Exploring Protein Native States and Large-Scale Conformational Changes with a Modified Generalized Born Model

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 383-394

  Onufriev, Alexey ^a   Bashford, Donald ^b   Case, David A ^b  

^a Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University   (United States)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Generalized Born approximation; Macromolecules; Molecular dynamics

Indexed keywords

BARNASE; BARSTAR; PROTEIN; PROTEIN A; THIOREDOXIN; UBIQUITIN;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY; MACROMOLECULE; MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SIMULATION; SOLVATION;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROSTATICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; RIBONUCLEASES; SOFTWARE; SOLVENTS; STAPHYLOCOCCAL PROTEIN A; THERMODYNAMICS; THIOREDOXIN; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 1842479952     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20033     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. Implicit solvation models: equilibria, structure, spectra, and dynamics. Chem Rev 1999;9:2161-2200.
2. Honig B, Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science 1995;268:1144-1149.
3. Beroza P, Case DA. Calculation of proton binding thermodynamics in proteins. Methods Enzymol 1998;295:170-189.
4. Madura JD, Davis ME, Gilson MK, Wade RC, Luty BA, McCammon JA. Biological applications of electrostatic calculations and Brownian dynamics. Rev Comp Chem 1994;5:229-267.
5. Gilson MK. Theory of electrostatic interactions in macromolecules. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:216-223.
6. Scarsi M, Apostolakis J, Caflisch A. Continuum electrostatic energies of macromolecules in aqueous solutions. J Phys Chem A 1997;101:8098-8106.
7. Luo R, David L, Gilson MK. Accelerated Poisson-Boltzmann calculations for static and dynamic systems. J Comp Chem 2002;23:1244-1253.
8. Gelin BR. Testing and comparison of empirical force fields: techniques and problems. In: van Gunsteren WF, Weiner PK, Wilkinson AJ, editors. Computer simulation of biomolecular sytems. Vol. 2. Leiden: ESCOM; 1993. p 127-146.
9. Kollman PA, Massova I, Reyes C, Kuhn B, Huo S, Chong L, Lee M, Lee T, Duan Y, Donini WWO, Cieplak P, Srinivasan J, Case DA, Cheatham TE. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc Chem Res 2000;33:889-897.
10. Still WC, Tempczyk A, Hawley RC, Hendrickson T. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechnics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 1990;112:6127-6129.
11. Schaefer M, Karplus M. A comprehensive analytical treatment of continuum electrostatics. J Phys Chem 1996;100:1578-1599.
12. Edinger S, Cortis C, Shenkin P, Friesner R. Solvation free energies of peptides: comparison of approximate continuum solvation models with accurate solution of Poisson-Boltzman equation. J Phys Chem B 1997;101:1190-1197.
13. Jayaram B, Liu Y, Beveridge DJ. A modification of the generalized Born theory for improved estimates of solvation energies and pK shifts. J Chem Phys 1998;109:1465-1470.
14. Aghosh A, Rapp CS, Friesner RA. A generalized Born model based on a surface integral formulation. J Phys Chem 1998;102:10983-10990.
15. Bashford D, Case D. Generalized Born models of macromolecular solvation effects. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2000;51:129-152.
16. Onufriev A, Bashford D, Case D. Modification of the Generalized Born model suitable for macromolecules. J Phys Chem B 2000;104:3712-3720.
17. Lee MS, Salsbury FR Jr, Brooks CL III. Novel generalized Born methods. J Chem Phys 2002;116:10606-10614.
18. Dominy BN, Brooks CL. Development of a Generalized Born model parametrization for proteins and nucleic acids. J Phys Chem B 1999;103:3765-3773.
19. David L, Luo R, Gilson MK. Comparison of generalized Born and Poisson models: energetics and dynamics of HIV protease. J Comp Chem 2000;21:295-309.
20. Spassov VZ, Yan L, Szalma S. Introducing an implicit membrane in generalized Born/solvent accessibility continuum solvent models. J Phys Chem B 2002;106:8726-8738.
21. Calimet N, Schaefer M, Simonson T. Protein molecular dynamics with the generalized Born/ACE solvent model. Proteins 2001;45:144-158.
22. Tsui V, Case D. Molecular dynamics simulations of nucleic acids using a generalized Born solvation model. J Am Chem Soc 2000;122:2489-2498.
23. Wang T, Wade R. Implicit solvent models for flexible protein-protein docking by molecular dynamics simulation. Proteins 2003;50:158-169.
24. Srinivasan J, Trevathan M, Beroza P, Case D. Application of a pairwise generalized Born model to proteins and nucleic acids: inclusion of salt effects. Theor Chem Accts 1999;101:426-434.
25. Onufriev A, Case D, Bashford D. Effective Born radii in the Generalized Born approximation: the importance of being perfect. J Comp Chem 2002;23:1297-1304.
26. Qiu D, Shenkin P, Hollinger F, Still WC. The GB/SA continuum model for solvation: a fast analytical method for the calculation of approximate Born radii. J Phys Chem A 1997;101:3005-3014.
27. Hawkins GD, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. Parametrized models of aqueous free energies of solvation based on pairwise descreening of solute atomic charges from a dielectric medium. J Phys Chem 1996;100:19824-19836.
28. Schaefer M, Froemmel C. A precise analytical method for calculating the electrostatic energy of macromolecules in aqueous solution. J Mol Biol 1990;216:1045-1066.
29. Richards FM. Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. Annu Rev Biochem Bioeng 1977;6:151-176.
30. Feig M, Onufriev A, Lee MS, Im W, Case DA, Brooks CL. Performance comparison of Generalized Born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures. J Comp Chem 2004;25:265-284.
31. Onufriev A, Case DA, Bashford D. Structural details, pathways, and energetics of unfolding apomyoglobin. J Mol Biol 2003;325:555-567.
32. Eliezer D, Yao J, Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Structural and dynamic characterization of partially folded states of apomyoglobin and implications for protein folding. Nat Struct Biol 1998;5:148-155.
33. Gohlke H, Case DA. Converging free energy estimates: MM-PB(GB)SA studies on the protein-protein complex Ras-Raf. J Comp Chem 2004;25:238-250.
34. Tsui V, Case D. Theory and applications of the Generalized Born solvation model in macromolecular simulations. Biopolymers 2001;56:275-291.
35. Beachy MD, Chasman D, Murphy RB, Halgren TA, Friesner RA. Accurate ab initio quantum chemical determinantion of the relative energies of peptide conformations and assessement of empirical force fields. J Am Chem Soc 1997;119:5908-5920.
36. Garcia AE, Sanbonmatsu KY. Exploring the energy landscape of a β-hairpin in explicit solvent. Proteins 2001;42:345-354.
37. Simmerling C, Strockbine B, Roitberg AE. All-atom structure prediction and folding simulations of a stable protein. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124:11258-11259.
38. Nicholls A, Honig B. A rapid finite difference algorithm, utilizing successive over relaxation to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. J Comp Chem 1991;12:435-445.