Temperature Dependence of the Free Energy Landscape of the src-SH3 Protein Domain

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 395-406

  Guo, Weihua ^a   Lampoudi, Sotiria ^a   Shea, Joan Emma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Desolvation; Energy landscapes; Protein folding; SH3 protein domain

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; ENERGY; HYDROPHOBICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; SRC SH3 PROTEIN DOMAIN; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; THERMODYNAMICS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROGEN BONDING; HYDROPHOBICITY; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SOLVENTS; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS; SRC-FAMILY KINASES; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 1842584557     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20053     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Dobson CM, Sali A, Karplus M. Protein folding: a perspective from theory and experiment. Angew Chem Int Ed 1998;37:868-893.
2. Brookss CL III. Simulations of protein folding and unfolding. Curr Biol 1998;8:222-226.
3. Gruebele M. Protein folding: the free energy surface. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:161-168.
4. Shakhnovich EI. Theoretical studies of protein folding thermodynamics and kinetics. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:29-40.
5. Head-Gordon T, Brown S. Minimalist models for protein folding and design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2003;13:160-167.
6. Gutin AM, Abkevich VI, Shakhnovich EI. A protein engineering analysis of the transition state for protein folding: simulation in the lattice model. Fold Des 1998;3:183-194.
7. Sali A, Shakhnovich EI, Karplus M. Kinetics of protein folding: a lattice model study of the requirements of folding to the native state. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1614-1636.
8. Thirumalai D, Klimov D. Deciphering the timescales and mechanisms of protein folding using minimal off-lattice models. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1999;9:197-207.
9. Guo Z, Brooks CL III. Thermodynamics of protein folding: a statistical mechanical study of a small beta protein. Biopolymers 1997;42:745-757.
10. Karanicolas J, Brooks CL III. The origins of symmetry breaking in the folding of proteins with analogous topologies. Protein Sci 2002;11:2351-2361.
11. Shea J-E, Nochomovitz YD, Guo Z, Brooks CL III. Exploring the space of protein folding Hamiltonians: the balance of forces in a minimalist beta-barrel model. J Chem Phys 1998;109:2895-2903.
12. Shea J-E, Onuchic JN, Brooks CL III. Exploring the origins of topological frustration: design of a minimally frustrated model of fragment B of protein A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:12512-12517.
13. Shea J-E, Onuchic JN, Brooks CL III. Energetic frustration and the nature of the transition state in protein folding. J Chem Phys 2000;113:1-9.
14. Shea J-E, Brooks CL III. From folding theories to folding proteins: a review and assessment of simulation studies of protein folding and unfolding. Ann Rev Phys Chem 2001;52:499-534.
15. Friedel M, Sheeler D, Shea J-E. Effects of confinement and crowding on the thermodynamics and kinetics of folding of a minimalist beta-barrel protein. J Chem Phys 2003;118:8106-8113.
16. Baumketner A, Shea J-E, Hiwatari Y. Glass transition in an off-lattice protein model studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Rev E 2003;67:011912.
17. Onuchic JN, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG. Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Ann Rev Phys Chem 1997;48:545-600.
18. Kaya, Chan HS. Solvation effects and driving forces for protein thermodynamic and kinetic cooperativity: how adequate is native-centric topological modeling? J Mol Biol 2003;326:911-931.
19. Cheung MS, Garcia AE, Onuchic JN. Protein folding mediated by solvation: water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:685-690.
20. Pokarowski P, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. A minimal physically realistic protein-like lattice model: designing an energy landscape that ensures all-or-none folding to a unique native state. Biophys J 2003;84:1518-1526.
21. Shen MY, Freed KF. Long time dynamics of met-enkephalin: comparison of explicit and implicit solvent models. Biophys J 2002;82:1791-1808.
22. Shen MY, Freed KF. All-atom fast protein folding simulations: the villin headpiece. Proteins 2002;49:439-445.
23. Zagrovic B, Sorin EJ, Pande VS. Beta-hairpin folding simulations in atomistic detail using an implicit solvent model. J Mol Biol 2001;313:151-169.
24. Roux B, Simonson T. Implicit solvent models. Biophys Chem 1999;78:1-20.
25. Bursulaya B, Brooks CL III. Comparative study of the folding free energy landscape of a three-stranded beta-sheet protein with explicit and implicit solvent models. J Phys Chem B 2000;104:12378-12383.
26. Gsponer J, Caflisch A. Molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding from the transition state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:6719-6724.
27. Ghosh A, Elber R, Scheraga HA. An atomically detailed study of the folding pathways of protein A with the stochastic difference equation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:10394-10398.
28. Cardenas AE, Elber R. Kinetics of cytochrome C folding: atomically detailed simulations. Proteins 2003;51:245-257.
29. Grantcharova VP, Baker D. Folding dynamics of the src SH3 domain. Biochemistry 1997;36:15685-15692.
30. Grantcharova VP, Riddle DS, Santiago JV, Baker D. Important role of hydrogen bonds in the sturcturally polarized transition state for folding of the src SH3 domain. Nat Struct Biol 1998;5:714-720.
31. Riddle DS, Grantcharova VP, Santiago JV, Alm E, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Experiment and theory highlight role of native state topology in SH3 folding. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:1016-1024.
32. Viguera AR, Martinez JC, Filimonov VV, Mateo PL, Serrano L. Thermodynamic and kinetic analysis of the SH3 domain of spectrin shows a two-state folding transition. Biochemistry 1994;33:2142-2150.
33. Martinez JC, Serrano L. The folding transition state between SH3 domains is conformationally restricted and evolutionarily conserved. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:1010-1016.
34. Plaxco KW, Guijarro JI, Morton CJ, Pitkeathly M, Campbell ID, Dobson CM. The folding kinetics and thermodynamics of the Fyn-SH3 domain. Biochemistry 1998;37:2529-2537.
35. Northey JGB, Di Nardo AA, Davidson AR. Hydrophobic core packing in the SH3 domain folding transition state. J Mol Biol 2002;9:126-130.
36. Clementi C, Nymeyer H, Onuchic JN. Topological and energetic factors: What determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "on route" intermediates for protein folding?: an investigation for small globular proteins. J Mol Biol 2000;298:937-953.
37. Borreguero JM, Dokholyan NV, Buldyrev SV, Shakhnovich EI, Stanley HE. Thermodynamics and folding kinetics analysis of the SH3 domain form discrete molecular dynamics. J Mol Biol 2002;318:863-876.
38. Ding F, Dokholyan NV, Buldyrev SV, Stanley HE, Shakhnovich EI. Direct molecular dynamics observation of protein folding transition state ensemble. Biophys J 2002;83:3525-3532.
39. Dokholyan NV, Li L, Ding F, Shakhnovich EI. Topological determinants of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:8637-8641.
40. Gsponer J, Caflisch A. Role of native topology investigated by multiple unfolding simulations of four SH3 domains. J Mol Biol 2001;309:285-298.
41. Tsai J, Levitt M, Baker D. Hierarchy of structure loss in MD simulations of src SH3 domain unfolding. J Mol Biol 1999;291:215-225.
42. Shea J-E, Onuchic JN, Brooks CL III. Probing the folding free energy landscape of the src-SH3 protein domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:16064-16068.
43. Guo W, Lampoudi S, Shea J-E. Posttransition state desolvation of the hydrophobic core of the src-SH3 protein domain. Biophys J 2003;85:61-69.
44. Dinner AR, Karplus M. Is protein unfolding the reverse of protein folding?: a lattice simulation analysis. J Mol Biol 1999;292:403-419.
45. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura J, Impley RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983;79:926-935.
46. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan DJ, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comp Chem 1982;4:187-217.
47. Boczko EM, Brooks CL III. Constant-temperature free energy surfaces for physical and chemical processes. J Phys Chem 1993;97:4509-4513.
48. Sheinerman FB, Brooks CL III. Calculations on folding of segment B1 of streptococcal protein G. J Mol Biol 1998;278:439-455.
49. Du R, Pande VS, Grosberg AY, Tanaka T, Shakhnovich EI. On the transition state for protein folding. J Chem Phys 1998;108:334-350.
50. Wright CF, Lindorff-Larsen K, Randles LG, Clarke J. Parallel protein-unfolding pathways revealed and mapped. Nat Struct Biol 2003;10:658-662.
51. McCallister EL, Alm E, Baker D. Critical role of beta-hairpin formation in protein G folding. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7:669-673.
52. Garcia AE, Hummer G. Water penetration and escape in proteins. Proteins 2000;38:261-272.
53. Caflisch A, Karplus M. Molecular dynamics simulation of protein denaturation: solvation of the hydrophobic cores and secondary structure of barnase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:1746-1750.
54. Guo Z, Boczko EM, Brooks CL III. Exploring the folding free energy surface of a three-helix bundle protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:10161-10166.
55. Shimizu S, Chan HS. Temperature dependence of hydrophobic interactions: a mean force perspective, effects of water density, and nonadditivity of thermodynamic signatures. J Chem Phys 2000;113:4683-4700.
56. Shimizu S, Chan HS. Anti-cooperativity and cooperativity in hydrophobic interactions: three-body free energy landscapes and comparison with implicit-solvent potential functions for proteins. Proteins 2002;48:15-30.