Cross-talk and decision making in MAP kinase pathways

Nature Genetics

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 409-414

  McClean, Megan N ^a,b   Mody, Areez ^a   Broach, James R ^c   Ramanathan, Sharad ^a,d  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE KINASE KINASE; PHEROMONE;

ARTICLE; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST;

MAP KINASE SIGNALING SYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHEROMONES; RECEPTOR CROSS-TALK; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33847324364     PISSN: 10614036     EISSN: 15461718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ng1957     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hunter, T. & Plowman, G.D. The protein kinases of budding yeast: six score and more. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 18-22 (1997).
2. Posas, F., Takekawa, M. & Saito, H. Signal transduction by MAP kinase cascades in budding yeast. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1, 175-182 (1998).
3. Banuett, F. Signalling in the yeasts: an informational cascade with links to the filamentous fungi. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 249-274 (1998).
4. Whitmarsh, A.J. & Davis, R.J. Structural organization of MAP-kinase signaling modules by scaffold proteins in yeast and mammals. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 481-485 (1998).
5. Ferrell, J.E. Jr. & Machleder, E.M. The biochemical basis of an all-or-none switch in Xenopus oocytes. Science 280, 895-898 (1998).
6. Schwartz, M.A. & Madhani, H.D. Principles of MAP kinase signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 725-748 (2004).
7. Sprague, G.F. Jr. Control of MAP kinase signaling specificity or how not to go HOG wild. Genes Dev. 12, 2817-2820 (1998).
8. Pryciak, P.M. & Huntress, F.A. Membrane recruitment of the kinase cascade scaffold protein Ste5 by the Gbetagamma complex underlies activation of the yeast pheromone response pathway. Genes Dev. 12, 2684-2697 (1998).
9. Choi, K.Y., Satterberg, B., Lyons, D.M. & Elion, E.A. Ste5 tethers multiple protein kinases in the MAP kinase cascade required for mating in S. cerevisiae. Cell 78, 499-512 (1994).
10. Posas, F. & Saito, H. Osmotic activation of the HOG MAPK pathway via Ste11p MAPKKK: scaffold role of Pbs2p MAPKK. Science 276, 1702-1705 (1997).
11. Harris, K. et al. Role of scaffolds in MAP kinase pathway specificity revealed by custom design of pathway-dedicated signaling proteins. Curr. Biol. 11, 1815-1824 (2001).
12. O'Rourke, S.M. & Herskowitz, I. The Hog1 MAPK prevents cross talk between the HOG and pheromone response MAPK pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 12, 2874-2886 (1998).
13. Posas, F. & Saito, H. Activation of the yeast SSK2 MAP kinase kinase kinase by the SSK1 two-component response regulator. EMBO J. 17, 1385-1394 (1998).
14. Posas, F. et al. Yeast HOG1 MAP kinase cascade is regulated by a multistep phosphorelay mechanism in the SLN1-YPD1-SSK1 "two-component" osmosensor. Cell 86, 865-875 (1996).
15. O'Rourke, S.M. & Herskowitz, I. Unique and redundant roles for HOG MAPK pathway components as revealed by whole-genome expression analysis. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 532-542 (2004).
16. Breitkreutz, A. & Tyers, M. MAPK signaling specificity: it takes two to tango. Trends Cell Biol. 12, 254-257 (2002).
17. Tsien, R.Y. The green fluorescent protein. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 509-544 (1998).
18. Hagen, D.C., McCaffrey, G. & Sprague, G.F. Jr. Pheromone response elements are necessary and sufficient for basal and pheromone-induced transcription of the FUS1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 2952-2961 (1991).
19. Campbell, R.E. et al. A monomeric red fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7877-7882 (2002).
20. Rep, M., Krantz, M., Thevelein, J.M. & Hohmann, S. The transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic shock. Hot1p and Msn2p/Msn4p are required for the induction of subsets of high osmolarity glycerol pathway-dependent genes. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8290-8300 (2000).
21. Murray, J.D. Mathematical Biology (Springer, New York, 2002).
22. Hall, J.P. et al. The osmoregulatory pathway represses mating pathway activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation of a FUS3 mutant that is insensitive to the repression mechanism. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6715-6723 (1996).
23. Xiong, W. & Ferrell, J.E. Jr. A positive-feedback-based bistable 'memory module' that governs cell fate decision. Nature 426, 460-465 (2003).
24. Zhu, H. et al. Analysis of yeast protein kinases using protein chips. Nat. Genet. 26, 283-289 (2000).
25. Philips, J. & Herskowitz, I. Osmotic balance regulates cell fusion during mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 138, 961-974 (1997).
26. Gimeno, C.J., Ljungdahl, P.O., Styles, C.A. & Fink, G.R. Unipolar cell divisions in the yeast S. cerevisiae lead to filamentous growth: regulation by starvation and RAS. Cell 68, 1077-1090 (1992).
27. Bhattacharyya, R.P. et al. The Ste5 scaffold allosterically modulates signaling output of the yeast mating pathway. Science 311, 822-826 (2006).