From coarse-grain to all-atom: Toward multiscale analysis of protein landscapes

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 646-661

  Heath, Allison P ^a   Kavraki, Lydia E ^a,b   Clementi, Cecilia ^b,c  

^a Rice University   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

All atom reconstruction; Coarse grain; Free energy landscape; Minimalist model; Multiscale; Protein folding

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ATOM; ENERGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 34447515841     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21371     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Praprotnik M, Delle Site L, Kremer K. Adaptive resolution molecular-dynamics simulation: changing the degrees of freedom on the fly. J Chem Phys 2005;123:224106.
2. Neri M, Anselmi C, Cascella M, Maritan A, Carloni P. Coarse-grained model of proteins incorporating atomistic detail of the active site. Phys Rev Lett 2005;95:218102.
3. Shi Q, Izvekov S, Voth GA. Mixed atomistic and coarse-grained molecular dynamics: simulation of a membrane-bound ion channel. J Phys Chem B 2006;110:15045-15048.
4. Fan ZZ, Hwang JK, Warshel A. Using simplified protein representation as a reference potential for all-atom calculations of folding free energy. Theor Chem Acc 1999;103:77-80.
5. De Mori GM, Colombo G, Micheletti C. Study of the Villin headpiece folding dynamics by combining coarse-grained Monte Carlo evolution and all-atom molecular dynamics. Proteins 2005;58:459-471.
6. Ding F, Guo W, Dokholyan NV, Shakhnovich EI, Shea JE. Reconstruction of the src-SH3 protein domain transition state ensemble using multiscale molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 2005;350:1035-1050.
7. Lyman E, Ytreberg FM, Zuckerman DM. Resolution exchange simulation. Phys Rev Lett 2006;96:028105.
8. Christen M, van Gunsteren WF. Multigraining: an algorithm for simultaneous fine-grained and coarse-grained simulation of molecular systems. J Chem Phys 2006;124:154106.
9. Kwak W, Hansmann UH. Efficient sampling of protein structures by model hopping. Phys Rev Lett 2005;95:138102.
10. Hess B, Len S, van der Vegt N, Kremer K. Long time atomistic polymer trajectories from coarse grained simulations: bisphenol-A polycarbonate. Soft Matter 2006;2:409-414.
11. Praprotnik M, Delle Site L, Kremer K. Adaptive resolution scheme for efficient hybrid atomistic-mesoscale molecular dynamics simulations of dense liquids. Phys Rev E 2006;73:066701.
12. Bedrov D, Ayyagari C, Smith G. Multiscale modeling of poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymer micelles in aqueous solution. J Chem Theory Comput 2006;2:598-606.
13. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
14. Das P, Matysiak S, Clementi C. Balancing energy and entropy: a minimalist model for the characterization of protein folding landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:10141-10146.
15. Matysiak S, Clementi C. Minimalist protein model as a diagnostic tool for misfolding and aggregation. J Mol Biol 2006;363:297-308.
16. Bassolino-Klimas D, Bruccoleri RE. Application of a directed conformational search for generating 3-D coordinates for protein structures from α-carbon coordinates. Proteins 1992;14:465-474.
17. Rey A, Skolnick J. Efficient algorithm for the reconstruction of a protein backbone from the α-carbon coordinates. J Comput Chem 1992;13:443-456.
18. Liwo A, Pincus MR, Wawak RJ, Rackovsky S, Scheraga HA. Calculation of protein backbone geometry from α-carbon coordinates based on peptide-group dipole alignment. Protein Sci 1993;2:1697-1714.
19. Jones TA, Thirup S. Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J 1986;5:819-822.
20. Claessens M, Van Cutsem E, Lasters I, Wodak S. Modelling the polypeptide backbone with 'spare parts' from known protein structures. Protein Eng 1989;2:335-345.
21. Reid LS, Thornton JM. Rebuilding flavodoxin from Cα coordinates: a test study. Proteins 1989;5:170-182.
22. Holm L, Sander C. Database algorithm for generating protein backbone and side-chain co-ordinates from a Cα trace: application to model building and detection of co-ordinate errors. J Mol Biol 1991;218:183-194.
23. Payne PW. Reconstruction of protein conformations from estimated positions of the Cα coordinates. Protein Sci 1993;2:315-324.
24. Milik M, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Algorithm for rapid reconstruction of protein backbone from ct carbon coordinates. J Comput Chem 1997;18:80-85.
25. Feig M, Rotkiewicz P, Kolinski A, Skolnick J, Brooks CL. Accurate reconstruction of all-atom protein representations from side-chain-based low-resolution models. Proteins 2000;41:86-97.
26. Wang Y, Huq HI, de la Cruz XF, Lee B. A new procedure for constructing peptides into a given calpha chain. Fold Des 1998;3:1-10.
27. Dunbrack RL. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:431-440.
28. Pierce NA, Winfree E. Protein design is NP-hard. Protein Eng 2002;15:779-782.
29. Chazell B, Kingsford C, Singh M. A semidefinite programming approach to side chain positioning with new rounding strategies. INFORMS J Comput 2004;16:380-392.
30. Huang ES, Koehl P, Levitt M, Pappu RV, Ponder JW. Accuracy of side-chain prediction upon near-native protein backbones generated by ab initio folding methods. Proteins 1998;33:204-217.
31. Xiang Z, Honig B. Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2001;311:421-430.
32. Desmet J, De Maeyer M, Hazers B, Lasters I. The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning. Nature 1992;356:539-542.
33. Goldstein RF. Efficient rotamer elimination applied to protein side-chains and related spin glasses. Biophys J 1994;66:1335-1340.
34. Keller DA, Shibata M, Marcus E, Ornstein RL, Rein R. Finding the global minimum: a fuzzy end elimination implementation. Protein Eng 1995;8:893-904.
35. De Maeyer M, Desmet J, Lasters I. All in one: a highly detailed rotamer library improves both accuracy and speed in the modelling of sidechains by dead-end elimination. Fold Des 1997;2:53-66.
36. Pierce NA, Spriet IA, Desmet J, Mayo SL. Conformational splitting: a more powerful criterion for dead-end elimination. J Comput Chem 1999;21:999-1009.
37. Gordon DB, Mayo SL. Branch-and-terminate: a combinatorial optimization algorithm for protein design. Structure 1999;7:1089-1098.
38. Looger LL, Hellinga HW. Generalized dead-end elimination algorithms make large-scale protein side-chain structure prediction tractable: implications for protein design and structural genomics. J Mol Biol 2001;307:429-445.
39. Liang S, Grishin NV. Side-chain modeling with an optimized scoring function. Protein Sci 2002;11:322-331.
40. Lee C, Subbiah S. Prediction of protein side-chain conformation by packing optimization. J Mol Biol 1991;217:373-388.
41. Bower MJ, Cohen FE, Dunbrack RL. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J Mol Biol 1997;267:1268-1282.
42. Dunbrack RL, Karplus M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol 1993;230:543-574.
43. Tuffery P, Etchebest C, Hazout S, Lavery R. A new approach to the rapid determination of protein side chain conformations. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1991;8:1267-1289.
44. Pedersen JT, Moult J. Genetic algorithms for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:227-231.
45. Koehl P, Delarue M. Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. J Mol Biol 1994;239:249-275.
46. Lee C. Predicting protein mutant energetics by self-consistent ensemble optimization. J Mol Biol 1994;236:918-939.
47. Mendes J, Baptista AM, Carrondo MA, Soares CM. Improved modeling of side-chains in proteins with rotamer-based methods: a flexible rotamer model. Proteins 1999;37:530-543.
48. Leach AR, Lemon AP. Exploring the conformational space of protein side chains using dead-end elimination and the A* algorithm. Proteins 1998;33:227-239.
49. Samudrala R, Moult J. A graph-theoretic algorithm for comparative modeling of protein structure. J Mol Biol 1998;279:287-302.
50. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 2003;12:2001-2014.
51. Dukka Bahadur KC, Tomita E, Suzuki J, Akutsu T. Protein side-chain packing problem: a maximum edge-weight clique algorithmic approach. J Bioinform Comput Biol 2005;3:103-126.
52. Kingsford CL, Chazelle B, Singh M. Solving and analyzing side-chain positioning problems using linear and integer programming. Bioinformatics 2005;21:1028-1036.
53. Eriksson O, Zhou Y, Elofsson A. Side chain-positioning as an integer programming problem. Proceedings of the first international workshop on algorithms in bioinformatics. London, UK: Springer-Verlag; 2001. pp 128-141.
54. Desmet J, Spriet J, Lasters I. Fast and accurate side-chain topology and energy refinement (FASTER) as a new method for protein structure optimization. Proteins 2002;48:31-43.
55. Wang J, Cieplak P, Kollman PA. How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? J Comput Chem 2000;21:1049-1074.
56. Onufriev A, Bashford D, Case DA. Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2004;55:383-394.
57. Eisenmenger F, Argos P, Abagyan R. A method to configure protein side-chains from the main-chain trace in homology modelling. J Mol Biol 1993;231:849-860.
58. Meza JC. OPT++: an object-oriented class library for nonlinear optimization. Technical Report, Technical Report SAND94-8225. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories; 1994.
59. Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Baker D. Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2005;14:1328-1339.
60. Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TE, III, Simmerling CL, Wang J, Duke RE, Luo R, Merz KM, Wang B, Pearlman DA, Crowley M, Brozell S, Tsui V, Gohlke H, Mongan J, Hornak V, Cui G, Beroza P, Schafmeister C, Caldwell JW, Ross WS, Kollman PA. AMBER 8. San Francisco, CA: University of California; 2004.
61. Pawson T. Protein modules and signalling networks. Nature 1995;373:573-580.
62. Grantcharova VP, Baker D. Folding dynamics of the src SH3 domain. Biochemistry 1997;36:15685-15692.
63. Agalarov SC, Sridhar Prasad G, Funke PM, Stout CD, Williamson JR. Structure of the S15,S6,S18-rRNA complex: assembly of the 30S ribosome central domain. Science 2000;288:107-113.
64. Lindahl M, Svensson LA, Liljas A, Sedelnikova SE, Eliseikina IA, Fomenkova NP, Nevskaya N, Nikonov SV, Garber MB, Muranova TA. Crystal structure of the ribosomal protein S6 from Thermus thermophilus. EMBO J 1994;13:1249-1254.
65. Otzen DE, Kristensen O, Proctor M, Oliveberg M. Structural changes in the transition state of protein folding: alternative interpretations of curved chevron plots. Biochemistry 1999;38:6499-6511.
66. Otzen DE, Oliveberg M. Conformational plasticity in folding of the split β-α-β protein S6: evidence for burst-phase disruption of the native state. J Mol Biol 2002;317:613-627.
67. Otzen DE, Kristensen O, Oliveberg M. Designed protein tetramer zipped together with a hydrophobic Alzheimer homology: a structural clue to amyloid assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:9907-9912.
68. Matysiak S, Clementi C. Optimal combination of theory and experiment for the characterization of the protein folding landscape of S6: how far can a minimalist model go? J Mol Biol 2004;343:235-248.
69. Wallner B, Elofsson A. All are not equal: a benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Protein Sci 2005;14:1315-1327.
70. Du R, Pande VS, Grosberg AY, Tanaka T, Shakhnovich ES. On the transition coordinate for protein folding. J Chem Phys 1998;108:334-350.
71. Cho SS, Levy Y, Wolynes PG. P versus Q: structural reaction coordinates capture protein folding on smooth landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:586-591.
72. Das P, Moll M, Stamati H, Kavraki LE, Clementi C. Low-dimensional, free-energy landscapes of protein-folding reactions by non-linear dimensionality reduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:9885-9890.
73. Clementi C, Plotkin SS. The effects of nonnative interactions on protein folding rates: theory and simulation. Protein Sci 2004;13:1750-1766.
74. Kumar S, Bouzida D, Swendsen RH, Kollman PA, Rosenburg JM. The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method. J Comput Chem 1992;13:1011-1021.
75. Hartigan J. Clustering algorithms. New York: Wiley; 1975.
76. Fawzi NL, Chubukov V, Clark LA, Brown S, Head-Gordon T. Influence of denatured and intermediate states of folding on protein aggregation. Protein Sci 2005;14:993-1003.
77. Tarus B, Straub JE, Thirumalai D. Probing the initial stage of aggregation of the Aβ(10-35)-protein: assessing the propensity for peptide dimerization. J Mol Biol 2005;345:1141-1156.
78. Friedel M, Shea JE. Self-assembly of peptides into a β-barrel motif. J Chem Phys 2004;120:5809-5823.
79. Ding F, Dokholyan NV, Buldyrev SV, Stanley HE, Shakhnovich EI. Molecular dynamics simulation of the SH3 domain aggregation suggests a generic amyloidogenesis mechanism. J Mol Biol 2002;324:851-857.
80. Clementi C, Nymeyer H, Onuchic JN. Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. J Mol Biol 2000;298:937-953.
81. Alm E, Baker D. Prediction of protein-folding mechanisms from free-energy landscapes derived from native structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:11305-11310.
82. Galzitskaya OV, Finkelstein AV. A theoretical search for folding/unfolding nuclei in three-dimensional protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:11299-11304.
83. Cobos ES, Filimonov W, Vega MC, Mateo PL, Serrano L, Martinez JC. A thermodynamic and kinetic analysis of the folding pathway of an SH3 domain entropically stabilised by a redesigned hydrophobic core. J Mol Biol 2003;328:221-233.
84. Viguera AR, Serrano L. Bergerac-SH3: "frustation" induced by stabilizing the folding nucleus. J Mol Biol 2001;311:357-371.
85. Riddle DS, Grantcharova VP, Santiago JV, Alm E, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Experiment and theory highlight role of native state topology in SH3 folding. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:1016-1024.
86. Grantcharova VP, Riddle DS, Baker D. Long-range order in the src SH3 folding transition state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:7084-7089.
87. Guo W, Lampoudi S, Shea JE. Temperature dependence of the free energy landscape of the src-SH3 protein domain. Proteins 2004;55:395-406.
88. Shea JE, Onuchic JN, Brooks CL. Probing the folding free energy landscape of the Src-SH3 protein domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:16064-16068.
89. Gsponer J, Caflisch A. Molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding from the transition state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:6719-6724.
90. Di Nardo AA, Korzhnev DM, Stogios PI, Zarrine-Afsar A, Kay LE, Davidson AR. Dramatic acceleration of protein folding by stabilization of a nonnative backbone conformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:7954-7959.
91. Viguera AR, Vega C, Serrano L. Unspecific hydrophobic stabilization of folding transition states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:5349-5354.