Accountability, student assessment, and the need for a comprehensive approach

International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning

Volumn 9, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Volante, Louis ^a  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744515005     PISSN: 12069620     EISSN: 12069620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Behuniak, P. (2002). Consumer-referenced testing. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(3), 199-207.
2. Burger, J. M., & Krueger, M. (2003). A balanced approach to high-stakes achievement testing: An analysis of the literature with policy implications. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 7(4). Online at http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll.
3. Canadian Federation of Teachers. (1999). Province-wide assessment programs. Online at http://www.ctf-fce.ca/e/what/other/assessment/testing-main. htm
4. Cheng, L., & Couture, J. (2000). Teachers' work in the global culture of performance. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 46(1), 65-74
5. Chudowsky, N. P. & James, W. (2003). Large-scale assessment that supports learning: What will it take? Theory into Practice, 42(1), 75-83.
6. Cimbricz, S. (2002). State-mandated testing and teachers' beliefs and practice. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2), Online at http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n2.html
7. Covaleskie, J. F. (2002). Two cheers for standardized testing. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6(2). Online at http://www.ucalgarv.ca/~iejll/volume6/covaleskie.html
8. Delhi, K. (1998). Shopping for Schools. Orbit, 29(1), 29-33.
9. Earl, L. (1998). Developing indicators: The call for accountability. Policy Options, 6, 20-25.
10. Earl, L., & Torrance, N. (2000). Embedding accountability and improvement into large-scale assessment: What difference does it make? Peabody Journal of Education, 75(4), 114-41.
11. Earl, L., Levin, B., Leithwood, K., Fullan, M., Watson, N., Torrance, N., Jantzi, et al. (2003) England's National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies: Final report of the external evaluation of the implementation of the strategies. Department of Education and Employment, England.
12. EQAO. (1998). Educators handbook. Toronto, Ontario: Queen's Printer of Ontario.
13. Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. New York: Falmer.
14. Gratz, D. B. (2000). High standards for whom? Phi Delta Kappan, 81(9), 681-87.
15. Hardy, L. (2003). Overburdened, overwhelmed. American School Board Journal, 190(4), 18-23.
16. Herman, J. L. (1992). What research tells us about good assessment. Educational Leadership, 49(8), 74-78.
17. Jones, K. (2004). A balanced school accountability model: An alternative to high-stakes testing. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(8), 584-90.
18. Linn, R. (2000). Assessment: Responsibility and reasonable expectations. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 3-13.
19. MacDonald, T. (2001). To test or not to test: A question of accountability in Canadian Schools. Online at http://policy.ca/archive/20010622. php3.
20. McDonald, A. S. (2001). The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 21(1), 89-101.
21. McMillan, J. H. (2000). Fundamental assessment principles for teachers and school administrators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(8). Online at http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=8
22. Neil, M. (2003). High stakes, high risk: The dangerous consequences of high-stakes testing. American School Board Journal, 190(2), 18-21.
23. Popham, W. J. (2004). All about accountability / Why assessment illiteracy is professional suicide. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 82-83.
24. Popham, W. J. (2003). The seductive allure of data. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 48-51.
25. Popham, W. J. (2001). Teaching to the test. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 16-20.
26. Stiggens, R. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-765.
27. Volante, L. (2004). Teaching to the test: What every educator and policy maker should know. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 35. Online at http://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/articles/volante.html
28. Wickstrom, R. A. (1999). Accountability: Toward an appropriate approach. Education Canada, 39(3), 16-19.
29. Wideman, R. (2002). Using action research and provincial test results to improve student learning. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6(20). Online at http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll/volume6/wideman.html
30. Wilson, M. (Ed.). (2004). Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability: 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Wright, W. E. (2002). The effects of high stakes testing in an inner city elementary school: The curriculum, the teachers, and the English language learners. Current Issues in Education, 5(5). Online at http://cie.ed.asu.edu/ volume5/number5