Large-scale assessments that support learning: What will it take?

Theory into Practice

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 75-83

  Chudowsky, Naomi ^b   Pellegrino, James W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037412776     PISSN: 00405841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4201_10     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Federation of Teachers. (1999). Making standards matter. Washington, DC: Author.
3. College Board. (1994). Evaluating the advanced placement portfolio in studio art. New York: College Entrance Examination Board and Educational Testing Service.
4. Commission on Instructionally Supportive Assessment. (2001). Building tests to support instruction and accountability. Retrieved April 30, 2002, from http://www.nea.org/issues/high-stakes/buildingtests.html
5. Finn, C.E., Jr., Petrilli, J.J., & Vanourek, G. (1998). The state of state standards. Fordham Report (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
6. Hoff, D.J. (2002, April 3). Md. to phase out innovative testing program. Education Week.
7. Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H., & Mark, M.A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
8. Koretz, D.M., & Barron, S.I. (1998). The validity of gains in scores on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS) (MR-1014-EDU). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
9. Mislevy, R.J. (1996). Test theory reconceived. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33(4), 379-416.
10. Mislevy, R.J. (2000, December). The challenge of context. Presentation at the CRESST Conference, Los Angeles.
11. Mosher, F.A. (in press). What NAEP really could do. In L.V. Jones & I. Olkin (Eds.), The nation's report card: Evolution and perspectives. Phi Delta Kappa and Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association and National Center for Education Statistics.
12. National Academy of Education. (1997). Assessment in transition: Monitoring the nation's educational progress. Stanford, CA: Author.
13. National Research Council. (1999a). Grading the nation's report card: Evaluating NAEP and transforming the assessment of educational progress. J.W. Pellegrino, L.R. Jones, & K.J. Mitchell (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. National Research Council. (1999b). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. J.P. Heubert & R.M Hauser (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. J.W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, & R. Glaser (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. National Research Council. (2002). Technology and assessment: Thinking ahead - Proceedings of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17. Pellegrino, J.W. (1992). Understanding what we measure and measuring what we understand. In B.R. Gifford & M.C. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp. 275-300). Boston: Kluwer.
18. Popham, W.J. (2002). Implementing ESEA's testing provisions: Guidance from an independent commission's requirements. Retrieved April 30, 2002, from http://www.aasa.org/issues_and_insights/issues_dept/Commiss.n_Report_Book.pdf
19. Shepard, L.A. (2000, April). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Presidential address presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
20. VanLehn, K., & Martin, J. (1998). Evaluation of an assessment system based on Bayesian student modeling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 179-221.
21. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.