Examining the effect of feedback in beginning L2 composition

Foreign Language Annals

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 71-76

  Gascoigne, Carolyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248697536     PISSN: 0015718X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02174.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Amon, E., Muyskens, J. & Omaggio Hadley, A. (2000). Vis-á- Vis. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
2. Burkland, J., & Grimm, N.. (1986). Motivating through responding. Journal of Teaching Writing, 5, 237-47.
3. Cohen, A. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning, (pp. 57-69). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Cohen, A., & Cavalcanti, M. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Insights for the classroom (pp. 155-77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Conners, R., & Lunsford, A. (1993). Teachers' rhetorical comments on student papers. College Composition and Communication, 44, 200-28.
6. Cumming, A. (1983). Teachers'procedures for responding to the writing of students of English as a second language. Paper presented at the Canadian Council of Teachers of English.
7. Fatham, A., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Insights for the classroom (pp. 178-90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Ferris, D. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 29, 33-53.
9. Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly 31, 315-35.
10. Goldstein, L. (2001). For Kylai: What does the research say about responding to ESL writers? In T. Silva and P. Matsuda (Eds.), On Second Language Writing, (pp. 73-89). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Hall, C. (1990). Managing the complexity of revising across languages. TESOL Quarterly 24, 43-60.
12. Hariston, M. (1982). The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication 33, 76-88.
13. Hariston, M. (1986). On not being a composition slave. In C. W. Bridges (Ed.), Training the new teacher of college composition, (pp. 117-24). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
14. Hillocks, G. (1982). The interaction of instruction, teacher comment, and revision in teaching the composition process. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 261-78.
15. Knoblauch, C. H., & Brannon, L. (1981). Teacher commentary on student writing: The state of the art. Freshman English News, 10, 1-4.
16. Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Insights for the classroom, (pp. 57-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203-17.
18. McCurdy, P. (1992). What do students do with composition feedback? Paper presented at the Annual TESOL Convention, Vancouver, B.C.
19. Mendonca, C, & Johnson, K. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745-69.
20. Zamel, V (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79-104.