Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 239-245

  Mehl, Albert ^a,b   Kunzelmann, Karl Heinz ^a   Folwaczny, Matthias ^a   Nickel, Reinhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Department of Restorative Dentistry ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Ceramic; Composite; Fracture resistance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; IN VITRO STUDY; MASTICATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RIGIDITY; SIMULATION; STANDARD; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TECHNOLOGY; THERMODYNAMICS; THERMOSTABILITY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BICUSPID; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING;

EID: 7044241186     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. Am J Dent 1997;10:237-241.
2. Behle CA. Conservative direct and indirect resin posterior restorative alternatives for cracked dentitions. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:405-413.
3. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Watts DC. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resins: The effect of alternative luting procedures. Quintess Inter 1994;25:269-275.
4. Cotert HS, Sen BH, Balkan M. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:374-378.
5. Dietschi D, Moor L. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:41-56.
6. Haller B, Posorsky A, Klaiber B. Höckerstabilisierung mit zahnfarbenen Adhäsivinlays in vitro. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1997;52:515-519.
7. Haller B, Thull R, Klaiber B, Schmitz A. Höckerstabilisierung durch Adhäsivinlays in MOD-Kavitaten. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1990;45:660-663.
8. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
9. Hofmann N, Haller B, Klaiber B, Münchenberg K. Randqualität gesinterter und gepreßter Keramikinlays nach Belastung im Kausimulator. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993;48:713-717.
10. Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years - a clinical study. J Dent 1999;27:325-331.
11. Krämer N, Popp S, Sindel J, Frankenberger R. Einfluß der Vorbehandlung von Kompositinlays auf die Verbundfestigkeit. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996;51:598-602.
12. Krejci I, Güntert A, Lutz F. Scanning electron microscopic and clinical examination of composite resin inlays/onlays up to 12 months in situ. Quintessence Int 1994;25:403-409.
13. Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int 1992;23:181-186.
14. Kunzelmann K-H, Buschhorn S, Mehl A, Hickel R. Bond strength of conventional and ultrasonically activated bonding composite resins [abstract 648]. J Dent Res 1994;73:182.
15. Lang H, Schwan R, Nolden R. Die Verformung gefüllter Zähne. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994;49:812-818.
16. Lang H, Schwan R, Müllejans R, Raab WH-M. Der Verbund im Kavitäteninneren und die Stabilität des Füllungsrandes. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2000;55:751-755.
17. Lopes LMP, Leitao JGM, Douglas WH. Effect of a new resin inlay/onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement. Quintessence Int 1991;22:641.
18. Manhart J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays. Am J Dent 2001;14:95-99.
19. Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Oper Dent 2001;26:357-366.
20. Mehl A, Buschhorn S, Kunzelmann K-H, Hickel R. Bond strength between ceramic inlays and bonding composite resins [abstract 645]. J Dent Res 1994;73:182.
21. Mehl A, Hickel R. Current State of Development and Perspectives of Machine-based Production Methods for Dental Restorations. Int J Comput Dent 1999;1:9-35.
22. Mörmann W, Krejci I. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int 1992;23:109-115.
23. Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:122-128.
24. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Geurtsen W. Sind Keramik-Inlays und -Veneers wissenschaftlich anerkannt? Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994;49:197-209.
25. Schnabel C, Däs P, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Two-body wear simulation in a computer controlled artificial mouth [abstract 1540]. J Dent Res 1994;73:294.
26. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 2001;32:199-205.