Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 389-394

  Dalpino, Paulo H P ^b   Francischone, Carlos E ^a,b   Ishikiriama, Aquira ^b   Franco, Eduardo B ^b  

^a University of São Paulo ^*  (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; DENTAL POLYGLASS; FILTEK Z250; GLASS IONOMER; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; RESIN; SILICATE CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZATION; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MATERIALS TESTING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SILICATE CEMENT; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 0038656696     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Vale W A. Cavity preparation. Irish Dent Rev 1956; 2: 33-41.
2. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, et al. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:419-22.
3. Larson TD, Douglas, WH, Geistfeld, RE. Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth. Oper Dent 1981;6:2-5.
4. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Watts DC. The effect of cavity wall taper on fracture resistance of teeth restored with resin composite inlays. Oper Dent 1993;18:230-236.
5. Brunton PA, Cattel P, Burke FJT, et al. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:167-171.
6. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:21E-26E.
7. Galan Jr. J. Contribution to the study of the main dimensions of human permanent teeth from white Brazilians of both genders. Rev Bras Odont 1970;27:145-148.
8. Wieczkowski Jr. G, Joynt RB, Klockowski R, et al. Effects of incremental versus bulk fill technique on resistance to cuspal fracture of teeth restored with posterior composites. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:283-7.
9. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Watts DC. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resins: The effect of alternative luting procedures. Quintessence Int 1994;25:269-275.
10. Jagadish S, Yogesh BG. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations. Oper Dent 1990;15:42-47.
11. Eakle WS. Increased fracture resistance of teeth: Comparison of five bonded composite resin systems. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 17-20.
12. Cavel WT, Kelsey WP, Blankenau RJ. An in vivo study of cuspal fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:38-42.
13. Hood JAA. Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co, Minneapolis, 1985; 443-450.
14. Johnson EW, Castaldi CR, Gav DJ et al. Stress pattern variations in operatively prepared human teeth, studied by three-dimensional photoelasticity. J Dent Res 1968;47:548-58.
15. Morin D, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Cusp reinforcement by the acid-etch technique. J Dent Res 1984;63:1075-1078.
16. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989;68:1540-1544.
17. Lopes LM, Leitao JGM, Douglas WH. Effect of a new resin inlay/onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement. Quintessence Int 1991;22: 641-645.
18. Reel DC, Mitchell MS. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:177-180.
19. Vanherle G, Lambrechts P, Braem M. Overview of the clinical requirements for posterior composites. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co, Minneapolis, 1985;21-40.
20. Swift EJ Jr., Perdigao J, Heymamm H 0. Bonding to enamel and dentin: A brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int 1995;26:95-110.
21. Joynt RB, Wieczkowowski G, Klockowski R, et al. Effects of composite restorations on resistance to cuspal fracture in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:431-5.
22. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. The effect of postcuring on quantity of remaining double bonds, mechanical properties, and in vitro wear of two resin composites. J Dent 2000;28:447-52.
23. Gracis SE, Nicholls JL, Chalupnik JD, et al. Shock-absorbing behavior of five restorative materials used on implants. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:282-291.
24. Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, Stephens, NH. Effects of secondary curing on indirect posterior composite resins. Oper Dent 1994;19:217-220.
25. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J. Proximal adaptation and marginal seal of posterior composite restorations with direct and indirect placement techniques. Quintessence Int 1990;21:663-669.
26. Binns D. The chemical and physical properties of dental porcelain. In: McLean J W. Dental Ceramics. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Ceramics. Quintessence Publishing Co., Chicago, 1983;41-82.
27. Barghi N, Gay M, Taubert T. Bonding composite resin to low fusing porcelain: Effects of surface treatments. J Dent Res 1995;74:158 (Abstr. 1175).
28. Jensen ME, Redford GA, Williams BT, et al. Posterior etched porcelain restorations: An in vitro study. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1987;8:615-622.
29. Goel VK, Khera SC, Singh K. Clinical implications of the response of enamel and dentin to masticatory loads. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:446-54.