Media Convergence: Grand Theft Audio: Negotiating Copyright as Composers

Computers and Composition

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 79-103

  DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole ^a   Webb, Suzanne ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Convergence; Copyright; Creative commons; Fair use; Intellectual property; Piracy

Indexed keywords

EID: 39649108206     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2007.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (121)

1. In: Alexander J., and Banks W. (Eds). Special issue: Sexuality, technology, and the teaching of writing. Computers and Composition 21 3 (2004)
2. Alexander J., and Banks W.P. Sexualities, technologies, and the teaching of writing: A critical overview. Computers and Composition 21 3 (2004) 273-293
3. In: Alexander J., and Dickson M. (Eds). Role play: Distance learning and the teaching of writing (2006), Cresskill, NJ, Hampton Press
4. In: Allen N. (Ed). Working with words and images: New steps in an old dance (2002), Ablex, Stamford, CT
5. Anderson, Daniel. (2005). Prosumer approaches to new media composition: Consumption and production in continuum. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 8 (1). Retrieved January 2, 2007 from http://www.hu.mtu.edu/kairos/CoverWeb/anderson/story.html.
6. Anson C.M. Distant voices: Teaching writing in a culture of technology. College English 61 3 (1999) 1-20
7. Ball C. Show, not tell: The value of new media scholarship. Computers and Composition 21 (2004) 403-425
8. Bernhardt S.A. Designing a microcomputer classroom for teaching composition. Computers and Composition 7 1 (1989) 93-110
9. Bernhardt S.A. The shape of text to come: The texture of print on screens. College Composition and Communication 44 2 (1993) 151-175
10. Boehm, Diana Christian, & Taggett, Laura. (1998). About plagiarism, pixels and platitudes. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 3 (1). Retrieved January 2, 2007 from http://www.english.ttu.edu/KAIROS/3.1/binder2.html?coverweb/boehm/pixels.htm.
11. Boisvert, Anne-Marie. (2003). On bricolage: Assembling culture with whatever comes to hand (Trans. Timothy Barnard). HorizonZero, 8 (April/May). Retrieved January 2, 2005, from: http://www.horizonzero.ca/textsite/remix.php?is=8andfile=4andtlang=0.
12. Bolter J.D. Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing (1991), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
13. Brady Aschauer A. Tinkering with technological skill: An examination of the gendered uses of technologies. Computers and Composition 16 1 (1999) 7-23
14. Britton B., and Glynn S.M. Computer writing environments: Theory, research, and design (1989), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
15. Brumberger E.R. The rhetoric of typography: The persona of typeface and text. Technical Communication 50 2 (2003) 206-223
16. Brumberger E.R. The rhetoric of typography: The awareness and impact of typeface appropriateness. Technical Communication 50 2 (2003) 224-231
17. Brumberger E.R. The rhetoric of typography: Effects on reading time, reading comprehension, and perceptions of ethos. Technical Communication 51 1 (2003) 13-24
18. Buckley J. The invisible audience and the disembodied voice: Online teaching and the loss of body image. Computers and Composition 14 (1997) 179-187
19. Burbules N.C. Rhetorics of the Web: Hyperreading and critical literacy practices. In: Snyder I. (Ed). Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (1998), Routledge, London 102-122
20. Condon W. Selecting computer software for writing instruction: Some considerations. Computers and Composition 10 1 (1992) 53-56
21. Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC) Committee on Computers and Composition. (1998). Promotion and tenure guidelines for work with technology. Retrieved January 10, 2007 from http://www.ncte.org/about/over/positions/level/coll/107658.htm.
22. Conference on College Composition and Communication. (2004). CCCC position statement on teaching, learning, and assessing writing in digital environments. Retrieved December 20, 2006 from http://www.ncte.org/cccc/resources/123773.htm.
23. Cooper M., and Selfe C.L. Computer conferencing and learning: Authority, resistance, and internally persuasive discourse. College English 52 8 (1990) 847-869
24. Cooper M. Postmodern pedagogy in electronic conversations. In: Hawisher G.E., and Selfe C.L. (Eds). Passions pedagogies and 21st century technologies (1999), Utah State University Press, Logan 140-160
25. Curtis M.S. Windows on composing: Teaching revision on word processors. College Composition and Communication 39 3 (1998) 227-344
26. DeVoss D.N., Cushman E., and Grabill J.T. Infrastructure and composing: The when of new-media writing. College Composition and Communication 57 1 (2005) 14-44
27. Dinan J.S., Gagnon R., and Taylor J. Integrating computers into the writing classroom: Some guidelines. Computers and Composition 3 2 (1986) 33-39
28. Enzensberger H. The consciousness industry: On literature, politics and the media (1974), Seabury Press, New York
29. Faigley L. Beyond imagination: The Internet and global digital literacy. In: Hawisher G.E., and Selfe C.L. (Eds). Passions pedagogies and 21st century technologies (1999), Utah State University Press, Logan 129-139
30. Forum. A conversation about software, technology, and composition studies. Computers and Composition 9 1 (1992) 151-168
31. Gates, Bill. (1999, October 4). Everyone, anytime, anywhere. Forbes ASAP. Retrieved December 5, 2006 from http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/ofnote/10-04forbes.mspx.
32. George D. From analysis to design: Visual communication in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication 54 (2002) 11-39
33. Grabill J.T. Utopic visions, the technopoor, and public access: Writing technologies in a community literacy program. Computers and Composition 15 (1998) 297-315
34. Grabill J.T. Community computing and citizen productivity. Computers and Composition 20 2 (2003) 131-150
35. Grabill J.T. On divides and interfaces: Access, class, and computers. Computers and Composition 20 (2003) 455-472
36. Grabill J.T. Writing community change: Designing technologies for citizen action (2007), Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ
37. Grigar D. Over the line, online, gender lines: E-mail and women in the classroom. In: Blair K., and Takayoshi P. (Eds). Feminist cyberscapes: Mapping gendered academic spaces (1999), Ablex, Stamford, CT 257-281
38. Gruber S. Re: Ways we contribute: Students, instructors, and pedagogies in the computer-mediated writing classroom. Computers and Composition 12 1 (1995) 61-78
39. Haas C. Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
40. Halbritter B. Musical rhetoric in integrated-media composition. Computers and Composition 23 (2006) 317-334
41. Handa, Carolyn (Ed.). (2001). Special issues: Digital rhetoric, digital literacy, computers, and composition. Computers and Composition, 18 (1 and 2).
42. In: Handa C. (Ed). Visual rhetoric in a digital world (2004), Bedford/St. Martin's, Boston
43. Hansen, Evan. (2004, August 25). JibJab beats copyright rap. CNET News.com. Accessed June 11, 2007 from http://www.news.com.com/JibJab+beats+copyright+rap/2100-1026_35322970.html.
44. Harris L.D., and Wambeam C.A. The Internet-based composition classroom: A study in pedagogy. Computers and Composition 13 (1996) 353-371
45. Hawisher G.E., LeBlanc P., Moran C., and Selfe C.L. Computers and the teaching of writing in American higher education 1979-1994: A history (1995), Ablex, Stamford, CT
46. Heba G. HyperRhetoric: Multimedia, literacy, and the future of composition. Computers and Composition 14 (1997) 19-44
47. Hocks M.E. Feminist interventions in electronic environments. Computers and Composition 16 (1999) 107-119
48. Hocks M.E. Understanding visual rhetoric in digital writing environments. College Composition and Communication 54 (2003) 629-656
49. Hocks M.E., and Kendrick M. Eloquent images: Word and image in the age of new media (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
50. Holdstein D., and Selfe C.L. Computers and writing: Theory, research, practice (1990), Modern Language Association, New York
51. Holdstein D. Interchanges: Counterpostings on a genre of email. College Composition and Communication 47 (1996) 279-284
52. Janangelo J. Technopower and technoppression. Computers and Composition 9 1 (1991) 47-64
53. Jenkins, Henry. (2005, March). Welcome to convergence culture. Receiver, 12 (1). Retrieved May 31, 2007 from http://www.vodafone.com/flash/receiver/12/articles/pdf/12_01.pdf.
54. Jenkins H. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide (2006), New York University Press, New York
55. Kent-Drury R.M. Finding a place to stand: Negotiating the spatial configuration of the networked computer classroom. Computers and Composition 15 3 (1998) 387-407
56. Kinkead J. Computer conversations: E-mail and writing instruction. College Composition and Communication 38 (1987) 337-341
57. Knadler S. E-racing difference in e-space: Black female subjectivity and the Web-based portfolio. Computers and Composition 18 (2001) 235-255
58. Kress G. Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: The potentials of new forms of text. In: Snyder I. (Ed). Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (1998), Routledge, London 53-79
59. Kress G. English at the crossroads: Rethinking curricula of communication in the context of the turn to the visual. In: Hawisher G.E., and Selfe C.L. (Eds). Passions pedagogies and 21st century technologies (1999), Utah State University Press, Logan 66-88
60. In: Lang S., Walker J., and Dorwick K. (Eds). Special issue: Tenure. Computers and Composition 17 1 (2000)
61. LeBlanc Paul. Writing teachers writing software: Creating our place in the electronic age (1993), National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL
62. LeCourt D. Writing (without) the body: Gender and power in networked discussion groups. In: Blair K., and Takayoshi P. (Eds). Feminist cyberscapes: Mapping gendered academic spaces (1999), Ablex, Stamford, CT 153-176
63. Lessig L. Code and other laws of cyberspace (1999), Basic Books, New York
64. Lessig L. Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity (2004), The Penguin Press, New York
65. Lessig, Lawrence. (2005a, April). Who owns culture? Presentation at the New York Public Library, New York, NY.
66. Lessig, Lawrence. (2005b, March). Remix culture. Presentation at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, San Francisco, CA.
67. Logie, John. (2006). Copyright in increasingly digital academic contexts: What it takes. Paper Presentation at the WIDE Research Center 2006 Conference, "Writing: Digital Knowledge," East Lansing, MI. Retrieved March 20, 2007, from http://www.wide.msu.edu/widepapers/Logie-WIDEresponse.pdf/file_view.
68. Manovich, Lev. (2002). Who is the author? Sampling/remixing/open source. Retrieved December 30, 2005, from http://www.manovich.net/DOCS/models_of_authorship.doc.
69. Markel M. What students see: Word processing and the perception of visual design. Computers and Composition 15 (1998) 373-386
70. Marshall Alan. Decay and renewal in typeface markets: Variations on a typographical theme. Emigre (1997) 42
71. McGee T., and Ericsson P. The politics of the program: MS Word as the invisible grammarian. Computers and Composition 19 (2002) 453-470
72. McKee H. "YOUR VIEWS SHOWED TRUE IGNORANCE!!!": (Mis)communication in an online interracial discussion forum. Computers and Composition 19 (2002) 411-434
73. McLeod K. Freedom of expression®: Overzealous copyright bozos and other enemies of creativity (2005), Doubleday/Random House, New York
74. Metz, Rachel. (2004, July 29). Sue you: This song is our song. Wired News. Accessed June 11, 2007 from http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2004/07/64376.
75. Moran C., and Hawisher G.E. The rhetorics and languages of electronic mail. In: Snyder I. (Ed). Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (1998), Routledge, London 80-101
76. Moran Charles. From a high-tech to a low-tech writing classroom: "You can't go home again". Computers and Composition 15 (1998) 1-10
77. Moran C. Access: The a-word in technology studies. In: Hawisher G.E., and Selfe C.L. (Eds). Passions pedagogies and 21st century technologies (1999), Utah State University Press, Logan 205-220
78. Pagnucci Gian.S., and Mauriello Nicholas. The masquerade: Gender, identity, and writing for the Web. Computers and Composition 16 (1999) 141-151
79. Palmquist M.E. Network-supported interaction in two writing classrooms. Computers and Composition 10 4 (1993) 25-57
80. Palmquist M., Kiefer K., Hartvigsen J., and Godlew B. Transitions: Teaching writing in computer-supported and traditional classrooms (1998), Ablex, Stamford, CT
81. Peoples Halio M. Multimedia narration: Constructing possible worlds. Computers and Composition 13 (1996) 343-352
82. Porter J.E. Rhetorical ethics and internetworked writing (1998), Ablex, Greenwich, CT
83. Porter J.E., Sullivan P., Blythe S., Grabill J.T., and Miles L. Institutional critique: A rhetorical methodology for change. College Composition and Communication 51 4 (2000) 610-642
84. Redd T. "Tryin to make a dolla outa fifteen cent": Teaching composition with the Internet at an HBCU. Computers and Composition 20 (2003) 359-373
85. Regan A.E., and Zuern J.D. Community-service learning and computer-mediated advanced composition: The going to class, getting online, and giving back project. Computers and Composition 17 (2000) 177-195
86. Richardson E.B. African American women instructors: In a net. Computers and Composition 14 (1997) 279-287
87. Rickert T., and Salvo M. The distributed Gesamptkunstwerk: Sound, worlding, and new media culture. Computers and Composition 23 (2006) 296-316
88. Rife, Martine. (2006). Why Kairos matters to writing: A reflection on its intellectual property conversation and developing law during the last ten years. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 11 (1). Retrieved March 11, 2007 from http://ww.kairos.technorhetoric.net/11.1/topoi/rife/index.html.
89. Rouzie A. Conversation and carrying-on: Play, conflict, and serio-ludic discourse in synchronous computer conferencing. College Composition and Communication 53 (2001) 251-299
90. Ruszkiewicz J. Word and image: The next revolution. Computers and Composition 5 3 (1988) 9-15
91. Sanchez R. Our bodies? Our selves? Questions about teaching in the MUD. In: Taylor T., and Ward I. (Eds). Literacy theory in the age of the Internet (1998), Columbia University Press, New York 93-108
92. Schütze, Bernard. (2004). Samples from the heap: Notes on recycling the detritus of a remixed culture. HorizonZero, 8 (April/May). Retrieved October 20, 2006 from http://www.horizonzero.ca/textsite/remix.php?tlang=0andis=8andfile=5.
93. Selfe C.L. Creating a computer-supported writing lab: Sharing stories and creating vision. Computers and Composition 4 2 (1987) 44-65
94. Selfe C., and Selfe Jr. R.J. The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication 45 4 (1994) 480-504
95. Sirc G. "What is composition...?" After Duchamp (notes toward a general teleintertext). In: Hawisher G.E., and Selfe C.L. (Eds). Passions pedagogies and [21st] century technologies (1999), Utah State University Press, Logan 178-204
96. Spooner M., and Yancey K. Postings on a genre of email. College Composition and Communication 47 (1996) 252-278
97. Sullivan L.L. Wired women writing: Towards a feminist theorization of hypertext. Computers and Composition 16 (1999) 25-54
98. Sullivan P. Desktop publishing: A powerful tool for advanced composition courses. College Composition and Communication 39 (1998) 344-347
99. Takayoshi P. Building new networks from the old: Women's experiences with electronic communications. Computers and Composition 11 1 (1994) 21-35
100. Takayoshi P. Complicated women: Examining methodologies for understanding the uses of technology. Computers and Composition 17 (2000) 123-138
101. Takayoshi P., Huot E., and Huot M. No boys allowed: The World Wide Web as a clubhouse for girls. Computers and Composition 16 (1999) 89-106
102. Taylor T. The persistence of difference in networked classrooms: Non-negotiable difference and the African American student body. Computers and Composition 14 (1997) 169-178
103. Teaching about plagiarism in a digital age: Students listen when teachers discuss the issues. (2005, November). Council Chronicle. Retrieved September 6, 2006 from http://www.ncte.org/pubs/chron/highlights/122871.htm.
104. Thompson D. Electronic bulletin boards: A timeless place for collaborative writing projects. Computers and Composition 7 3 (1990) 43-53
105. Trimbur J. Delivering the message: Typography and the materiality of writing. In: Olson G. (Ed). Rhetoric and composition as intellectual work (2002), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale 188-202
106. Tuman M.C. Literacy online: The promise (and peril) of reading and writing with computers (1992), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh
107. Ulmer G.L. Heuretics: The logic of invention (1994), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
108. Vaidhyanathan S. Copyrights and copywrongs: The rise of intellectual property and how it threatens creativity (2001), New York University Press, New York
109. VanderLans R. The trouble with type. In: Heller S., and Meggs P.B. (Eds). Texts on type: Critical writings on typography (2001), Allworth Press, New York 223-227
110. Vernon A. Computerized grammar checkers 2000: Capabilities, limitations, and pedagogical possibilities. Computers and Composition 17 (2000) 329-349
111. Webb P. Technologies of difference: Reading the virtual age through sexual (in)difference. Computers and Composition 20 (2003) 151-167
112. Webb-Peterson P., and Savenye W. Special issue: Distance education. Computers and Composition 18 4 (2001)
113. Westbrook S. Visual rhetoric in a culture of fear: Impediments to multimedia production. College English 68 5 (2006) 457-480
114. Westbrook, Steve. (2007, March). Innovators or outlaws. Paper presentation at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, New York, NY.
115. Wolfe J.L. Why do women feel ignored? Gender differences in computer-mediated classroom interactions. Computers and Composition 16 (1999) 153-166
116. Writing in Digital Environments (WIDE) Research Center Collective. (2005). Why teach digital writing? Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 10 (1). Retrieved January 3, 2007 from http://www.english.ttu.edu/kairos/10.1/binder2.html?coverweb/wide/index.html.
117. Wysocki A.F. Impossibly distinct: On form/content and word/image in two pieces of computer-based interactive multimedia. Computers and Composition 18 (2001) 137-162
118. Wysocki A.F. The multiple media of texts: How onscreen and paper texts incorporate words, images, and other media. In: Bazerman C., and Prior P. (Eds). What writing does and how it does it (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 123-164
119. Wysocki A.F., and Jasken J.I. What should be an unforgettable face.... Computers and Composition 21 (2004) 29-48
120. Wysocki A.F., and Johnson-Eilola J. Blinded by the letter: Why are we using literacy as a metaphor for everything else?. In: Hawisher G.E., and Selfe C.L. (Eds). Passions pedagogies and 21st century technologies (1999), Utah State University Press, Logan 349-368
121. Wysocki A.F., Johnson-Eilola J., Selfe C.##L., and Sirc G. Writing new media (2004), Utah State University Press, Logan