Smc5-Smc6 complex suppresses gross chromosomal rearrangements mediated by break-induced replications

DNA Repair

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1426-1436

  Hwang, Ji Young ^a   Smith, Stephanie ^a   Ceschia, Audrey ^b   Torres Rosell, Jordi ^b   Aragon, Luis ^b   Myung, Kyungjae ^a  

^a NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Break induced replication; Checkpoints; Gross chromosomal rearrangement; Smc5 Smc6; Translocations

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARCINOGENESIS; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; DNA DAMAGE; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE MUTATION; GROSS CHROMOSOMAL REARRANGEMENT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE REPEAT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELOMERE;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TELOMERE; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC;

EID: 48149093617     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Kolodner R.D., Putnam C.D., and Myung K. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 297 (2002) 552-557
2. Loeb L.A., Loeb K.R., and Anderson J.P. Multiple mutations and cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003) 776-781
3. Khanna K.K., and Jackson S.P. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat. Genet. 27 (2001) 247-254
4. Chen C., and Kolodner R.D. Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants. Nat. Genet. 23 (1999) 81-85
5. Motegi A., and Myung K. Measuring the rate of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a practical approach to study genomic rearrangements observed in cancer. Methods 41 (2007) 168-176
6. Schmidt K.H., Pennaneach V., Putnam C.D., and Kolodner R.D. Analysis of gross-chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 409 (2006) 462-476
7. Banerjee S., and Myung K. Increased genome instability and telomere length in the elg1-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant are regulated by S-phase checkpoints. Eukaryot. Cell 3 (2004) 1557-1566
8. Banerjee S., Smith S., and Myung K. Suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements by yKu70-yKu80 heterodimer through DNA damage checkpoints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (2006) 1816-1821
9. Lengronne A., and Schwob E. The yeast CDK inhibitor Sic1 prevents genomic instability by promoting replication origin licensing in late G(1). Mol. Cell. 9 (2002) 1067-1078
10. Myung K., Datta A., and Kolodner R.D. Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 104 (2001) 397-408
11. Myung K., Pennaneach V., Kats E.S., and Kolodner R.D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin-assembly factors that act during DNA replication function in the maintenance of genome stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003) 6640-6645
12. Tanaka S., and Diffley J.F. Deregulated G1-cyclin expression induces genomic instability by preventing efficient pre-RC formation. Genes Dev. 16 (2002) 2639-2649
13. Motegi A., Kuntz K., Majeed A., Smith S., and Myung K. Regulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements by ubiquitin and SUMO ligases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 1424-1433
14. Smith S., Hwang J.Y., Banerjee S., Majeed A., Gupta A., and Myung K. Mutator genes for suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements identified by a genome-wide screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (2004) 9039-9044
15. Myung K., Datta A., Chen C., and Kolodner R.D. SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat. Genet. 27 (2001) 113-116
16. Schmidt K.H., Wu J., and Kolodner R.D. Control of translocations between highly diverged genes by Sgs1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog of the Bloom's syndrome protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 5406-5420
17. Myung K., Chen C., and Kolodner R.D. Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 411 (2001) 1073-1076
18. Pennaneach V., and Kolodner R.D. Recombination the Tel1 Mec1 checkpoints differentially effect genome rearrangements driven by telomere dysfunction in yeast. Nat. Genet. 36 (2004) 612-617
19. Kats E.S., Albuquerque C.P., Zhou H., and Kolodner R.D. Checkpoint functions are required for normal S-phase progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae RCAF- and CAF-I-defective mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (2006) 3710-3715
20. Chan S.W., and Blackburn E.H. Telomerase and ATM/Tel1p protect telomeres from nonhomologous end joining. Mol. Cell. 11 (2003) 1379-1387
21. Huang M.E., Rio A.G., Nicolas A., and Kolodner R.D. A genomewide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes that suppress the accumulation of mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003) 11529-11534
22. Ragu S., Faye G., Iraqui I., Masurel-Heneman A., Kolodner R.D., and Huang M.E. Oxygen metabolism and reactive oxygen species cause chromosomal rearrangements and cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (2007) 9747-9752
23. Putnam C.D., Pennaneach V., and Kolodner R.D. Chromosome healing through terminal deletions generated by de novo telomere additions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (2004) 13262-13267
24. Myung K., Smith S., and Kolodner R.D. Mitotic checkpoint function in the formation of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (2004) 15980-15985
25. Hwang J.Y., Smith S., and Myung K. The Rad1-Rad10 complex promtes the production of gross chromosomal rearrangements from spontaneous DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 169 (2005) 1927-1937
26. Cortes-Ledesma F., de Piccoli G., Haber J.E., Aragon L., and Aguilera A. SMC proteins, new players in the maintenance of genomic stability. Cell Cycle 6 (2007) 914-918
27. Lehmann A.R. The role of SMC proteins in the responses to DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst). 4 (2005) 309-314
28. Losada A., and Hirano T. Dynamic molecular linkers of the genome: the first decade of SMC proteins. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 1269-1287
29. Nasmyth K., and Haering C.H. The structure and function of SMC and kleisin complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74 (2005) 595-648
30. Lehmann A.R., Walicka M., Griffiths D.J., Murray J.M., Watts F.Z., McCready S., and Carr A.M. The rad18 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe defines a new subgroup of the SMC superfamily involved in DNA repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15 (1995) 7067-7080
31. De Piccoli G., Cortes-Ledesma F., Ira G., Torres-Rosell J., Uhle S., Farmer S., Hwang J.Y., Machin F., Ceschia A., McAleenan A., Cordon-Preciado V., Clemente-Blanco A., Vilella-Mitjana F., Ullal P., Jarmuz A., Leitao B., Bressan D., Dotiwala F., Papusha A., Zhao X., Myung K., Haber J.E., Aguilera A., and Aragon L. Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination. Nat. Cell. Biol. 8 (2006) 1032-1034
32. Lindroos H.B., Strom L., Itoh T., Katou Y., Shirahige K., and Sjogren C. Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways. Mol. Cell. 22 (2006) 755-767
33. Branzei D., Sollier J., Liberi G., Zhao X., Maeda D., Seki M., Enomoto T., Ohta K., and Foiani M. Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127 (2006) 509-522
34. Santa Maria S.R., Gangavarapu V., Johnson R.E., Prakash L., and Prakash S. Requirement of Nse1, a subunit of the Smc5-Smc6 complex, for Rad52-dependent postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 27 (2007) 8409-8418
35. Torres-Rosell J., Machin F., Farmer S., Jarmuz A., Eydmann T., Dalgaard J.Z., and Aragon L. SMC5 and SMC6 genes are required for the segregation of repetitive chromosome regions. Nat. Cell Biol. 7 (2005) 412-419
36. Torres-Rosell J., Sunjevaric I., De Piccoli G., Sacher M., Eckert-Boulet N., Reid R., Jentsch S., Rothstein R., Aragon L., and Lisby M. The Smc5-Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nat. Cell Biol. 9 (2007) 923-931
37. Potts P.R., and Yu H. The SMC5/6 complex maintains telomere length in ALT cancer cells through SUMOylation of telomere-binding proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14 (2007) 581-590
38. Lea D.E., and Coulson C.A. The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet. 49 (1948) 264-285
39. Lengronne A., Pasero P., Bensimon A., and Schwob E. Monitoring S phase progression globally and locally using BrdU incorporation in TK(+) yeast strains. Nucleic Acids Res. 29 (2001) 1433-1442
40. Lydeard J.R., Jain S., Yamaguchi M., and Haber J.E. Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 448 (2007) 820-823
41. Torres-Rosell J., De Piccoli G., Cordon-Preciado V., Farmer S., Jarmuz A., Machin F., Pasero P., Lisby M., Haber J.E., and Aragon L. Anaphase onset before complete DNA replication with intact checkpoint responses. Science 315 (2007) 1411-1415
42. McEachern M.J., and Haber J.E. Break-induced replication and recombinational telomere elongation in yeast. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75 (2006) 111-135
43. Sacher M., Pfander B., Hoege C., and Jentsch S. Control of Rad52 recombination activity by double-strand break-induced SUMO modification. Nat. Cell Biol. 8 (2006) 1284-1290
44. Weinert T. DNA damage checkpoints update: getting molecular. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8 (1998) 185-193
45. Naiki T., Shimomura T., Kondo T., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K. Rfc5, in cooperation with rad24, controls DNA damage checkpoints throughout the cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 20 (2000) 5888-5896
46. Shimomura T., Ando S., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K. Functional and physical interaction between Rad24 and Rfc5 in the yeast checkpoint pathways. Mol. Cell Biol. 18 (1998) 5485-5491
47. Branzei D., Seki M., and Enomoto T. Rad18/Rad5/Mms2-mediated polyubiquitination of PCNA is implicated in replication completion during replication stress. Genes Cells 9 (2004) 1031-1042
48. Kanellis P., Agyei R., and Durocher D. Elg1 forms an alternative PCNA-interacting RFC complex required to maintain genome stability. Curr. Biol. 13 (2003) 1583-1595
49. Allen J.B., Zhou Z., Siede W., Friedberg E.C., and Elledge S.J. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 8 (1994) 2401-2415
50. Sanchez Y., Desany B.A., Jones W.J., Liu Q., Wang B., and Elledge S.J. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 271 (1996) 357-360
51. Sanchez Y., Bachant J., Wang H., Hu F., Liu D., Tetzlaff M., and Elledge S.J. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286 (1999) 1166-1171
52. Agarwal R., Tang Z., Yu H., and Cohen-Fix O. Two distinct pathways for inhibiting pds1 ubiquitination in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 45027-45033
53. D'Amours D., and Jackson S.P. The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of DNA repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3 (2002) 317-327
54. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., and Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118 (2004) 699-713
55. Nakada D., Hirano Y., and Sugimoto K. Requirement of the Mre11 complex and exonuclease 1 for activation of the Mec1 signaling pathway. Mol. Cell Biol. 24 (2004) 10016-10025
56. Nakada D., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K. ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 1957-1962
57. Liberi G., Maffioletti G., Lucca C., Chiolo I., Baryshnikova A., Cotta-Ramusino C., Lopes M., Pellicioli A., Haber J.E., and Foiani M. Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 339-350
58. Myung K., and Kolodner R.D. Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (2002) 4500-4507
59. Zhao X., and Blobel G. A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102 (2005) 4777-4782
60. Schulz V., and Zakian V.A. The Saccharomyces PIF1 DNA helicase inhibits telomere elongation and de novo telomere formation. Cell 76 (1994) 145-155
61. Zhou J., Monson E.K., Teng S., Schulz V.P., and Zakian V.A. Pif1phelicase a catalytic inhibitor of telomerase in yeast. Science 289 (2000) 771-774
62. Lingner J., and Cech T.R. Telomerase and chromosome end maintenance. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8 (1998) 226-232
63. Lemoine F.J., Degtyareva N.P., Lobachev K., and Petes T.D. Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites. Cell 120 (2005) 587-598
64. Smith C.E., Llorente B., and Symington L.S. Template switching during break-induced replication. Nature 447 (2007) 102-105
65. Rattray A.J., and Symington L.S. Stimulation of meiotic recombination in yeast by an ARS element. Genetics 134 (1993) 175-188
66. Cortes-Ledesma F., and Aguilera A. Double-strand breaks arising by replication through a nick are repaired by cohesin-dependent sister-chromatid exchange. EMBO Rep. 7 (2006) 919-926
67. Potts P.R., Porteus M.H., and Yu H. Human SMC5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid homologous recombination by recruiting the SMC1/3 cohesin complex to double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 25 (2006) 3377-3388
68. Strom L., Karlsson C., Lindroos H.B., Wedahl S., Katou Y., Shirahige K., and Sjogren C. Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break. Science 317 (2007) 242-245
69. Vega L.R., Mateyak M.K., and Zakian V.A. Getting to the end: telomerase access in yeast and humans. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4 (2003) 948-959
70. Ho J.C., Warr N.J., Shimizu H., and Watts F.Z. SUMO modification of Rad22, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologue of the recombination protein Rad52. Nucleic Acids Res. 29 (2001) 4179-4186
71. Cobb J.A., Bjergbaek L., and Gasser S.M. RecQ helicases: at the heart of genetic stability. FEBS Lett. 529 (2002) 43-48
72. Rothstein R., and Gangloff S. Hyper-recombination and Bloom's syndrome: microbes again provide clues about cancer. Genome Res. 5 (1995) 421-426