Improving information-seeking behavior among business majors

Research Strategies

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 357-369

  Long, Casey M ^a   Shrikhande, Milind M ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248583790     PISSN: 07343310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resstr.2006.12.022     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arnold J.M., and Jayne E.A. Dangling by a slender thread: The lessons and implication of teaching the World Wide Web to freshman. Journal of Academic Librarianship 24 1 (1998) 43-52
2. Boudreau S., and Bicknell-Holmes T. A model for strategic business instruction. Research Strategies 19 2 (2003) 148-162
3. Cooney M., and Hiris L. Integrating information literacy and its assessment into a graduate business course: A collaborative framework. Research Strategies 19 3-4 (2003) 213-232
4. D'Angelo B.J. Using source analysis to promote critical thinking. Research Strategies 18 4 (2001) 303-309
5. Davis P.M. The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior: A 2000 update. College & Research Libraries 63 1 (2002) 53-60
6. Davis P.M. Effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior: Guiding student scholarship in a networked age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 3 1 (2003) 41-51
7. Davis P.M., and Cohen S.A. The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52 4 (2001) 309-314
8. Emmons M., and Martin W. Engaging conversation: Evaluating the contribution of library instruction to the quality of student research. College & Research Libraries 63 6 (2002) 545-560
9. ENDER (Formative Evaluation of the Distributed National Research) Project. (2002). How students search: Information seeking and electronic resource use (Issues Paper 8). Retrieved December 22, 2004, from Manchester, England: Manchester Metropolitan University, Department of Information and Communications, Centre for Research in Library and Information Management Web site: http://www.cerlim.ac.uk/edner/ip/ip08.rtf
10. Feast V. Integration of information literacy skills into business courses. Reference Services Review 31 1 (2003) 81-95
11. Fenske R., and Roselle A. Proving the efficacy of library instruction evaluation. Research Strategies 16 3 (1998) 175-185
12. Fiegen A.M., Cherry B., and Watson K. Reflections on collaboration: Learning outcomes and information literacy assessment in the business curriculum. Reference Services Review 30 4 (2002) 307-318
13. Gratch B. Toward a methodology for evaluating research paper bibliographies. Research Strategies 3 4 (1985) 170-177
14. Hovde K. Check the citation: Library instruction and student paper bibliographies. Research Strategies 17 1 (2000) 3-9
15. Judd V., Tims B., Farrow L., and Periatt J. Evaluation and assessment of a library instruction component of an introduction to business course: A continuous process. Reference Services Review 32 3 (2004) 274-283
16. King D.N., and Ory J.C. Effects of library instruction on student research: A case study. College & Research Libraries 42 1 (1981) 31-41
17. Kirk T. A comparison of two methods of library instruction for students in introductory biology. College & Research Libraries 32 6 (1971) 465-474
18. Kohl D.F., and Wilson L.A. Effectiveness of course-integrated bibliographic instruction in improving coursework. RQ 27 2 (1986) 206-211
19. Lombardo S., and Miree C.E. Caught in the Web: The impact of library instruction on business students' perception and use of print and online resources. College & Research Libraries 64 1 (2003) 6-22
20. Malone D., and Videon C. Assessing undergraduate use of electronic resources: A quantitative analysis of works cited. Research Strategies 15 3 (1997) 151-158
21. Martin S. Impact of a graduate entry programme on a medical school library service. Health Information and Libraries Journal 20 1 (2003) 42-49
22. Morrison J.L., Kim H.S., and Kydd C.T. Student preferences for cybersearch strategies: Impact on critical evaluation of sources. Journal of Education for Business 73 5 (1998) 264-268
23. Muha, D. (2003, August 28). New study confirms internet plagiarism is prevalent. Rutgers University-Newark Online Campus News. Retrieved December 23, 2004, from http://www.newark.rutgers.edu/news/
24. O'Keeffe J. One step at a time: A framework for introducing business students to basic sources of company and industry data. Research Strategies 16 1 (1998) 71-77
25. Online Computer Library Center (OCLC). (2002). OCLC White paper on the information habits of college students: How academic librarians can influence students' Web-based information choices. Retrieved July 26, 2004, from http://www2.oclc.org/oclc/pdf/printondemand/informationhabits.pdf
26. Paterson E.R. An Assessment of College Student Library Skills. RQ 17 3 (1978) 226-229
27. Roldan M., and Wu Y.D. Building context-based library instruction. Journal of Education for Business 79 6 (2004) 323-327
28. Rutledge D.P., and Maehler A. An assessment of library education contributions to business student learning: A case study. Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship 9 1 (2003) 3-14
29. Stein L.L., and Lamb J.M. Not just another BI: Faculty-librarian collaboration to guide students through the research process. Research Strategies 16 1 (1998) 29-39
30. Ursin L., Lindsay E.B., and Johnson C.M. Assessing library instruction in the freshman seminar: A citation analysis study. Reference Services Review 32 3 (2004) 284-292
31. Webster J., and Reilly L. A library instruction case study: Measuring success from multiple perspectives. Research Strategies 19 1 (2003) 16-32
32. Young V.E., and Ackerson L.G. Evaluation of student research paper bibliographies: Refining evaluation criteria. Research Strategies 13 2 (1995) 80-93