Porcelain Versus Composite Inlays/Onlays: Effects of Mechanical Loads on Stress Distribution, Adhesion, and Crown Flexure

International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 543-555

  Magne, Pascal ^a,b   Belser, Urs C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b NONE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CERAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; COMPRESSION; DENTIN; DENTITION; ENAMEL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LOADING TEST; STRESS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH EXTRACTION; YOUNG MODULUS;

COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; PLIABILITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0345059014     PISSN: 01987569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Friedman MJ. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure - A clinician's observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19:625-636.
2. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Quintessence Int 1998;29:211-221.
3. Fradeani M. Six-year follow-up with Empress veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:216-225.
4. Magne P, Perroud R, Hodges JS, Belser U. Clinical performance of novel-design porcelain veneers for the recovery of coronal volume and length. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:441-457.
5. Dumfahrt H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II - Clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:9-18.
6. Magne P, Belser U. Bonded Porcelain Restorations in the Anterior Dentition - A Biomimetic Approach. Berlin: Quintessence, 2002.
7. Walls AW, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. Composite laminate veneers: A clinical study. J Oral Rehabil 1988;15:439-454.
8. Rucker LM, Richter W, MacEntee M, Richardson A. Porcelain and resin veneers clinically evaluated: 2-year results. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121:594-596.
9. Lacy AM, Wada C, Du W, Watanabe L. In vitro microleakage at the gingival margin of porcelain and resin veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:7-10.
10. Meijering AC, Roeters FJ, Mulder J, Creugers NH. Patients' satisfaction with different types of veneer restorations. J Dent 1997;25:493-497.
11. Kreulen CM, Creugers NH, Meijering AC. Meta-analysis of anterior veneer restorations in clinical studies. J Dent 1998;26:345-353.
12. Meijering AC, Creugers NH, Roeters FJ, Mulder J. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: A 2.5-year interim evaluation. J Dent 1998;26:563-568.
13. Fuzzi M, Rappelli G. Ceramic inlays: Clinical assessment and survival rate. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:71-79.
14. Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: A 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:122-128.
15. Manhart J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays. Am J Dent 2001;14:95-99.
16. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive Metal-Free Restorations. Berlin: Quintessence, 1997.
17. Douglas WH. Considerations for modeling. Dent Mater 1996;12:203-207.
18. Morin D, Delong R, Douglas WH. Cusp reinforcement by the acid-etch technique. J Dent Res 1984;63:1075-1078.
19. Morin DL, Douglas WH, Cross M, Delong R. Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: Experimental strain measurements. Dent Mater 1988;4:41-48.
20. Morin DL, Cross M, Voller VR, Douglas WH, Delong R. Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: Modeling and analysis. Dent Mater 1988;4:77-84.
21. Assif D, Marshak BL, Pilo R. Cuspal flexure associated with amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:258-262.
22. Cameron CE. The cracked tooth syndrome. J Am Dent Assoc 1964;68:405-411.
23. Cameron CE. The cracked tooth syndrome: Additional findings. J Am Dent Asssoc 1976;93:971-975.
24. Cavel WT, Kelsey WP, Blankenau RJ. An in vivo study of cuspal fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:38-42.
25. McCullock AJ, Smith BG. In vitro studies of cusp reinforcement with adhesive restorative material. Br Dent J 1986;161:450-452.
26. MacPherson LC, Smith BG. Reinforcement of weakened cusps by adhesive restorative materials: An in-vitro study. Br Dent J 1995;178:341-344.
27. Hood JAA. Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds). International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Restorative Materials, St Paul, MN. Amsterdam: Peter Szulc, 1985:443-450.
28. Douglas WH. Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds). International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Restorative Materials, St Paul, MN. Amsterdam: Peter Szulc, 1985:433-441.
29. Dietschi D, Moor L. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:41-56.
30. Bremer BD, Geurtsen W. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2001;14:216-220.
31. Cotert HS, Sen BH, Balkan M. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:374-378.
32. Korioth TWP, Versluis A. Modeling the mechanical behavior of the jaws and their related structures by finite element (FE) analysis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:90-104.
33. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: Dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:111-121.
34. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage? J Dent Res 1996;75:871-878.
35. Anusavice KJ, Hojjatie B. Influence of incisal length of ceramic and loading orientation on stress distribution in ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 1988;67:1371-1375.
36. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, CElis JP, Vanherle G. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 1992;8:310-319.
37. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials, ed 6. St Louis: Mosby, 1980:76.
38. Eldiwany M, Powers JM, George LA. Mechanical properties of direct and post-cured composites. Am J Dent 1993;6:222-224.
39. Watts DC, El Mowafy OM, Grant AA. Temperature-dependence of compressive properties of human dentin. J Dent Res 1987;66:29-32.
40. Gere JM, Timoshenko SP. Analysis of stress and strain. In: Mechanics of Materials, ed 3. Boston: PWS, 1990:378-460.
41. Magne P, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Rationalization of incisor shape: Experimental-numerical analysis. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:345-355.
42. Jantarat J, Panitvisai P, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Comparison of methods for measuring cuspal deformation in teeth. J Dent 2001;29:75-82.
43. Magne M, Belser U. Rationalization of shape and related stress distribution in posterior teeth: A finite element study using nonlinear contact analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:425-433.
44. Misra DN, Bowen RL. Sorption of water by filled-resin composites. J Dent Res 1977;56:603-612.
45. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of posterior resins: Effect of dentin-bonding agent and hygroscopic expansion. Dent Mater 1989;5:122-126.
46. Koike T, Hasegawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Wakumoto S. Effect of water sorption and thermal stress on cavity adaptation of dental composites. Dent Mater 1990;6:178-180.
47. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990;69:36-39.
48. McCabe JF, Rusby S. Dentine bonding - The effect of pre-curing the bonding resin. Br Dent J 1994;176:333-336.
49. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: Direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1999;24:147-155.
50. Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agents: Its effect on the bond strength. Am J Dent 1996;9:115-119.
51. Paul SJ, Schärer P. The dual bonding technique: A modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:536-545.
52. Paul SJ. Effect of a dual application of dentin-bonding agents on shear bond strength of various adhesive luting systems on dentin. In: Adhesive Luting Procedures. Berlin: Quintessence, 1997:89-98.
53. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989;68:1540-1544.
54. Reeh ES, Ross GK. Tooth stiffness with composite veneers: A strain gauge and finite element evaluation. Dent Mater 1994;10:247-252.
55. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989;15:512-516.
56. Magne P, Dietschi D, Holz J. Esthetic restorations for posterior teeth: Practical and clinical considerations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:105-119.
57. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Sakagushi RL. Thermal expansion coefficient of dental composites measured with strain gauges. Dent Mater 1996;12:290-294.
58. Xu HC, Liu WY, Wang T. Measurement of thermal expansion coefficient of human teeth. Aust Dent J 1989;34:530-535.