Teachers' work in the global culture of performance

Alberta Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 65-74

  Cheng, Liying ^a   Couture, Jean Claude ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034336871     PISSN: 00024805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abel, M.H., & Sewell, J. (1999). Stress and burnout in rural and urban secondary school teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 287-293.
2. Anderson, J.O., Muir, W., Bateson, D.J., Blackmore, & D., Rogers, W.T. (1990). The impact of provincial examinations on education in British Columbia: General report. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Education.
3. Arnott, K. (1999, July). Trustees speak out. Education Today, pp. 20-21, 33.
4. Baker, E.L. (1989). Can we fairly measure the quality of education? (Center for Study of Evaluation (CSE) technical report 290). Los Angeles, CA: Center for Study of Evaluation (CSE).
5. Borko, H., Flory, M., & Cumbo, K. (1994). Teachers' ideas and practices about assessment and instruction: A case study of the effects of alternative assessments in instruction, student learning and accountability practices (CSE technical report 366). Boulder, CO: University of Colorado at Boulder, CRESST.
6. Bracey, G.W. (1989). The $150 million redundancy. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 698-702.
7. Broadfoot, P.M. (1998). Education, assessment and society. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
8. Calder, P. (1990). The impact of diploma examinations on the teaching-learning process. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Teachers' Association.
9. Calder, P. (1997). The impact of Alberta achievement tests or the teaching-learning process. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Teachers' Association.
10. Canadian Teachers Federation. (1999). Standardized testing and high stakes decisions. Ottawa: Author.
11. Cannell, J.J. (1987). Nationally normed elementary achievement testing in America's public schools: How all 50 states are above the national average. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 7(4), 12-15.
12. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (1994). School achievement indicators program. Toronto, ON: Author.
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Toward what end? The evaluation of student learning for the improvement of teaching. In J. Millman (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools (p. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
14. Dorr-Bremme, D., & Herman, J. (1986). Assessing student achievement: A profile of classroom practices. CSE monograph series in evaluation, 11. Los Angeles, CA: CSE.
15. Eisner. E. (1999). The uses of performance assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 658-660.
16. Forbes, D. (1973). Selling English short. English Language Teaching Journal, 27, 132-137.
17. Friedman, I. (1991). High- and low-burnout schools: School culture and aspects of teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 325-333.
18. Friedman, I. (1995). Student behavior patterns contributing to teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 281-289.
19. Gee, J.P., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of new capitalism. Sydney, NS: Westview Press.
20. Head, S. (1996). The new, ruthless economy. New York Review of Books, 29, 47-52.
21. Herman, J.L. (1989). Priorities of educational testing and evaluation: The testimony of the CRESST National Faculty (CSE technical report 304). Los Ange es, CA: CRESST.
22. Herman, J.L. (1992). Accountability and alternative assessment: Research and development issues (CSE technical report 384). Los Angeles, CA: CRESST.
23. Herman, J.L., & Golan, S. (1991). Effects of standardized testing on teachers and learning - Another look (CSE technical report 334). Los Angeles, CA: CRESST
24. Jenkins, S., & Calhoun, J.F. (1991). Teacher stress: Issues and intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 60-70.
25. Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Kellaghan, T., & Greaney, V. (1992). Using examinations to improve education: A study of fourteen African countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.
27. Kellaghan, T., Madaus, G.F., & Airasian, P.W. (1982). The effects of standardized testing. London: Kluwen, Nijhof.
28. Latham, H. (1877). On the action of examinations considered as a means of selection. Cambridge, MA: Deighton, Bell.
29. Linn, R.L. (1992). Educational assessment: Expanded expectations and challenges (CSE technical report 351). Boulder, CO: University of Colorado at Boulder, CRESST.
30. Linn, R.L., Grave, M. E., & Sanders, N.M. (1989). Comparing state and district test results to national norms: Interpretations of scoring "above the national average" (Technical report). Boulder, CO: CRESST.
31. Lytton, H., & Pyryt, M. (1997). Why do schools differ in achievement test results? Calgary, AB: Calgary Board of Education.
32. Macintosh, H.G. (1986). The prospects for public examinations in England and Wales. In D.L. Nuttall (Ed.), Assessing educational achievement (pp. 19-34). London: Falmer Press.
33. Macpherson, R.J.S. (1995). Accountability research in education: Current developments. International Journal of Educational Research, 23, 561-567.
34. Madaus, G.F. (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In L.N. Tanner (Ed.), Critical issues in curriculum: Eighty-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 83-121). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35. Martin, A.K. (1999). Towards an epistemology of professionalism: Perturbations, metaphors, and politics. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education, Sherbrooke.
36. Mathison, S.M. (1987). The perceived effects of standardized testing on teaching and curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
37. Mawhinney, H.B. (1998). Patterns of social control in assessment practices in Canadian frameworks for accountability in education. Educational Policy, 12, 98-109.
38. McEwen, N. (1995a). Educational accountability in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Education, 20, 27-44.
39. McEwen, N. (1995b). Introducing accountability in education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Education, 20, 1-17.
40. Neave, G. (1989). On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: An overview of recent trends in high school education in Western Europe 1986-1988. European Journal of Education, 20(1), 1-7.
41. Noble, A.J., & Smith, M.L. (1994). Old and new beliefs about measurement-driven reform: "The more things change, the more they stay the same" (CSE technical report 373). Arizona State University: CSE.
42. Ohanian, S. (1999). One size fits few. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
43. Palmer, P. (1998). The courage to teach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44. Payne, K., & Biddle, B. (1999). Poor school funding, child poverty and mathematics achievement. Educational Researcher, 28(6), 4-13.
45. Petrie, H.G. (1987). Introduction to evaluation and testing. Educational Policy, 1, 175-180.
46. Robertson, H.-J. (1998). No more teachers, no more books. Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart.
47. Romberg, T.A., Zarinnia, A., & Williams, S.R. (1989). The Influence of mandated testing on mathematics instruction: Grade 8 teachers' perceptions (monograph). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, National Center for Research in Mathematical Science Education.
48. Runte, R. (1998). The impact of centralized examinations on teacher professionalism. Canadian Journal of Education, 23, 166-181.
49. Shepard, L.A. (1993). The place of testing reform in educational reform: A reply to Cizek. Educational Researcher, 22(4), 10-14.
50. Simmt, E. et al. (1999). The teaching practices project: Research into teaching practices in Alberta schools that have had a history of students exceeding expectations on grade 9 provincial achievement tests in mathematics. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Education.
51. Sizer, T. (1998, September 10). School reform in the United States. IDEAS Series. CBC Radio.
52. Smith, M.L., Edelsky, C., Draper, K., Rottenberg, C., & Cherland, M. (1990). The role of testing in elementary schools (CSE technical report 321). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, CSE.
53. Spolsky, B. (1994). The examination of classroom backwash cycle: Some historical cases. In D. Nunan, V. Berry, & R. Berry (Eds.), Bringing about change in language education (pp. 55-66). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Department of Curriculum Studies.
54. Stake, R.E. (1988). The effect of reforms in assessment in the USA. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Educational Association at the University of East Anglia.
55. Stodolsky, H. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56. Tompkins, J. (1991). Pedagogy of the distressed. College English, 52(6), 16-17.
57. Trying to teach. (1993). Edmonton, AB: Alberta Teachers' Association.
58. Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and education. New York: Routledge.
59. Wideen, M.F., O'Shea, T., & Pye, I. (1997). High-stakes testing and the teaching of science. Canadian Journal of Education, 22, 428-444.