Constructing trust between teacher and students through feedback and revision cycles in an EFL writing classroom

Written Communication

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 506-537

  Lee, Given ^a,b   Schallert, Diane L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center   (United States)

Author keywords

EFL instruction; Process writing approach; Revision; Teacher trust; Teacher written feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 51549084196     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088308322301     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anson, C.M. (2000). Response and the social construction of error. Assessing Writing, 7, 5-21.
2. Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method ? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-257.
3. Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, 169-188.
4. Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-34.
5. Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T.N., & Ackerman, J. (1989). Social context and socially constructed texts: The initiation of a graduate student into a writing research community. Technical Report, 33, 1-20.
6. Blakeslee, A. (2001). Interacting with audiences: Social influences on the production of scientific writing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Braine, G. (1999). From the periphery to the center: One teacher's journey. In G. Braine (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 15-28). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Casanave, C.P. (1995). Local interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 83-110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9. Casanave, C.P. (2007). Controversies in second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Dong, Y.R. (1996). Learning how to use citations for knowledge transformation: Non-native doctoral students' dissertation writing in science. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 428-457.
12. Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher written commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 155-182.
13. Flower, L., Hayes, J., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37, 16-55.
14. Fox, H. (1994). Listening to the world: Cultural issues in academic writing. Urbana, IL: National Council for Teachers of English.
15. Gascoigne, C. (2004). Examining the effects of feedback in beginning L2 composition. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 71-76.
16. Goldstein, L.S. (1998, April). Taking caring seriously: The ethic of care in classroom life. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
17. Goldstein, L.S. (1999). The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the co-construction of mind. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 647-673.
18. Goldstein, L.M. (2005). Teacher written commentary: In second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19. Goldstein, L.S., & Freedman, D. (2003). Challenges enacting caring teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 441-454.
20. Goldstein, L.S., " Lake, V.E. (2000). "Love, love, and more love for children": Exploring preservice teachers' understandings of caring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 861-872.
21. Hedgcock, S., " Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141-163.
22. Herrington, A.J. (1985). Writing in academic setting: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-359.
23. Hillocks, G. (1982). The interaction of instruction, teacher comment, and revision in teaching the composing process. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 261-278.
24. Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255-286.
25. Kepner, C.G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of feedback to the development of second language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 305-313.
26. Kim, M. (2005). Dialogical caring encounters between teacher and students: The role of computer-mediated communication in preparing preservice reading teachers. 53rd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 53, 67-89.
27. Lee, I. (in press). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17.
28. Lee, G., & Schallert, D.L. (in press). Meeting in the margins: Effects of the teacher-student relationship on revision processes of EFL college students taking a composition course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17.
29. Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 57-68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Mathison-Fife, J., & O' Neill, P. (2001). Moving beyond the written comment: Narrowing the gap between practice and research. College Composition and Communication, 53, 300-321.
31. Murphy, S. (2000). A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room ? Assessing Writing, 7, 79-90.
32. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33. Noddings, N. (2001). The caring teacher. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4 ed., pp. 99-105). New York: Macmillan.
34. Odell, L., Goswami, D., & Herrington, A. (1983). The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in nonacademic settings. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. A. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing: Principles and methods (pp. 220-235). New York: Longman.
35. Ortega, L. (2004, Spring). L2 writing research in EFL contexts: Some challenges and opportunities for EFL researchers [Featured article]. ALAK [Applied Linguistic Association of Korea] Newsletter.
36. Oxford, R., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 78, 12-28.
37. Park, J.K. (1999). Teaching English in Korean culture and context. English Teaching, 54, 3-21.
38. Prior, P. (1991). Contextualizing writing and response in a graduate seminar. Written Communication, 8, 267-310.
39. Prior, P. (1995a). Redefining the task: An ethnographic examination of writing and response in graduate seminars. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 47-82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40. Prior, P. (1995 b). Tracing authoritative and internally persuasive discourses: A case study of response, revision, and disciplinary enculturation. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 283-325.
41. Reid, J. (1994). Responding to ESL students' texts: The myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 272-292.
42. Saito, H. (1994). Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11, 46-70.
43. Schulz, R.A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback. Modern Language Journal, 85, 244-258.
44. Silva, T., & Brice, C. (2004). Research in teaching writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 70-106.
45. Smith, S. (1997). The genre of the end comment: Conventions in teacher response to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 48, 249-268.
46. Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148-156.
47. Straub, R. (2000). The student, the text, and the classroom context: A case study of teacher response. Assessing Writing, 7, 23-55.
48. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.