A practical approach to phylogenomics: The phylogeny of ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii) as a case study

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Li, Chenhong ^a   Ortí, Guillermo ^a   Zhang, Gong ^b   Lu, Guoqing ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA; MOLECULAR MARKER; GENETIC MARKER; PRIMER DNA;

ACTINOPTERYGII; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DANIO RERIO; FISH; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; MARKER GENE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TAKIFUGU RUBRIPES; VERTEBRATE; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION;

ACTINOPTERYGII; DANIO RERIO; PISCES; TAKIFUGU RUBRIPES; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA PRIMERS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FISHES; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

EID: 33947659375     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-44     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. F Delsuc H Brinkmann H Philippe, Nat Rev Genet 2005 6 5 361 375 15861208 10.1038/nrg1603
2. Relationships Between Gene Trees and Species Trees. P Pamilo M Nei, Mol Biol Evol 1988 5 5 568 583 3193878
3. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. WM Fitch, Syst Zool 1970 19 2 99 113 5449325 10.2307/2412448
4. Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution. P Lopez D Casane H Philippe, Mol Biol Evol 2002 19 1 1 7 11752184
5. Case in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. J Felsenstein, Syst Biol 1978 27 401 410
6. The Deinococcus-Thermus phylum and the effect of rRNA composition on phylogenetic tree construction. WG Weisburg SJ Giovannoni CR Woese, Syst Appl Microbiol 1989 11 128 134 11542160
7. Compositional bias may affect both DNA-based and protein-based phylogenetic reconstructions. PG Foster DA Hickey, J Mol Evol 1999 48 3 284 290 10093217 10.1007/PL00006471
8. Phylogenomics: intersection of evolution and genomics. JA Eisen CM Fraser, Science 2003 300 5626 1706 1707 12805538 10.1126/science.1086292
9. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: impact of missing data on large alignments. H Philippe EA Snell E Bapteste P Lopez PW Holland D Casane, Mol Biol Evol 2004 21 9 1740 1752 15175415 10.1093/molbev/msh182
10. Prospects for building the tree of life from large sequence databases. AC Driskell C Ane JG Burleigh MM McMahon C O'Meara B MJ Sanderson, Science 2004 306 5699 1172 1174 15539599 10.1126/science.1102036
11. Molecular phylogeny of early vertebrates: monophyly of the agnathans as revealed by sequences of 35 genes. N Takezaki F Figueroa Z Zaleska-Rutczynska J Klein, Mol Biol Evol 2003 20 2 287 292 12598696 10.1093/molbev/msg040
12. The analysis of 100 genes supports the grouping of three highly divergent amoebae: Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, and Mastigamoeba. E Bapteste H Brinkmann JA Lee DV Moore CW Sensen P Gordon L Durufle T Gaasterland P Lopez M Muller H Philippe, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002 99 3 1414 1419 11830664 10.1073/pnas.032662799
13. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. A Rokas BL Williams N King SB Carroll, Nature 2003 425 6960 798 804 14574403 10.1038/nature02053
14. Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. WJ Murphy E Eizirik WE Johnson YP Zhang OA Ryder SJ O'Brien, Nature 2001 409 6820 614 618 11214319 10.1038/35054550
15. Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. MC Brandley A Schmitz TW Reeder, Syst Biol 2005 54 3 373 390 16012105 10.1080/10635150590946808
16. Data partitions and complex models in Bayesian analysis: the phylogeny of Gymnophthalmid lizards. TA Castoe TM Doan CL Parkinson, Syst Biol 2004 53 3 448 469 15503673 10.1080/10635150490445797
17. Novel evolutionary relationship among four fish model systems. WJ Chen G Ortí A Meyer, Trends Genet 2004 20 9 424 431 15313551 10.1016/j.tig.2004.07.005
18. Animal evolution and the molecular signature of radiations compressed in time. A Rokas D Kruger SB Carroll, Science 2005 310 5756 1933 1938 16373569 10.1126/science.1116759
19. Generating single-copy nuclear gene data for a recent adaptive radiation. JB Whittall A Medina-Marino EA Zimmer SA Hodges, Mol Phylogenet Evol 2006 39 1 124 134 16314114 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.10.010
20. Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? DM Hillis DD Pollock JA McGuire DJ Zwickl, Syst Biol 2003 52 1 124 126 12554446 10.1080/10635150390132911
21. Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and "ending incongruence": a cautionary tale in phylogenetics. DE Soltis VA Albert V Savolainen K Hilu YL Qiu MW Chase JS Farris S Stefanovic DW Rice JD Palmer PS Soltis, Trends Plant Sci 2004 9 10 477 483 15465682 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.08. 008
22. Phylogenetic relaionships of new world needlefishes (Teleostei: Belonidae) and the biogeography of transitions between marine and freshwater habitats. NR Lovejoy BB Collette, Copeia 2001 2001 2 324 338 10.1643/0045-8511(2001)001[0324:PRONWN]2.0.CO;2
23. C-mos, a nuclear marker useful for squamate phylogenetic analysis. KM Saint CC Austin SC Donnellan MN Hutchinson, Mol Phylogenet Evol 1998 10 2 259 263 9878236 10.1006/mpev.1998.0515
24. Gorilla and orangutan c-myc nucleotide sequences: inference on hominoid phylogeny. K Mohammad-Ali ME Eladari F Galibert, J Mol Evol 1995 41 3 262 276 7563112 10.1007/BF01215173
25. Basal divergences in birds and the phylogenetic utility of the nuclear RAG-1 gene. JG Groth GF Barrowclough, Mol Phylogenet Evol 1999 12 2 115 123 10381315 10.1006/mpev.1998.0603
26. Relative apparent synapomorphy analysis (RASA). I: The statistical measurement of phylogenetic signal. J Lyons-Weiler GA Hoelzer RJ Tausch, Mol Biol Evol 1996 13 6 749 757 8754211
27. Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics. H Philippe Y Zhou H Brinkmann N Rodrigue F Delsuc, BMC Evol Biol 2005 5 50 16209710 10.1186/1471-2148-5-50
28. Choosing the best genes for the job: the case for stationary genes in genome-scale phylogenetics. TM Collins O Fedrigo GJ Naylor, Syst Biol 2005 54 3 493 500 16012114 10.1080/10635150590947339
29. Confidence in evolutionary trees from biological sequence data. MA Steel PJ Lockhart D Penny, Nature 1993 364 6436 440 442 8332213 10.1038/364440a0
30. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. MJ Phillips F Delsuc D Penny, Mol Biol Evol 2004 21 7 1455 1458 15084674 10.1093/molbev/msh137
31. Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. A Amores A Force YL Yan L Joly C Amemiya A Fritz RK Ho J Langeland V Prince YL Wang M Westerfield M Ekker JH Postlethwait, Science 1998 282 5394 1711 1714 9831563 10.1126/science.282.5394.1711
32. From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD). A Meyer Y Van de Peer, Bioessays 2005 27 9 937 945 16108068 10.1002/bies.20293
33. Complex genomic rearrangements lead to novel primate gene function. FD Ciccarelli C von Mering M Suyama ED Harrington E Izaurralde P Bork, Genome Res 2005 15 3 343 351 15710750 10.1101/gr.3266405
34. The zebrafish gene map defines ancestral vertebrate chromosomes. IG Woods C Wilson B Friedlander P Chang DK Reyes R Nix PD Kelly F Chu JH Postlethwait WS Talbot, Genome Res 2005 15 9 1307 1314 16109975 10.1101/gr.4134305
35. Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. O Jaillon JM Aury F Brunet JL Petit N Stange-Thomann E Mauceli L Bouneau C Fischer C Ozouf-Costaz A Bernot S Nicaud D Jaffe S Fisher G Lutfalla C Dossat B Segurens C Dasilva M Salanoubat M Levy N Boudet S Castellano V Anthouard C Jubin V Castelli M Katinka B Vacherie C Biemont Z Skalli L Cattolico J Poulain V De Berardinis C Cruaud S Duprat P Brottier JP Coutanceau J Gouzy G Parra G Lardier C Chapple KJ McKernan P McEwan S Bosak M Kellis JN Volff R Guigo MC Zody J Mesirov K Lindblad-Toh B Birren C Nusbaum D Kahn M Robinson-Rechavi V Laudet V Schachter F Quetier W Saurin C Scarpelli P Wincker ES Lander J Weissenbach H Roest Crollius, Nature 2004 431 7011 946 957 15496914 10.1038/nature03025
36. Vertebrate phylogenomics: reconciled trees and gene duplications. RD Page JA Cotton, Pac Symp Biocomput 2002 536 547 11928506
37. Nuclear gene sequences for higher level phylogenetic analysis: 14 promising candidates. TP Friedlander JC Regier C Mitter, Syst Biol 1992 41 4 483 490 10.2307/2992589
38. Major patterns of higher teleostean phylogenies: a new perspective based on 100 complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. M Miya H Takeshima H Endo NB Ishiguro JG Inoue T Mukai TP Satoh M Yamaguchi A Kawaguchi K Mabuchi SM Shirai M Nishida, Mol Phylogenet Evol 2003 26 1 121 138 12470944 10.1016/S1055-7903(02) 00332-9
39. Gnathostome fishes. MLJ Stiassny EO Wiley GD Johnson MR de Carvalho, Assembling The Tree of Life New York, Oxford University Press, Cracraft J, Donoghue MJ, 2004 410 429
40. Interrelationships of fishes. MLJ Stiassny LR Parenti GD Johnson, San Diego, Academic Press 1996 xiii, 496 p.
41. Phylogenetic relationships of teleostei: past and present. G Arratia, Estud Oceanol 2000 19 19 51
42. Interrelationships of fishes. PH Greenwood RS Miles C Patterson, London, Academic Press 1973 536 p.
43. Phylomarker - mining phylogenetic markers for assembling the Tree of Life [http://bioinfo-srv1.awh.unomaha.edu/phylomarker].
44. The root of the mammalian tree inferred from whole mitochondrial genomes. MJ Phillips D Penny, Mol Phylogenet Evol 2003 28 2 171 185 12878457 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00057-5
45. ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. F Abascal R Zardoya D Posada, Bioinformatics 2005 21 9 2104 2105 15647292 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti263
46. L. A. S. Johnson Review No. 2. Use of nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants. RL Small RC Cronn JF Wendel, Australian Systematic Botany 2004 17 145 170 10.1071/SB03015
47. Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22000 species of ray-finned fish. JS Taylor I Braasch T Frickey A Meyer Y Van de Peer, Genome Res 2003 13 3 382 390 12618368 10.1101/gr.640303
48. Are all fishes ancient polyploids? Y Van de Peer JS Taylor A Meyer, J Struct Funct Genomics 2003 3 1-4 65 73 12836686 10.1023/A:1022652814749
49. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. M Remm CE Storm EL Sonnhammer, J Mol Biol 2001 314 5 1041 1052 11743721 10.1006/jmbi.2000.5197
50. Fishes of the world. JS Nelson, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 4th 2006 601 pp.
51. Novel Relationships Among Ten Fish Model Species Revealed Based on a Phylogenomic Analysis Using ESTs. D Steinke W Salzburger A Meyer, J Mol Evol 2006 62 6 772 784 16752215 10.1007/s00239-005-0170-8
52. The phylogenetic position of toadfishes (order Batrachoidiformes) in the higher ray-finned fish as inferred from partitioned Bayesian analysis of 102 whole mitochondrial genome sequences. M Miya TP Satoh M Nishida, Biol J Linn Sco Lond 2005 85 289 306 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00483.x
53. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. H Shimodaira M Hasegawa, Mol Biol Evol 1999 16 1114 1116
54. Ensembl [www.ensembl.org/index.html].
55. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. S Rozen H Skaletsky, Methods Mol Biol 2000 132 365 386 10547847
56. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. JD Thompson TJ Gibson F Plewniak F Jeanmougin DG Higgins, Nucleic Acids Res 1997 25 24 4876 4882 9396791 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876
57. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. DL Swofford, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. 2003
58. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. F Ronquist JP Huelsenbeck, Bioinformatics 2003 19 12 1572 1574 12912839 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
59. TREEFINDER: a powerful graphical analysis environment for molecular phylogenetics. G Jobb A von Haeseler K Strimmer, BMC Evol Biol 2004 4 18 15222900 10.1186/1471-2148-4-18