Membrane Localization of Scaffold Proteins Promotes Graded Signaling in the Yeast MAP Kinase Cascade

Current Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 16, 2008, Pages 1184-1191

  Takahashi, Satoe ^a   Pryciak, Peter M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

SIGNALING

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCING ADAPTOR PROTEIN; STE5 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; FUNGAL GENE; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; CELL MEMBRANE; GENES, FUNGAL; MAP KINASE SIGNALING SYSTEM; MUTATION; PHEROMONES; RECEPTOR CROSS-TALK; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 49649109812     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.050     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Qi M., and Elion E.A. MAP kinase pathways. J. Cell Sci. 118 (2005) 3569-3572
2. Ferrell Jr. J.E., and Machleder E.M. The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. Science 280 (1998) 895-898
3. Huang C.Y., and Ferrell Jr. J.E. Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996) 10078-10083
4. Bagowski C.P., Besser J., Frey C.R., and Ferrell Jr. J.E. The JNK cascade as a biochemical switch in mammalian cells: Ultrasensitive and all-or-none responses. Curr. Biol. 13 (2003) 315-320
5. Poritz M.A., Malmstrom S., Kim M.K., Rossmeissl P.J., and Kamb A. Graded mode of transcriptional induction in yeast pheromone signalling revealed by single-cell analysis. Yeast 18 (2001) 1331-1338
6. Colman-Lerner A., Gordon A., Serra E., Chin T., Resnekov O., Endy D., Pesce C.G., and Brent R. Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system. Nature 437 (2005) 699-706
7. Ferrell Jr. J.E. How responses get more switch-like as you move down a protein kinase cascade. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22 (1997) 288-289
8. Moore S.A. Comparison of dose-response curves for alpha factor-induced cell division arrest, agglutination, and projection formation of yeast cells. Implication for the mechanism of alpha factor action. J. Biol. Chem. 258 (1983) 13849-13856
9. Dorer R., Pryciak P.M., and Hartwell L.H. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells execute a default pathway to select a mate in the absence of pheromone gradients. J. Cell Biol. 131 (1995) 845-861
10. Whitehurst A., Cobb M.H., and White M.A. Stimulus-coupled spatial restriction of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 activity contributes to the specificity of signal-response pathways. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 (2004) 10145-10150
11. Mackeigan J.P., Murphy L.O., Dimitri C.A., and Blenis J. Graded mitogen-activated protein kinase activity precedes switch-like c-Fos induction in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 4676-4682
12. Yang L., and Baker N.E. Cell cycle withdrawal, progression, and cell survival regulation by EGFR and its effectors in the differentiating Drosophila eye. Dev. Cell 4 (2003) 359-369
13. Kholodenko B.N. Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7 (2006) 165-176
14. Patwardhan P., and Miller W.T. Processive phosphorylation: Mechanism and biological importance. Cell. Signal. 19 (2007) 2218-2226
15. Morrison D.K., and Davis R.J. Regulation of MAP kinase signaling modules by scaffold proteins in mammals. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19 (2003) 91-118
16. Kolch W. Coordinating ERK/MAPK signalling through scaffolds and inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6 (2005) 827-837
17. Burack W.R., and Shaw A.S. Signal transduction: Hanging on a scaffold. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12 (2000) 211-216
18. Ferrell Jr. J.E. What do scaffold proteins really do?. Sci. STKE 2000 (2000) PE1
19. Levchenko A., Bruck J., and Sternberg P.W. Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen- activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 5818-5823
20. Dohlman H.G., and Thorner J.W. Regulation of G protein-initiated signal transduction in yeast: Paradigms and principles. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70 (2001) 703-754
21. Elion E.A. The Ste5p scaffold. J. Cell Sci. 114 (2001) 3967-3978
22. Pryciak P.M., and Huntress F.A. Membrane recruitment of the kinase cascade scaffold protein Ste5 by the Gβγ complex underlies activation of the yeast pheromone response pathway. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 2684-2697
23. van Drogen F., Stucke V.M., Jorritsma G., and Peter M. MAP kinase dynamics in response to pheromones in budding yeast. Nat. Cell Biol. 3 (2001) 1051-1059
24. Maeder C.I., Hink M.A., Kinkhabwala A., Mayr R., Bastiaens P.I., and Knop M. Spatial regulation of Fus3 MAP kinase activity through a reaction-diffusion mechanism in yeast pheromone signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 9 (2007) 1319-1326
25. Lamson R.E., Takahashi S., Winters M.J., and Pryciak P.M. Dual role for membrane localization in yeast MAP kinase cascade activation and its contribution to signaling fidelity. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) 618-623
26. Ingolia N.T., and Murray A.W. Positive-feedback loops as a flexible biological module. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007) 668-677
27. Paliwal S., Iglesias P.A., Campbell K., Hilioti Z., Groisman A., and Levchenko A. MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast. Nature 446 (2007) 46-51
28. Gartner A., Nasmyth K., and Ammerer G. Signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires tyrosine and threonine phosphorylation of FUS3 and KSS1. Genes Dev. 6 (1992) 1280-1292
29. Zhou Z., Gartner A., Cade R., Ammerer G., and Errede B. Pheromone-induced signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the sequential function of three protein kinases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13 (1993) 2069-2080
30. Bhattacharyya R.P., Remenyi A., Good M.C., Bashor C.J., Falick A.M., and Lim W.A. The Ste5 scaffold allosterically modulates signaling output of the yeast mating pathway. Science 311 (2006) 822-826
31. Zhan X.L., Deschenes R.J., and Guan K.L. Differential regulation of FUS3 MAP kinase by tyrosine-specific phosphatases PTP2/PTP3 and dual-specificity phosphatase MSG5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 11 (1997) 1690-1702
32. O'Rourke S.M., and Herskowitz I. The Hog1 MAPK prevents cross talk between the HOG and pheromone response MAPK pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 2874-2886
33. Hohmann S., Krantz M., and Nordlander B. Yeast osmoregulation. Methods Enzymol. 428 (2007) 29-45
34. Louvion J.F., Havaux-Copf B., and Picard D. Fusion of GAL4-VP16 to a steroid-binding domain provides a tool for gratuitous induction of galactose-responsive genes in yeast. Gene 131 (1993) 129-134
35. Cairns B.R., Ramer S.W., and Kornberg R.D. Order of action of components in the yeast pheromone response pathway revealed with a dominant allele of the STE11 kinase and the multiple phosphorylation of the STE7 kinase. Genes Dev. 6 (1992) 1305-1318
36. Andersson J., Simpson D.M., Qi M., Wang Y., and Elion E.A. Differential input by Ste5 scaffold and Msg5 phosphatase route a MAPK cascade to multiple outcomes. EMBO J. 23 (2004) 2564-2576
37. Flatauer L.J., Zadeh S.F., and Bardwell L. Mitogen-activated protein kinases with distinct requirements for Ste5 scaffolding influence signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 1793-1803
38. Winters M.J., Lamson R.E., Nakanishi H., Neiman A.M., and Pryciak P.M. A membrane binding domain in the Ste5 scaffold synergizes with Gβγ binding to control localization and signaling in pheromone response. Mol. Cell 20 (2005) 21-32
39. Posas F., and Saito H. Osmotic activation of the HOG MAPK pathway via Ste11p MAPKKK: Scaffold role of Pbs2p MAPKK. Science 276 (1997) 1702-1705
40. Drogen F., O'Rourke S.M., Stucke V.M., Jaquenoud M., Neiman A.M., and Peter M. Phosphorylation of the MEKK Ste11p by the PAK-like kinase Ste20p is required for MAP kinase signaling in vivo. Curr. Biol. 10 (2000) 630-639
41. Harris K., Lamson R.E., Nelson B., Hughes T.R., Marton M.J., Roberts C.J., Boone C., and Pryciak P.M. Role of scaffolds in MAP kinase pathway specificity revealed by custom design of pathway-dedicated signaling proteins. Curr. Biol. 11 (2001) 1815-1824
42. McClean M.N., Mody A., Broach J.R., and Ramanathan S. Cross-talk and decision making in MAP kinase pathways. Nat. Genet. 39 (2007) 409-414
43. Pincet F. Membrane recruitment of scaffold proteins drives specific signaling. PLoS ONE 2 (2007) e977
44. Slaughter B.D., Schwartz J.W., and Li R. Mapping dynamic protein interactions in MAP kinase signaling using live-cell fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy and imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 (2007) 20320-20325
45. Inouye C., Dhillon N., and Thorner J. Ste5 RING-H2 domain: Role in Ste4-promoted oligomerization for yeast pheromone signaling. Science 278 (1997) 103-106
46. Kofahl B., and Klipp E. Modelling the dynamics of the yeast pheromone pathway. Yeast 21 (2004) 831-850
47. Tian T., Harding A., Inder K., Plowman S., Parton R.G., and Hancock J.F. Plasma membrane nanoswitches generate high-fidelity Ras signal transduction. Nat. Cell Biol. 9 (2007) 905-914
48. Hao N., Nayak S., Behar M., Shanks R.H., Nagiec M.J., Errede B., Hasty J., Elston T.C., and Dohlman H.G. Regulation of cell signaling dynamics by the protein kinase-scaffold Ste5. Mol. Cell 30 (2008) 649-656