Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer-based interviewing systems

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 1093-1109

  Nass, Clifford ^a   Moon, Youngme ^b   Carney, Paul ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033121347     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00142.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Athey, K. R., Colman, J. E., Reitman A. P., & Tang J. (1960). Two experiments showing the effect of the interviewer's racial background on responses to questionnaires concerning racial issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 244-246.
2. Booth-Kewley, S., Edwards, J. E., & Rosenfeld, P. (1992). Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: Does the computer make a difference? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 562-566.
3. Evan, W. M., & Miller, J. R. (1969). Automated psychological testing: Method of administration, need for approval, and measures of anxiety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 311-320.
4. Finkel, S. E., Guterbock, T. M., & Borg, M. J. (1991). Race-of interviewer effects in a pre-election poll: Virginia 1989. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 313-330.
5. Greaud, V. A., & Green, B. F. (1986). Equivalence of conventional and computer presentation of speed tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 23-34.
6. Hutchinson, K. L., & Wegge, D. G. (1991). The effects of interviewer gender upon response in telephone survey research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 573-584.
7. Jones, E. E. (1964). Ingratiation: A social psychological analysis. New York, NY: Meredith.
8. Kane, E. W., & Macaulay, L. J. (1993). Interviewer gender and gender attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 1-28.
9. King, W. C., & Miles, E. W. (1995). A quasi-experimental assessment of the effect of computerizing noncognitive paper-and-pencil measurements: A test of measurement equivalence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 643-651.
10. Koson, D., Kitchen, C., Kochen, M., & Stodolosky, D. (1970). Psychological testing by computer: Effect on response bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 803-810.
11. Langer, E. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Lautenschlager, G. J., & Flaherty, V. L. (1990). Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability? Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 310-314.
13. Lee, J. A., Moreno, K. E., & Sympson, J. B. (1986). The effects of mode of test administration on test performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 727-733.
14. Martin, C. L., & Nagao, D. H. (1989). Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 72-80.
15. Moon, Y., & Nass, C. (1996). How "real" are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. Communication Research, 23, 651-674.
16. Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 669-678.
17. Nass, C., Lombard, M., Henriksen, L., & Steuer, J. (1995). Anthropocentrism and computers. Behaviour and Information Technology, 14, 229-238.
18. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B., & Dryer, D. C. (1995). Can computer personalities be human personalities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 223-239.
19. Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997). Are computers gender-neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 864-876.
20. Nass, C., & Steuer, J. S. (1993). Voices, boxes, and sources of messages: Computers and social actors. Human Communication Research, 19, 504-527.
21. Nass, C., Steuer, J. S., Henriksen, L., & Dryer, D. C. (1994). Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: Performance assessments of computers subsequent to "self-" and "other-" evaluations. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 40, 543-559.
22. Reese, S. D., Danielson, W. A., Shoemaker, P. J., Chang, T., & Hsu, H. (1986). Ethnicity-of-interviewer effects among Mexican-Americans and Anglos. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 563-572.
23. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24. Schuman, H., & Converse, J. M. (1971). The effects of Black and White interviewers on Black responses in 1968. Public Opinion Quarterly, 35, 44-68.
25. Singer, E., Frankel, M. R., & Glassman, M. B. (1983). The effect of interviewer characteristics and expectations on response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 84-95.
26. Small, W. J. (1970). To kill a messenger: Television news and the real world. New York, NY: Hastings House.
27. Sproull, L. (1986). Using electronic mail for data collection in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 159-169.
28. Stone, V. A., & Beell, T. L. (1975). To kill a messenger: A case of congruity. Journalism Quarterly, 52, 111-114.
29. Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1974). Response effects in surveys. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
30. Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
31. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
32. Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
33. Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
34. Winograd, T., & Flores, C. (1987). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.