Social robotics and human-machine interaction: Current research and relevance for social psychology;«Social robotics» und mensch-maschine-interaktion: Aktuelle forschung und relevanz für die sozialpsychologie

Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 219-221

  Echterhoff, Gerald ^a   Bohner, Gerd ^a   Siebler, Frank ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Human computer interaction; Human machine interaction; Robot; Social robotics

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845499693     PISSN: 00443514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/0044-3514.37.4.219     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social behavior. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 165-178.
2. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Berry, D.S., Misovich, S. J., Kean, K.J. & Baron, R.M. (1992). Effects of disruption of structure and motion on perceptions of social causality. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 237-244.
4. Blakemore, S. J., Winston, J. & Frith, U. (2004). Social cognitive neuroscience: Where are we heading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 216-222.
5. Bohner, G., Moskowitz, G. B. & Chaiken, S. (1995). The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 33-68.
6. Breazeal, C. (2002). Designing sociable robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Breazeal, C. (2003a). Emotion and sociable human robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 119-155.
8. Breazeal, C. (2003b). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 167-175.
9. Bretherton, I., McNew, S. & Beeghly-Smith, M. (1981). Early person knowledge as expressed in gestural and verbal communication: When do infants acquire a «Theory of Mind»? In M. Lamb & L. Sherrod (Eds.), Infant social cognition: Empirical and theoretical considerations (pp. 333-373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Bruce, A., Nourbakhsh, I. & Simmons, R. (2001). The role of expressiveness and attention in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 2001 AAAI Fall Symposium, AAAI Press, Cape Cod, 4138-4142.
11. Caporael, L. R. & Thorngate, W. (1984). Introduction: Toward the social psychology of computing. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 1-13.
12. Caporael, L. R. (1986). Anthropomorphism and mechanomorphism: Two faces of the human machine. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 215-234.
13. Cappella, J. N. & Pelachaud, C. (2002). Rules for responsive robots: Using human interactions to build virtual interactions. In A. L. Vangelisti, H. T. Reis & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Stability and change in relationships (pp. 325-353). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Carroll, J. M. (1996). Becoming social: Expanding scenario-based approaches in HCI. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15, 266-275.
15. Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
16. Cole, J. (1999). About face. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Dautenhahn, K. & Billard, A. (1999). Bringing up robots or-the psychology of socially intelligent robots: From theory to implementation. Proceedings of the Autonomous Agents, 366-367.
18. DiSalvo, C. F., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J. & Kiesler, S. (2002). All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads. DIS Conference Proceedings, London, England, June 25-28, 2002, pp. 321-326.
19. Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 177-190.
20. Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T. & Groll, S. (2005). Audience-tuning effects on memory: The role of shared reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 257-276.
21. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
22. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
23. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Fogg, B. J. & Nass, C. (1997). Silicon sycophants: The effects of computers that flatter. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46, 551-561.
25. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I. & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 143-166.
26. Gelman, R. & Spelke, E. (1981). The development of thoughts about animate and inanimate objects: Implications for research on social cognition. In J. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 43-66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Gergely, G., Nádasdy, Z., Csibra, G. & Bíró, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165-193.
28. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S. & Powers, A. (2003). Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. ROMAN 2003, Oct. 31 - Nov. 2, IXX (pp. 55-60).
29. Graf, B., Hans, M. & Schraft, R. D. (2004). Care-O-Bot II: Development of a Next Generation Robotic Home Assistant. Autonomous Robots, 16, 193-205.
30. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
31. Guth, W. & Tietz, R. (1986). Auctioning ultimatum bargaining positions: How to act if rational decisions are unacceptable? In R. W. Scholz (Ed.), Current issues in West German decision research (pp. 173-185). New York: Peter Lang.
32. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
33. Heider, F. & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
34. Hinds, P. J., Roberts, T. L. & Jones, H. (2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 151-181.
35. Johnson, D., Gardner, J. & Wiles, J. (2004). Experience as a moderator of the media equation: The impact of flattery and praise. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 237-258.
36. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D. & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 61-84.
37. Kiesler, S. & Hinds, P. (2004). Introduction to this special issue on human-robot interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 1-8.
38. Kiesler, S., Sproull, L. & Waters, K. (1996). A prisoner's dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 47-56.
39. Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y. & Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13, 522-525.
40. Krämer, N. C. (im Druck). Soziale Wirkungen virtueller Helfer. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
41. Krämer, N. C. & Bente, G. (2002). Virtuelle Helfer: Embodied Conversational Agents in der Mensch-Computer-Interaktion. In G. Bente, N.C. Krämer & A. Petersen (Hrsg.), Virtuelle Realitäten (S. 203-225). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
42. Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43. Lee, E.-J. & Nass, C. (2002). Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication: When interacting via computers differs from interacting with computers. Human Communication Research, 28, 349-381.
44. Lee, S.-L., Kiesler, S., Lau, I. Y.-M. & Chiu, C.-Y. (2005). Human mental models of humanoid computers. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, http://www.peopleandrobots.org/ admin/uploads/LeeKiesleretAlICRA05.pdf
45. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books.
46. Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 324-340.
47. Mori, M. (1982). The Buddha in the robot. Boston, MA: Tuttle.
48. Nass, C. (2004). Etiquette equality: Exhibitions and expectations of computer politeness. Communications of the ACM, 47, 35-37.
49. Nass, C., Fogg, B. J. & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 669-678.
50. Nass, C., Isbister, K. & Lee, E.-J. (2000). Truth is beauty: Researching conversational agents. In J. Cassells, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost & E. Churchill (Eds.), Embodied conversational agents (pp. 374-402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Nass, C. & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81-103.
52. Nass, C., Moon, Y. & Carney, P. (1999). Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer-based interviewing systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1093-1110.
53. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B. & Dryer, D. C. (1995). Can computer personalities be human personalities? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 43, 223-239.
54. Nass, C., Moon, Y. & Green, N. (1997). Are computers gender-neutral? Gender Stereotypic responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 864-876.
55. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Morkes, J., Kim, E. Y. & Fogg, B. J. (1997). Computers are social actors: A review of current research. In B. Friedman (Ed.), Moral and ethical issues in human-computer interaction (pp. 137-162). Stanford, CA: CSLI Press.
56. Nass, C., Steuer, J. S., Henriksen, L. & Dryer, D. C. (1994). Machines and social attributions: Performance assessments of computers subsequent to «self» or «other» evaluations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 543-559.
57. Neisser, U. (1963). The imitation of man by machine. Science, 139, 193-197.
58. Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-253.
59. Ostrom, T. M. (1984). The sovereignty of social cognition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Parise, S., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L. & Waters, K. (1999). Cooperating with life-like interface agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 123-142.
61. Pineau, J., Montemerlo, M., Pollack, M., Roy, N. & Thrun, S. (2003). Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 271-281.
62. Reeves, B. & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
63. Rickenberg, R. & Reeves, B. (2000). The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCH1 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 49-56.
64. Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E. & Cohen, J. S. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300, 1755-1758.
65. Scassellati, B. (2002). Theory of mind for a humanoid robot. Autonomous Robots, 12, 13-24.
66. Scheibe, K. E. & Erwin, M. (1979). The computer as alter. Journal of Social Psychology, 108, 103-109.
67. Scholl, B. J. & Tremoulet, P.D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299-309.
68. Schwarz, N., Strack, E, Hilton, D. J. & Naderer, G. (1991). Base rates, representativeness, and the logic of conversation: The contextual relevance of «irrelevant» information. Social Cognition, 9, 67-84.
69. Searle, J. R. (1981). Minds, brains and programs. In D. R. Hofstadter & D. C. Dennett (Eds.), The Mind's I: Fantasies and reflections on self and soul (pp. 353-373). Toronto: Bantam.
70. Sproull, L., Kiesler, S. & Zubrow, D. (1984). Encountering an alien culture. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 31-48.
71. Sproull, L., Subramani, R., Kiesler, S., Walker, J. H. & Waters, K. (1996). When the interface is a face. Human Computer Interaction, 11, 97-124.
72. Sundar, S. S. (2004). Loyalty to computer terminals: Is it anthropomorphism or consistency? Behavior & Information Technology, 23, 107-118.
73. Sundar, S. S. & Nass, C. (2000). Source orientation in human-computer interaction: Programmer, networker, or independent social actor? Communication Research, 27, 683-703.
74. Takeuchi, A. & Naito, T. (1995). Situated facial displays: Towards social interaction. In I. Katz, R. Mack, L. Marks, M. B. Rosson & J. Nielsen (Eds.), Human factors in computing systems: CHI'95 conference proceedings (pp. 450-455). New York: ACM Press.
75. Thrun, S. (2004). Toward a framework for human-robot interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 19, 9-24.
76. Tremoulet, P. D. & Feldman, J. (2000). Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception, 29, 943-951.
77. Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433-460.
78. Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.
79. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
80. UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe). (2004). World robotics 2004. Satistics, market analysis, forecasts, case studies and profitability of robot investment. Geneva: UN.
81. Walker, J. H., Sproull, L. & Subramani, R. (1994). Using a Human Face in an Interface. Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI'94 Conference Proceedings (pp. 85-91). Boston: ACM.
82. Woods, S., Dautenhahn, K. & Schulz, J. (2004), The design space of robots: Investigating children's views. Proc. IEEE Ro-man 2004, 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, September 20-22, 2004, Kurashiki, Okayama Japan, IEEE Press, pp. 47-52.
83. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.