Evolution of the lizard family phrynosomatidae as inferred from diverse types of data

Herpetological Monographs

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 43-84

  Reeder, Tod W ^a,b   Wiens, John J ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SECTION OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Callisaurus; Congruence; Cophosaurus; Holbrookia; Incomplete taxa; Petrosaurus; Phrynosoma; Phrynosomatidae; Phylogeny; Sator; Sceloporus; Uma; Urosaurus; Uta

Indexed keywords

CALLISAURUS; COPHOSAURUS; HOLBROOKIA; IGUANIA; PETROSAURUS; PHRYNOSOMA; PHRYNOSOMATINAE; SATOR; SCELOPORUS; SQUAMATA; UMA; UROSAURUS; UTA;

EID: 0001995326     PISSN: 07331347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.2307/1466980     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ALLARD, M. W., AND R. L. HONEYCUTT. 1992. Nucleotide sequence variation in the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene and the phylogeny of African molerats (Rodentia: Bathyergidae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:27-40.
2. ARCHIE, J. W. 1989. Homoplasy excess ratios: New indices for measuring levels of homoplasy in phylogenetic systematics and a critique of the consistency index, Syst. Zool. 38:253-269.
3. ARNOLD, E. N. 1984. Variation in the cloacal and hemipenial muscles of lizards and its bearing on their relationships. Pp. 57-85. In M. J. Ferguson (Ed.), The Structure, Development, and Evolution of Reptiles. Symp. Zool. Soc. London.
4. BARRETT, M., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND E. SOBER. 1991. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:486-493.
5. BLACKBURN, D. G. 1978. The Comparative, Functional, and Evolutionary Myology of Burrowing Sceloporine Lizards. Master's Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
6. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
7. CARPENTER, C. C. 1962. A comparison of the patterns of display behavior of Urosaurus, Uta, and Streptosaurus. Herpetologica 18:145-152.
8. _. 1963. Patterns of behavior in three forms of the fringe-toed lizards (Uma - Iguanidae). Copeia 1963:406-412.
9. _. 1967. Aggression and social structure in iguanid lizards. Pp. 87-105. In W. W. Milstead (Ed.), Lizard Ecology: A Symposium. University of Missouri Press, Columbia.
10. _. 1978. Comparative display behavior in the genus Sceloporus (Iguanidae). Milwaukee Publ. Mus. Contrib. Biol. Geol. 18:1-71.
11. CAMPBELL, J. A., AND D. R. FROST. 1993. Anguid lizards of the genus Abronia: Revisionary notes, descriptions of four new species, a phylogenetic analysis, and key. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 216: 1-121.
12. CHIPPINDALE, P. T., AND J. J. WIENS. 199-1. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:278-287.
13. CLARKE, R. F. 1965. An ethological study of the iguanid genera Callisaurus, Cophosaurus, and Holbrookia. Emporia State Res. Stud. 13:1-66.
14. DE QUEIROZ, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42:368-372.
15. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1982. The scierai ossicles of sceloporine iguanids: A reexamination with comments on their phylogenetic significance. Herpetologica 38:302-311.
16. _. 1989. Morphological and Biochemical Evolution in the Sand Lizards. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
17. _. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships and rates of allozyme evolution among the lineages of sceloporine sand lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 45:333-362.
18. DONOGHUE, M. J., J. A. DOYLE, J. GAUTHIER, A. G. KLUGE, AND T. ROWE. 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20:431-460.
19. DONOGHUE, M. J., AND M. J. SANDERSON. 1992. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Pp. 340-368. In P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle (Eds.), Molecular Systematics in Plants. Chapman and Hall, New York.
20. DUNHAM, A. E., D. B. MILES, AND D. N. REZNICK. 1988a. Life history patterns in squamate reptiles. Pp. 441-511. In C. Gans and R. Huey (Eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 16. A. R. Liss, New York.
21. DUNHAM, A. E., P. J. MORIN, AND H. M. WILDUR. 1988b. Methods for the study of reptile populations. Pp. 331-386. In C. Gans and R. Huey (Eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 16. A. R. Liss, New York.
22. ETHERIDGE, R. 1962. Skeletal variation in the iguanid lizard Sator grandaevus. Copeia 1962:613-619.
23. _. 1964. The skeletal morphology and systematic relationships of sceloporine lizards. Copeia 1964: 610-631.
24. ETHERIDGE, R., AND K. DE QUEIROZ. 1988. A phylogeny of Iguanidae. Pp. 283-368. In R. Estes and G. Pregill (Eds.), Phylogenetic Relationships of Lizard Families: Essays Commemorating Charles L. Camp. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California.
25. FARRIS, J. S. 1970. Methods of computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19:83-92.
26. _. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5:417-419.
27. _. 1990. The retention index and homoplasy excess. Syst. Zool. 38:406-407.
28. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
29. FERGUSON, G. W. 1971. Variation and evolution of the push-up displays of the side-blotched lizard genus Uta (Iguanidae). Syst. Zool. 20:79-101.
30. FROST, D. R., AND R. ETHERIDGE. 1989. A phylogenetic analysis and taxonomy of iguanian lizards. Misc. Publ. Univ. Kansas 81:1-65.
31. FROST, D. R., AND D. M. HILLIS. 1990. Species in concept and practice: Herpetological applications. Herpetologica 46:87-104.
32. GORMAN, G. C., L. ATKINS, AND T. HOLZINGER. 1967. New karyotypic data on 15 genera of lizards in the family Iguanidae, with a discussion of taxonomic and cytological implications. Cytogenetics 6:286-299.
33. GORMAN, G. C., L. BAPTISTA, AND R. B. BURY. 1969. Chromosomes and sceloporine relationships, with special reference to the horned lizards. Mammal. Chromosomes Newsl. 10:6-11.
34. GUILLETTE, L. J., R. E. JONES, K. T. FITZGERALD, AND H. M. SMITH. 1980. Evolution of viviparity in the lizard genus Sceloporus. Herpetologica 36: 201-215.
35. HILLIS, D. M. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:23-42.
36. HILLIS, D. M., AND J. J. BULL. 1993. An empirical test of boot strapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 182-192.
37. JULLIEN, R., AND A. RENOUS-LÈCURU. 1972. Variations du trajet du nert ulnaire (ulnaris) et de l'innervations des muscles dorsaux de la jamb chez les lacertiliens (reptiles: squamates): Valeur systematique et application phylogenetique. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Zool. 23:207-246.
38. KLUGE, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
39. KLUGE, A. G., AND J. S. FARRIS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18:1-32.
40. KRAUS, F., AND M. M. MIYAMOTO. 1991. Rapid cladogenesis among the pecoran ruminants: Evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Syst. Zool. 40:117-130.
41. LANYON, S. M. 1988. The stochastic mode of molecular evolution: What consequences for systematic investigations? Auk 105:565-573.
42. LEVITON, A. E., R. H. GIBBS, JR., E. HEAL, AND C. E. DAWSON. 1985. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology: Part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copeia 1985:802-832.
43. LYNN, R. T. 1965. A comparative study of display behavior in Phrynosoma (Iguanidae). Southwest. Nat. 10:25-30.