Standards, accountability, and the determination of school success

Educational Forum

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 206-213

  Vaughan, Audrey C ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250317906     PISSN: 00131725     EISSN: 19388098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00131720208984830     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bock, R. D., and R. G. Wolfe. 1996. Audit and review of the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVA AS): Final report. Part 1 of A review and analysis of the Tennessee Value Added Assessment System, ed. R. D. Bock, R. G. Wolfe, and T. H. Fisher. Nashville: Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury. Available at: http://www.comptroller.state.tn.us/o rea/repor t s/t vaascp 1.pdf.
2. Bush, G. W. 2001. No child left behind. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Available at: http://www.ed.gov/offi ces/O E S E/esea/ncl b/titlepage.html.
3. Cizek, G. J. 1998. Filling in the blanks: Putting standardized tests to the test. Washington, D.C.: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Available at: http://www.edexcellence.net/library/cizek.pdf.
4. Fletcher, M. A. 2001. School accountability remains tough task: Education plan must define success. Washington Post, 29 May, A2.
5. Gandal, M. 1995. Not all standards are created equal. Educational Leadership 52(6): 16-21.
6. Hill, D. 2000. He’s got your number. Teacher Magazine 11(8): 42-47.
7. Houston, P. D. 1999. Skeptical about our nation’s accountability agenda. School Administrator 56(10): 54.
8. Kanstoroom, M. 1999. Boosting teacher quality: A common sense proposal-Testimony prepared for delivery to the Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education of the Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: CEW. Available at: http://edworkforce.house.gov/hearings/706th/petlteacherS1399fkanstoroom.htm.
9. National Education Summit. 1999. 1999 National education summit: Briefing book. Washington, D.C.: Achieve, Inc. Available at: http://www.achieve.org/dstore.nsf/Lookup/7999SummitBriefing Book/$ fi l e/1 999 S u m m i t BriefingBook.pdf.
10. National Governors Association. 1996. 1996 National education summit policy statement. Washington, D.C.: NGA.
11. Neill, M. 2000. Telephone conversation with D. Hill, April.
12. Olson, L. 1999. Shining a spotlight on results. Education Week 18(17): 8.
13. Public Agenda. 1998. Education: A nation divided? Public Agenda Online. New York: PA. Available at: htttp://www.publicagenda.org/issues/nation_divided_detail.cfm?issue_type=education&lis=3.
14. Reville, S. P. 1999. Breaking out of the ‘prison of time.’ Education Week 18(34): 36.
15. Sanders, W. L. 1998. Value-added assessment. School Administrator 55(11): 24-27.
16. Schmoker, M., and R. J. Marzano. 1999. Realizing the promise of standards-based education. Educational Leadership 56(6): 17-21.
17. Virginia Department of Education. 1999. Board president and state superintendent report significant improvement in tests results for African-American students. Richmond: VDOE. Available at: http://www.pen.k72.va.us/VDO E/NewHome/p ress releas es/a ug599.html.
18. Virginia Department of Education. 2000. African-American students continue gains on Virginia tests: African-American students improve on 20 of 27 SOL tests; Other minorities also improve. Richmond: VDOE. Available at: http://www.pen.k72.va.us/VDOE/NavHome/pressreleases/sep2200.html.
19. Wake County Public School System. 2001. Gaps in academic achievement: WCPSS status 2000-01. Raleigh, N.C.: WCPSS. Available at: http://zvzvzv.zvcpss.net/evaluation-research/index_reports/2001/gaps_in_academic_achievement_wcpss_status_2000_2001.pdf
20. Waters, G. A. 1998. Critical evaluation for education reform. Educational Policy Analysis Archives 6(20). Available at http://epaa.asu.edu/epaaH6n20.html.