Evolution of the lizard family Phrynosomatidae as inferred from diverse types of data

Herpetological Monographs

Volumn 10, Issue , 1996, Pages 43-84

  Reeder, Tod W ^a,b   Wiens, John J ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SECTION OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Callisaurus; Congruence; Cophosaurus; Holbrookia; Incomplete taxa; Petrosaurus; Phrynosoma; Phrynosomatidae; Phylogeny; Sator; Sceloporus; Uma; Urosaurus; Uta

Indexed keywords

CALLISAURUS; COPHOSAURUS; HOLBROOKIA; IGUANIA; PETROSAURUS; PHRYNOSOMA; PHRYNOSOMATINAE; SATOR; SCELOPORUS; SQUAMATA; UMA; UROSAURUS; UTA;

EID: 0001995326     PISSN: 07331347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.2307/1466980     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. ALLARD, M. W., AND R. L. HONEYCUTT. 1992. Nucleotide sequence variation in the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene and the phylogeny of African molerats (Rodentia: Bathyergidae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:27-40.
2. ARCHIE, J. W. 1989. Homoplasy excess ratios: New indices for measuring levels of homoplasy in phylogenetic systematics and a critique of the consistency index, Syst. Zool. 38:253-269.
3. ARNOLD, E. N. 1984. Variation in the cloacal and hemipenial muscles of lizards and its bearing on their relationships. Pp. 57-85. In M. J. Ferguson (Ed.), The Structure, Development, and Evolution of Reptiles. Symp. Zool. Soc. London.
4. BARRETT, M., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND E. SOBER. 1991. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:486-493.
5. BLACKBURN, D. G. 1978. The Comparative, Functional, and Evolutionary Myology of Burrowing Sceloporine Lizards. Master's Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
6. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
7. CARPENTER, C. C. 1962. A comparison of the patterns of display behavior of Urosaurus, Uta, and Streptosaurus. Herpetologica 18:145-152.
8. _. 1963. Patterns of behavior in three forms of the fringe-toed lizards (Uma - Iguanidae). Copeia 1963:406-412.
9. _. 1967. Aggression and social structure in iguanid lizards. Pp. 87-105. In W. W. Milstead (Ed.), Lizard Ecology: A Symposium. University of Missouri Press, Columbia.
10. _. 1978. Comparative display behavior in the genus Sceloporus (Iguanidae). Milwaukee Publ. Mus. Contrib. Biol. Geol. 18:1-71.
11. CAMPBELL, J. A., AND D. R. FROST. 1993. Anguid lizards of the genus Abronia: Revisionary notes, descriptions of four new species, a phylogenetic analysis, and key. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 216: 1-121.
12. CHIPPINDALE, P. T., AND J. J. WIENS. 1994. Weighting partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:278-287.
13. CLARKE, R. F. 1965. An ethological study of the iguanid genera Callisaurus, Cophosaurus, and Holbrookia. Emporta State Res. Stud. 13:1-66.
14. DE QUEIROZ, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42:368-372.
15. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1982. The scierai ossicles of sceloporine iguanids: A reexamination with comments on their phylogenetic significance. Herpetologica 38:302-311.
16. _. 1989. Morphological and Biochemical Evolution in the Sand Lizards. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
17. _. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships and rates of allozyme evolution among the lineages of sceloporine sand lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 45:333-362.
18. DONOGHUE, M. J., J. A. DOYLE, J. GAUTHIER, A. G. KLUGE, AND T. ROWE. 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20:431-460.
19. DONOGHUE, M. J., AND M. J. SANDERSON. 1992. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Pp. 340-368. In P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle (Eds.), Molecular Systematics in Plants. Chapman and Hall, New York.
20. DUNHAM, A. E., D. B. MILES, AND D. N. REZNICK. 1988a. Life history patterns in squamate reptiles. Pp. 441-511. In C. Gans and R. Huey (Eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 16. A. R. Liss, New York.
21. DUNHAM, A. E., P. J. MORIN, AND H. M. WILBUR. 1988b. Methods for the study of reptile populations. Pp. .331-386. In C. Gans and R. Huey (Eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 16. A. R. Liss, New York.
22. ETHERIDGE, R. 1962. Skeletal variation in the iguanid lizard Sator grandaevus. Copeia 1962:613-619.
23. _. 1964. The skeletal morphology and systematic relationships of sceloporine lizards. Copeia 1964: 610-631.
24. ETHERIDGE, R., AND K. DE QUEIROZ. 1988. A phylogeny of Iguanidae. Pp. 283-368. In R. Estes and G. Pregill (Eds.), Phylogenetic Relationships of Lizard Families: Essays Commemorating Charles L. Camp. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California.
25. FARRIS, J. S. 1970. Methods of computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19:83-92.
26. _. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5:417-419.
27. _. 1990. The retention index and homoplasy excess. Syst. Zool. 38:406-407.
28. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
29. FERGUSON, G. W. 1971. Variation and evolution of the push-up displays of the side-blotched lizard genus Uta (Iguanidae). Syst. Zool. 20:79-101.
30. FROST, D. R., AND R. ETHERIDGE. 1989. A phylogenetic analysis and taxonomy of iguanian lizards. Misc. Publ. Univ. Kansas 81:1-65.
31. FROST, D. R., AND D. M. HILLIS. 1990. Species in concept and practice: Herpetological applications. Herpetologica 46:87-104.
32. GORMAN, G. C., L. ATKINS, AND T. HOLZINGER. 1967. New karyotypic data on 15 genera of lizards in the family Iguanidae, with a discussion of taxonomic and cytological implications. Cytogenetics 6:286-299.
33. GORMAN, G. C., L. BAPTISTA, AND R. B. BURY. 1969. Chromosomes and sceloporine relationships, with special reference to the horned lizards. Mammal. Chromosomes Newsl. 10:6-11.
34. GUILLETTE, L. J., R. E. JONES, K. T. FITZGERALD, AND H. M. SMITH. 1980. Evolution of viviparity in the lizard genus Sceloporus. Herpetologica 36: 201-215.
35. HILLIS, D. M. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:23-42.
36. HILLIS, D. M., AND J. J. BULL. 1993. An empirical test of boot strapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 182-192.
37. JULLIEN, R., AND A. RENOUS-LÈCURU. 1972. Variations du trajet du nert ulnaire (ulnaris) et de l'innervations des muscles dorsaux de la jamb chez les lacertiliens (reptiles: squamates): Valeur systematique et application phylogenetique. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Zool. 23:207-246.
38. KLUGE, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
39. KLUGE, A. G., AND J. S. FARRIS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18:1-32.
40. KRAUS, F., AND M. M. MIYAMOTO. 1991. Rapid cladogenesis among the pecoran ruminants: Evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Syst. Zool. 40:117-130.
41. LANYON, S. M. 1988. The stochastic mode of molecular evolution: What consequences for systematic investigations? Auk 105:565-573.
42. LEVITON, A. E., R. H. GIBBS, JR., E. HEAL, AND C. E. DAWSON. 1985. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology: Part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copeia 1985:802-832.
43. LYNN, R. T. 1965. A comparative study of display behavior in Phrynosoma (Iguanidae). Southwest. Nat. 10:25-30.
44. MADDISON, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 40:315-328.
45. MADDISON, W. P., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND D. R. MADDISON. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst. Zool. 33:83-103.
46. MICKEVICH, M. F. 1978. Taxonomic congruence. Syst. Zool. 27:143-158.
47. MIYAMOTO, M. M., AND W. M. FITCH. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:64-76.
48. MONTANUCCI, R. R. 1987. A phylogenetic study of the horned lizards, genus Phrynosoma, based on skeletal and external morphology. Contrib. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles County 113:1-26.
49. OELRICH, T. M. 1956. The anatomy of the head of Ctenosaura pectinata (Iguanidae). Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan 94:1-122.
50. PAMILO, P., AND M. NEI. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-583.
51. PENNOCK, L., D. W. TINKLE, AND M. W. SHAW. 1969. Minute Y chromosome in the lizard genus Uta (family Iguanidae). Cytogenetics 8:9-19.
52. PRESCH, W. 1969. Evolutionary osteology and relationships of the horned lizard genus Phrynosoma (family Iguanidae). Copeia 1969:250-275.
53. PURDUE, J. R., AND C. C. CARPENTER. 1972a. A comparative study of the body movements of displaying males of the lizard genus Sceloporus (Iguanidae). Behaviour 41:68-81.
54. _. 1972b. A comparative study of the display motion in the iguanid genera Sceloporus, Uta, and Urosaurus. Herpetologica 28:137-141.
55. REEDER, T. W. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships among phrynosomatid lizards as inferred from mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences: Substitutional bias and information content of transitions relative to transversions. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:203-222.
56. SANDERSON, M. J., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43:1781-1795.
57. SAVAGE, J. M. 1958. The iguanid lizard genera Urosaurus and Uta, with remarks on related groups. Zoologica 43:41-54.
58. SITES, J. W., J. W. ARCHIE, C. J. COLE, AND O. F. VILLELA. 1992. A review of phylogenetic hypotheses for the lizard genus Sceloporus (Phrynosomatidae): Implications for ecological and evolutionary studies. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 213:1-110.
59. SMITH, H. M. 1939. The Mexican and Central American lizards of the genus Sceloporus. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Tool. Ser. 26:1-397.
60. _. 1946. Handbook of Lizards: Lizards of the United States and Canada. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
61. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1981. Taxonomic congruence in the Leptopodomorpha re-examined. Syst. Zool. 30:309-325.
62. STEVENS, P. S. 1991. Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis: A review. Syst. Bot. 16:553-581.
63. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1990. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.0s. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
64. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND W. P. MADDISON. 1987. Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony. Math. Biosci. 87:199-229.
65. THIELE, K. 1993. The Holy Grail of the perfect character: The cladistic treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 9:275-304.
66. THOMAS, R. A., AND J. R. DIXON. 1976. A re-evaluation of the Sceloporus scalaris group (Sauria: Iguanidae). Southwest. Nat. 20:523-536.
67. WHEELER, W. C. 1993. The triangle inequality and character analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:707-712.
68. WIENS, J. J. 1993a. Phylogenetic relationships of phrynosomatid lizards and monophyly of the Sceloporus group. Copeia 1993:287-299.
69. _. 1993b. Phylogenetic systematics of the tree lizards (genus Urosaurus). Herpetologica 49:399-420.
70. _. 1995. Polymorphic characters in phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Biol. 44:482-500.
71. WIENS, J. J., AND P. T. CHIPPINDALE. 1994. Combining and weighting characters and the prior agreement approach revisited. Syst. Biol. 43:565-566.
72. WIENS, J. J., AND T. W. REEDER. 1995. Combining data sets with different numbers of taxa for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 44:548-558.
73. _. 1997. Phylogeny of the spiny lizards (Sceloporus) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Herpetol. Monogr. 11:In press.
74. WIENS, J. J., AND M. R. SERVEDIO. 1997. Accuracy of phylogenetic analysis including and excluding polymorphic characters. Syst. Biol. 46:In press.
75. WYLES, J. S., AND G. C. GORMAN. 1978. Close relationship between the lizard genus Sator and Sceloporus utiformis (Reptilia, Lacertilia, Iguanidae): Electrophoretic and immunological evidence. J. Herpetol. 12:343-350.