Microtubule-induced cortical cell polarity

Genes and Development

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 483-496

  Siegrist, Sarah E ^a   Doe, Chris Q ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Dlg; GEF; Khc 73; Microtubule; Neuroblast; Polarity

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; RAC1 PROTEIN;

APICAL MEMBRANE; BASOLATERAL MEMBRANE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL POLARITY; CELL STRUCTURE; CENTROSOME; DENDRITE; EMBRYO CELL; ENZYME ACTIVATION; EPITHELIUM CELL; FIBROBLAST; GROWTH CONE; LAMELLIPODIUM; MICROTUBULE; NERVE CELL; NERVE FIBER; NERVE GROWTH; NEUROBLAST; NONHUMAN; PERMEABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEM CELL;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL POLARITY; EPITHELIAL CELLS; GROWTH CONES; HUMANS; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; NEURONS; PSEUDOPODIA; RAC1 GTP-BINDING PROTEIN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ZYGOTE;

EID: 33947142869     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: 15495477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1511207     Document Type: Review

References (126)

1. Affolter, M. and Weijer, C.J. 2005. Signaling to cytoskeletal dynamics during chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 9: 19-34.
2. Akhmanova, A. and Hoogenraad, C.C. 2005. Microtubule plus-end-tracking proteins: Mechanisms and functions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17: 47-54.
3. Akong, K., McCartney, B.M., and Peifer, M. 2002. Drosophila APC2 and APC1 have overlapping roles in the larval brain despite their distinct intracellular localizations. Dev. Biol. 250: 71-90.
4. Andersen, S.S. 2000. Spindle assembly and the art of regulating microtubule dynamics by MAPs and Stathmin/Op18. Trends Cell Biol. 10: 261-267.
5. Asaba, N., Hanada, T., Takeuchi, A., and Chishti, A.H. 2003. Direct interaction with a kinesin-related motor mediates transport of mammalian discs large tumor suppressor homologue in epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 8395-8400.
6. Banerjee, M., Worth, D., Prowse, D.M., and Nikolic, M. 2002. Pak1 phosphorylation on t212 affects microtubules in cells undergoing mitosis. Curr. Biol. 12: 1233-1239.
7. Barrett, K., Leptin, M., and Settleman, J. 1997. The Rho GTPase and a putative RhoGEF mediate a signaling pathway for the cell shape changes in Drosophila gastrulation. Cell 91: 905-915.
8. Behrens, R. and Nurse, P. 2002. Roles of fission yeast tea1p in the localization of polarity factors and in organizing the microtubular cytoskeleton. J. Cell Biol. 157: 783-793.
9. Bement, W.M., Benink, H.A., and von Dassow, G. 2005. A microtubule-dependent zone of active RhoA during cleavage plane specification. J. Cell Biol. 170: 91-101.
10. Benais-Pont, G., Punn, A., Flores-Maldonado, C., Eckert, J., Raposo, G., Fleming, T.P., Cereijido, M., Balda, M.S., and Matter, K. 2003. Identification of a tight junction-associated guanine nucleotide exchange factor that activates Rho and regulates paracellular permeability. J. Cell Biol. 160: 729-740.
11. Bershadsky, A.D., Vaisberg, E.A., and Vasiliev, J.M. 1991. Pseudopodial activity at the active edge of migrating fibroblast is decreased after drug-induced microtubule depolymerization. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 19: 152-158.
12. Bilder, D. 2004. Epithelial polarity and proliferation control: Links from the Drosophila neoplastic tumor suppressors. Genes & Dev. 18: 1909-1925.
13. Blangy, A., Vignal, E., Schmidt, S., Debant, A., Gauthier-Rouviere, C., and Fort, P. 2000. TrioGEF1 controls Rac- and Cdc42-dependent cell structures through the direct activation of rhoG. J. Cell Sci. 113: 729-739.
14. Bowman, S.K., Neumuller, R.A., Novatchkova, M., Du, Q., and Knoblich, J.A. 2006. The Drosophila NuMA Homolog Mud regulates spindle orientation in asymmetric cell division. Dev. Cell 10: 731-742.
15. Braga, V.M., Machesky, L.M., Hall, A., and Hotchin, N.A. 1997. The small GTPases Rho and Rac are required for the establishment of cadherin-dependent cell-cell contacts. J. Cell Biol. 137: 1421-1431.
16. Bretscher, A. 2005. Microtubule tips redirect actin assembly. Dev. Cell 8: 458-459.
17. Briggs, M.W. and Sacks, D.B. 2003. IQGAP proteins are integral components of cytoskeletal regulation. EMBO Rep. 4: 571-574.
18. Broadus, J. and Doe, C.Q. 1997. Extrinsic cues, intrinsic cues and microfilaments regulate asymmetric protein localization in Drosophila neuroblasts. Curr. Biol. 7: 827-835.
19. Browning, H., Hackney, D.D., and Nurse, P. 2003. Targeted movement of cell end factors in fission yeast. Nat. Cell Biol. 5: 812-818.
20. Buck, K.B. and Zheng, J.Q. 2002. Growth cone turning induced by direct local modification of microtubule dynamics. J. Neurosci. 22: 9358-9367.
21. Busch, K.E., Hayles, J., Nurse, P., and Brunner, D. 2004. Tea2p kinesin is involved in spatial microtubule organization by transporting tip1p on microtubules. Dev. Cell 6: 831-843.
22. Callow, M.G., Zozulya, S., Gishizky, M.L., Jallal, B., and Smeal, T. 2005. PAK4 mediates morphological changes through the regulation of GEF-H1. J. Cell Sci. 118: 1861-1872.
23. Carvalho, P., Tirnauer, J.S., and Pellman, D. 2003. Surfing on microtubule ends. Trends Cell Biol. 13: 229-237.
24. Cowan, C.R. and Hyman, A.A. 2004. Centrosomes direct cell polarity independently of microtubule assembly in C. elegans embryos. Nature 431: 92-96.
25. D'Avino, P.P., Savoian, M.S., and Glover, D.M. 2005. Cleavage furrow formation and ingression during animal cytokinesis: A microtubule legacy. J. Cell Sci. 118: 1549-1558.
26. Daub, H., Gevaert, K., Vandekerckhove, J., Sobel, A., and Hall, A. 2001. Rac/Cdc42 and p65PAK regulate the microtubule-destabilizing protein stathmin through phosphorylation at serine 16. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 1677-1680.
27. de Anda, F.C., Pollarolo, G., Da Silva, J.S., Camoletto, P.G., Feiguin, F., and Dotti, C.G. 2005. Centrosome localization determines neuronal polarity. Nature 436: 704-708.
28. Drummond, D.R. and Cross, R.A. 2000. Dynamics of interphase microtubules in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr. Biol. 10: 766-775.
29. Etienne-Manneville, S. 2006. In vitro assay of primary astrocyte migration as a tool to study Rho GTPase function in cell polarization. Methods Enzymol. 406: 565-578.
30. Etienne-Manneville, S. and Hall, A. 2003. Cdc42 regulates GSK-3β and adenomatous polyposis coli to control cell polarity. Nature 421: 753-756.
31. Ezratty, E.J., Partridge, M.A., and Gundersen, G.G. 2005. Microtubule-induced focal adhesion disassembly is mediated by dynamin and focal adhesion kinase. Nat. Cell Biol. 7: 581-590.
32. Feierbach, B. and Chang, F. 2001. Roles of the fission yeast formin for3p in cell polarity, actin cable formation and symmetric cell division. Curr. Biol. 11: 1656-1665.
33. Feierbach, B., Verde, F., and Chang, F. 2004. Regulation of a formin complex by the microtubule plus end protein tea1p. J. Cell Biol. 165: 697-707.
34. Fukata, M., Watanabe, T., Noritake, J., Nakagawa, M., Yamaga, M., Kuroda, S., Matsuura, Y., Iwamatsu, A., Perez, F., and Kaibuchi, K. 2002. Rac1 and Cdc42 capture microtubules through IQGAP1 and CLIP-170. Cell 109: 873-885.
35. Galjart, N. and Perez, F. 2003. A plus-end raft to control microtubule dynamics and function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15: 48-53.
36. Gao, Y., Xing, J., Streuli, M., Leto, T.L., and Zheng, Y. 2001. Trp(56) of rac1 specifies interaction with a subset of guanine nucleotide exchange factors. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 47530-47541.
37. Garcia, P., Tajadura, V., Garcia, I., and Sanchez, Y. 2006a. Rgf1p is a specific Rho1-GEF that coordinates cell polarization with cell wall biogenesis in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 17: 1620-1631.
38. Garcia, P., Tajadura, V., Garcia, I., and Sanchez, Y. 2006b. Role of Rho GTPases and Rho-GEFs in the regulation of cell shape and integrity in fission yeast. Yeast 23: 1031-1043.
39. Glaven, J.A., Whitehead, I., Bagrodia, S., Kay, R., and Cerione, R.A. 1999. The Dbl-related protein, Lfc, localizes to microtubules and mediates the activation of Rac signaling pathways in cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 2279-2285.
40. Glynn, J.M., Lustig, R.J., Berlin, A., and Chang, F. 2001. Role of bud6p and tea1p in the interaction between actin and microtubules for the establishment of cell polarity in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 11: 836-845.
41. Goldman, R.D. 1971. The role of three cytoplasmic fibers in BHK-21 cell motility. I. Microtubules and the effects of colchicine. J. Cell Biol. 51: 752-762.
42. Goldstein, B. and Hird, S.N. 1996. Specification of the anteroposterior axis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 122: 1467-1474.
43. Grigoriev, I.S., Chernobelskaya, A.A., and Vorobjev, I.A. 1999. Nocodazole, vinblastine and taxol at low concentrations affect fibroblast locomotion and saltatory movements of organelles. Membr. Cell Biol. 13: 23-48.
44. Gromley, A., Yeaman, C., Rosa, J., Redick, S., Chen, C.T., Mirabelle, S., Guha, M., Sillibourne, J., and Doxsey, S.J. 2005. Centriolin anchoring of exocyst and SNARE complexes at the midbody is required for secretory-vesicle- mediated abscission. Cell 123: 75-87.
45. Gundersen, G.G., Wen, Y., Eng, C.H., Schmoranzer, J., Cabrera-Poch, N., Morris, E.J., Chen, M., and Gomes, E.R. 2005. Regulation of microtubules by Rho GTPases in migrating cells. Novartis Found. Symp. 269: 106-116; discussion 116-126, 223-130.
46. Hacker, U. and Perrimon, N. 1998. DRhoGEF2 encodes a member of the Dbl family of oncogenes and controls cell shape changes during gastrulation in Drosophila. Genes & Dev. 12: 274-284.
47. Hall, A. 2005. Rho GTPases and the control of cell behaviour. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33: 891-895.
48. Hamill, D.R., Severson, A.F., Carter, J.C., and Bowerman, B. 2002. Centrosome maturation and mitotic spindle assembly in C. elegans require SPD-5, a protein with multiple coiledcoil domains. Dev. Cell 3: 673-684.
49. Hanada, T., Lin, L., Tibaldi, E.V., Reinherz, E.L., and Chishti, A.H. 2000. GAKIN, a novel kinesin-like protein associates with the human homologue of the Drosophila discs large tumor suppressor in T lymphocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 28774-28784.
50. Honigberg, L. and Kenyon, C. 2000. Establishment of left/right asymmetry in neuroblast migration by UNC-40/DCC, UNC-73/Trio and DPY-19 proteins in C. elegans. Development 127: 4655-4668.
51. Izumi, Y., Ohta, N., Hisata, K., Raabe, T., and Matsuzaki, F. 2006. Drosophila Pins-binding protein Mud regulates spindle-polarity coupling and centrosome organization. Nat. Cell Biol. 8: 586-593.
52. Jankovics, F. and Brunner, D. 2006. Transiently reorganized microtubules are essential for zippering during dorsal closure in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Cell 11: 375-385.
53. Jenkins, N., Saam, J.R., and Mango, S.E. 2006. CYK-4/GAP provides a localized cue to initiate anteroposterior polarity upon fertilization. Science 313: 1298-1301.
54. Kabir, N., Schaefer, A.W., Nakhost, A., Sossin, W.S., and Forscher, P. 2001. Protein kinase C activation promotes microtubule advance in neuronal growth cones by increasing average microtubule growth lifetimes. J. Cell Biol. 152: 1033-1044.
55. Kaverina, I., Krylyshkina, O., and Small, J.V. 1999. Microtubule targeting of substrate contacts promotes their relaxation and dissociation. J. Cell Biol. 146: 1033-1044.
56. Kawasaki, Y., Senda, T., Ishidate, T., Koyama, R., Morishita, T., Iwayama, Y., Higuchi, O., and Akiyama, T. 2000. Asef, a link between the tumor suppressor APC and G-protein signaling. Science 289: 1194-1197.
57. Kawasaki, Y., Sato, R., and Akiyama, T. 2003. Mutated APC and Asef are involved in the migration of colorectal tumour cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 5: 211-215.
58. Knoblich, J.A., Jan, L.Y., and Jan, Y.N. 1995. Asymmetric segregation of Numb and Prospero during cell division. Nature 377: 624-627.
59. Krendel, M., Zenke, F.T., and Bokoch, G.M. 2002. Nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1 mediates cross-talk between microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton. Nat. Cell Biol. 4: 294-301.
60. Lee, H., Engel, U., Rusch, J., Scherrer, S., Sheard, K., and Van Vactor, D. 2004. The microtubule plus end tracking protein Orbit/MAST/CLASP acts downstream of the tyrosine kinase Abl in mediating axon guidance. Neuron 42: 913-926.
61. Lee, C.Y., Robinson, K.J., and Doe, C.Q. 2006. Lgl, Pins and aPKC regulate neuroblast self-renewal versus differentiation. Nature 439: 594-598.
62. Li, H.P., Liu, Z.M., and Nirenberg, M. 1997. Kinesin-73 in the nervous system of Drosophila embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 1086-1091.
63. Liao, G., Nagasaki, T., and Gundersen, G.G. 1995. Low concentrations of nocodazole interfere with fibroblast locomotion without significantly affecting microtubule level: Implications for the role of dynamic microtubules in cell locomotion. J. Cell Sci. 108: 3473-3483.
64. Ma, C., Benink, H.A., Cheng, D., Montplaisir, V., Wang, L., Xi, Y., Zheng, P.P., Bement, W.M., and Liu, X.J. 2006. Cdc42 activation couples spindle positioning to first polar body formation in oocyte maturation. Curr. Biol. 16: 214-220.
65. Marks, J., Hagan, I.M., and Hyams, J.S. 1986. Growth polarity and cytokinesis in fission yeast: The role of the cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci. Suppl. 5: 229-241.
66. Martin, S.G., McDonald, W.H., Yates III, J.R., and Chang, F. 2005. Tea4p links microtubule plus ends with the formin for3p in the establishment of cell polarity. Dev. Cell 8: 479-491.
67. Mary, S., Charrasse, S., Meriane, M., Comunale, F., Travo, P., Blangy, A., and Gauthier-Rouviere, C. 2002. Biogenesis of N-cadherin-dependent cell-cell contacts in living fibroblasts is a microtubule-dependent kinesin-driven mechanism. Mol. Biol. Cell 13: 285-301.
68. Mataraza, J.M., Briggs, M.W., Li, Z., Entwistle, A., Ridley, A.J., and Sacks, D.B. 2003. IQGAP1 promotes cell motility and invasion. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 41237-41245.
69. McGee, A.W., Dakoji, S.R., Olsen, O., Bredt, D.S., Lim, W.A., and Prehoda, K.E. 2001. Structure of the SH3-guanylate kinase module from PSD-95 suggests a mechanism for regulated assembly of MAGUK scaffolding proteins. Mol. Cell 8: 1291-1301.
70. Mikhailov, A. and Gundersen, G.G. 1998. Relationship between microtubule dynamics and lamellipodium formation revealed by direct imaging of microtubules in cells treated with nocodazole or taxol. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 41: 325-340.
71. Mitchison, J.M. and Nurse, P. 1985. Growth in cell length in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci. 75: 357-376.
72. Motegi, F. and Sugimoto, A. 2006. Sequential functioning of the ECT-2 RhoGEF, RHO-1 and CDC-42 establishes cell polarity in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nat. Cell Biol. 8: 978-985.
73. Motegi, F., Velarde, N.V., Piano, F., and Sugimoto, A. 2006. Two phases of astral microtubule activity during cytokinesis in C. elegans embryos. Dev. Cell 10: 509-520.
74. Munro, E., Nance, J., and Priess, J.R. 2004. Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior-posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. Dev. Cell 7: 413-424.
75. Nikolaidou, K.K. and Barrett, K. 2004. A Rho GTPase signaling pathway is used reiteratively in epithelial folding and potentially selects the outcome of Rho activation. Curr. Biol. 14: 1822-1826.
76. O'Connell, K.F., Maxwell, K.N., and White, J.G. 2000. The spd-2 gene is required for polarization of the anteroposterior axis and formation of the sperm asters in the Caenorhabditis elegans zygote. Dev. Biol. 222: 55-70.
77. Padash Barmchi, M., Rogers, S., and Hacker, U. 2005. DRho-GEF2 regulates actin organization and contractility in the Drosophila blastoderm embryo. J. Cell Biol. 168: 575-585.
78. Piel, M., Nordberg, J., Euteneuer, U., and Bornens, M. 2001. Centrosome-dependent exit of cytokinesis in animal cells. Science 291: 1550-1553.
79. Ren, Y., Li, R., Zheng, Y., and Busch, H. 1998. Cloning and characterization of GEF-H1, a microtubule-associated guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rac and Rho GTPases. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 34954-34960.
80. Ridley, A.J., Paterson, H.F., Johnston, C.L., Diekmann, D., and Hall, A. 1992. The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. Cell 70: 401-410.
81. Rodriguez, O.C., Schaefer, A.W., Mandato, C.A., Forscher, P., Bement, W.M., and Waterman-Storer, C.M. 2003. Conserved microtubule-actin interactions in cell movement and morphogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5: 599-609.
82. Rogers, S.L., Wiedemann, U., Hacker, U., Turck, C., and Vale, R.D. 2004. Drosophila RhoGEF2 associates with microtubule plus ends in an EB1-dependent manner. Curr. Biol. 14: 1827-1833.
83. Rossman, K.L., Der, C.J., and Sondek, J. 2005. GEF means go: Turning on RHO GTPases with guanine nucleotide-exchange factors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6: 167-180.
84. Rupes, I., Jia, Z., and Young, P.G. 1999. Ssp1 promotes actin depolymerization and is involved in stress response and new end take-off control in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 10: 1495-1510.
85. Sadler, P.L. and Shakes, D.C. 2000. Anucleate Caenorhabditis elegans sperm can crawl, fertilize oocytes and direct anterior-posterior polarization of the 1-cell embryo. Development 127: 355-366.
86. Sawin, K.E. and Snaith, H.A. 2004. Role of microtubules and tea1p in establishment and maintenance of fission yeast cell polarity. J. Cell Sci. 117: 689-700.
87. Schaefer, A.W., Kabir, N., and Forscher, P. 2002. Filopodia and actin arcs guide the assembly and transport of two populations of microtubules with unique dynamic parameters in neuronal growth cones. J. Cell Biol. 158: 139-152.
88. Schneider, S.Q. and Bowerman, B. 2003. Cell polarity and the cytoskeleton in the Caenorhabditis elegans zygote. Annu. Rev. Genet. 37: 221-249.
89. Schonegg, S. and Hyman, A.A. 2006. CDC-42 and RHO-1 coordinate acto-myosin contractility and PAR protein localization during polarity establishment in C. elegans embryos. Development 133: 3507-3516.
90. Shewan, A.M., Maddugoda, M., Kraemer, A., Stehbens, S.J., Verma, S., Kovacs, E.M., and Yap, A.S. 2005. Myosin 2 is a key Rho kinase target necessary for the local concentration of E-cadherin at cell-cell contacts. Mol. Biol. Cell 16: 4531-4542.
91. Shimada, Y., Yonemura, S., Ohkura, H., Strutt, D., and Uemura, T. 2006. Polarized transport of Frizzled along the planar microtubule arrays in Drosophila wing epithelium. Dev. Cell 10: 209-222.
92. Shimomura, A., Kohu, K., Akiyama, T., and Senda, T. 2005. Subcellular localization of the tumor suppressor protein APC in developing cultured neurons. Neurosci. Lett. 375: 81-86.
93. Shpetner, H.S. and Vallee, R.B. 1992. Dynamin is a GTPase stimulated to high levels of activity by microtubules. Nature 355: 733-735.
94. Sieberer, B.J., Ketelaar, T., Esseling, J.J., and Emons, A.M. 2005. Microtubules guide root hair tip growth. New Phytol. 167: 711-719.
95. Siegrist, S.E. and Doe, C.Q. 2005. Microtubule-induced Pins/Gαi cortical polarity in Drosophila neuroblasts. Cell 123: 1323-1335.
96. Siller, K.H., Cabernard, C., and Doe, C.Q. 2006. The NuMA-related Mud protein binds Pins and regulates spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nat. Cell Biol. 8: 594-600.
97. Small, J.V. and Kaverina, I. 2003. Microtubules meet substrate adhesions to arrange cell polarity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15: 40-47.
98. Snaith, H.A. and Sawin, K.E. 2003. Fission yeast mod5p regulates polarized growth through anchoring of tea1p at cell tips. Nature 423: 647-651.
99. Snaith, H.A., Samejima, I., and Sawin, K.E. 2005. Multistep and multimode cortical anchoring of tea1p at cell tips in fission yeast. EMBO J. 24: 3690-3699.
100. Sonneville, R. and Gonczy, P. 2004. Zyg-11 and cul-2 regulate progression through meiosis II and polarity establishment in C. elegans. Development 131: 3527-3543.
101. Spana, E.P. and Doe, C.Q. 1995. The prospero transcription factor is asymmetrically localized to the cell cortex during neuroblast mitosis in Drosophila. Development 121: 3187-3195.
102. Stehbens, S.J., Paterson, A.D., Crampton, M.S., Shewan, A.M., Ferguson, C., Akhmanova, A., Parton, R.G., and Yap, A.S. 2006. Dynamic microtubules regulate the local concentration of E-cadherin at cell-cell contacts. J. Cell Sci. 119: 1801-1811.
103. Stepanova, T., Slemmer, J., Hoogenraad, C.C., Lansbergen, G., Dortland, B., De Zeeuw, C.I., Grosveld, F., van Cappellen, G., Akhmanova, A., and Galjart, N. 2003. Visualization of microtubule growth in cultured neurons via the use of EB3-GFP (end-binding protein 3-green fluorescent protein). J. Neurosci. 23: 2655-2664.
104. Stinchcombe, J.C., Majorovits, E., Bossi, G., Fuller, S., and Griffiths, G.M. 2006. Centrosome polarization delivers secretory granules to the immunological synapse. Nature 443: 462-465.
105. Strome, S. and Wood, W.B. 1983. Generation of asymmetry and segregation of germ-line granules in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 35: 15-25.
106. Suter, D.M. and Forscher, P. 1998. An emerging link between cytoskeletal dynamics and cell adhesion molecules in growth cone guidance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8: 106-116.
107. Takaishi, K., Sasaki, T., Kotani, H., Nishioka, H., and Takai, Y. 1997. Regulation of cell-cell adhesion by rac and rho small G proteins in MDCK cells. J. Cell Biol. 139: 1047-1059.
108. Takeichi, M. 1991. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science 251: 1451-1455.
109. Tatebe, H., Shimada, K., Uzawa, S., Morigasaki, S., and Shiozaki, K. 2005. Wsh3/Tea4 is a novel cell-end factor essential for bipolar distribution of Tea1 and protects cell polarity under environmental stress in S. pombe. Curr. Biol. 15: 1006-1015.
110. Umesono, K., Toda, T., Hayashi, S., and Yanagida, M. 1983. Cell division cycle genes nda2 and nda3 of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe control microtubular organization and sensitivity to anti-mitotic benzimidazole compounds. J. Mol. Biol. 168: 271-284.
111. Vaezi, A., Bauer, C., Vasioukhin, V., and Fuchs, E. 2002. Actin cable dynamics and Rho/Rock orchestrate a polarized cytoskeletal architecture in the early steps of assembling a stratified epithelium. Dev. Cell 3: 367-381.
112. Vasiliev, J.M., Gelfand, I.M., Domnina, L.V., Ivanova, O.Y., Komm, S.G., and Olshevskaja, L.V. 1970. Effect of colcemid on the locomotory behaviour of fibroblasts. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 24: 625-640.
113. Vaughan, K.T. 2004. Surfing, regulating and capturing: Are all microtubule-tip-tracking proteins created equal? Trends Cell Biol. 14: 491-496.
114. Wallenfang, M.R. and Seydoux, G. 2000. Polarization of the anterior-posterior axis of C. elegans is a microtubule-directed process. Nature 408: 89-92.
115. Watanabe, T., Wang, S., Noritake, J., Sato, K., Fukata, M., Takefuji, M., Nakagawa, M., Izumi, N., Akiyama, T., and Kaibuchi, K. 2004. Interaction with IQGAP1 links APC to Rac1, Cdc42, and actin filaments during cell polarization and migration. Dev. Cell 7: 871-883.
116. Watanabe, T., Noritake, J., and Kaibuchi, K. 2005. Regulation of microtubules in cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 15: 76-83.
117. Waterman-Storer, C.M., Worthylake, R.A., Liu, B.P., Burridge, K., and Salmon, E.D. 1999. Microtubule growth activates Rac1 to promote lamellipodial protrusion in fibroblasts. Nat. Cell Biol. 1: 45-50.
118. Waterman-Storer, C.M., Salmon, W.C., and Salmon, E.D. 2000. Feedback interactions between cell-cell adherens junctions and cytoskeletal dynamics in newt lung epithelial cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 11: 2471-2483.
119. Williamson, T., Gordon-Weeks, P.R., Schachner, M., and Taylor, J. 1996. Microtubule reorganization is obligatory for growth cone turning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93: 15221-15226.
120. Wittmann, T. and Waterman-Storer, C.M. 2001. Cell motility: Can Rho GTPases and microtubules point the way? J. Cell Sci. 114: 3795-3803.
121. Wittmann, T., Bokoch, G.M., and Waterman-Storer, C.M. 2004. Regulation of microtubule destabilizing activity of Op18/stathmin downstream of Rac1. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 6196-6203.
122. Wu, X., Xiang, X., and Hammer III, J.A. 2006. Motor proteins at the microtubule plus-end. Trends Cell Biol. 16: 135-143.
123. Zenke, F.T., Krendel, M., DerMardirossian, C., King, C.C., Bohl, B.P., and Bokoch, G.M. 2004. p21-activated kinase 1 phosphorylates and regulates 14-3-3 binding to GEF-H1, a microtubule-localized Rho exchange factor. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 18392-18400.
124. Zhou, F.Q., Waterman-Storer, C.M., and Cohan, C.S. 2002. Focal loss of actin bundles causes microtubule redistribution and growth cone turning. J. Cell Biol. 157: 839-849.
125. Zhou, F.Q., Zhou, J., Dedhar, S., Wu, Y.H., and Snider, W.D. 2004. NGF-induced axon growth is mediated by localized inactivation of GSK-3β and functions of the microtubule plus end binding protein APC. Neuron 42: 897-912.
126. Zumbrunn, J., Kinoshita, K., Hyman, A.A., and Nathke, I.S. 2001. Binding of the adenomatous polyposis coli protein to microtubules increases microtubule stability and is regulated by GSK3 β phosphorylation. Curr. Biol. 11: 44-49.