Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: Performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods

Systematic Biology

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 228-253

  Wiens, John J ^a   Servedio, Maria R ^b  

^a SECTION OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Distance methods; Maximum likelihood; Parsimony; Polymorphism; Simulations

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION TREE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION TREES; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0032095587     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351598260897     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ALBERCH, P. 1983. Morphological variation in the neotropical salamander genus Bolitoglossa. Evolution 37:906-919.
2. ALLARD, M. W., AND M. M. MIYAMOTO. 1992. Testing phylogenetic approaches with empirical data, as illustrated with the parsimony method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:778-786.
3. ARCHIE, J. W., C. SIMON, AND A. MARTIN. 1989. Small sample size does decrease the stability of dendrograms calculated from allozyme-frequency data. Evolution 43:678-683.
4. BERLOCHER, S. H., AND D. L. SWOFFORD. 1997. Searching for phylogenetic trees under the frequency parsimony criterion: An approximation using generalized parsimony. Syst. Biol. 46:211-215.
5. BUTH, D. G. 1984. The application of electrophoretic data in systematic studies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:501-522.
6. CAMPBELL, J. A., AND D. R. FROST. 1993. Anguid lizards of the genus Abronia : Revisionary notes, description of four new species, a phylogenetic analysis, and key. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 216:1-121.
7. CARMEAN, D., AND B. CRESPI. 1995. Do long branches attract flies? Nature 373:666.
8. CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. L., AND A. W. F. EDWARDS. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 19:233257.
9. COLLESS, D. H. 1980 Congruence between morphometric and allozyme data for Menidia species: A reappraisal. Syst. Zool. 29:288-299.
10. CROTHER, B. I. 1990. Is "some better than none" or do allele frequencies contain phylogenetically useful information? Cladistics 6:277-281.
11. FARRIS, J. S. 1981. Distance data in phylogenetic analysis. Pages 3-23 in Advances in cladistics, Volume 1. Proceeding of the first meeting of the Willi Hennig Society (V. A. Funk and D. R. Brooks, eds.). New York Botanical Garden, New York.
12. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-410.
13. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from gene frequencies and quantitative characters: Finding maximum likelihood estimates. Evolution 35:1229-1242.
14. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Phylogenies from gene frequencies: A statistical problem. Syst. Zool. 34:300-311.
15. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1988 Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:445-471.
16. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1995. PHYLIP, version 3.57c. Department of Genetics, Univ. Washington, Seattle.
17. FIALA, K. L., AND R. R. SOKAL. 1985. Factors determining the accuracy of cladogram estimation: Evaluation using computer simulation. Evolution 39:609-622.
18. FISHER, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection, 1st edition. Clarendon, Oxford, England.
19. FITCH, W. M., AND E. MARGOLIASH. 1967. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155:279-284.
20. GORMAN, G., AND J. RENZI, JR. 1979. Genetic distance and heterozygosity estimates in electrophoretic studies: Effects of sample size. Copeia 1979:242-249.
21. HILLIS, D. M. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:23-42.
22. HILLIS, D. M. 1995. Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 44:3-16.
23. HILLIS, D. M., J. P. HUELSENBECK, AND C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 1994. Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. Science 264:671-677.
24. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1995. The performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44:17-48.
25. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1997. Is the Felsenstein zone a fly trap? Syst. Biol. 46:69-74.
26. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND D. M. HILLIS. 1993. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 42:247-264.
27. KIM, J., AND M. A. BURGMAN. 1988. Accuracy of phylogenetic-estimation methods under unequal evolutionary rates. Evolution 42:596-602.
28. KIMURA, M. 1955. Random genetic drift in multiallelic locus. Evolution 9:419-435.
29. KIMURA, M. 1956. Random genetic drift in a triallelic locus; Exact solution with a continuous model. Biometrics 12:57-66.
30. KIMURA, M., AND J. F. CROW. 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49:725-738.
31. KREITMAN, M. 1983. Nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 304:412-417.
32. MABEE, P. M., AND J. HUMPHRIES. 1993. Coding polymorphic data: Examples from allozymes and ontogeny. Syst. Biol. 42:166-181.
33. MICKEVICH, M. F., AND C. MITTER. 1981. Treating polymorphic characters in systematics: A phylogenetic treatment of electrophoretic data. Pages 45-58 in Advances in cladistics, Volume 1. Proceeding of the first meeting of the Willi Hennig Society (V. A. Funk and D. R. Brooks, eds.). New York Botanical Garden, New York.
34. MICKEVICH, M. F., AND C. MITTER. 1983. Evolutionary patterns in allozyme data: A systematic approach. Pages 169-176 in Advances in cladistics, Volume 2. Proceedings of the second meeting of the Willi Hennig Society (V. A. Funk and D. R. Brooks, eds.). Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
35. MURPHY, R. W. 1993. The phylogenetic analysis of allozyme data: Invalidity of coding alleles by presence/absence and recommended procedures. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 21:25-38.
36. NEI, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106:238-292.
37. PAMILO, P., AND M. NEI. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-583.
38. PRESS, W. H., B. P. FLANNERY, S. A. TEUKOLSKY, AND W. T. VETTERLING. 1988. Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
39. RANNALA, B. 1995. Polymorphic characters and phylogenetic analysis: A statistical perspective. Syst. Biol. 44:421-429.
40. ROGERS, J. S. 1986. Deriving phylogenetic trees from allele frequencies: A comparison of nine genetic distances. Syst. Zool. 35:297-310.
41. ROHLF, F. J., AND M. C. WOOTEN. 1988. Evaluation of the restricted maximum-likelihood method for estimating phylogenetic trees using simulated allele-frequency data. Evolution 42:581-595.
42. ROHLF, F. J, W. S. CHANG, R. R. SOKAL, AND J. KIM. 1990. Accuracy of estimated phylogenies: Effects of tree topology and evolutionary model. Evolution 44:1671-1684.
43. SAITOU, N., AND M. NEI. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425.
44. SMOUSE, P. E., T. E. DOWLING, J. A. TWOREK, W. R. HOEH, AND W. M. BROWN. 1991. Effects of intraspecific variation on phylogenetic inference: A likelihood analysis of mtDNA restriction site data in cyprinid fishes. Syst. Zool. 40:393-409.
45. SOKAL, R. R., AND C. D. MICHENER. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 28:1409-1438.
46. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1983. WAGPROC, Version 4.2. Wagner Procedure Program. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
47. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND S. H. BERLOCHER. 1987. Inferring evolutionary trees from gene frequency data under the principle of maximum parsimony. Syst. Zool. 36:293-325.
48. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND G. J. OLSEN. 1990. Phylogeny reconstruction. Pages 411-501 in Molecular systematics, 1st edition (D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
49. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogeny reconstruction. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics, 2nd edition (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
50. TAKAHATA, N. 1989. Gene genealogy in three related populations: Consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 122:957-966.
51. WIENS, J. J. 1995. Polymorphic characters in phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Biol. 44:482-500.
52. WIENS, J. J. 1998. Testing phylogenetic methods with tree-congruence: Phylogenetic analysis of polymorphic morphological characters in phrynosomatid lizards. Syst. Biol. 47:(in press).
53. WIENS, J. J., AND M. R. SERVEDIO. 1997. Accuracy of phylogenetic analysis including and excluding polymorphic characters. Syst. Biol. 46:332-345.
54. WOLFRAM, S. 1991. Mathematica: A system for doing mathematics by computer. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
55. WRIGHT, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97-159.
56. WU, C.-I. 1991. Inferences of species phylogeny in relation to segregation of ancient polymorphisms. Genetics 127:429-435.