Toward appropriate preparation for standardized achievement testing

Journal of Educational Thought

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 129-144

  Volante, Louis ^a  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248633121     PISSN: 00220701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alberta Teachers Association (2005). Testing and accountability in education. Available from http://www.teachers.ab.ca
2. Anderson, J.O. (1990). The impact of provincial examinations on education in British Columbia: General report. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Department of Education.
3. Austin, J.T., & Mahlman, R.A. (2002). High-stakes testing: Implications for career and technical education. (Report No. NDCCTE7). Washington, DC: Office of Vocational and Adult Education.
4. Beidel, D.C., Turner, S.M., & Taylor-Ferreira, J.C. (1999). Teaching study skills and test-taking strategies to elementary school students. Behavior Modification, 23(4), 30-46.
5. Burger, J.M. & Krueger, M. (2003). A balanced approach to high-stakes achievement testing: An analysis of the literature with policy implications. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 7(4). Available from http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll
6. Calkins, L., Montegomery, K., & Santman, D. (1999). Helping children master the tricks and avoid the traps of standardized tests. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6(8). Available from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6&n=8
7. Canadian Federation of Teachers. (1999). Province-wide assessment programs. Available from http://www.ctf-fce.ca/e/what/other/ assessmenftesting-main.htm
8. Cheng, L. & Couture, J. (2000). Teachers' work in the global culture of performance. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 46(1), 65-74.
9. Chudowsky, N.P. & Pellegrino, J.W. (2003). Large-scale assessment that supports learning: What will it take? Theory into Practice, 42(1), 75-83.
10. Covaleskie, J.F. (2002). Two cheers for standardized testing. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6(2). Available from http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll/volume6/covaleskie.html
11. Delhi, K. (1998). Shopping for schools. Orbit, 29(1), 29-33.
12. Duke, D.E. (1999). Real learning: Do tests help? Action for Better Schools, 6(2), 1-12.
13. Earl, L. (1998). Developing indicators: The call for accountability. Policy Options, 6, 20-25.
14. Earl, L., Levin, B., Leithwood, K, Fullan, et al., (2003). England's national literacy and numeracy strategies: Final report of the external evaluation of the implementation of the strategies. Department of Education and Employment, UK.
15. Earl, L., & Torrance, N. (2000). Embedding accountability and improvement into large-scale assessment: What difference does it make? Peabody Journal of Education, 75(4), 114-141.
16. Education Quality and Accountability Office. (1998). Educators handbook. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer of Ontario.
17. Goodnough, A. (1999, December 9). New York City teachers nabbed in school-test cheating scandal. National Post, p. B1.
18. Gronlund, N.E. (2003). Assessment of student achievement (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19. Gustafson, R.W. (2001). The future of Canadian public education: Canadian or American? Education Canada, 42(1), 40-43.
20. Hilliard, A.G. (2000). Excellence in education versus high-stakes standardized testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(4), 293-304.
21. Joint Committee on Testing Practices. (2005). Code of fair testing practices in education (revised). Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(1), 23-26.
22. Kane, M. (2001, April). The role of policy assumptions in validating high-stakes testing programs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
23. Kane, M. (2002). Validating high-stakes testing programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(1), 31-41.
24. Kaufhold, J. (1998). What's wrong with teaching to the test? School Administrator, 11(55), 14-16.
25. Levinson, C.Y. (2000). Student assessment in eight countries. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 58-61.
26. Lewington, J. (1999). Accountability: Reality or pretense? Education Canada, 39(3), 36-37.
27. MacDonald, T. (2001). To test or not to test: A question of accountability in Canadian Schools. Available from http://policy.ca/archive/ 20010622.php3
28. Marshak, D. (2003). No Child Left Behind: A foolish race into the past. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(3), 229-231.
29. McDonald, A. S. (2001). The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 21(1), 89-101.
30. McMillan, J.H. (2000). Fundamental assessment principles for teachers and school administrators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(8). Available from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=8
31. Meaghan, D.E., & Casas, F.R. (1995). On standardized achievement testing: Response to Freedman and Wilson and a last word. Interchange, 26(1), 81-96.
32. Mehrens, W A., & Kaminski, J. (1989). Methods for improving standardized test scores: Fruitful, fruitless, or fraudulent? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 8(1), 14-22.
33. Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. (Report No. ETS-RR-96-17). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
34. Miyasaka, J.R. (2000, April). A framework for evaluating the validity of test preparation practices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
35. Neil, M. (2003a). High stakes, high risk: The dangerous consequences of high-stakes testing. American School Board Journal, 190(2), 18-21.
36. Neil, M. (2003b). The dangers of testing. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 43-46.
37. Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association. (2002). Weighing in: A discussion paper of provincial assessment policy. Available from http://www.oecta.on.ca/pdfs/weighingin.pdf
38. Popham, W.J. (2000). The mismeasurement of educational quality. School Administrator, 57(11), 12-15.
39. Popham, W.J. (2001). Teaching to the test. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 16-20.
40. th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.
41. Power, M.A. (1999). Ethical standards in testing: Test preparation and administration. Vancouver, Washington: Washington Educational Research Association.
42. Rogers, W.T., & Bateson, D.J. (1991). The influence of test-wiseness on performance of high school seniors on school leaving examinations. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(2), 159-83.
43. Rubenstein, J. (2003). Test preparation: What makes it effective? (Report No. ED 480-063). North Carolina: U.S. Department of Education.
44. Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
45. Smith, M.L. & Fey, P. (2000). Validity and accountability of high-stakes testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 334-344.
46. Stiggins, R. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-765.
47. Vaughan, A.C. (2002). Standards, accountability, and the determination of school success. Educational Forum, 66(3), 206-13.
48. Volante, L. (2005). Accountability, student assessment, and the need for a comprehensive approach. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 9(6). Available from http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll
49. Wei, H.H. (2002, April). Teachers' responses to policy implementation: Interactions of new accountability policies and culturally relevant pedagogy in urban school reform. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
50. Wideen, M.R., O'Shea, T., Pye, I., & Ivany, G. (1997). High-stakes testing and the teaching of science. Canadian Journal of Education, 22(4), 428-44.
51. rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Wolfe, R., Childs, R., & Elgie, S. (2004). Final Report of the External Evaluation of EQAO's Assessment Processes. Toronto, ON: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto. Available from http://www.eqao.com/pdf_e/04/04p014e.pdf
53. Wright, W.E. (2002). The effects of high stakes testing in an inner city elementary school: The curriculum, the teachers, and the English language learners. Current Issues in Education, 5(5). Available from http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume5/number5
54. Yeh, S.S. (2001). Tests worth teaching to: Constructing state-mandated tests that emphasize critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 12-17.