Eukaryotic DNA damage tolerance and translesion synthesis through covalent modifications of PCNA

Cell Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 162-173

  Andersen, Parker L ^a   Xu, Fang ^b   Xiao, Wei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b NINGXIA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

DNA damage tolerance; PCNA; Sumoylation; Translesion synthesis; Ubiquitination; Y family polymerase

Indexed keywords

CYCLINE; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; SUMO 1 PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; BASE MISPAIRING; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MUTAGENESIS; NEOPLASM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROKARYOTIC CELL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROCESSING; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; UBIQUITINATION;

ANIMALS; BASE PAIR MISMATCH; BINDING SITES; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUTAGENESIS; NEOPLASMS; PROKARYOTIC CELLS; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SUMO-1 PROTEIN; UBIQUITINATION;

EUKARYOTA; MAMMALIA; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 38049123477     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: 17487838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2007.114     Document Type: Review

References (151)

1. Rupp WD, Howard-Flanders P. Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J Mol Biol 1968; 31:291-304.
2. Cordeiro-Stone M, Makhov AM, Zaritskaya LS, Griffith JD. Analysis of DNA replication forks encountering a pyrimidine dimer in the template to the leading strand. J Mol Biol 1999; 289:1207-1218.
3. Bridges BA, Munson RJ. Mutagenesis in Escherichia coli: evidence for the mechanism of base change mutation by ultraviolet radiation in a strain deficient in excision-repair. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1968; 171:213-226.
4. Ganesan AK. Persistence of pyrimidine dimers during post-replication repair in ultraviolet light-irradiated Escherichia coli K12. J Mol Biol 1974; 87:103-119.
5. Broomfield S, Hryciw T, Xiao W. DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 2001; 486:167-184.
6. Barbour L, Xiao W. Regulation of alternative replication bypass pathways at stalled replication forks and its effects on genome stability: a yeast model. Mutat Res 2003; 532:137-155.
7. Moldovan GL, Pfander B, Jentsch S. PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell 2007; 129:665-679.
8. Bridges BA, Sedgwick SG. Effect of photoreactivation on the filling of gaps in deoxyribonucleic acid synthesized after exposure of Escherichia coli to ultraviolet light. J Bacteriol 1974; 117:1077-1081.
9. Howard-Flanders P, Rupp WD, Wilkins BM, Cole RS. DNA replication and recombination after UV irradiation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1968; 33:195-207.
10. Salles B, Defais M. Signal of induction of RecA protein in E. coli. Mutat Res 1984; 131:53-59.
11. Little JW. Autodigestion of LexA and phage lambda repressors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984; 81:1375-1379.
12. Reuven NB, Arad G, Maor-Shoshani A, Livneh Z. The mutagenesis protein UmuC is a DNA polymerase activated by UmuD', RecA, and SSB and is specialized for translesion replication. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:31763-31766.
13. Tang M, Bruck I, Eritja R, et al. Biochemical basis of SOS-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia colt reconstitution of in vitro lesion bypass dependent on the UmuD'2C mutagenic complex and RecA protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:9755-9760.
14. Pham P, Seitz EM, Saveliev S, et al. Two distinct modes of RecA action are required for DNA polymerase V-catalyzed translesion synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:11061-11066.
15. Robu ME, Inman RB, Cox MM. RecA protein promotes the regression of stalled replication forks in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:8211-8218.
16. Hochstrasser M. Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. Annu Rev Genet 1996; 30:405-439.
17. Pickart CM. Back to the future with ubiquitin. Cell 2004; 116:181-190.
18. Pickart CM, Fushman D. Polyubiquitin chains: polymeric protein signals. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2004; 8:610-616.
19. Hochstrasser M. Evolution and function of ubiquitin-like protein-conjugation systems. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2:E153-E157.
20. Schwartz DC, Hochstrasser M. A superfamily of protein tags: ubiquitin, SUMO and related modifiers. Trends Biochem Sci 2003; 28:321-328.
21. Bayer P, Arndt A, Metzger S, et al. Structure determination of the small ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-I. J Mol Biol 1998; 280:275-286.
22. Sheng W, Liao X. Solution structure of a yeast ubiquitin-like protein Smt3: the role of structurally less defined sequences in protein-protein recognitions. Protein Sci 2002; 11:1482-1491.
23. Prakash L. Characterization of postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and effects of rad6, rad18, rev3 and rad52 mutations. Mol Gen Genet 1981; 184:471-478.
24. Haynes RH, Kunz BA. DNA repair and mutagenesis in yeast. In: Strathern J, Jones EW, Broach JR (Eds.) The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Life Cycle and Inheritance. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1981, 371-414.
25. Friedberg EC. Deoxyribonucleic acid repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev 1988; 52:70-102.
26. Prakash S, Sung P, Prakash L. DNA repair genes and proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Genet 1993; 27:33-70.
27. Montelone BA, Prakash S, Prakash L. Recombination and mutagenesis in rad6 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: evidence for multiple functions of the RAD6 gene. Mol Gen Genet 1981; 184:410-415.
28. Jentsch S, McGrath JP, Varshavsky A. The yeast DNA repair gene RAD6 encodes a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Nature 1987; 329:131-134.
29. Sung P, Berleth E, Pickart C, Prakash S, Prakash L. Yeast RAD6 encoded ubiquitin conjugating enzyme mediates protein degradation dependent on the N-end-recognizing E3 enzyme. EMBO J 1991; 10:2187-2193.
30. Sung P, Prakash S, Prakash L. The RAD6 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae polyubiquitinates histones, and its acidic domain mediates this activity. Genes Dev 1988; 2:1476-1485.
31. Robzyk K, Recht J, Osley MA. Rad6-dependent ubiquitination of histone H2B in yeast. Science 2000; 287:501-504.
32. Morrison A, Miller EJ, Prakash L. Domain structure and functional analysis of the carboxyl-terminal polyacidic sequence of the RAD6 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1988; 8:1179-1185.
33. Reynolds P, Weber S, Prakash L. RAD6 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a protein containing a tract of 13 consecutive aspartates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985; 82:168-172.
34. Reynolds P, Koken MH, Hoeijmakers JH, Prakash S, Prakash L. The rhp6+ gene of Schizosaccharomycespombe: a structural and functional homolog of the RAD6 gene from the distantly related yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 1990; 9:1423-1430.
35. Koken M, Reynolds P, Bootsma D, Hoeijmakers J, Prakash S, Prakash L. Dhr6, a Drosophila homolog of the yeast DNA-repair gene RAD6. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88:3832-3836.
36. Koken MH, Reynolds P, Jaspers-Dekker I, Prakash L, Prakash S, Bootsma D, Hoeijmakers JH. Structural and functional conservation of two human homologs of the yeast DNA repair gene RAD6. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88:8865-8869.
37. Watkins JF, Sung P, Prakash S, Prakash L. The extremely conserved amino terminus of RAD6 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme is essential for amino-end rule-dependent protein degradation. Genes Dev 1993; 7:250-261.
38. Dohmen RJ, Madura K, Bartel B, Varshavsky A. The N-end rule is mediated by the UBC2(RAD6) ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88:7351-7355.
39. Bailly V, Lamb J, Sung P, Prakash S, Prakash L. Specific complex formation between yeast RAD6 and RAD18 proteins: a potential mechanism for targeting RAD6 ubiquitin-conjugating activity to DNA damage sites. Genes Dev 1994; 8:811-820.
40. Bailly V, Lauder S, Prakash S, Prakash L. Yeast DNA repair proteins Rad6 and Rad18 form a heterodimer that has ubiquitin conjugating, DNA binding, and ATP hydrolytic activities. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:23360-23365.
41. Lovering R, Hanson IM, Borden KL, et al. Identification and preliminary characterization of a protein motif related to the zinc finger. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:2112-2116.
42. Saurin AJ, Borden KL, Boddy MN, Freemont PS. Does this have a familiar RING? Trends Biochem Sci 1996; 21:208-214.
43. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 2002; 419:135-141.
44. Jones JS, Weber S, Prakash L. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD18 gene encodes a protein that contains potential zinc finger domains for nucleic acid binding and a putative nucleotide binding sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1988; 16:7119-7131.
45. Kunz BA, Kang XL, Kohalmi L. The yeast rad18 mutator specifically increases G-C-T-A transversions without reducing correction of G-A or C-T mismatches to G-C pairs. Mol Cell Biol 1991; 11:218-225.
46. Lemontt JF. Pathways of ultraviolet mutability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. II. The effect of rev genes on recombination. Mutat Res 1971; 13:319-326.
47. Lemontt JF. Mutants of yeast defective in mutation by ultraviolet light. Genetics 1971; 68:21-33.
48. Larimer FW, Perry JR, Hardigree AA. The REV1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation, sequence, and functional analysis. J Bacteriol 1989; 171:230-237.
49. Nelson JR, Lawrence CW, Hinkle DC. Deoxycytidyl transferase activity of yeast REV1 protein. Nature 1996; 382:729-731.
50. Nelson JR, Lawrence CW, Hinkle DC. Thymine-thymine dimer bypass by yeast DNA polymerase ζ. Science 1996; 272:1646-1649.
51. Lawrence CW. Cellular functions of DNA polymerase ζ and Rev1 protein. Adv Protein Chem 2004; 69:167-203.
52. Broomfield S, Chow BL, Xiao W. MMS2, encoding a ubiquitin-conjugating-enzyme-like protein, is a member of the yeast error-free postreplication repair pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:5678-5683.
53. Xiao W, Chow BL, Fontanie T, et al. Genetic interactions between error-prone and error-free postreplication repair pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 1999; 435:1-11.
54. Hofmann RM, Pickart CM. Noncanonical MMS2-encoded ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme functions in assembly of novel polyubiquitin chains for DNA repair. Cell 1999; 96:645-653.
55. Brusky J, Zhu Y, Xiao W. UBC133, a DNA-damage-inducible gene, is a member of the error-free postreplication repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 2000; 37:168-174.
56. Ulrich HD, Jentsch S. Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair. EMBO J 2000; 19:3388-3397.
57. Johnson RE, Henderson ST, Petes TD, Prakash S, Bankmann M, Prakash L. Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD5-mcoded DNA repair protein contains DNA helicase and zinc-binding sequence motifs and affects the stability of simple repetitive sequences in the genome. Mol Cell Biol 1992; 12:3807-3818.
58. Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L. Yeast DNA repair protein RAD5 that promotes instability of simple repetitive sequences is a DNA-dependent ATPase. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:28259-28262.
59. Ahne F, Jha B, Eckardt-Schupp F. The RAD5 gene product is involved in the avoidance of non-homologous end-joining of DNA double strand breaks in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:743-749.
60. Chen S, Davies AA, Sagan D, Ulrich HD. The RING finger ATPase Rad5p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contributes to DNA double-strand break repair in a ubiquitin-independent manner. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:5878-5886.
61. Torres-Ramos CA, Yoder BL, Burgers PM, Prakash S, Prakash L. Requirement of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in RAD6-dependent postreplicational DNA repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:9676-9681.
62. Garg P, Burgers PM. Ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen activates translesion DNA polymerases η and REV1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:18361-18366.
63. Stelter P, Ulrich HD. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 2003; 425:188-191.
64. Moldovan GL, Pfander B, Jentsch S. PCNA controls establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase. Mol Cell 2006; 23:723-732.
65. Lawrence CW, Christensen RB. Metabolic suppressors of trimethoprim and ultraviolet light sensitivities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae rad6 mutants. J Bacteriol 1979; 139:866-876.
66. Rong L, Klein HL. Purification and characterization of the SRS2 DNA helicase of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 1993; 268:1252-1259.
67. Rong L, Palladino F, Aguilera A, Klein HL. The hyper-gene conversion hpr5-1 mutation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an allele of the SRS2/RADH gene. Genetics 1991; 127:75-85.
68. Broomfield S, Xiao W. Suppression of genetic defects within the RAD6 pathway by srs2 is specific for error-free post-replication repair but not for damage-induced mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:732-739.
69. Ulrich HD. The srs2 suppressor of UV sensitivity acts specifically on the RAD5- and MMS2-dependent branch of the RAD6 pathway. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:3487-3494.
70. Aboussekhra A, Chanet R, Zgaga Z, Cassier-Chauvat C, Heude M, Fabre F. RADH, a gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding a putative DNA helicase involved in DNA repair. Characteristics of radH mutants and sequence of the gene. Nucleic Acids Res 1989; 17:7211-7219.
71. Aguilera A, Klein HL. Genetic control of intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and genetic characterization of hyper-recombination mutations. Genetics 1988; 119:779-790.
72. Chanet R, Heude M, Adjiri A, Maloisel L, Fabre F. Semidominant mutations in the yeast Rad51 protein and their relationships with the Srs2 helicase. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16:4782-4789.
73. Kaytor MD, Nguyen M, Livingston DM. The complexity of the interaction between RAD52 and SRS2. Genetics 1995; 140:1441-1442.
74. Milne GT, Ho T, Weaver DT. Modulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA double-strand break repair by SRS2 and RAD51. Genetics 1995; 139:1189-1199.
75. Schild D. Suppression of a new allele of the yeast RAD52 gene by overexpression of RAD51, mutations in srs2 and ccr4, or mating-type heterozygosity. Genetics 1995; 140:115-127.
76. Veaute X, Jeusset J, Soustelle C, Kowalczykowski SC, Le Cam E, Fabre F. The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 2003; 423:309-312.
77. Krejci L, Van Komen S, Li Y, et al. DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 2003; 423:305-309.
78. Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Sacher M, Hoege C, Jentsch S. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 2005; 436:428-433.
79. Papouli E, Chen S, Davies AA, et al. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol Cell 2005; 19:123-133.
80. Haracska L, Torres-Ramos CA, Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L. Opposing effects of ubiquitin conjugation and SUMO modification of PCNA on replicational bypass of DNA lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:4267-4274.
81. Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, Wood RD, Schultz RA, Ellenberger T. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 2006.
82. Yang W, Woodgate R. What a difference a decade makes: in-sights into translesion DNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:15591-15598.
83. Woodgate R. A plethora of lesion-replicating DNA polymerases. Genes Dev 1999; 13:2191-2195.
84. Wang Z. Translesion synthesis by the UmuC family of DNA polymerases. Mutat Res 2001; 486:59-70.
85. Lehmann AR, Niimi A, Ogi T, et al. Translesion synthesis: Y-family polymerases and the polymerase switch. DNA Repair (Amst) 2001; 6:891-899.
86. Friedberg EC, Gerlach VL. Novel DNA polymerases offer clues to the molecular basis of mutagenesis. Cell 1999; 98:413-416.
87. Wagner J, Fujii S, Gruz P, Nohmi T, Fuchs RP. The beta clamp targets DNA polymerase IV to DNA and strongly increases its processivity. EMBO Rep 2000; 1:484-488.
88. Tang M, Pham P, Shen X, Taylor JS, O'Donnell M, Woodgate R, et al. Roles of E. coli DNA polymerases IV and V in lesion-targeted and untargeted SOS mutagenesis. Nature 2000; 404:1014-1018.
89. Kobayashi S, Valentine MR, Pham P, O'Donnell M, Goodman MF. Fidelity of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV. Preferential generation of small deletion mutations by dNTP-stabilized misalignment. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:34198-34207.
90. Fiala KA, Suo Z. Mechanism of DNA polymerization catalyzed by Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 DNA polymerase IV. Biochemistry 2004; 43:2116-2125.
91. Fuchs RP, Fujii S, Wagner J. Properties and functions of Escherichia coli: Pol IV and Pol V. Adv Protein Chem 2004; 69:229-264.
92. Nelson JR, Gibbs PE, Nowicka AM, Hinkle DC, Lawrence CW. Evidence for a second function for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rev1p. Mol Microbiol 2000; 37:549-554.
93. Nair DT, Johnson RE, Prakash L, Prakash S, Aggarwal AK. Rev1 employs a novel mechanism of DNA synthesis using a protein template. Science 2005; 309:2219-2222.
94. Otsuka C, Kunitomi N, Iwai S, Loakes D, Negishi K. Roles of the polymerase and BRCT domains of Rev1 protein in translesion DNA synthesis in yeast in vivo. Mutat Res 2005; 578:79-87.
95. Guo C, Sonoda E, Tang TS, et al. REV1 protein interacts with PCNA: significance of the REV1 BRCT domain in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cell 2006; 23:265-271.
96. Acharya N, Haracska L, Johnson RE, Unk I, Prakash S, Prakash L. Complex formation of yeast Rev1 and Rev7 proteins: a novel role for the polymerase-associated domain. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:9734-9740.
97. Guo C, Fischhaber PL, Luk-Paszyc MJ, et al. Mouse Rev1 protein interacts with multiple DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis. EMBO J 2003; 22:6621-6630.
98. Gibbs PE, Wang XD, Li Z, McManus TP, McGregor WG, Lawrence CW, et al. The function of the human homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae REV1 is required for mutagenesis induced by UV light. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:4186-4191.
99. McDonald JP, Levine AS, Woodgate R. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD30 gene, a homologue of Escherichia coli dinB and umuC, is DNA damage inducible and functions in a novel error-free postreplication repair mechanism. Genetics 1997; 147:1557-1568.
100. Masutani C, Kusumoto R, Yamada A, et al. The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase η. Nature 1999; 399:700-704.
101. Johnson RE, Kondratick CM, Prakash S, Prakash L. hRAD30 mutations in the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum. Science 1999; 285:263-265.
102. Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L. Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase, Polh. Science 1999; 283:1001-1004.
103. Johnson RE, Washington MT, Prakash S, Prakash L. Fidelity of human DNA polymerase η. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:7447-7450.
104. Washington MT, Prakash L, Prakash S. Yeast DNA polymerase η utilizes an induced-fit mechanism of nucleotide incorporation. Cell 2001; 107:917-927.
105. Vaisman A, Lehmann AR, Woodgate R. DNA polymerases h and i. Adv Protein Chem 2004; 69:205-228.
106. Tissier A, McDonald JP, Frank EG, Woodgate R. poli, a remarkably error-prone human DNA polymerase. Genes Dev 2000; 14:1642-1650.
107. Nair DT, Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L, Aggarwal AK. Replication by human DNA polymerase-i occurs by Hoogsteen base-pairing. Nature 2004; 430:377-380.
108. Wolfle WT, Johnson RE, Minko IG, Lloyd RS, Prakash S, Prakash L. Human DNA polymerase i promotes replication through a ring-closed minor-groove adduct that adopts a syn conformation in DNA. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:8748-8754.
109. Vaisman A, Woodgate R. Unique misinsertion specificity of poll may decrease the mutagenic potential of deaminated cytosines. EMBO J 2001; 20:6520-6529.
110. Haracska L, Prakash L, Prakash S. Role of human DNA polymerase K as an extender in translesion synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:16000-16005.
111. Wolfle WT, Washington MT, Prakash L, Prakash S. Human DNA polymerase K uses template-primer misalignment as a novel means for extending mispaired termini and for generating single-base deletions. Genes Dev 2003; 17:2191-2199.
112. Ohmori H, Ohashi E, Ogi T. Mammalian Pol κ: regulation of its expression and lesion substrates. Adv Protein Chem 2004; 69:265-278.
113. Shen X, Sayer JM, Kroth H, et al. Efficiency and accuracy of SOS-induced DNA polymerases replicating benzo[a]pyrene7,8-diol 9,10-epoxide A and G adducts. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:5265-5274.
114. Ogi T, Shinkai Y, Tanaka K, Ohmori H. Polk protects mammalian cells against the lethal and mutagenic effects of benzo[a]pyrene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:15548-15553.
115. Ohashi E, Ogi T, Kusumoto R, Iwai S, Masutani C, Hanaoka F, et al. Error-prone bypass of certain DNA lesions by the human DNA polymerase. Genes Dev 2000; 14:1589-1594.
116. Zhang Y, Yuan F, Wu X, et al. Error-free and error-prone lesion bypass by human DNA polymerase K in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:4138-4146.
117. Zhang Y, Yuan F, Xin H, et al. Human DNA polymerase K synthesizes DNA with extraordinarily low fidelity. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:4147-4156.
118. Ogi T, Mimura J, Hikida M, Fujimoto H, Fujii-Kuriyama Y, Ohmori H. Expression of human and mouse genes encoding polk: testis-specific developmental regulation and AhR-dependent inducible transcription. Genes Cells 2001; 6:943-953.
119. Kannouche P, Broughton BC, Volker M, Hanaoka F, Mullenders LH, Lehmann AR. Domain structure, localization, and function of DNA polymerase η, defective in xeroderma pigmentosum variant cells. Genes Dev 2001; 15:158-172.
120. Kannouche P, Fernandez de Henestrosa AR, Coull B, et al. Localization of DNA polymerases η and l to the replication machinery is tightly co-ordinated in human cells. EMBO J 2002; 21:6246-6256.
121. Bi X, Slater DM, Ohmori H, Vaziri C. DNA polymerase K is specifically required for recovery from the benzo[a]pyrene-dihydrodiol epoxide (BPDE)-induced S-phase checkpoint. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:22343-22355.
122. Kannouche PL, Wing J, Lehmann AR. Interaction of human DNA polymerase η with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 2004; 14:491-500.
123. Guo C, Tang TS, Bienko M, et al. Ubiquitin-binding motifs in REV1 protein are required for its role in the tolerance of DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:8892-8900.
124. Watanabe K, Tateishi S, Kawasuji M, Tsurimoto T, Inoue H, Yamaizumi M. Rad18 guides polh to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination. EMBO J 2004; 23:3886-3896.
125. Bi X, Barkley LR, Slater DM, et al. Rad18 regulates DNA polymerase κ and is required for recovery from S-phase check-point-mediated arrest. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:3527-3540.
126. Garg P, Burgers PM. Ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen activates translesion DNA polymerases η and REV1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:18361-18366.
127. Haracska L, Unk I, Johnson RE, et al. Stimulation of DNA synthesis activity of human DNA polymerase K by PCNA. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:784-791.
128. Haracska L, Unk I, Prakash L, Prakash S. Ubiquitylation of yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen and its implications for translesion DNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:6477-6482.
129. Acharya N, Brahma A, Haracska L, Prakash L, Prakash S. Mutations in the ubiquitin binding UBZ motif of DNA polymerase η do not impair its function in translesion synthesis during replication. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:7266-7272.
130. Hishida T, Ohya T, Kubota Y, Kamada Y, Shinagawa H. Functional and physical interaction of yeast Mgs1 with PCNA: impact on RAD6-depmdmt DNA damage tolerance. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:5509-5517.
131. Hishida T, Iwasaki H, Ohno T, Morishita T, Shinagawa H. A yeast gene, MGS1, encoding a DNA-dependent AAA(+) ATPase is required to maintain genome stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:8283-8289.
132. Hishida T, Ohno T, Iwasaki H, Shinagawa H. Saccharomyces cerevisiae MGS1 is essential in strains deficient in the RAD6-dependent DNA damage tolerance pathway. EMBO J 2002; 21:2019-2029.
133. Kai M, Furuya K, Paderi F, Carr AM, Wang TS. Rad3-dependent phosphorylation of the checkpoint clamp regulates repair-path-way choice. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9:691-697.
134. Hirano Y, Sugimoto K. ATR homolog Mec1 controls association of DNA polymerase ζ-Rev1 complex with regions near a double-strand break. Curr Biol 2006; 16:586-590.
135. Sabbioneda S, Minesinger BK, Giannattasio M, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M, Jinks-Robertson S. The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp physically interacts with polz and is partially required for spontaneous polζ-dependent mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:38657-38665.
136. Blastyak A, Pinter L, Unk I, Prakash L, Prakash S, Haracska L. Yeast Rad5 protein required for postreplication repair has a DNA helicase activity specific for replication fork regression. Mol Cell 2007; 28:167-175.
137. Cobb JA, Bjergbaek L. RecQ helicases: lessons from model organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:4106-4114.
138. Branzei D, Foiani M. Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007; 6:994-1003.
139. Klein HL. A SUMOry of DNA replication: synthesis, damage, and repair. Cell 2006; 127:455-457.
140. Xiao W, Lin SL, Broomfield S, Chow BL, Wei YF. The products of the yeast MMS2 and two human homologs QiMMS2 and CROC-1) define a structurally and functionally conserved Ubc-like protein family. Nucleic Acids Res 1998; 26:3908-3914.
141. Oh CE, McMahon R, Benzer S, Tanouye MA. bendless, a Drosophila gene affecting neuronal connectivity, encodes a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme homolog. J Neurosci 1994; 14:3166-3179.
142. Unk I, Hajdu I, Fatyol K, et al. Human SHPRH is a ubiquitin ligase for Mms2-Ubc13-dependent polyubiquitylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:18107-18112.
143. Motegi A, Sood R, Moinova H, Markowitz SD, Liu PP, Myung K. Human SHPRH suppresses genomic instability through proliferating cell nuclear antigen polyubiquitination. J Cell Biol 2006; 175:703-708.
144. Pastushok L, Xiao W. DNA postreplication repair modulated by ubiquitination and sumoylation. Adv Protein Chem 2004; 69:279-306.
145. Kunz BA, Xiao W. DNA damage tolerance in plants via translesion synthesis. Genes, Genomes Genomics 2007; 1:89-99.
146. Ma L, Broomfield S, Lavery C, Lin SL, Xiao W, Bacchetti S. Up-regulation of CIR1/CROC1 expression upon cell immortalization and in tumor-derived human cell lines. Oncogene 1998; 17:1321-1326.
147. Andersen PL, Zhou H, Pastushok L, et al. Distinct regulation of Ubc13 functions by the two ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme variants Mms2 and Uev1 A. J. Cell Biol 2005; 170:745-755.
148. Lawrence CW, Hinkle DC. DNA polymerase ζ and the control of DNA damage induced mutagenesis in eukaryotes. Cancer Surv 1996; 28:21-31.
149. Tissier A, Kannouche P, Reck MP, Lehmann AR, Fuchs RP, Cordonnier A. Co-localization in replication foci and interaction of human Y-family members, DNA polymerase pol η and REV1 protein. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004; 3:1503-1514.
150. O-Wang J, Kawamura K, Tada Y, et al. DNA polymerase κ, implicated in spontaneous and DNA damage-induced mutagenesis, is overexpressed in lung cancer. Cancer Res 2001; 61:5366-5369.
151. Pan Q, Fang Y, Xu Y, Zhang K, Hu X. Down-regulation of DNA polymerases κ, η, t, and ζ in human lung, stomach, and colorectal cancers. Cancer Lett 2005; 217:139-147.