning theory. New York: Wiley; 1998.
21. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.
22. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
23. Eisenhaber F, Argos P. Improved strategy in analytical surface calculation for molecular systems-handling of singularities and computational efficiency. J Comp Chem 1993;14:1272-1280.
24. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
25. Nguyen MN, Rajapakse JC. Two-stage support vector machines for protein secondary structure prediction. Neural Parallel Sci Comput 2003;11:1-18.
26. Guo J, Chen H, Sun Z, Lin Y. A novel method for protein secondary structure prediction using dual-layer SVM and profiles. Proteins 2004;54:738-743.
27. Scholköpf B, Sung K, Burges C, Girosi F, Niyogi P, Poggio T, Vapnik V. Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radial basis function classifiers. IEEE Trans Sign Process 1997;45:2758-2765.
28. Platt JC. Using analytic QP and sparseness to speed training of support vector machines. In: Kearns MS, Solla SA, Cohn A, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 11. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999. p 557-563.
29. Giorgi MHM, Hazout S, Tuffery P. PredAcc: prediction of solvent accessibility. Bioinformatics 1999;15:176-177.
30. Cuff JA, Barton GJ. Application of multiple sequence alignment profiles to improve protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins 2000;40:502-511.
31. Nelson DL, Cox MM. Lehninger principles of biochemistry. New York: Worth; 2000.
32. Chen H, Zho HX, Hu X, Yoo I. Classification comparison of prediction of solvent accessibility from protein sequences. Paper presented at the 2nd Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Conference, Dunedin, New Zealand: 2004.