The effects of high stakes testing in an inner-city elementary school: The curriculum, the teachers, and the English language learners

Current Issues in Education

Volumn 5, Issue , 2002, Pages 1-40

  Wright, Wayne E ^a,b,c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Education Policy Studies Laboratory   (United States)

^c Institute of Economics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542639638     PISSN: 1099839X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. American Educational Research Association. (2000). Position statement concerning high-stakes testing in PreK-12 education. Author. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, January 26, 2001, http://www.aera.net/about/policy/stakes.htm.
2. Amrein, A. L. & Berliner, D. C. (2002, March 28). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved March 30, 2002 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18/.
3. Amrein, A. L., Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (2002, Unpublished manuscript). In pursuit of better schools: What research says about high-stakes testing and student learning. Research funded and published by the Rockefeller Foundation: New York.
4. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
5. Butler, Y. G., Orr, J. E., Gutierrez, M. B., & Hakuta, K. (2000, Winter & Spring). Inadequate conclusions from an inadequate assessment: What can SAT-9 scores tell us about the impact of Proposition 227 in California? Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1 & 2), 141-154.
6. Coles, G. (2000). Misreading reading: The bad science that hurts children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Colvin, R. L. (1999, July 13). New errors delay Stanford 9 results. Los Angeles Times, pp. A3.
8. Djurklou, A. (1999, July 7). Second mistake in test scores. Long Beach Press Telegram, pp. A1.
9. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: MacMillan.
11. Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
12. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Garcia, P. A. (2001). Use with caution: California's Academic Performance Index is misleading for schools with large numbers of English learners. NABE News, 24(5), 11-12, 32.
14. Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man. New York, NY: W. W. Norton Company, Inc.
15. Grisham, D. L. (2001). High-stakes testing in our schools: A new report from California. Reading Online, 51, Retrieved from the World Wide Web January 26, 2002, http://www.readingonline.org/editorial/july2001/index.html
16. Grissmer, D., Flanagan, A., Kawata, J., & Williamson, S. (2000). Improving student achievement: What NAEP test scores tell us. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation [On-line]. Available: http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR924/
17. Haney, W. (2000, August). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41), Retrieved April 1, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/
18. Heubert, J. P. (2001). High-stakes testing: Opportunities and risks for students of color, English-language learners, and students with disabilities. In M. Pines (Ed.), The 21st Century challenge: Moving the youth agenda forward. Baltimore, MD: Sar Levitan Center for Social Policy Studies, John Hopkins University Press.
19. Heubert, J.P. & Hauser, R.M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. Klein, S. P., Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., & Stecher, B. M. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(49), Available: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n49/
21. Kohn, A. (2000). The case against standardized testing: Raising the scores, ruining the schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
22. Kopriva, R. (2000). Ensuring accuracy in testing for English language learners. Washington, DC: State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards LEP Consortium, Council of Chief State School Officers.
23. Koretz, D. M., Linn, R. L., Dunbar, S. B., & Shepard, L. A. (1991, April 5). The effects of high-stakes testing on achievement: Preliminary findings about generalizations across tests. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
24. Lapp, D., & Flood, J. (2000, Fall). An interview with Marion Joseph. The California Reader, 34(1).
25. McCarrier, A., Pinnell, G. S., & Fountas, I. C. (1999). Interactive writing: How language & literacy come together, K-2. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
26. McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
27. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
28. Mora, J. K. (2001). What do the SAT-9 scores for language minority students really mean? Retrieved from the World Wide Web, January 26, 2001, http://coe.sdsu.edu/people/jmora/SAT9analysis.htm.
29. Moustafa, M., & Land, R. (2001). The research base of Open Court and its translation into instructional policy in California. Retrieved from the World Web September 29, 2001, http://instructional1.calstatela.edu/mmousta/.
30. No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). Retrieved from the World Wide Web February 10, 2002, http://www.ed.gov/nclb.
31. Office of Civil Rights. (2000). The use of tests as part of high-stakes decision-making for students: A resource guide for educators and policy-makers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
32. Ohanian, S. (1999). One size fits few: The folly of educational standards. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
33. Pyle, A. (1999, February 18). California and the West; School accountability bill clears panel; Legislature: Measure would allow state to rank campuses by performance and identify 300 for improvements. Los Angeles Times, pp. 3.
34. Sacks, P. (1999). Standardized minds: The high price of America's testing culture and what we can do change it. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
35. Schneider, S., & Holtzman, D. (1999, November). Evaluation of California's Standards Based Accountability System: Final Report. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
36. Smith, M. L., Edelsky, C., Draper, K., Rottenberg, C., & Cherland, M. (1989). The role of testing in elementary schools. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Research on Educational Standards and Student Tests, University of California, Los Angeles.
37. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Steck-Vaughn Company. (1998). Test best for test prep. Orlando, FL: Author.
39. Stoskopf, A. (2000). The forgotten history of eugenics. In K. Swope & B. Miner (Eds.), Failing our kids: Why the testing craze won't fix our schools (pp. 76-80). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools, LTD.
40. Swope, K., & Miner, B. (Eds.). (2000). Failing our kids: Why the testing craze won't fix our schools. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools, LTD.
41. Taylor, D. (1998). Beginning to read and the spin doctors of science: The political campaign to change America's mind about how children learn to read. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teacher of English.
42. Thompson, M., DiCerbo, K., Mahoney, K., & MacSwan, J. (2002). Exito en California? A validity critique of language program evaluations and analysis of English learner test scores. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(7), Retrieved from the Word Wide Web January 26, 2002 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n7/
43. Valencia, R. R. & Bernal, E. M. (Eds.). (2000). The Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) case: Perspectives of plaintiff's experts [Special issue]. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 22(4).
44. Wells, F. (2001). ZIP codes shouldn't determine our students' future. California Educator, 5(8), 1-5.
45. Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.