Opposing effects of ubiquitin conjugation and SUMO modification of PCNA on replicational bypass of DNA lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 4267-4274

  Haracska, Lajos ^a,b   Torres Ramos, Carlos A ^a,c   Johnson, Robert E ^a   Prakash, Satya ^a   Prakash, Louise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^c Universidad Central del Caribe School of Medicine   (Puerto Rico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGININE; CYCLINE; DNA; LYSINE; SUMO PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE ETA; DNA POLYMERASE ZETA; FUNGAL DNA; RAD52 PROTEIN; RAD52 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; RAD6 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SUMO 1 PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN CONJUGATING ENZYME;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CONJUGATION; DNA DAMAGE; GENE MUTATION; GENE REPLICATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITINATION; YEAST CELL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; FUNGAL GENE; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENES, FUNGAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTATION; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; RAD52 DNA REPAIR AND RECOMBINATION PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SUMO-1 PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYMES; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 2942529467     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.10.4267-4274.2004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Amin, N. S., and C. Holm. 1996. In vivo analysis reveals that the interdomain region of the yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen is important for DNA replication and DNA repair. Genetics 144:479-493.
2. Armstrong, J. D., D. N. Chadee, and B. A. Kunz. 1994. Roles of the yeast RAD18 and KAD52 DNA repair genes in UV mutagenesis. Mutat. Res. 315:281-293.
3. Ayyagari, R., K. J. Impellizzeri, B. L. Yoder, S. L. Gary, and P. M. J. Burgers. 1995. A mutational analysis of the yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen indicates distinct roles in DNA replication and repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15: 4420-4429.
4. Bailly, V., J. Lamb, P. Sung, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1994. Specific complex formation between yeast RAD6 and RAD18 proteins: a potential mechanism for targeting RAD6 ubiquitin-conjugating activity to DNA damage sites. Genes Dev. 8:811-820.
5. Bailly, V., S. Lauder, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1997. Yeast DNA repair proteins Rad6 and Rad18 form a heterodimer that has ubiquitin conjugating, DNA binding, and ATP hydrolytic activities. J. Biol. Chem. 272:23360-23365.
6. Bambara, R. A., R. S. Murante, and L. A. Henricksen. 1997. Enzymes and reactions at the eukaryotic DNA replication fork. J. Biol. Chem. 272:4647-4650.
7. Bauer, G. A., and P. M. J. Burgers. 1990. Molecular cloning, structure and expression of the yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:261-265.
8. Cassier-Chauvat, C., and F. Fabre. 1991. A similar defect in UV-induced mutagenesis conferred by the rad6 and rad18 mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 254:247-253.
9. Haraeska, L., R. E. Johnson, I. Unk, B. Phillips, J. Hurwitz, L. Prakash, and S. Prakash. 2001. Physical and functional interactions of human DNA polymerase η with PCNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:7199-7206.
10. Haracska, L., R. E. Johnson, I. Unk, B. B. Phillips, J. Hurwitz, L. Prakash, and S. Prakash. 2001. Targeting of human DNA polymerase ι to the replication machinery via interaction with PCNA. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 98:14256-14261.
11. Haracska, L., C. M. Kondratick, I. Unk, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2001. Interaction with PCNA is essential for yeast DNA polymerase η function. Mol. Cell 8:407-415.
12. Haracska, L., I. Unk, K. E. Johnson, E. Johansson, P. M. J. Burgers, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2001. Roles of yeast DNA polymerases δ and ζ and of Rev1 in the bypass of abasic sites. Genes Dev. 15:945-954.
13. Haracska, L., I. Unk, R. E. Johnson, B. B. Phillips, J. Hurwitz, L. Prakash, and S. Prakash. 2002. Stimulation of DNA synthesis activity of human DNA polymerase κ by PCNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:784-791.
14. Higgins, N. P., K. Kato, and B. Strauss. 1976. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 101:417-425.
15. Hoege, C., B. Pfander, G.-L. Moldovan, G. Pyrowolakis, and S. Jentsch. 2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419:135-141.
16. Hofmann, R. M., and C. M. Pickart. 1999. Noncanonical MMS2-encoded ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme functions in assembly of novel polyubiquitin chains for DNA repair. Cell 96:645-653.
17. Johnson, R. E., L. Haracska, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2001. Role of DNA polymerase η in the bypass of a (6-4) TT photoproduct. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:3558-3563.
18. Johnson, R. E., S. T. Henderson, T. D. Petes, S. Prakash, M. Bankmann, and L. Prakash. 1992. Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD5-encoded DNA repair protein contains DNA helicase and zinc-binding sequence motifs and affects the stability of simple repetitive sequences in the genome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:3807-3818.
19. Johnson, R. E., S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1999. Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase, Polη. Science 283:1001-1004.
20. Johnson, R. E., M. T. Washington, L. Haracska, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2000. Eukaryotic polymerases τ and ζ act sequentially to bypass DNA lesions. Nature 406:1015-1019.
21. Johnson, R. E., M. T. Washington, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2000. Fidelity of human DNA polymerase η. J. Biol. Chem. 275:7447-7450.
22. Johnson, R. E., S.-L. Yu, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2003. Yeast DNA polymerase zeta (ζ) is essential for error-free replication past thymine glycol. Genes Dev. 17:77-87.
23. Kelman, Z., and J. Hurwitz. 1998. Protein-PCNA interactions: a DNA-scanning mechanism? Trends Biol. Sci. 23:236-238.
24. Krejci, L., S. Van Komen, Y. Li, J. Villemain, M. S. Reddy, H. Klein, T. Ellenberger, and P. Sung. 2003. DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 423:305-309.
25. Lawrence, C. W. 1982. Mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv. Genetics 21:173-254.
26. Murakami, Y., and J. Hurwitz. 1993. Functional interactions between SV40 T antigen and other replication proteins at the replication fork. J. Biol. Chem. 268:11008-11017.
27. Nelson, J. R., C. W. Lawrence, and D. C. Hinkle. 1996. Thymine-thymine dimer bypass by yeast DNA polymerase ζ. Science 272:1646-1649.
28. Prakash, L. 1981. Characterization of postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and effects of rad5, rad18, rev3 and rad52 mutations. Mol. Gen. Genet. 184:471-478.
29. Prakash, S., and L. Prakash. 2002. Translesion DNA synthesis in eukaryotes: a one- or two-polymerase affair. Genes Dev. 16:1872-1883.
30. Prakash, S., P. Sung, and L., Prakash. 1993. DNA repair genes and proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Genet. 27:33-70.
31. Schiestl, R. H., S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1990. The SRS2 suppressor of rad6 mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae acts by channeling DNA lesions into the RAD52 DNA repair pathway. Genetics 124:817-831.
32. Stary, A., P. Kannouche, A. R. Lehmann, and A. Sarasin. 2003. Role of DNA polymerase η in the UV mutation spectrum in human cells. J. Biol. Chem. 278:18767-18775.
33. Stelter, P., and H. D. Ulrich. 2003. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425:188-191.
34. Torres-Ramos, C., S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2002. Requirement of RAD5 and MMS2 for post replication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:2419-2426.
35. Torres-Ramos, C. A., B. L. Yoder, P. M. J. Burgers, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1996. Requirement of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in RAD6-dependent postreplicational DNA repair. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 9676-9681.
36. Ulrich, H. D., and S. Jentsch. 2000. Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair. EMBO J. 19:3388-3397.
37. Veaute, X., J. Jeusset, C. Soustelle, S. C. Kowalczykowski, E. Le Cam, and F. Fabre. 2003. The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 423:309-312.
38. Waga, S., and B. Stillman. 1994. Anatomy of a DNA replication fork revealed by reconstitution of SV40 DNA replication in vitro. Nature 369:207-212.
39. Washington, M. T., R. E. Johnson, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2000. Accuracy of thymine-thymine dimer bypass by Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase η. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97:3094-3099.
40. Washington, M. T., L. Prakash, and S. Prakash. 2003. Mechanism of nucleotide incorporation opposite a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase η. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 100:12093-12098.
41. Yu, S.-L., R. E. Johnson, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2001. Requirement of DNA polymerase η for error-free bypass of UV-induced CC and TC photoproducts. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:185-188.