All-ceramic partial coverage premolar restorations. Cavity preparation design, reliability and fracture resistance after fatigue

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 275-280

  Stappert, Christian F J ^a,b   Guess, Petra C ^a   Gerds, Thomas ^a   Strub, Jörg R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC;

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; BICUSPID; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTAL VENEERS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 26944435573     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Rosenblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 297-307.
2. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 619-626.
3. Ottl P, Lauer HC. Preparation technique for metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations. Quintessenz 1996; 47: 623-640 (In German).
4. Ban S, Anusavice KJ. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1791-1799.
5. Kelly JR. Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 103-110.
6. Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years. A clinical study. J Dent 1999; 27: 325-331.
7. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Kramer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: Clinical behavior. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 459-465.
8. Fradeani M, Aquilano A, Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 346-353.
9. El-Mowafy O, Brochu J. Longevity and clinical performance of IPS-Empress ceramic restorations - A literature review. J Can Dent Assoc 2002; 68: 233-237.
10. Lehener C, Studer S, Brodbeck U, Schärer P. Six-year clinical results of leucite- reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays. Acta Med Dent Helv 1998; 3: 137-146.
11. Milleding P, Ortengren U, Karlsson S. Ceramic inlay systems: Some clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 571-580.
12. Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, Hiller KA. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: Results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig 1998; 2: 161-167.
13. Studer S, Lehner C, Brodbeck U, Scharer P. Short-term results of IPS-Empress inlays and onlays. J Prosthodont 1996; 5: 277-287.
14. Kern M, Strub JR, Lu XY. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 372-378.
15. Sparrius O, Grossman ES. Marginal leakage of composite resin restorations in combination with dentinal and enamel bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:678-684.
16. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann JL. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 425-430.
17. Eakle WS, Braly BV. Fracture resistance of human teeth with mesial-occlusal-distal cavities prepared with sharp and round internal line forms. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 646-649.
18. Burke FJ. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns: The effect of increased tooth preparation. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 115-121.
19. Brunton PA, Cattell P, Burke FJT, Wilson NH. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 167-171.
20. St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift EJ Jr, Thompson JY. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 551-557.
21. Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal post and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 11-16.
22. Rosentritt M, Plein T, Kolbeck C, Handel G. In vitro fracture force and marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns fixed on natural and artifical teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 387-391.
23. Scherrer SS, De Rijk WG. The effect of crown length on the fracture resistance of posterior porcelain and glass-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5: 550-557.
24. Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC, Lee RB. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14: 109-114.
25. Castellani D, Baccetti T, Giovannoni A, Bernardini UD. Resistance to fracture of metal ceramic and all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 149-154.
26. Pospiech P, Rammelsberg P, Gernet W, Geymeier D. Comparative investigation on the flexural bending strength of Mirage-, Dicor- and metal-ceramic crowns. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1992; 47: 630-633 (In German).
27. Joynt RB, Wieczkowski G Jr, Klockowski R, Davis EL. Effects of composite restorations on resistance to cuspal fracture in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 431-435.
28. Jackson RD. Indirect resin inlay and onlay restorations: A comprehensive clinical overview. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999; 11: 891-900.
29. Fradeani M, Barducci G. Versatility of IPS Empress restorations. Part II: Veneers, inlays, and onlays. J Esthet Dent 1996; 8: 170-176.
30. Abu-Hassan MI, Abu-Hammad OA, Harrison A. Stress distribution associated with loaded ceramic onlay restorations with different designs of marginal preparation. An FEA study. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27:294-298.
31. Pröbster L. Are all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures scientifically recognized? Collective statement of DGZMK and DGZPW. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2001; 56: 575-576 (In German).
32. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer JM, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 1990; 21: 823-831.
33. Bremer BD, Geurtsen W. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 216-220.
34. Hahn P, Löst C. Experimental strength evaluation method of brittle restoration materials. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993; 48: 484-487 (In German).
35. Schwickerath H. Fatigue strength of dental ceramics. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1986; 46: 264-266 (In German).
36. Marx R. Recent ceramic materials for aesthetic restorations-reinforcement and fracture toughness. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993; 48: 229-236 (In German).
37. Lawn BR, Deng Y, Thompson VP. Use of contact testing in the characterization and design of all-ceramic crownlike layer structures: A review. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 495-510 (In German).
38. Marx R, Fischer H, Weber M, Jungwirth F. Crack parameters and Weibull modulus: subcritical crack propagation and fatigue strength of all-ceramic materials. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2001;56:90-98 (In German).
39. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990; 100: 953-960 (In German).
40. Anderson DJ. Measurement of stress in mastication. J Dent Res 1956; 35: 664-670.
41. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. A two-body frictional wear test. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1546-1553.
42. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 269-274.
43. Krejci D, Albert P, Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standarization on wear. J Dent Res 1999; 78:713-719.
44. Yoshinari M, Derand T. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 329-338.
45. Strub JR, Beschnidt SM. Fracture strength of 5 different all-ceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 602-609.
46. Geurtsen W, Jupitz G. Fracture strength of human premolars taking into account morphological factors. ZWR 1991; 100: 98-99 (In German).
47. Cötert HS, Sen BH, Balkan M. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 374-378.
48. Goel VK, Khera SC, Gurusami S, Chen RC. Effect of cavity depth on stresses in a restored tooth. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 174-183.
49. Lin CL, Chang CH, Ko CC. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 576-585.
50. Geurtsen W. The cracked-tooth syndrome: Clinical features and case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992; 12: 395-405.
51. Dietschi D, Spreaficio R. Adhesive metal free restorations - Current concepts for aesthetic rehabilitations in posterior teeth. Berlin: Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH, 1997; 61-77
52. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 503-509.
53. Körber KH, Ludwig K. Maximal chewing force as mathematical equivalent of dental restorations. Dent Labor 1983; 1: 55-60 (In German).