Addressing the intrinsic disorder bottleneck in structural proteomics

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 444-453

  Oldfield, Christopher J ^a   Ulrich, Eldon L ^a   Cheng, Yugong ^b   Dunker, A Keith ^b,c   Markley, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b Molecular Kinetics Inc   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic disorder; NMR spectroscopy; Protein Structure Initiative; Receiver operating characteristic curve; Structural genomics

Indexed keywords

NITROGEN 15;

ALGORITHM; ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; EUKARYOTE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; CLONING, MOLECULAR; DATABASES, PROTEIN; GENOMICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEINS; PROTEOME;

EID: 17844399803     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20446     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Terwilliger TC, Berendzen J. Exploring structure space: a protein structure initiative. Genetica 1999;106:141-147.
2. Wright PE, Dyson HJ. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: reassessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J Mol Biol 1999;293:321-331.
3. Dunker AK, Obradovic Z. The protein trinity-linking function and disorder. Nat Biotechnol 2001;19:805-806.
4. Uversky VN. Natively unfolded proteins: a point where biology waits for physics. Protein Sci 2002;11:739-756.
5. Vucetic S, Brown CJ, Dunker AK, Obradovic Z. Flavors of protein disorder. Proteins 2003;52:573-584.
6. Dunker AK, Obradovic Z, Romero P, Garner EC, Brown CJ. Intrinsic protein disorder in complete genomes. Genome Inform 2000;11:161-171.
7. Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J Mol Biol 2004;337:635-645.
8. Bracken C, Iakoucheva LM, Romero PR, Dunker AK. Combining prediction, computation and experiment for the characterization of protein disorder. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004;14:570-576.
9. Brenner SE. Target selection for structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7:967-969.
10. Romero P, Obradovic Z, Dunker AK. Folding minimal sequences: the lower bound for sequence complexity of globular proteins. FEBS Lett 1999;462:363-367.
11. Romero P, Obradovic Z, Li X, Garner EC, Brown CJ, Dunker AK. Sequence complexity of disordered protein. Proteins 2001;42:38-48.
12. Oldfield CJ, Van YY, Dunker AK. Prediction of intrinsic protein disorder: applications in structural genomics. In: Kennedy MA, editor. Structural genomics. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2005. Forthcoming.
13. Linding R, Jensen LJ, Diella F, Bork P, Gibson TJ, Russell RB. Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics. Structure 2003;11:1453-1459.
14. Wootton JC. Statistic of local complexity in amino acid sequences and sequence databases. Computers Chem 1993;17:149-163.
15. Oldfield CJ, Cheng Y, Cortese MS, Brown CJ, Uversky V, Dunker AK. Comparing and combining predictors of mostly disordered proteins. Biochemistry 2005;44:1989-2000.
16. Uversky V, Gillespie J, Fink A. Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiological conditions? Proteins 2000;41:415-427.
17. Linding R, Russell RB, Neduva V, Gibson TJ. GlobPlot: exploring protein sequences for globularity and disorder. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3701-3708.
18. Bamber D. The area above ordinal dominance graph and area below receiver operating characteristic graph. J Math Psychol 1975;12:387-415.
19. Dodd LE, Pepe MS. Partial AUC estimation and regression. Biometrics 2003;59:614-623.
20. Zou KH, Hall WJ, Shapiro DE. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests. Stat Med 1997;16:2143-2156.
21. Dunker AK, Brown CJ, Obradovic Z. Identification and functions of usefully disordered proteins. Adv Protein Chem 2002;62:25-49.
22. Balasubramanian S, Schneider T, Gerstein M, Regan L Proteomics of Mycoplasma genitalium: identification and characterization of unannotated arid atypical in a small model genome. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:3075-3082.
23. Minton AP. Implications of macromolecular crowding for protein assembly. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000;10:34-39.
24. Dedmon MM, Patel CN, Young GB, Pielak GJ. FlgM gains structure in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:12681-12684.
25. Saunders AJ, Davis-Searles PR, Allen DL, Pielak GJ, Erie DA. Osmolyte-induced changes in protein conformational equilibria. Biopolymers 2000;53:293-307.
26. Kip1. Biomacromolecules 2001;2:538-540.
27. Dunker AK, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Iakoucheva LM, Obradovic Z. Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry 2002;41:6573-6582.
28. Wissmann R, Baukrowitz T, Kalbacher H, Kalbitzer HR, Ruppersberg JP, Pongs O, Antz C, Fakler B. NMR structure and functional characteristics of the hydrophilic N terminus of the potassium channel beta-subunit Kvbeta1.1. J Biol Chem 1999;274:35521-35525.
29. Brown HG, Hoh JH. Entropic exclusion by neurofilament side-arms: a mechanism for maintaining interfilament spacing. Biochemistry 1997;36:15035-15040.
30. Hoh JH. Functional protein domains from the thermally driven motion of polypeptide chains: a proposal. Proteins 1998;32:223-228.
31. Hershey PE, McWhirter SM, Gross JD, Wagner G, Alber T, Sachs AB. The Cap-binding protein eIF4E promotes folding of a functional domain of yeast translation initiation factor eIF4G1. J Biol Chem 1999;274:21297-21304.
32. Gross JD, Moerke NJ, von der Haar T, Lugovskoy AA, Sachs AB, McCarthy JE, Wagner G. Ribosome loading onto the mRNA cap is driven by conformational coupling between eIF4G and eIF4E. Cell 2003;115:739-750.
33. Lacy ER, Filippov I, Lewis WS, Otieno S, Xiao L, Weiss S, Hengst L, Kriwacki RW. p27 binds cyclin-CDK complexes through a sequential mechanism involving binding-induced protein folding. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004;11:358-364.
34. Fletcher CM, Wagner G. The interaction of eIF4E with 4E-BP1 is an induced fit to a completely disordered protein. Protein Sci 1998;7:1639-1642.
35. Kussie PH, Gorina S, Marechal V, Elenbaas B, Moreau J, Levine AJ, Pavletich NP. Structure of the MDM2 oncoprotein bound to the p53 tumor suppressor transactivation domain. Science 1996;274:948-953.
36. Rustandi RR, Baldisseri DM, Weber DJ. Structure of the negative regulatory domain of p53 bound to S100B. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7:570-574.
37. Brown CJ, Takayama S, Campen AM, Vise P, Marshall TW, Oldfield CJ, Williams CJ, Dunker AK. Evolutionary rate heterogeneity in proteins with long disordered regions. J Mol Evol 2002;55:104-110.
38. Radivojac P, Obradovic Z, Brown CJ, Dunker AK. Improving sequence alignments for intrinsically disordered proteins. Pac Symp Biocomput 2002;7:589-600.
39. Garner E, Cannon P, Romero P, Obradovic Z, Dunker AK. Predicting disordered regions from amino acid sequence: common themes despite differing structural characterization. Genome Inform 1998;9:201213.