From 2R to 3R: Evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD)

BioEssays

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 937-945

  Meyer, Axel ^a   Van De Peer, Yves ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FISH GENETICS; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HOX GENE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TELEOST;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FISHES; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME; HUMANS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

MYA; PISCES; TETRAPODA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 26244444380     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.20293     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. New York: Springer Verlag.
2. Aburomia R, Khaner O, Sidow A. 2003. Functional evolution in the ancestral lineage of vertebrates or when genomic complexity was wagging its morphological tail. J Struct Funct Genomics 3:45-52.
3. Holland PW. 2003. More genes in vertebrates? J Struct Funct Genomics 3:75-84.
4. Spring J. 1997. Vertebrate evolution by interspecific hybridization-are we polyploid? FEBS Lett 400:2-8.
5. Horton AC, Mahadevan NR, Ruvinsky I, Gibson-Brown JJ. 2003. Phylogenetic analyses alone are insufficient to determine whether genome duplication(s) occurred during early vertebrate evolution. J Exp Zool 299B:41-53.
6. Levine M, Tjian R. 2003. Transcription regulation and animal diversity. Nature 424:147-151.
7. Sidow A. 1996. Gen(om)e duplications in the evolution of early vertebrates. Curr Opin Gen Dev 6:715-722.
8. Sharman AC, Holland PWH. 1996. Conservation, duplication, and divergence of developmental genes during chordate evolution. Neth J Zool 46:47-67.
9. Pebusque M-J, Coulieer F, Birnbaurm D, Pontarotti P. 1998. Ancient large-scale genome duplications: phylogenetic linkage analysis shed light on chordate genome evolution. Mol Biol Evol 15:1145-1159.
10. Postlethwait P, Amores A, Cresco W, Singer A, Yan Y-L. 2004. Subfunction partitioning, the teleost radiation and the annotation of the human genome. Trends Genet 20:481-490.
11. Lynch M, Conery JS. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290:1151-1155.
12. Abi-Rached L, Gilles A, Shiina T, Pontarotti P, Inoko H. 2002. Evidence of en bloc duplication in vertebrate genomes. Nat Genet 31:100-105.
13. Lundin LG, Larhammer D, Hallböök F. 2003. Numerous groups of chromosomal regional paralogies strongly indicate two genome doublings at the root of the vertebrates. J Struct Funct Genomics 3:53-63.
14. Meyer A, Schartl M. 1999. Gene and genome duplications in verterbrates: the one-to-four (-to-eight in fish) rule and the evolution of novel gene functions. Curr Op Cell Biol 11:699-704.
15. McLysaght A, Hokamp K, Wolfe KH. 2002. Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution. Nat Genet 31:200-204.
16. Gu X, Wang Y, Gu J. 2002. Age distribution of human gene families shows significant roles of both large- and small-scale duplications in vertebrate evolution. Nat Genet 31:205-209.
17. Panopoulou G, Hennig S, Groth D, Krause A, Poustka AJ, et al. 2003. New evidence for genome-wide duplications at the origin of vertebrates using an Amphioxus gene set and completed animal genomes. Genome Res 13:1056-1066.
18. Makalowski W. 2001. Are we polyploids? A brief history of one hypothesis. Genome Res 11:667-670.
19. Skrabanek L, Wolfe KH. 1998. Eukaryote genome duplication-where's the evidence? Curr Opin Gen Dev 8:694-700.
20. Hughes AL, Friedman R. 2003. Testing hypotheses of genome duplication in early vertebrates. J Struct Funct Genomics 3:85-93.
21. Furlong RF, Holland PWH. 2002. Were vertebrates octoploid? Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 357:531-544.
22. Gibson TJ, Spring J. 1998. Genetic redundancy in vertebrates: polyploidy and persistence of genes encoding multidomain proteins. Trends Genet 14:46-49.
23. Vandepoele K, De Vos W, Taylor JS, Meyer A, Van de Peer A. 2004. Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: Paranome age and size differs considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:1638-1643.
24. Van de Peer Y, Taylor JS, Braasch I, Meyer A. 2001. Ghosts of selection past: rates of evolution of anciently duplicated genes. J Mol Evol 53:434-444.
25. Friedman R, Hughes AL. 2001. Gene duplication and the structure of eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 11:373-381.
26. Gu X, Huang W. 2002. Testing the parsimony test of genome duplications: a counterexample. Genome Res 12:1-2.
27. Wittbrodt J, Meyer A, Schartl M. 1998. More genes in fish? BioEssays 20:511-515.
28. Aparicio S, et al. 2002. Whole-genome shotgun assembly and analysis of the genome of Fugu rubripes. Science 297:1301-1310.
29. Jaillon O, et al. 2004. Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature 31:946-957.
30. Van de Peer Y, Taylor JS, Meyer A. 2003. Are all fishes ancient polyploids? J Struct Funct Genomics 3:65-73.
31. Taylor JS, Van de Peer Y, Braasch I, Meyer A. 2001. Comparative genomics provides evidence for an ancient genome duplication in fish. Phil Trans Roy Soc 356:1661-1679.
32. Taylor JS, Braasch I, Frickey T, Meyer A, Van de Peer Y. 2003. Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22,000 species of ray-finned fish. Genome Res 13:382-390.
33. Christoffels A, Koh EG, Brenner S, Aparicio S, Venkatesh B. 2004. Fugu genome analysis provides evidence for a whole-genome duplication early during the evolution of ray-finned fishes. Mol Biol Evol 21:1146-1151.
34. Prohaska SJ, Stadler PF. 2004. The duplication of the Hox gene clusters in teleost fishes. Theory in BioSciences 23:89-110.
35. Van de Peer Y. 2004. Tetraodon genome confirms Takifugu findings: most fish are ancient polyploids. Genome Biology 5:250.
36. Volff J-N. 2005. Genome evolution and biodiversity in teleost fish. Heredity 94:280-294.
37. Stellwag E. 2004. Are genome evolution, organism complexity and species diversity linked? Integr Comp Biol 44:358-365.
38. Hoegg S, Meyer A. 2005. Hox clusters as models for vertebrate genomic evolution. Trends Genet 21:421-424.
39. Takezaki N, Rzhetsky A, Nei M. 1995. Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock and linearized trees. Mol Biol Evol 12:823-833.
40. Simillion C, Vandepoele K, Van de Peer Y. 2004. Recent developments in computational approaches for uncovering genomic homology. BioEssays 26:1225-1235.
41. Meyer A, Zardoya R. 2003. Recent advances in the (molecular) phylogeny of vertebrates. Ann Review Ecol Syst 34:311-338.
42. Hoegg S, Brinkmann H, Taylor JS, Meyer A. 2004. Phylogenetic timing of the fish-specific genome duplication correlates with phenotypic and taxonomic diversification in fishes. J Mol Evol 59:190-203.
43. Nelson J. 1994. Fishes of the world. New York: Wiley.
44. Chen W-J, Guillermo Ortí G, Meyer A. 2004. Novel evolutionary relationship among four fish model systems. Trends Genet 20:424-431.
45. Wittbrodt J, Shima A, Schartl M. 2002. Medaka-a model organism from the far east. Nature Rev Genet 3:53-64.
46. Amores A, Suzuki T, yan Y-L, Pomery J, Singer A, et al. 2004. Developmental roles of pufferfish Hox clusters and genome evolution in ray-finned fish. Genome Res 14:1-10.
47. Chui C, Dewar K, Wagner GP, Takahashi K, Ruddle F, et al. 2004. Bichir HoxA cluster sequence reveals surprising trends in ray-finned fish genomic evolution. Genome Res 14:11-17.
48. Powers TP, Amemiya CT. 2004. Evolutionary plasticity of vertebrate Hox genes. Curr Genomics 5:459-472.
49. Patterson C. 1993. An overview of the early fossil record of acanthomorphs. Bull Mar Sci 52:29-59.