Experience as a moderator of the media equation: The impact of flattery and praise

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 237-258

  Johnson, Daniel ^a   Gardner, John ^a   Wiles, Janet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLEGE BUILDINGS; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; RESEARCH; STUDENTS;

ENTERTAINMENT; MEDIA EQUATION;

PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

EID: 3242712221     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Byrne D., Clore G.L., Smeaton G. The attraction hypothesis. do similar attitudes effect anything? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51:1986;1167-1170.
2. Duck S.W. Personality similarity and friendship choice. similarity of what, when? Journal of Personality. 41(4):1973;543-558.
3. Fogg, B.J., Nass, C., 1997a. How users reciprocate to computers: an experiment that demonstrates behaviour change. CHI 97, Atlanta.
4. Fogg B.J., Nass C. Silicon sycophants. the effects of computers that flatter International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 46:1997;551-561.
5. Isbister, K., Nakanishi, H., Ishida, T., Nass, C., 2000. Helper agent: desiging an assistant for human-human interaction in a virtual meeting space. CHI 2000, Amsterdam.
6. Jordan P.W. New century supertrends. designing a pleasureable future. Affective Human Factors Design, ASEAN, Singapore:2001;Academic Press, New York.
7. Johnson D., Wiles J. Effective affective user interface design in games. Affective Human Factors Design, ASEAN, Singapore. 2001;Academic Press, New York.
8. Klein, J., Moon, Y., Picard, R., 1999. This computer responds to user frustration: theory, design, results and implications. Interacting with computers, submitted for publication.
9. Langer E.J. Matters of mind. mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal. 1(4):1992;289-305.
10. Langer E.J., Imber L.G. When practice makes imperfect. debilitating effects of overlearning Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37:1979;2014-2024.
11. McNair D., Lorr M., Droppleman L.F. Manual for the Profile of Mood States. 1971;Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego.
12. Moon Y., Nass C. How "real" are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction Communication Research. 23(6):1996;651-674.
13. Moon Y., Nass C. Are computers scapegoats? Attributions of responsibility in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 49:1998;79-94.
14. Nass C., Steuer J. Voices, boxes and sources of messages. computers as social actors Human Communication Research. 19(4):1993;504-527.
15. Nass, C., Lee, K.M., 2000. Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? An experimental test of similarity-attraction. CHI 2000, Amsterdam. ACM, New York.
16. Nass C., Moon Y. Machines and mindlessness. social responses to computers Journal of Social Issues. 56(1):2000;81-103.
17. Nass C., Lee K.M. Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 7(3):2001;171-181.
18. Nass C., Steuer J., Henriksen L., Dryer D.C. Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia. performance assessments of computers subsequent to "self-" or "other-" evaluations International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 40:1994;543-559.
19. Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E., 1994b. Computers are social actors. CHI 97, Boston.
20. Nass, C., Fogg, B.J., Moon, Y., 1995a. How powerful is social identity? Affiliation effects in human-computer interaction, 2002 http://www.stanford.edu/ group/commdept/oldstuff/srct_pages/Affiliation_conformity.html.
21. Nass C., Moon Y., Fogg B.J., Reeves B., Dryer D.C. Can computer personalities be human personalities. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 43:1995;223-239.
22. Nass C., Fogg B.J., Moon Y. Can computers be teammaters? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 45:1996;669-678.
23. Nass C., Reeves B., Leshner G. Technology and roles. a tale of two TVs Journal of Communication. 46(2):1996;121-128.
24. Nass C., Moon Y., Green N. Are computers gender neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 27:1997;864-876.
25. Nass C., Moon Y., Carney P. Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer-based interviewing systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 29(5):1999;1093-1110.
26. Neimeyer R.A., Mitchell K.A. Similarity and attraction. a longitudinal study Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 5(2):1988;131-148.
27. Picard R.W. Affective Computing. 1997;MIT Press, Cambridge.
28. Reber A.S. Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious:1993;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
29. Reeves B., Nass C. The Media Equation. How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places:1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Rickenberg, R., Reeves, B., 2000. The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. CHI 2000, Amsterdam.
31. Sundar S.S., Nass C. Source orientation in human-computer interaction. programmer, networker, or independent social actor? Communication Research. 27(6):2000;683-703.
32. Takeuchi, Y., Katagiri, Y., Nass, C., Fogg, B.J., 1998. Social response and cultural dependency in human-computer interaction. PRICAI 98 Singapore.
33. Takeuchi, Y., Katagiri, Y., Nass, C., Fogg, B.J., 2000. A cultural perspective in social interface. CHI 2000, Amsterdam.