Introduction to this special issue on human-robot interaction

Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 19, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 1-8

  Kiesler, Sara ^a   Hinds, Pamela J ^b  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); MOBILE ROBOTS; REMOTE CONTROL; ROBOTICS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC MENTAL MODELS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; HUMANOID ROBOTICS; PERSONAL SEVICE ROBOTS; PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ROBOTS; ROBOTIC ASSISTANTS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 3142661624     PISSN: 07370024     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_1     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Hagman, J. (2003). Hardware companions? - What online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. Proceedings of the CHI 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM
2. King, S., & Weiman, C. (1990). Helpmate autonomous mobile robot navigation system. Proceedings of the SPIE 1990 Conference on Mobile Robots. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optical Engineering
3. Murphy, R., & Rogers, E. (2001). Human-robot interaction: Final report for DARPA/NSF study human-robot interaction. Retrieved June 5, 2002, from http://www.csc.calpoly.edu/~erogers/HRI/HRI-report-final.html
4. Scassellati, B. (2000). How robotics and developmental psychology complement each other. Proceedings of the NSF/DARPA Workshop on Development and Learning. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press
5. Scheef, M., Pinto, J., Rahardja, K., Snibbe, S., & Tow, R. (2000). Experiences with Sparky, a social robot. Paper presented at the 2000 Workshop on Interactive Robot Entertainment, Pittsburgh, PA
6. Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 299-309
7. Thrun, S., Beetz, M., Bennewitz, M., Burgard, W., Cremers, A., Dellaert, F., et al. (2000). Probabilistic algorithms and the interactive museum tour-guide robot Minerva. International Journal of Robotics Research, 19, 972-999
8. Burke, J. L., Murphy, R. R., Coovert, M. D., & Riddle, D. L. (2004). Moonlight in Miami: A field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 85-116
9. Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C., & Gemperle, F. (2004). Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 25-59
10. Hinds, P. J., Roberts, T. L., & Jones, H. (2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 151-181
11. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 61-84
12. Thrun, S. (2004). Toward a framework for human-robot interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 9-24.
13. Yanco, H. A., Drury, J. L., & Scholtz, J. (2004). Beyond usability evaluation: Analysis of human-robot interaction at a major robotics competition. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 117-149.