CHOP Proteins into Structural Domain-Like Fragments

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 678-688

  Liu, Jinfeng ^a   Rost, Burkhard ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Automatic sequence clustering; Genome sequence analysis; Protein domains; Protein structure; Structural genomics

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; PROTEOME;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUKARYOTE; GENE CLUSTER; GENE DUPLICATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RELIABILITY; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL GENE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AMINO ACIDS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; FUNGAL PROTEINS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 2442499624     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20095     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gillliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
2. Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, Durbin R, Etwiller L, Eddy SR, Griffiths-Jones S, Howe KL, Marshall M, Sonnhammer EL. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:276-280.
3. Yang AS, Honig B. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments. J Mol Biol 2000;301:691-711.
4. Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Durbin R. Pfam: a comprehensive database of protein domain families based on seed alignments. Proteins 1997;28:405-420.
5. Corpet F, Servant F, Gouzy J, Kahn D. ProDom and ProDom-CG: tools for protein domain analysis and whole genome comparisons. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:267-269.
6. Servant F, Bru C, Carrere S, Courcelle E, Gouzy J, Peyruc D, Kahn D. ProDom: automated clustering of homologous domains. Brief Bioinform 2002;3:246-251.
7. Lo Conte L, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C, Murzin AG. SCOP database in 2002: refinements accommodate structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:264-267.
8. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:45-48.
9. Liu J, Rost B. Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes. Protein Sci 2001;10:1970-1979.
10. Rost B. Did evolution leap to create the protein universe? Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:409-416.
11. Rose GD. Hierarchic organization of domains in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1979;134:447-470.
12. Jaennicke R. Folding and association of proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1987;49:117-237.
13. Hao MH, Scheraga HA. Molecular mechanisms for cooperative folding of proteins. J Mol Biol 1998;277:973-983.
14. Sham YY, Ma B, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R. Thermal unfolding molecular dynamics simulation of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: thermal stability of protein domains and unfolding pathway. Proteins 2002;46:308-320.
15. Thornton JM, Orengo CA, Todd AE, Pearl FM. Protein folds, functions and evolution. J Mol Biol 1999;293:333-342.
16. Ponting CP, Russell RR. The natural history of protein domains. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2002;31:45-71.
17. Hurley JH, Anderson DE, Beach B, Canagarajah B, Ho YS, Jones E, Miller G, Misra S, Pearson M, Saidi L, Suer S, Trievel R, Tsujishita Y. Structural genomics and signaling domains. Trends Biochem Sci 2002;27:48-53.
18. Holm L, Sander C. Parser for protein folding units. Proteins 1994;19:256-268.
19. Baron M, Norman DG, Campbell ID. Protein modules. Trends Biochem Sci 1991;16:13-17.
20. Bennett MJ, Schlunegger MP, Eisenberg D. 3D domain swapping: a mechanism for oligomer assembly. Protein Sci 1996;5:2455-2468.
21. Teichmann SA, Rison SC, Thornton JM, Riley M, Gough J, Chothia C. The evolution and structural anatomy of the small molecule metabolic pathways in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 2001;311:693-708.
22. Apic G, Gough J, Teichmann SA. Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes. J Mol Biol 2001;310: 311-325.
23. Lupas AN, Ponting CP, Russell RB. On the evolution of protein folds: are similar motifs in different protein folds the result of convergence, insertion, or relics of an ancient peptide world? J Struct Biol 2001;134:191-203.
24. Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In: Bryson V, Vogel HJ, editors. Evolving genes and proteins. New York and London: Academic Press; 1965. p 97-166.
25. Orengo CA, Bray JE, Buchan DW, Harrison A, Lee D, Pearl FM, Sillitoe I, Todd AE, Thornton JM. The CATH protein family database: a resource for structural and functional annotation of genomes. Proteomics 2002;2:11-21.
26. Dietmann S, Park J, Notredame C, Heger A, Lappe M, Holm L. A fully automatic evolutionary classification of protein folds: DALI domain dictionary version 3. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:55-57.
27. Dengler U, Siddiqui AS, Barton GJ. Protein structural domains: analysis of the 3Dee domains database. Proteins 2001;42:332-344.
28. Marchler-Bauer A, Panchenko AR, Ariel N, Bryant SH. Comparison of sequence and structure alignments for protein domains. Proteins 2002;48:439-446.
29. Holm L, Sander C. Dictionary of recurrent domains in protein structures. Proteins 1998;33:88-96.
30. Montelione GT, Zheng D, Huang YJ, Gunsalus KC, Szyperski T. Protein NMR spectroscopy in structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7(Suppl):982-985.
31. Liu J, Rost B. Domains, motifs and clusters in the protein universe. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2003;7:5-11.
32. Ponting CP, Schultz J, Milpetz F, Bork P. SMART: identification and annotation of domains from signalling and extracellular protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1999;27:229-232.
33. Haft DH, Selengut JD, White O. The TIGRFAMs database of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:371-373.
34. Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. Blocks database and its applications. Methods Enzymol 1996;266:88-104.
35. Henikoff JG, Greene EA, Pietrokovski S, Henikoff S. Increased coverage of protein families with the blocks database servers. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:228-230.
36. George RA, Heringa J. Protein domain identification and improved sequence similarity searching using PSI-BLAST. Proteins 2002;48:672-681.
37. George RA, Heringa J. SnapDRAGON: a method to delineate protein structural domains from sequence data. J Mol Biol 2002; 316:839-851.
38. Wheelan SJ, Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. Domain size distributions can predict domain boundaries. Bioinformatics 2000;16:613-618.
39. Kulikowski CA, Muchnik I, Yun HJ, Dayanik AA, Zhang D, Song Y, Montelione GT. Protein structural domain parsing by consensus reasoning over multiple knowledge sources and methods. Medinfo 2001;10:965-969.
40. Murvai J, Vlahovicek K, Szepesvari C, Pongor S. Prediction of protein functional domains from sequences using artificial neural networks. Genome Res 2001;11:1410-1417.
41. Miyazaki S, Kuroda Y, Yokoyama S. Characterization and prediction of linker sequences of multi-domain proteins by a neural network. J Struct Funct Gen 2002;2:37-51.
42. Enright AJ, Ouzounis CA. GeneRAGE: a robust algorithm for sequence clustering and domain detection. Bioinformatics 2000;16: 451-457.
43. Marcotte EM, Pellegrini M, Thompson MJ, Yeates TO, Eisenberg D. A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature 1999;402:83-86.
44. Marsden RL, McGuffin LJ, Jones DT. Rapid protein domain assignment from amino acid sequence using predicted secondary structure. Protein Sci 2002;11:2814-2824.
45. Rigden DJ. Use of covariance analysis for the prediction of structural domain boundaries from multiple protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng 2002;15:65-77.
46. Kriventseva EV, Biswas M, Apweiler R. Clustering and analysis of protein families. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2001;11:334-339.
47. Yona G, Levitt M. Within the twilight zone: a sensitive profile-profile comparison tool based on information theory. J Mol Biol 2002;315:1257-1275.
48. Sasson O, Linial N, Linial M. The metric space of proteins-comparative study of clustering algorithms. Bioinformatics 2002; 18(Suppl 1):S14-S21.
49. Yona G, Linial N, Tishby N, Linial M. A map of the protein space - an automatic hierarchical classification of all protein sequences. In: Glasgow J, Littlejohn T, Major F, Lathrop R, Sankoff D, Sensen C, editors. Montreal, Canada: AAAI Press; 1998. p 212-221.
50. Krause A, Haas SA, Coward E, Vingron M. SYSTERS, GeneNest, SpliceNest: exploring sequence space from genome to protein. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:299-300.
51. Heger A, Holm L. Picasso: generating a covering set of protein family profiles. Bioinformatics 2001;17:272-279.
52. Wise MJ. The POPPs: clustering and searching using peptide probability profiles. Bioinformatics 2002;18(Suppl 1):S38-S45.
53. Kriventseva EV, Servant F, Apweiler R. Improvements to CluSTr: the database of SWISS-PROT+TrEMBL protein clusters. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:388-389.
54. Li W, Jaroszewski L, Godzik A. Clustering of highly homologous sequences to reduce the size of large protein databases. Bioinformatics 2001;17:282-283.
55. Przybylski D, Rost B. Alignments grow, secondary structure prediction improves. Proteins 2002;46:195-205.
56. Rost B. Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated. J Mol Biol 2002;318:595-608.
57. Sasson O, Vaaknin A, Fleischer H, Portugaly E, Bilu Y, Linial N, Linial M. ProtoNet: hierarchical classification of the protein space. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:348-352.
58. Yona G, Linial N, Linial M. ProtoMap: automatic classification of protein sequences and hierarchy of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:49-55.
59. Linial M, Linial N, Tishby N, Yona G. Global self-organization of all known protein sequences reveals inherent biological signatures. J Mol Biol 1997;268:539-556.
60. Carter P, Liu J, Rost B. PEP: Predictions for entire proteomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:410-413.
61. Etzold T, Argos P. SRS - an indexing and retrieval tool for flat file data libraries. CABIOS 1993;9:49-57.
62. Amodeo P, Fraternali F, Lesk AM, Pastore A. Modularity and homology: modelling of the titin type I modules and their interfaces. J Mol Biol 2001;311:283-296.
63. Liu J, Hegyi H, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Rost B. Automatic target selection for structural genomics on eukaryotes. Proteins 2004; In press.
64. Gough J, Karplus K, Hughey R, Chothia C. Assignment of homology to genome sequences using a library of hidden Markov models that represent all proteins of known structure. J Mol Biol 2001;313:903-919.
65. Liu J, Rost B. Target space for structural genomics revisited. Bioinformatics 2002;18:922-933.
66. Zipf GK. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Reading: Addison-Wesley Press; 1949.
67. Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G. Machine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals. Protein Eng 1999;12:3-9.
68. Sprague ER, Redd MJ, Johnson AD, Wolberger C. Structure of the C-terminal domain of Tup1, a corepressor of transcription in yeast. EMBO J 2000;19:3016-3027.
69. Tzamarias D, Struhl K. Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8-Tup1 transcriptional co-repressor complex. Nature 1994;369:758-761.
70. Letunic I, Goodstadt L, Dickens NJ, Doerks T, Schultz J, Mott R, Ciccarelli F, Copley RR, Ponting CP, Bork P. Recent improvements to the SMART domain-based sequence annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:242-244.
71. Serres MH, Gopal S, Nahum LA, Liang P, Gaasterland T, Riley M. A functional update of the Escherichia coli K-12 genome. Genome Biol 2001;2:RESEARCH0035.
72. Teichmann SA, Rison SC, Thornton JM, Riley M, Gough J, Chothia C. Small-molecule metabolism: an enzyme mosaic. TIBTECH 2001;19:482-486.
73. Dueber JE, Yeh BJ, Chak K, Lim WA. Reprogramming control of an allosteric signaling switch through modular recombination. Science 2003;301:1904-1908.
74. Abascal F, Valencia A. Clustering of proximal sequence space for the identification of protein families. Bioinformatics 2002;18:908-921.
75. Remm M, Storm CE, Sonnhammer EL. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J Mol Biol 2001;314:1041-1052.
76. Vlahovicek K, Murvai J, Barta E, Pongor S. The SBASE protein domain library, release 9.0: an online resource for protein domain identification. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:273-275.
77. Chothia C. One thousand protein families for the molecular biologist. Nature 1992;357:543-544.
78. Wolf YI, Grishin NV, Koonin EV. Estimating the number of protein folds and families from complete genome data. J Mol Biol 2000;299:897-905.
79. Coulson AF, Moult J. A unifold, mesofold, and superfold model of protein fold use. Proteins 2002;46:61-71.
80. Crippen GM, Maiorov VN. How many protein folding motifs are there? J Mol Biol 1995;252:144-151.
81. Finkelstein AV, Ptitsyn OB. Why do globular proteins fit the limited set of folding patterns? Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1987;50:171-190.
82. Orengo CA, Jones DT, Thornton JM. Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature 1994;372:631-634.
83. Vitkup D, Melamud E, Moult J, Sander C. Completeness in structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 2001;8:559-566.
84. Blundell TL, Johnson MS. Catching a common fold. Protein Sci 1993;2:877-883.
85. Montelione GT, Anderson S. Structural genomics: keystone for a human proteome project. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:11-12.
86. Burley SK, Almo SC, Bonanno JB, Capel M, Chance MR, Gaasterland T, Lin D, Sali A, Studier FW, Swaminathan S. Structural genomics: beyond the human genome project. Nat Gen 1999;23: 151-157.
87. Christendat D, Yee A, Dharamsi A, Kluger Y, Savchenko A, Cort JR, Booth V, Mackereth CD, Saridakis V, Ekiel I, Kozlov G, Maxwell KL, Wu N, McIntosh LP, Gehring K, Kennedy MA, Davidson AR, Pai EF, Gerstein M, Edwards AM, Arrowsmith CH. Structural proteomics of an archaeon. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7:903-909.
88. Hendrickson WA. Synchrotron crystallography. Trends Biochem Sci 2000;25:637-643.
89. Rost B. Marrying structure and genomics. Structure 1998;6:259-263.
90. Shapiro L, Lima CD. The Argonne Structural Genomics Workshop: Lamaze class for the birth of a new science. Structure 1998;6:265-267.
91. Sali A. 100,000 protein structures for the biologist. Nat Struct Biol 1998;5:1029-1032.
92. Thornton J. Structural genomics takes off. Trends Biochem Sci 2001;26:88-89.
93. Linial M, Yona G. Methodologies for target selection in structural genomics. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2000;73:297-320.
94. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25: 3389-3402.
95. Eddy SR. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 1998;14: 755-763.
96. Yang AS, Honig B. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. II. On the relationship between sequence and structural similarity for proteins that are not obviously related in sequence. J Mol Biol 2000;301:679-689.
97. Yang AS, Honig B. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. I. Protein structural alignment and a quantitative measure for protein structural distance. J Mol Biol 2000;301:665-678.