Mapping uncertainty and phylogenetic uncertainty in ancestral character state reconstruction: An example in the moss genus Brachytheciastrum

Systematic Biology

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 957-971

  Vanderpoorten, A ^a   Goffinet, B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Ancestral character state reconstruction; Bayesian inference; Comparative methods; Moss; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

BRACHYTHECIASTRUM; BRYOPHYTA;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BRYOPSIDA; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY;

BAYES THEOREM; BRYOPSIDA; EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 34147132846     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150601088995     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Alvarez, I., and J. F. Wendel. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29:417-434.
2. Bailey, C. D., T. G. Carr, S. A. Harris, and C. E. Hughes. 2003. Characterization of angiosperm nrDNA polymorphism, paralogy, and pseudogenes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29:435-455.
3. Blockeel, T. L., A. Vanderpoorten, A. Sotiaux, and B. Goffinet. 2005. The status of the midwestern European endemic moss, Brachythecium appleyardiae. J. Bryol. 27:137-142.
4. Blomberg, S. P., and T. Garland. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: Phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. J. Evol. Biol. 15:899-910.
5. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745.
6. Buck, W. R., B. Goffinet, and A. J. Shaw. 2000. Novel relationships in pleurocarpous mosses as revealed by cpDNA sequences. Bryologist 103:774-789.
7. Buck, W. R., J. A. Jimenez, R. M. Ros, and M. J. Cano. 2001. Brachythecium bellicum sp. nov. from northern Africa. Nova Hedwigia 72:467-472.
8. Corley, M. F. V. 1990. Brachythecium trachypodiuvi (Brid.) B., S. & G. in Scotland. J. Bryol. 16:173-177.
9. Cunningham, C. W. 1999. Some limitations of ancestral character-state reconstruction when testing evolutionary hypotheses. Syst. Biol. 48:665-674.
10. Cunningham, C. W., K. E. Omland, and T. H. Oakley. 1998. Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical reappraisal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:361-366.
11. Den Bakker, H. C, G. C. Zuccarello, T. H. W. Kuyper, and M. E. Noordeloo. 2004. Evolution of host specificity in the ectomycorrhizal genus Leccinum. New Phytol. 163:201-215.
12. Duckett, J. G., J. Burch, P. W. Fletcher, H. W. Matcham, D. J. Read, A. J. Russell, and S. Pressel S. 2004. In vitro cultivation of bryophytes: A review of practicalities, problems, progress and promise. J. Bryol. 26:3-20.
13. Feldberg, K., H. Groth, R. Wilson, A. Schafer-Verwimp, and J. Heinrichs. 2004. Cryptic speciation in Herbertus (Herbertaceae, Jungermanniopsida): Range and morphology of Herbertus sendtneri inferred from nrlTS sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 249:247-261.
14. Forest, F., and A. Bruneau. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis, organization, and molecular evolution of the nontranscribed spacer of 5S ribosomal RNA genes in Corylus (Betulaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161:793-806.
15. Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160:712-726.
16. Goffinet, B. 2000. Origin and phylogenetic relationships of bryophytes. Pages 124-149 in Bryophyte biology (A. J. Shaw and B. Goffinet, eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Goffinet, B., and W. R. Buck. 2004. Systematics of Bryophyta: From molecules to a revised classification. Monogr. Syst. Bot. Miss. Bot. Gard. 98:205-239.
18. Goffinet, B., A. J. Shaw, and C. J. Cox. 2004. Phylogenetic inferences in the dung-moss family Splachnaceae from analyses of cpDNA sequence data and implications for the evolution of entomophily. Am. J. Bot. 91:748-759.
19. Huelsenbeck, J. P., N. Larget, and M. E. Alfaro. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1123-1133.
20. Ignatov, M. S., and S. Huttunen. 2002. Brachytheciaceae (Bryophyta)-a family of sibling genera. Arctoa 11:245-296.
21. Ignatov, M. S., and E. A. Ignatova. 2004. Moss flora of the middle part of European Russia, Vol. 2: Fontinalaceae-Amblystegiaceae. Arctoa 11 (Suppl. 2):612-960.
22. Jenner, R. A. 2004. Accepting partnership by submission? Morphological phylogenetics in the new millennium. Syst. Biol. 53:333-342.
23. Kress, W. J., L. M. Prince, W. J. Hahn, and E. A. Zimmer. 2001. Unraveling the evolutionary radiation of the families of the Zingiberales using morphological and molecular evidence. Syst. Biol. 50:926-944.
24. Lee, M. S. Y. 2004. Molecular and morphological data sets have similar numbers of relevant characters. Taxon 53:1019-1022.
25. Lee, M. S. Y. 2006. Morphological phylogenetics and the universe of useful characters. Taxon 55:5-7.
26. Lewis, P. 0.2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50:913-925.
27. Lutzoni, F, M. Pagel, and V. Reeb. 2001. Major fungal lineages derived from lichen-symbiotic ancestors. Nature 411:937-940.
28. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 2005. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 1.06. http:// mesquiteprojetc.org
29. Martins, E. P. 2000. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:296-299.
30. McDaniel, S. F, and A. J. Shaw. 2003. Phylogeographic structure and cryptic speciation in the trans-antarctic moss Pyrrhobryum minoides. Evolution 57:205-215.
31. Miller, J. S., and D. L. Venable. 2003. Floral morphometrics and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in Lycium (Solanaceae). Evolution 57:74-86.
32. Minin, V, Z. Abdo, P. Joyce, and J. Sullivan. 2003. Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. Syst. Biol. 52:674-683.
33. Mooers, A. O. 2004. Effects of tree shape on the accuracy of maximum likelihood-based ancestor reconstructions. Syst. Biol. 53:809-814.
34. Mooers, A. O., and D. Schluter. 1999. Reconstructing ancestor states with maximum likelihood: Support for one- and two-rate models. Syst. Biol. 48:623-633.
35. Mooers, A. O., M. Vamosi, and D. Schluter. 1999. Using phylogenies to test macroevolutionary hypotheses of trait evolution in cranes (Gruinae). Am. Nat. 154:249-259.
36. Nei, N., and S. Kumar. 2000. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
37. Nosil, P., and A. O. Mooers. 2005. Testing hypotheses about ecological specialization using phylogenetic trees. Evolution 59:2256-2263.
38. Oakley, T. K, G. Zhenglong, E. Abouheif, N. H. Patel, and W.-H. Li. 2005. Comparative methods for the analysis of gene-expression evolution: an example using yeast functional genomic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:40-50.
39. Ober, K. A. 2003. Arboreality and morphological evolution in ground beetles (Carabidae: Harpalinae): Testing the taxon pulse model. Evolution 57:1343-1358.
40. Page, R. D. M. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 12:357-358.
41. Pa gel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: A general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255:37-45.
42. Pagel, M. 1998. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scr. 26:331-348.
43. Pagel, M. 1999a. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884.
44. Pagel, M. 1999b. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48:612-622.
45. Pagel, M. 2002. Modelling the evolution of continuously varying characters on phylogenetic trees. The case of Hominid cranial capacity. Pages 269-286 in Morphology, shape and phylogenetics (N. McLeod and P. Forey, eds.). Taylor & Francis, London.
46. Pagel, M., and F. Lutzoni. 2002. Accounting for phylogenetic uncertainty in comparative studies of evolution and adaptation. Pages 148-161 in Biological evolution and statistical physics (M. Lassig and A. Valleriani, eds.). Springer, Berlin.
47. Pagel, M., and A. Meade. 2004. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst. Biol. 53:571-581.
48. Pagel, M., A. Meade, and D. Barker. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 53:673-684.
49. Posada, D., and T. R. Buckley. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: Advantages of the AIC and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53:793-808.
50. Pressel, S., H. W. Matcham, and J. G. Duckett. 2005. Studies of protonemal morphogenesis in mosses. X. Ephemeraceae revisited; new dimensions underground. J. Bryol. 27:311-318.
51. Ranker, T. A., A. R. Smith, B. S. Parris, J. M. O. Geiger, C. H. Haufler, S. C. K. Straub, and H. Schneider. 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of grammitid ferns (Grammitidaceae): A case of rampant morphological homoplasy. Taxon 53:415-428.
52. Razafimandimbison, S. G., E. A. Kellogg, and B. Bremer. 2004. Recent origin and phylogenetic utility of divergent ITS putative pseudogenes: A case study from the Naucleeae (Rubiaceae). Syst. Biol. 53:177-192.
53. Renzaglia, K. S., R. J. Duff, D. L. Nickrent, and D. J. Garbary. 2000. Vegetative and reproductive innovations of early land plants: implications for a unified phylogeny. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355:769-793.
54. Ronquist, F. 2004. Bayesian inferrence of character evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:475-481.
55. Riiber, L., R. Britz, H. H. Tan, P. K. L. Ng, and R. Zardoya. 2004. Evolution of mouthbrooding and life-history correlates in the fighting fish genus Betta. Evolution 58:799-813.
56. Schluter, D., T. Price, A. O. Mooers, and D. Ludwig. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51:1699-1711.
57. Scotland, R. W., R. G. Olmstead, and J. R. Bennett. 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction: The role of morphology. Syst. Biol. 52:539-548.
58. Shaw, A. J. 2000. Molecular phylogeography and cryptic speciation in the mosses, Mielichhoferia elongata and M. tnielichhoferiana (Bryaceae). Mol. Ecol. 9:595-608.
59. Shaw, A. J. 2001. Biogeographic patterns and cryptic speciation in bryophytes. J. Biogeogr. 28:253-261.
60. Shaw, A. J., and B. Allen . 2000. Phylogenetic relationships, morphological incongruence, and geographic speciation in the Fontinalaceae (Bryophyta). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16:225-237.
61. Shaw, A. J., C. J. Cox, B. Goffinet, W. R. Buck, and S. B. Boles. 2003a. Phylogenetic evidence of a rapid radiation of pleurocarpous mosses (Bryophyta). Evolution 57:2226-2241.
62. Shaw, A. J., O. Werner, and R. M. Ros. 2003b. Intercontinental Mediterranean disjunct mosses: Morphological and molecular patterns. Am. J. Bot. 90:540-550.
63. Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparisons of loglikelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
64. Smith, N. D., and A. H. Turner. 2005. Morphology's role in phylogeny reconstruction: perspectives from paleontology. Syst. Biol. 54:166-173.
65. Stech, M., and J. Dohrmann. 2004. Molecular relationships and biogeography of two Gondwanan Catnpylopus species, C. pilifer and C. introflexus (Dicranaceae). Monogr. Syst. Bot. Miss. Bot. Gard. 98:415-431.
66. Stech, M., and D. Wagner. 2005. Molecular relationships, biogeography, and evolution of Gondwanan Campylopus species (Dicranaceae, Bryopsida). Taxon 54:377-382.
67. Stireman, J. O. 2005. The evolution of generalization? Parasitoid flies and the perils of inferring host range evolution from phylogenies. J. Evol. Biol. 18:325-336.
68. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
69. Thompson, G. J., and B. P. Oldroyd. 2004. Evaluating alternative hypotheses for the origin of eusociality in corbiculate bees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33:452-456.
70. Vanderpoorten, A., C. J. Cox, and A. J. Shaw. 2004. Evolution of multiple paralogous adenosine kinase genes in the moss genus Hygwamblystegium: Phylogenetic implications. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:505-516.
71. Vanderpoorten, A., L. Hedenas, C. J. Cox, and A. J. Shaw. 2002. Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the Amblystegiaceae (Bryophyta, Musci). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 23:1-21.
72. Vanderpoorten, A., M. S. Ignatov, S. Huttunen, and B. Goffinet. 2005. A molecular and morphological recircumscription of Brachytheciastrum (Brachytheciaceae, Bryopsida). Taxon 54:369-376.
73. Vanderpoorten, A., and A.-L. Jacquemart. 2004. Evolutionary mode, tempo, and phylogenetic association of continuous morphological traits in the aquatic moss genus Amblystegium. J. Evol. Biol. 17:279-287.
74. Werner, O., and J. Guerra. 2004. Molecular phylogeography of the moss Tortula muralis Hedw. (Pottiaceae) based on chloroplast rpsi gene sequence data. Plant Biol. 6:147-157.
75. Werner, O., J. A. Jimenez, R. M. Ros, M. J. Cano, and J. Guerra. 2005a. Preliminary investigation of the systematics of Didymodon (Pottiaceae, Musci) based on nrlTS sequence data. Syst. Bot. 30:461-470.
76. Werner, O., R. M. Ros, and M. Grundmann. 2005b. Molecular phylogeny of Trichostomoideae (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) based on nrlTS sequence data. Taxon 54:361-368.
77. Wiens, J. J. 2004. The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 53:653-661.
78. Yang, Z. 1997. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Cabios 13:555-556. http:// abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/ paml.html.