Nonbonded terms extrapolated from nonlocal knowledge-based energy functions improve error detection in near-native protein structure models

Protein Science

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1410-1421

  Ferrada, Evandro ^a   Melo, Francisco ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Comparative modeling; Knowledge based potentials; Protein structure assessment; Protein structure prediction; Statistical potentials

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; ATOM; ENERGY; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; KNOWLEDGE BASES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 34250886494     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: 1469896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.062735907     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Altschul, S. 1998. Generalized affine gap costs for protein sequence alignment. Proteins 32: 88-96.
2. Baker, D. and Sali, A. 2001. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294: 93-96.
3. Berman, H.M., Battistuz, T., Bhat, T.N., Bluhm, W.F., Bourne, P.E., Burkhardt, K., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G.L., Iype, L., Jain, S., et al. 2002. The Protein Data Bank. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58: 899-907.
4. Bernstein, H.J. 2000. Recent changes to RasMol, recombining the variants. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25: 453-455.
5. Bonneau, R., Strauss, C.E., Rohl, C.A., Chivian, D., Bradley, P., Malmstrom, L., Robertson, T., and Baker, D. 2002. De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 322: 65-78.
6. Bradley, P., Chivian, D., Meiler, J., Misura, K.M., Rohl, C.A., Schief, W.R., Wedemeyer, W.J., Schueler-Furman, O., Murphy, P., Schonbrun, J., et al. 2003. Rosetta predictions in CASP5: Successes, failures, and prospects for complete automation. Proteins 53: 457-468.
7. Brooks, B., Bruccoleri, R., Olafson, B., States, D., Swaminathan, S., and Karplus, M. 1983. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimizations and dynamic calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4: 187-217.
8. Burley, S.K., Almo, S.C., Bonanno, J.B., Capel, M., Chance, M.R., Gaasterland, T., Lin, D., Sali, A., Studier, F.W., and Swaminathan, S. 1999. Structural genomics: Beyond the Human Genome Project. Nat. Genet. 23: 151-157.
9. DeBolt, S.E. and Skolnick, J. 1996. Evaluation of atomic level mean force potentials via inverse folding and inverse refinement of protein structures: Atomic burial position and pairwise nonbonded interactions. Protein Eng. 9: 637-655.
10. Dill, K.A. 1997. Additivity principles in biochemistry. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 701-704.
11. Fawcett, T. 2004. ROC graphs: Notes and practical considerations for researchers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
12. Feliciangeli, S.F., Thomas, L., Scott, G.K., Subbian, E., Hung, C., Molloy, S.S., Jean, F., Shinde, U., and Thomas, G. 2006. Identification of a pH sensor in the Furin propeptide that regulates enzyme activation. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 16108-16116.
13. Fiser, A., Do, R.K., and Sali, A. 2000. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci. 9: 1753-1773.
14. Gonzalez, E.M., Reed, C., Bix, G., Fu, J., Zhang, Y., Gopalakrishnan, B., Greenspan, D.S., and Iozzo, R.V. 2004. BMP-1/Tolloid-like metalloproteases process endorepellin, the angiostatic C-terminal fragment of perlecan. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 7080-7087.
15. Hagler, A.T., Huler, E., and Lifson, S. 1974. Energy functions for peptides and proteins. I. Derivation of a consistent force field including the hydrogen bond from amide crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96: 5319-5327.
16. Jones, D.T. 1999. GenTHREADER: An efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 287: 797-815.
17. Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R., and Thornton, J.M. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358: 86-89.
18. Kopp, J. and Schwede, T. 2004. The SWISS-MODEL repository of annotated three-dimensional protein structure homology models. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: D230-D234.
19. Kryshtafovych, A., Venclovas, C., Fidelis, K., and Moult, J. 2005. Progress over the first decade of CASP experiments. Proteins S7: 225-236.
20. Lazaridis, T. and Karplus, M. 1998. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J. Mol. Biol. 288: 477-487.
21. Lu, H. and Skolnick, J. 2001. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 44: 223-232.
22. MacKerell Jr., A.D., Bashford, D., Bellott, M., Dunbrack Jr., R.L., Evanseck, J.D., Field,M.J., Fischer, S., Gao, J., Guo, H., Ha, S., et al. 1998. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102: 3586-3616.
23. Marti-Renom, M.A., Stuart, A., Fiser, A., Sanchez, R., Melo, F., and Sali, A. 2000. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29: 291-325.
24. Melo, F. and Feytmans, E. 1997. Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. J. Mol. Biol. 267: 207-222.
25. Melo, F. and Feytmans, E. 1998. Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy. J. Mol. Biol. 277: 1141-1152.
26. Melo, F., Sanchez, R., and Sali, A. 2002. Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci. 11: 430-448.
27. Miyazawa, S. and Jernigan, R.L. 1985. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: Quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18: 534-552.
28. Park, B.H. and Levitt, M. 1996. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J. Mol. Biol. 258: 367-392.
29. Park, B.H., Huang, E.S., and Levitt, M. 1997. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J. Mol. Biol. 266: 831-846.
30. Pieper, U., Eswar, N., Braberg, H., Madhusudhan, M.S., Davis, F., Rossi, A., Marti-Renom, M.A., Karchin, R., Webb, B., Melo, F., et al. 2006. MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models, and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: 291-295.
31. Pizzo, E., Buonanno, P., Di Maro, A., Ponticelli, S., De Falco, S., Quarto, N., Cubellis, M.V., and D'Allesio, G. 2006. Ribonucleases and angiogenins from fish. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 27454-27460.
32. Rohl, C.A., Strauss, C.E., Misura, K.M., and Baker, D. 2004. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol. 383: 66-93.
33. Rychlewski, L., Zhang, B., and Godzik, A. 1998. Function and fold predictions for Mycoplasma genitalium proteins. Fold. Des. 3: 229-238.
34. Rychlewski, L., Zhang, B., and Godzik, A. 1999. Insights from structural predictions: Analysis of Escherichia coli genome. Protein Sci. 8: 614-624.
35. Sali, A. and Blundell, T.L. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234: 779-815.
36. Sali, A., Fiser, A., Sanchez, R., Marti-Renom, M.A., Jerkovic, B., Badretdinov, A., Melo, F., Overington, J., and Feyfant, E. 2001. MODELLER, a protein structure modeling program, Release 6v0. http://salilab.org/modeller/.
37. Samudrala, R. and Moult, J. 1998. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 275: 895-916.
38. Sanchez, R. and Sali, A. 1998. Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 13597-13602.
39. Sanchez, R., Pieper, U., Melo, F., Eswar, N., Marti-Renom, M.A., Madhusudhan, M.S., Mirkovic, N., and Sali, A. 2000. Protein structure modeling for structural genomics. Nat. Struct. Biol. (Suppl) 7: 986-990.
40. Sayle, R. and Milner-White, E.J. 1995. RasMol: Biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20: 374.
41. Schwede, T., Kopp, J., Guex, N., and Peitsch, M.C. 2003. SWISS-MODEL: An automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 3381-3385.
42. Sippl, M.J. 1990. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 213: 859-883.
43. Sippl, M.J. 1993a. Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 7: 473-501.
44. Sippl, M.J. 1993b. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17: 355-362.
45. Sippl, M.J. and Weitckus, S. 1992. Detection of native like models for amino acid sequences of unknown three dimensional structure in a data base of known protein conformations. Proteins 13: 258-271.
46. Solis, A.D. and Rackovsky, S. 2006. Improvement of statistical potentials and threading score functions using information maximization. Proteins 62: 892-908.
47. Swets, J.A. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240: 1285-1293.
48. Swets, J.A., Dawes, R.M., and Monahan, J. 2000. Better decisions through science. Sci. Am. 283: 82-87.
49. Tsai, J., Bonneau, R., Morozov, A.V., Kuhlman, B., Rohl, C.A., and Baker, D. 2003. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction. Proteins 52: 76-87.
50. Wang, K., Fan, B., Levitt, M., and Samudrala, R. 2004. Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions. BMC Struct. Biol. 4: 8.
51. Weiner, P.K. and Kollman, P.A. 1981. AMBER: Assisted model building with energy refinement. A general program for modeling molecules and their interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 2: 287-303.
52. Xia, Y., Huang, E.S., Levitt, M., and Samudrala, R. 2000. Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach. J. Mol. Biol. 300: 171-185.
53. Zhang, L., Godzik, A., Skolnick, J., and Fetrow, J.S. 1998. Functional analysis of the Escherichia coli genome for members of the αβ hydrolase family. Fold. Des. 3: 535-548.
54. Zhang, B., Rychlewski, L., Pawlowski, K., Fetrow, J.S., Skolnick, J., and Godzik, A. 1999. From fold predictions to function predictions: Automation of functional site conservation analysis for functional genome predictions. Protein Sci. 8: 1104-1115.
55. Zhang, Y., Kolinski, A., and Skolnick, J. 2003. TOUCHSTONE II: A new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction. Biophys. J. 85: 1145-1164.
56. Zhou, H. and Zhou, Y. 2002. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci. 11: 2714-2726.