The student, the text, and the classroom context: A case study of teacher response

Assessing Writing

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 23-55

  Straub, Richard ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom context; Commenting styles; Teacher response; Writing instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345792397     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00017-9     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anson, C. (1989). Response styles and ways of knowing. In: C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: theory, practice, research (pp. 332-366). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
2. Anson, C. (1997). In our own voices: using recorded commentary to respond to writing. In: M. D. Sorcinelli, & P. Elbow (Eds.), Writing to learn: strategies for assigning and responding to writing across the disciplines (pp. 105-113). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Anson, C. (1998). Reflective reading: developing thoughtful ways to respond to students' writing. In: L. Odell, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Evaluating writing: the role of teachers ' knowledge about texts, learning, and culture (pp. 302-24). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
4. Auten, J. G. (1998). Power and the teacher's pen: talking about teacher response to student writing. CEA Forum, 28, 1-4.
5. Baumlin, J., & Baumlin, T. F. (1989). Paper grading and the rhetorical stance. In: B. Lawson, S. Sterr Ryan, & W. R. Winterowd (Eds.), Encountering student texts: interpretive issues in reading student writing (pp. 171-182). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
6. Brannon, L., & Knoblauch, C. H. (1982). On students' rights to their own texts: a model of teacher response. College Composition and Communication, 33, 157-166.
7. Connors, R., & Glenn, C. (1995). Responding to and evaluating student essays. The St. Martin's guide to teaching writing (3rd ed.). New York: St. Martin's.
8. Connors, R., & Lunsford, A. (1993). Teachers' rhetorical comments on student papers. College Composition and Communication, 44, 200-224.
9. Daiker, D. (1989). Learning to praise. In: C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: theory, practice, research (pp. 103-113). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
10. Danis, M. F. (1987). The voice in the margins: paper-marking as conversation. Freshman English News, 15, 18-20.
11. Dragga, S. (1988). The effects of praiseworthy grading on students and teachers. Journal of Teaching Writing, 7, 41-50.
12. Elbow, P. (1993). Ranking, evaluating, liking: sorting out three forms of judgment. College English, 55, 187-206.
13. Elbow, P. (1999). Options for responding to student writing. In: R. Straub (Ed.), A sourcebook for responding to student writing (pp. 197-202). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
14. Fuller, D. (1987). Teacher commentary that communicates: practicing what we preach in the writing class. Journal of Teaching Writing, 6, 307-317.
15. Fuller, D. (1988). A curious case of our responding habits: what do we respond to and why? Journal of Advanced Composition, 8, 88-96.
16. Griffin, C. W. (1982). Theory of responding to student writing: the state of the art. College Composition and Communication, 33, 296-301.
17. Haswell, R. (1983). Minimal marking. College English, 45, 600-604.
18. Hodges, E. (1997). Negotiating the margins: some principles for responding to our students' writing, some strategies for helping students read our comments. In: M. D. Sorcinelli, & P. Elbow (Eds.), Writing to learn: strategies for assigning and responding to writing across the disciplines (pp. 77-89). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Jensen, G., & DiTiberio, J. (1984). Personality and the teaching of composition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20. Knoblauch, C. H., & Brannon, L. (1984). Responding to texts: facilitating revision in the writing workshop. In: Rhetorical traditions and the teaching of writing (pp. 118-150). Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
21. Krest, M. (1988). Monitoring student writing: how not to avoid the draft. Journal of Teaching Writing, 7, 27-39.
22. Lees, E. (1979). Evaluating student writing. College Composition and Communication, 30, 370-374.
23. Lunsford, R. F. (1997). When less is more: principles for responding in the disciplines. In: M. D. Sorcinelli, & P. Elbow (Eds.), Writing to learn: strategies for assigning and responding to writing across the disciplines (pp. 91-104). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Mathison Fife, J., & O'Neill, P. (1997). Re-seeing research on response. College Composition and Communication, 48, 274-277.
25. Moxley, J. (1989). Responding to student writing: goals, methods, alternatives. Freshman English News, 17, 3-11.
26. Moxley, J. (1992). Teachers' goals and methods of responding to student writing. Composition Studies/FEN, 20, 17-33.
27. O'Neill, P., & Mathison Fife, J. (1999). Listening to students: contextualizing response to student writing. Composition Studies, 27, 39-51.
28. Onore, C. (1989). The student, the teacher, and the text: negotiating meanings through response and revision. In: C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: theory, practice, research (pp. 231-260). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
29. Purves, A. (1984). The teacher as reader: an anatomy. College English, 46, 259-265.
30. Schwegler, R. (1991). The politics of reading student papers. In: R. Bullock, & J. Trimbur (Eds.), The politics of writing instruction: postsecondary (pp. 203-226). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
31. Smith, S. (1997). The genre of the end comment: conventions in teacher responses to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 48, 249-268.
32. Sommers, J. (1989a). The effects of tape-recorded commentary on student revision: a case study. Journal of Teaching Writing, 8, 49-75.
33. Sommers, J. (1989b). The writer's memo: collaboration, response, and development. In: C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: theory, practice, research (pp. 174-186). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
34. Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148-156.
35. Straub, R. (1996a). Teacher response as conversation: more than casual talk, an exploration. Rhetoric Review, 14, 374-398.
36. Straub, R. (1996b). The concept of control in teacher response: defining the varieties of "directive" and "facilitative" commentary. College Composition and Communication, 47, 223-251.
37. Straub, R. (2000). The practice of response: strategies for commenting on student writing. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
38. Straub, R., & Lunsford, R. F. (1995). Twelve readers reading: responding to college student writing. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
39. Thompson, T. (1995). Understanding attitudes toward assessment: the personality factor. Assessing Writing, 2, 191-206.
40. Welch, K. (1998). Sideshadowing teacher response. College English, 60, 374-395.
41. White, E. (1999). Using scoring guides to assess writing. In: R. Straub (Ed.), A sourcebook for responding to student writing (pp. 203-212). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
42. Zak, F. (1990). Exclusively positive responses to student writing. Journal of Basic Writing, 9, 40-53.