Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 89-100

  Dejak, Beata ^a   Mlotkowski, Andrzej ^b   Romanowicz, Maciej ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF LODZ   (Poland)

^b LODZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MASTICATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BITE FORCE; CERAMICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; INLAYS; MOLAR; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 34547612824     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60042-0     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Cavel W., Kelsey W., and Blankenau R. An in vivo study of cuspal fracture. J Prosthet Dent 53 (1985) 38-42
2. Eakle W., Maxwell E., and Braly B. Fractures of posterior teeth in adults. J Am Dent Assoc 112 (1986) 215-218
3. Blaser P., Lund M., Cochran M., and Potter R. Effect of designs of Class II preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture. Oper Dent 8 (1983) 6-10
4. Lin C., Chang C., Wang C., Ko C., and Lee H. Numerical investigation of the factors affecting interfacial stresses in an MOD restored tooth by auto-meshed finite element method. J Oral Rehabil 28 (2001) 517-525
5. Goel V., Khera S., Gurusami S., and Chen R. Effect of cavity depth on stresses in a restored tooth. J Prosthet Dent 67 (1992) 174-183
6. Reich S., Wichmann M., Rinne H., and Shortall A. Clinical performance of large, all-ceramic CAD/CAM-generated restorations after three years: a pilot study. J Am Dent Assoc 135 (2004) 605-612
7. Meyer Jr. A., Cardoso L., Araujo E., and Baratieri L. Ceramic inlays and onlays: clinical procedures for predictable results. J Esthet Restor Dent 15 (2003) 338-351
8. Etemadi S., Smales R., Drummond P., and Goodhart J. Assessment of tooth preparation designs for posterior resin-bonded porcelain restorations. J Oral Rehabil 26 (1999) 691-697
9. Cattell M., Clarke R., and Lynch E. The biaxial flexural strength and reliability of four dental ceramics- Part II. J Dent 25 (1997) 409-414
10. Holand W., Schweiger M., Frank M., and Rheinberger V. A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress 2 and the IPS Empress glass-ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 53 (2000) 297-303
11. Hikita K., Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Ikeda T., Van Landuyt K., Maida T., et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 23 (2007) 71-80
12. Burke F., Fleming G., Nathanson D., and Marquis P. Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent 4 (2002) 7-22
13. Denehy G., and Torney D. Internal enamel reinforcement through micromechanical bonding. J Prosthet Dent 36 (1976) 171-175
14. Bremer B., and Geurtsen W. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites. Am J Dent 14 (2001) 216-220
15. Mehl A., Kunzelmann K., Folwaczny M., and Hickel R. Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities. J Adhes Dent 6 (2004) 239-245
16. St-Georges A., Sturdevant J., Swift Jr. E., and Thompson J. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003) 551-557
17. Dalpino P., Francischone C., Ishikiriama A., and Franco E. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Am J Dent 15 (2002) 389-394
18. Santos M., and Bezerra R. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques. J Can Dent Assoc 71 (2005) 585
19. Kramer N., and Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 262-271
20. Hayashi M., Tsuchitani Y., Kawamura Y., Miura M., Takeshige F., and Ebisu S. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 25 (2000) 473-481
21. Otto T., and De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 15 (2002) 122-128
22. Shillingburg H. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. (1997), Quintessence, Chicago 171-179
23. Fisher D., Caputo A., Shillingburg H., and Duncanson Jr. M. Photoelastic analysis of inlay and onlay preparations. J Prosthet Dent 33 (1975) 47-53
24. Magne P., and Belser U. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 23 (2003) 543-555
25. Mondelli J., Steagall L., Ishikiriama A., de Lima Navarro M., and Soares F. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent 43 (1980) 419-422
26. Stappert C., Guess P., Gerds T., and Strub J. All-ceramic partial coverage premolar restorations. Cavity preparation design, reliability and fracture resistance after fatigue. Am J Dent 18 (2005) 275-280
27. Arnelund C., Johansson A., Ericson M., Hager P., and Fyrberg K. Five-year evaluation of two resin-retained ceramic systems: a retrospective study in a general practice setting. Int J Prosthodont 17 (2004) 302-306
28. Boresi A., and Schmidt R. Advanced mechanics of materials. 6th ed. (2003), John Wiley & Sons, New York 113-122
29. Yu M. Advances in strength theories for materials under complex stress state in the 20th Century. Appl Mech Rev 55 (2002) 169-218
30. Habelitz S., Marshall S., Marshall Jr. G., and Balooch M. Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometre scale. Arch Oral Biol 46 (2001) 173-183
31. Giannini M., Soares J., and de Carvalho R. Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structures. Dent Mater 20 (2004) 322-329
32. Tsai S., and Wu E. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Composite Mat 5 (1971) 58-80
33. Keaveny T., Wachtel E., Zadesky S., and Arramon Y. Application of the Tsai-Wu quadratic multiaxial failure criterion to bovine trabecular bone. J Biomech Eng 121 (1999) 99-107
34. Natali A., and Pavan P. A comparative analysis based on different strength criteria for evaluation of risk factor for dental implants. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 5 (2002) 127-133
35. Tsai S., and Hahn H. Introduction to composite materials (1980), Technomic Publishing Co, Westport 276-281 302-6.
36. Zienkiewicz O., and Taylor R. The finite element method. 5th ed. Volume 1 (2000), Elsevier, St. Louis 87-110
37. Kraus B., Jordan R., and Abrams L. Dental anatomy and occlusion (1969), Williams and Wilkins Co, Baltimore 223-262 197
38. Ash Jr. M. Wheeler's atlas of tooth form. 5th ed. (1984), Elsevier, Philadelphia 26 68.
39. Banks R. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 63 (1990) 619-626
40. Deines D. The etched porcelain inlay/onlay restoration. Mo Dent J. 66 (1986) 26-28
41. Provenza D., and Seitel W. Oral histology: inheritance and development. 2nd ed. (1986), Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins, Philadelphia 243-263 342-65.
42. Arikawa H. Dynamic shear modulus in torsion of human dentin and enamel. Dent Mater J 8 (1989) 223-235
43. Craig R., Peyton F., and Johnson D. Compressive properties of enamel, dental cements and gold. J Dent Res 40 (1961) 936-940
44. Smith D., and Cooper W. The determination of shear strength. A method using a micro-punch apparatus. Brit Dent J 130 (1971) 333-337
45. Craig R., and Peyton F. Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin. J Dent Res 37 (1958) 710-718
46. Rees J., and Jacobsen P. Elastic modulus of the periodontal ligament. Biomaterials 18 (1997) 995-999
47. Lettry S., Seedhom B., Berry E., and Cuppone M. Quality assessment of the cortical bone of the human mandible. Bone 32 (2003) 35-44
48. Giesen E., Ding M., Dalstra M., and van Eijden T. Mechanical properties of cancellous bone in human mandibular condyle are anisotropic. J Biomech 34 (2001) 799-803
49. Sano H., Ciucchi B., Matthews W., and Pashley D. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res 73 (1994) 1205-1211
50. Konishi N., Watanabe L., Hilton J., Marshall G., Marshall S., and Staninec M. Dentin shear strength: effect of distance from the pulp. Dent Mater 18 (2002) 516-520
51. Albakry M., Guazzato M., and Swain M. Biaxial flexural strength, elastic moduli, and x-ray diffraction characterization of three pressable all-ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003) 374-380
52. Magne P., Perakis N., Belser U., and Krejci I. Stress distribution of inlay-anchored adhesive fixed partial dentures: a finite element analysis of influence of restorative materials and abutment preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 87 (2002) 516-527
53. Dejak B., Mlotkowski A., and Romanowicz M. Finite element analysis of stresses in molars during clenching and mastication. J Prosthet Dent 90 (2003) 591-597
54. Gibbs C., Lunden H., Mahan P., and Fujimoto J. Chewing movements in relation to border movements at the first molar. J Prosthet Dent 46 (1981) 308-322
55. Agrawal K., Lucas P., Printz J., and Bruce I. Mechanical properties of foods responsible for resisting food breakdown in the human mouth. Arch Oral Biol 42 (1997) 1-9
56. Gibbs C., Mahan P., Lundeen H., Brehnan K., Walsh E., and Holbrook W. Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent 46 (1981) 443-449
57. Suit S., Gibbs C., and Benz S. Study of gliding tooth contact during mastication. J Periodontol 47 (1976) 331-334
58. Katona T. A mathematical analysis of the role of friction in occlusal trauma. J Prosthet Dent 86 (2001) 636-643
59. Abo-Hamar S., Hiller K., Jung H., Federlin M., Friedl K., and Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig 9 (2005) 161-167