Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques

Journal of the Canadian Dental Association

Volumn 71, Issue 8, 2005, Pages

  Coelho Santos, Maria Jacinta M ^a,b   Bezerra, Rebeca Barroso ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bicuspid; Composite resins; Dental cavity preparation adverse effects; Dental porcelain

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MAXILLA; SILICON DIOXIDE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH FRACTURES; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 27944473657     PISSN: 14882159     EISSN: 14882159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. Am J Dent 1997, 10(5):237-41.
2. Cotert HS, Sen BH, Balkan M. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations, Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14(4):374-8.
3. Dalpino PH, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A, Franco EB. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic material. Am J Dent 2002; 15(6):389-94.
4. Morin D, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Cusp reinforcement by the acid-etch technique. J Dent Res 1984, 63(8): 1075-84.
5. Mackenzie DF. The reinforcing effect of mesio-occlusodistal acid-etch composite restorations on weakened posterior teeth. Br Dent J 1986; 161(11):410-4.
6. Redford DA, Jensen ME. Etched porcelain resin-bonded posterior restorations: cuspal flexure, strength, microleakage. J Dent Res 1986; 65(Abstr 1573):344.
7. Oliveira FC, Denehy GE, Boyer DB. Fracture resistance of endodontically prepared teeth using various restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 115(1):57-60.
8. Nasedkin JN. Porcelain posterior resin-bonded restorations: current perspectives on esthetic restorative dentistry; Part II. J Can Dent Assoc 1988; 54(7):499-506.
9. de Freitas CR, Miranda ML, Andrade MF, Flores VH, Vaz LG, Guimaraes C. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration on class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer. Quintessence Int 2002; 33(8):589-94.
10. Hurmuzlu F, Kiremitci A, Serper A, Altundasar E, Siso SH. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with ormorcer and packable composite. J Endod 2003; 29(12):838-40.
11. Soares CJ, Martins LR, Pfeifer JM, Giannini M. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite resin and ceramic inlay systems. Quintessence Int 2004; 35(4):281-6.
12. Boyer DB, Roth L. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams. Am J Dent 1994; 7(2):91-4.
13. Bell JG, Smith MC, du Pont JJ. Cuspal failures of MOD restored teeth. Aust Dent J 1982; 27(5):283-7.
14. Vale WA. Cavity preparation. Irish Dent Rev 1956; 33-41.
15. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, de Lima Navarro MF, Soares FB. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43(4):419-22.
16. Christensen GJ. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Tooth-colored posterior restorations, 1997. Oper Dent 1997; 22(4):146-8.
17. Leinfelder KF. Using composite resin as a posterior restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122(4):65-70.
18. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composite resins: the materials and their clinical performance. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126(5):663-4, 667-8, 671-2.
19. Qualtrough AJ, Wilson, NH, Smith GA. Porcelain inlay: a historical view. Oper Dent 1990; 15(2):61-70.
20. Rosenblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128(3):297-307.
21. Peutzfeldt A. Indirect resin and ceramic systems. Oper Dent 2001; (Suppl 6): 153-76.
22. Reel DC, Mitchell RJ. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61(2): 177-80.
23. Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications. Int Dent J 1991; 41(1):25-32.
24. Moscovich H, Creugers NH, De Kanter RJ, Roeters FJ. Loss of sound tooth structure when replacing amalgam restorations by adhesive inlays. Oper Dent 1998; 23(6):327-31.
25. Costa LC, Pegoraro LF, Bonfante G. Influence of different metal restorations bonded with resin on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77(4):365-9.
26. Watts DC, Wilson NH, Burke FJ. Indirect composite preparation width and depth and tooth fracture resistance. Am J Dent 1995; 8(1): 15-9.
27. Jensen ME, Redford DA, Williams BT, Gardner F. Posterior etched-porcelain restorations: an in vitro study. Compendium 1987; 8(8):615-7, 620-2.