The politics of the program: Ms Word as the invisible grammarian

Computers and Composition

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 453-470

  McGee, Tim ^a   Ericsson, Patricia ^b  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Michigan Technology University   (United States)

Author keywords

Composition; Correctness:Current traditional rhetoric; Grammar; Language; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Pedagogy; Style

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036898761     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S8755-4615(02)00142-1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baugh, Albert C., & Cable, Thomas. (1993). A history of the English language (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
2. Berlin, James. (1996). Rhetorics, poetics and cultures: Refiguring college English studies. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
3. Braddock, Richard, Lloyd-Jones, Richard, & Schoer, Lowell. (1963). Research in written composition. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
4. Buderi, Robert. (1999). Software's ultimate sandbox. Technology Review, 102(1), 44-51.
5. Campbell, George. (1997). WORD 97. PC World, 15(2), 109-110.
6. Connors, Robert. (1997). Composition-rhetoric: Backgrounds, theory, pedagogy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
7. Cooper, Marilyn. (1989). The ecology of writing. In Marilyn Cooper & Michael Holzman (Eds.), Writing as social action (pp. 1-13). Portsmouth, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
8. Dale, Robert. (1996). Computer assistance in text creation and editing. In Ronald A. Cole, Joseph Mariani, Hans Uszkoreit, Annie Zaenen, & Victor Zue (Eds.), Survey of the state of the art in human language technology. Retrieved March 21, 2001, from .
9. Dale, Robert, Moist, Herman, & Somers, H. L. (2000). Handbook of natural language processing. New york: Marcel Dekker.
10. Haefner, Joel. (1999). The politics of the code. Computers and Composition, 16, 325-339.
11. Haist, Caroline. (1999, November). An evaluation of Microsoft WORD 97's Grammar Checker. Syntax in the schools, 16(2). Retrieved July 1, 2001, from .
12. Hartwell, Patrick. (1985). Grammar, grammars, and the teaching of grammar. College English, 47, 105-127.
13. Hawhee, Debra. (1999). Composition history and the Harbrace College Handbook. College Composition and Communication, 50(3), 504-523.
14. Heidorn, George E. (2000). Intelligent writing assistance. In Robert Dale, Hermann Moisl, & Harold Sommers (Eds.), Handbook of natural language processing (pp. 181-207). New York: Marcel Dekker.
15. Herrington, Anne, & Moran, Charles. (2001). What happens when machines read our students writing? College English, 63, 480-499.
16. Johnson, Eric. (1992). The ideal grammar and style checker. Text Technology, 2(4). Retrieved July 1, 2001, from .
17. Johnson, Eric. (1997). The current state of grammar and style checkers. Text Technology, 7(1). Retrieved July 1, 2001, from .
18. Kemp, Fred. (1992). Who programmed this? Examining the instructional attitudes of writing-support software. Computers and Composition, 10, 9-24.
19. Lowe, Doug. (1997). More WORD 97 for WINDOWS for dummies. Foster City, CA: IDG Books.
20. McCleary, Bill. (1995). Grammar making a comeback in composition teaching. Composition Chronicle: Newsletter for Writing Teachers, 8(6), 1-4.
21. Microsoft. (2000). Microsoft WORD 2000 [Computer Software] online help files. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation.
22. Microsoft makes move into educational software. (1997, September 24). Lubbock-Avalanche Journal. Retrieved July 1, 2001, from .
23. Milroy, Lesley. (1998). Myth 12: Bad grammar is slovenly. In Laurie Bauer & Peter Trudgill (Eds.), Language myths. London: Penguin Books.
24. Phelps, Alan. (1998). Why not Word? Competitors still challenge Microsoft's word processor dominance. In Smart computing in plain English. Retrieved July 12, 2001, from .
25. Rickly, Rebecca. (2001, May). Technology, institutional assessment, and big brother. Council of Writing Program Administrators President's Newsletter, 8-10.
26. Rose, Mike. (1984). Writer's block: The cognitive dimension. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
27. Selfe, Cynthia L. (1999). Technology and literacy: A story about the perils of not paying attention. College Composition and Communication, 50(3), 411-436.
28. Selfe, Cynthia L., & Selfe, Richard, Jr. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication, 45(4), 480-504.
29. Spinks, Nelda H., Wells, Barron W., & Meche, Melanie. (1997, October). Customizing grammar checking. Business Education Forum, 24-26.
30. Vande Kopple, William J. (1998, April 1-4). Current research on language and its status with composition teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the conference on college composition and communication (ERIC ED418408).
31. Vernon, Alex. (2000). Computerized Grammar Checkers 2000: Capabilities, limitations, and pedagogical possibilities. Computers and Composition, 17, 329-350.
32. Weiser, Mark. (1991, September). The computer for the twenty-first century. Scientific American, 94-104.
33. Williams, Joseph. (2000). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace (6th ed.). New York: Longman.
34. Word 2000. (2001). Microsoft in education. Retrieved July 1, 2001, from