Unraveling the evolutionary radiation of the families of the zingiberales using morphological and molecular evidence

Systematic Biology

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 926-944

  Kress, W John ^a   Prince, Linda M ^a   Hahn, William J ^b   Zimmer, Elizabeth A ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^b MC 5557 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

18S; atpB; Fossils; Mhylogeny; Monocots; Morphology; rbcL; Tropical; Zingiberales

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; RBCL PROTEIN, PLASTID; RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; RNA 18S;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; FOSSIL; GENE; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; DATABASES, GENETIC; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FOSSILS; GENES, PLANT; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; RIBULOSE-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 18S; ZINGIBERALES;

EID: 0035527397     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351501753462885     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. APG (ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP). 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 85:531-553.
2. BAKER, R. H., X. B. YU, AND R. DESALLE. 1998. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:427-436.
3. BAUM, D. A., R. L. SMALL, AND J. F. WENDEL. 1998. Biogeography and floral evolution of Baobabs (Adansonia, Bombacaceae) as inferred from multiple data sets. Syst. Biol. 47:181-207.
4. BOYD, A. 1992. Musopsis n. gen.: A banana-like leaf genus from the early Tertiary of eastern North Greenland. Am. J. Bot. 79:1359-1367.
5. BULT, C., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, AND Y. SUH. 1992. Amplification and sequencing of 16/18S rDNA from gel-purified total plant DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 10:273-284.
6. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42:795-803.
7. BREMER, K. 2000. Early Cretaceous lineages of monocot flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:4707-4711.
8. BRUNEAU, A., E. E. DICKSON, AND S. KNAPP. 1995. Congruence of chloroplast DNA restriction site characters with morphological and isozyme data in Solanum sect. Lasiocarpa. Can. J. Bot. 73:1151-1167.
9. CHASE, M. W., D. E. SOLTIS, R. G. OLMSTEAD, D. MORGAN D. H. LES, B. D. MISHLER, M. R. DUVALL, R. A. PRICE, H. G. HILLS, Y.-L. QIU, K. A. KRON, J. H. RETTIG E. CONTI, J. D. PALMER, J. R. MANHART, K. J. SYTSMA, H. J. MICHAELS, W. J. KRESS, K. G. KAROL, W. D. CLARK, M. HEDREN, B. S. GAUT, R. K. JANSEN, K.-J. KIM, C. F. WIMPEE, J. F. SMITH, G. R. FURNIER, S. H. STRAUSS, Q.-Y. XIANG, G. M. PLUNKETT, P. S. SOLTIS,: S. SWENSEN, S. E. WILLIAMS, P. A. GADEK, C. J. QUINN, L. E. EGUIARTE, E. E. GOLENBERG, G. H. LEARN, JR., S. W. GRAHAM, S. C. BARRETT, S. DAYANANDAN, AND V. A. ALBERT. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80:528-580.
10. CHASE, M. W., M. R. DUVALL, H. G. HILLS, J. G. CONRAN, A. V. COX, L. E. EGUIARTE, J. HARTWELL, M. F. FAY, L. R. CADDICK, K. M. CAMERON, AND S. HOOT. 1995. Molecular phylogenies of Lilianae. Pages 109-138 in Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution (P. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds.). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew UK.
11. CHASE, M. W., D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, P. J. RUDALL, M. F. FAY, W. H. HAHN, S. SULLIVAN, J. JOSEPH, M. MOVRAY, P. J. KORES, T. J. GIVNISH, K. J. SYTSMA, AND J. C. PIRES. 2000. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: An assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. Pages 3-16 in Monocots: Systematics and evolution (K. I. Wilson and D. A. Morrison, eds.). CSIRO, Melbourne.
12. CRONQUIST, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
13. DAHLGREN, R., AND F. N. RASMUSSEN. 1983. Monocotyledon evolution characters and phylogenetic estimation. Evol. Biol. 16:255-395.
14. DAHLGREN, R., H. T. CLIFFORD, AND P. F. YEO. 1985. The families of the monocotyledons. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
15. DAVIS, J. I. 1995. A phylogenetic structure of the monocotyledons, as inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation, and a comparison of measures of clade support. Syst. Bot. 20:503-527.
16. DE QUEIROZ, A., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND J. KIM. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:657-681.
17. DONOGHUE, M. J., R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of the Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79:333-345.
18. DUVALL, M. R., M. T. CLEGG, M. W. CHASE, W. D. CLARK, W. J. KRESS, H. G. HILLS, L. E. EGUIARTE, J. F. SMITH, B. S. GAUT, E. A. ZIMMER, AND G. H. LEARN, JR. 1993. Molecular phylogenies for the monocotyledons constructed from rbcL sequence data. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80:607-619.
19. ENGLER, A., AND K. PRANTL. 1889. Musaceae, Zingiberaceae, Cannaceae, Marantaceae. Nat. Pflanzenfam.. 2:1-43.
20. ERIKSSON, T. 1995. AutoDecay, version 2.5. Botaniska Institutionen, Stockholms Univ., Stockholm.
21. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-320.
22. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence intervals on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
23. FURNESS, C. A., AND P. J. RUDALL. 1998. The tapetum and systematics in monocotyledons. Bot. Rev. 64:201-239.
24. GIVNISH, T. J., T. M. EVANS, J. C. PIRES, AND K. J. SYTSMA. 1999. Polyphyly and convergent morphological evolution in Commelinales and Commelinidae: Evidence from rbcL sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 12:360-385.
25. GOLDMAN, N., J. P. ANDERSON, AND A. G. RODRIGO. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652-670.
26. GRAHAM, S. W., J. R. KOHN, B. R. MORTON, J. E. ECKENWALDER, AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1998. Phylogenetic congruence and discordance among one morphological and three molecular data sets from Pontederiaceae. Syst. Biol. 47:545-567.
27. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND T. YANO. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 21:160-174.
28. HERSHKOVITZ, M. A., E. A. ZIMMER, AND W. J. HAHN. 1999. Ribosomal DNA sequences and angiosperm phylogenetics. Pages 268-326 in Molecular systematics and plant evolution (P. M. Hollingsworth, R. M. Bateman, and R. S. Gornall, eds.). Taylor & Francis, London.
29. HOOT, S. B., A. CULHAM, AND P. R. CRANE. 1995. The utility of atpB gene sequences in resolving phylogenetic relationships: Comparison with rbcL and 18S ribosomal DNA sequences in the Lardizabalaceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 82:194-207.
30. JUDD, W. S., P. STEVENS, C. CAMPBELL, AND E. KELLOGG. 1999. Plant systematics: A phylogenetic approach. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
31. JUKES, T. H., AND C. R. CANTOR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pages 21-132 in Mammalian protein metabolism (H. N. Munro, ed.). Academic Press, New York.
32. KIMURA, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
33. KIRCHOFF, B. K. 1988. Floral ontogeny and evolution in the ginger group of the Zingiberales. Pages 45-56 in Aspects of floral development (P. Liens, S. C. Tucker, and P. K Endress, eds.). Cramer, Berlin.
34. KISHINO, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
35. KRESS, W. J. 1990. The phylogeny and classification of the Zingiberales. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 77:698-721.
36. KRESS, W. J. 1995. Phylogeny of the Zingiberanae: Morphology and molecules. Pages 443-460 in Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution (P. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds.). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, U.K.
37. KRESS, W. J., D. E. STONE, AND S. C. SELLERS. 1978. Ultrastructure of exine-less pollen: Heliconia (Heliconiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 65:1064-1076.
38. KUBITZKI, K. 1998. The families and genera of vascular plants. IV. Flowering plants - Monocotyledons. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
39. LANAVE, C., G. PREPARATA, C. SACCONE, AND G. SERIO. 1984. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol. 20:86-93.
40. LES, D. L., E. L. SCHNEIDER, D. J. PADGETT, P. M. SOLTIS, D. E. SOLTIS, AND M. ZANIS. 1999. Phylogeny, classification and floral evolution of water lilies (Nymphaeaceae; Nymphaeales): A synthesis of non-molecular, rbcL, matK, and 18S rDNA data. Syst. Bot. 24:28-16.
41. LIU, F.-G. R., AND M. M. MIYAMOTO. 1999. Phylogenetic assessment of molecular and morphological data for Eutherian mammals. Syst. Biol. 48:54-64.
42. LUCKOW, M. 1997. Generic relationships in the Dichrostachys group (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae): Evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction sites and morphology. Syst. Bot. 22:189-198.
43. LUTZONI, F., AND R. VILGALYS. 1995. Integration of morphological and molecular data sets in estimating fungal phylogenies. Can. J. Bot. 73(Suppl. 1): S649-S659.
44. MADDISON, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 40:315-328.
45. MANCHESTER, S. R., AND W. J. KRESS. 1993. Fossil bananas (Musaceae): Ensete oregonense from the Eocene of western North America and its phylogeographic significance. Am. J. Bot. 80:1264-1272.
46. MUNRO, S. L., AND H. P. LINDER. 1998. The phylogenetic position of Prionium (Juncaceae) within the Order Juncales based on morphological and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 23:43-56.
47. PRINCE, L. M., AND C. R. PARKS. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of Theaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 88.
48. RODRÍGUEZ, R, J. L. OLIVER, A. MARÍN, AND J. R. MEDINA. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theor. Biol. 142:485-501.
49. RODRIGUEZ-DE LA ROSA, R. A., AND S. R. S. CEVALLOS-FERRIZ. 1994. Upper Cretaceous Zingiberalean fruits with in situ seeds from Southeastern Coahuila, Mexico. Int. J. Plant Sci. 155:786-805.
50. RUDALL, P. J., D. W. STEVENSON, AND H. P. LINDER. 1999. Structure and systematics of Hanguana, a monocotyledon of uncertain affinity. Austr. Syst. Bot. 12:311-330.
51. SHAFFER, H. B., P. MEYLAN, AND M. L. MCKNIGHT. 1997. Tests of turtle phylogeny: Molecular, morphological, and paleontological approaches. Syst. Biol. 46:235-268.
52. SMITH, A. B., AND G. L. J. PATERSON. 1995. Ophiuroid phylogeny and higher taxonomy: Morphological, molecular and palaeontological perspectives. Zool. J. Linnean Soc. 114:213-243.
53. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, D. L. NICKKENT, L. A. JOHNSON, W. J. HAHN, S. B. HOOT, J. A. SWEERE, R. K. KUZOFF, K. A. KRON, M. W. CHASE, S. M. SWENSEN, E. A. ZIMMER, S.-M. CHAW, L. J. GILLESPIE, W. J. KRESS, AND K. J. SYTSMA. 1997. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 84:1-49.
54. STEVENSON, D. W., AND H. LOCONTE. 1995. Cladistic analysis of monocot families. Pages 543-578 in Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution (P. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds.). Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, U.K.
55. STEVENSON, D. W., J. I. DAVIS, J. V. FREUDENSTEIN, C. R. HARDY, M. P. SIMMONS, AND C. D. SPECHT. 2000. A phylogenetic analysis of the monocotyledons based on morphological and molecular character sets, with comments on the placement of Acorus and Hydatellaceae. Pages 17-24 in Monocots: Systematics and evolution (K. I. Wilson and D. A. Morrison, eds.). CSIRO, Melbourne.
56. SULLIVAN, J., J. A. MARKERT, AND C. W. KILPATRICK. 1997. Phylogeography and molecular systematics of the Peromyscus aztecus species group (Rodentia: Muridae) inferred using parsimony and likelihood. Syst. Biol. 46:426-440.
57. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
58. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mabel, eds.). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
59. TAVARÉ, S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect. Math. Sci. 17:57-86.
60. TAYLOR, J. W., AND E. SWANN. 1994. DNA from herbarium specimens. Pages 166-181 in Ancient DNA (B. Herrmann and S. Hummel, eds.). Springer-Verlag, New York.
61. TEHLER, A. 1995. Morphological data, molecular data, and total evidence in phylogenetic analysis. Can. J. Bot. 73(Suppl. 1):S667-S676.
62. TOMLINSON, P. B. 1962. Phylogeny of the Scitamineae-Morphological and anatomical considerations. Evolution 16:192-213.
63. WHITING, M. F., J. C. CARPENTER, Q. D. WHEELER, AND W. C. WHEELER. 1997. The Strepsiptera problem: Phylogeny of the Holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 46:1-68.
64. WILEY, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics: The theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.