Protein disorder prediction: Implications for structural proteomics

Structure

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1453-1459

  Linding, Rune ^a   Jensen, Lars Juhl ^a,b   Diella, Francesca ^c   Bork, Peer ^a,b   Gibson, Toby J ^a   Russell, Robert B ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^b MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

^c GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENOMICS; HIGH TEMPERATURE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEFECT; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 0242458482     PISSN: 09692126     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2003.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ackerman M., Shortle D. Robustness of the long-range structure in denatured staphylococcal nuclease to changes in amino acid sequence. Biochemistry. 41:2002;13791-13797.
2. Andersen C., Palmer A., Brunak S., Rost B. Continuum secondary structure captures protein flexibility. Structure. 10:2002;175-184.
3. Aviles F., Chapman G., Kneale G., Crane-Robinson C., Bradbury E. The conformation of histone H5. Isolation and characterisation of the globular segment. Eur. J. Biochem. 88:1978;363-371.
4. Bates G. Huntingtin aggregation and toxicity in Huntington's disease. Lancet. 361:2003;1642-1644.
5. Battiste J., Pestova T., Hellen C., Wagner G. The eIF1A solution structure reveals a large RNA-binding surface important for scanning function. Mol. Cell. 5:2000;109-119.
6. Brenner S. Target selection for structural genomics. Nat. Struct. Biol. Sppl. 7:2000;967-969.
7. Brooks B., Karplus M. Normal modes for specific motions of macromolecules. application to the hinge-bending mode of lysozyme Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:1985;4995-4999.
8. Cornilescu G., Delaglio F., Bax A. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J. Biomol. NMR. 13:1999;289-302.
9. Dedmon M., Patel C., Young G., Pielak G. FlgM gains structure in living cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;12681-12684.
10. Demarest S., Martinez-Yamout M., Chung J., Chen H., Xu W., Dyson H., Evans R., Wright P. Mutual synergistic folding in recruitment of CBP/p300 by p160 nuclear receptor coactivators. Nature. 415:2002;549-553.
11. Dunker A., Brown C., Lawson J., Iakoucheva L., Obradovic Z. Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry. 41:2002;6573-6582.
12. Dunker, A., Garner, E., Guilliot, S., Romero, P., Albrecht, K., Hart, J., Obradovic, Z., Kissinger, C., and Villafranca, J. (1998). Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: theory, predictions and observations. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 473-484.
13. Dunker A., Lawson J., Brown C., Williams R., Romero P., Oh J., Oldfield C., Campen A., Ratliff C., Hipps K.et al. Intrinsically disordered protein. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 19:2001;26-59.
14. Evans P., Owen D. Endocytosis and vesicle trafficking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:2002;814-821.
15. Garner E., Cannon P., Romero P., Obradovic Z., Dunker A. Predicting disordered regions from amino acid sequence. Common themes despite differing structural characterization. Genome Inform. Ser. Workshop Genome Inform. 9:1998;201-213.
16. Garner E., Romero P., Dunker A., Brown C., Obradovic Z. Predicting binding regions within disordered proteins. Genome Inform. Ser. Workshop Genome Inform. 10:1999;41-50.
17. Gunasekaran K., Tsai C., Kumar S., Zanuy D., Nussinov R. Extended disordered proteins. targeting function with less scaffold Trends Biochem. Sci. 28:2003;81-85.
18. Hegger, R., Kantz, H., and Schreiber, T. (1999). Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: The tisean package. CHAOS 9.
19. Jensen L.J., Gupta R., Blom N., Devos D., Tamames J., Kesmir C., Nielsen H., Stærfeldt H.H., Rapacki K., Workman C.et al. Prediction of human protein function from post-translational modifications and localization features. J. Mol. Biol. 319:2002;1257-1265.
20. Kabsch W., Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure. pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features Biopolymers. 22:1983;2577-2637.
21. Kaplan B., Ratner V., Haas E. alpha-Synuclein. Its biological function and role in neurodegenerative diseases J. Mol. Neurosci. 20:2003;83-92.
22. Klein-Seetharaman J., Oikawa M., Grimshaw S., Wirmer J., Duchardt E., Ueda T., Imoto T., Smith L., Dobson C., Schwalbe H. Long-range interactions within a nonnative protein. Science. 295:2002;1719-1722.
23. Li X., Obradovic Z., Brown C., Garner E., Dunker A. Comparing predictors of disordered protein. Genome Inform. Ser. Workshop Genome Inform. 11:2000;172-184.
24. Linding R., Russell R.B., Neduva V., Gibson T.J. GlobPlot. exploring protein sequences for globularity and disorder Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2003;3701-3708.
25. Liu J., Tan H., Rost B. Loopy proteins appear conserved in evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 322:2002;53-64.
26. Plaxco K., Gross M. Unfolded, yes, but random? Never! Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:2001;659-660.
27. Press, W., Teukolsky, S., Vetterling, W., and Flannery, B. (2002). Numerical Recipes in C++ The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, second edition.
28. Promponas V., Enright A., Tsoka S., Kreil D., Leroy C., Hamodrakas S., Sander C., Ouzounis C. Cast. an iterative algorithm for the complexity analysis of sequence tracts. complexity analysis of sequence tracts Bioinformatics. 16:2000;915-922.
29. Puntervoll P., Linding R., Gemund C., Chabanis-Davidson S., Mattingsdal M., Cameron S., Martin D., Ausiello G., Brannetti B., Costantini A., Ferre F., Maselli V., Via A., Cesareni G., Diella F.et al. ELM server. a new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2003;3625-3630.
30. Radhakrishnan I., Perez-Alvarado G., Parker D., Dyson H., Montminy M., Wright P. Solution structure of the KIX domain of CBP bound to the trans-activation domain of CREB. a model for activator:coactivator interactions Cell. 91:1997;741-752.
31. Romero P., Obradovic Z., Kissinger C.R., Villafranca J., Dunker A. Identifying disordered proteins from amino acid sequences. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks. 1:1997;90-95.
32. Saqi M., Sternberg M. Identification of sequence motifs from a set of proteins with related function. Protein Eng. 7:1994;165-171.
33. Schweers O., Schonbrunn-Hanebeck E., Marx A., Mandelkow E. Structural studies of tau protein and Alzheimer paired helical filaments show no evidence for beta-structure. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1994;24290-24297.
34. Shortle D., Ackerman M. Persistence of native-like topology in a denatured protein in 8 M urea. Science. 293:2001;487-489.
35. Smith D., Radivojac P., Obradovic Z., Dunker A., Zhu G. Improved amino acid flexibility parameters. Protein Sci. 12:2003;1060-1072.
36. Smyth E., Syme C., Blanch E., Hecht L., Vasak M., Barron L. Solution structure of native proteins with irregular folds from Raman optical activity. Biopolymers. 58:2001;138-151.
37. Tompa P. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27:2002;527-533.
38. Uversky V. Natively unfolded proteins. a point where biology waits for physics Protein Sci. 11:2002;739-756.
39. Verkhivker G., Bouzida D., Gehlhaar D., Rejto P., Freer S., Rose P. Simulating disorder-order transitions in molecular recognition of unstructured proteins. where folding meets binding Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:2003;5148-5153.
40. Vihinen M., Torkkila E., Riikonen P. Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions. Proteins. 19:1994;141-149.
41. Wootton J. Non-globular domains in protein sequences. automated segmentation using complexity measures Comput. Chem. 18:1994;269-285.
42. Wright P., Dyson H. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm J. Mol. Biol. 293:1999;321-331.
43. Zoete V., Michielin O., Karplus M. Relation between sequence and structure of HIV-1 protease inhibitor complexes. a model system for the analysis of protein flexibility J. Mol. Biol. 315:2002;21-52.