Insights into Protein-Protein Interfaces using a Bayesian Network Prediction Method

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 362, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 365-386

  Bradford, James R ^a   Needham, Chris J ^a   Bulpitt, Andrew J ^a   Westhead, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian network; drug targets; interaction types; Mog1p family; protein protein binding sites

Indexed keywords

RAN PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BAYES THEOREM; BINDING SITE; COMPUTER PREDICTION; DRUG BINDING SITE; DRUG PROTEIN BINDING; ELECTRICITY; PAPILLOMA VIRUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EMBRYOPHYTA; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE;

EID: 33748779553     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.07.028     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Arkin M.R., and Wells J.A. Small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions: progressing towards the dream. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 3 (2004) 301-317
2. Arkin M.R., Randal M., DeLano W.L., Hyde J., Luong T.N., Oslob J.D., et al. Binding of small molecules to an adaptive protein-protein interface. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003) 1603-1608
3. Nooren I.M., and Thornton J.M. Diversity of protein-protein interactions. EMBO J. 22 (2003) 3486-3492
4. Chothia C., and Janin J. Principles of protein-protein recognition. Nature 256 (1975) 705-708
5. Jones S., and Thornton J.M. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996) 13-20
6. Jones S., and Thornton J.M. Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. J. Mol. Biol. 272 (1997) 121-132
7. Nooren I.M., and Thornton J.M. Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 325 (2003) 991-1018
8. Young L., Jernigan R.L., and Covell D.G. A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein-protein recognition. Protein Sci. 3 (1994) 717-729
9. Glaser F., Steinberg D.M., Vakser I.A., and Ben-Tal N. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 43 (2001) 89-102
10. Tsai C.-J., Lin S.L., Wolfson H.J., and Nussinov R. Studies of protein-protein interfaces: a statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect. Protein Sci. 6 (1997) 53-64
11. Lo Conte L., Chothia C., and Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 285 (1999) 2177-2198
12. Larsen T.A., Olson A.J., and Goodsell D.S. Morphology of protein-protein interfaces. Structure 6 (1998) 421-427
13. Ansari S., and Helms V. Statistical analysis of predominantly transient protein-protein interfaces. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 61 (2005) 344-355
14. Xu D., Tsai C.J., and Nussinov R. Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges across protein-protein interfaces. Protein Eng. 10 (1997) 999-1012
15. Bahadur R.P., Chakrabarti P., Rodier F., and Janin J. A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 336 (2004) 943-955
16. Chakrabarti P., and Janin J. Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 47 (2002) 334-343
17. Crowley P.B., and Golovin A. Cation-π interactions in protein-protein interfaces. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 59 (2005) 231-239
18. Fernandez-Recio J., Totrov M., Skorodumov C., and Abagyan R. Optimal docking area: A new method for predicting protein-protein interaction sites. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 58 (2004) 134-143
19. Clackson T., and Wells J.A. A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface. Science 267 (1995) 383-386
20. Bogan A.A., and Thorn K.S. Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 280 (1998) 1-9
21. Hu Z., Ma B., Wolfson H., and Nussinov R. Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 39 (2000) 331-342
22. Ma B., Elkayam T., Wolfson H., and Nussinov R. Protein-protein interactions: structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003) 5772-5777
23. Keskin O., Ma B., and Nussinov R. Hot regions in protein-protein interactions: the organisation and contribution of structurally conserved hot spot residues. J. Mol. Biol. 345 (2005) 1281-1294
24. Valdar W.S.J., and Thornton J.M. Protein-protein interfaces: analysis of amino acid conservation in homodimers. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 42 (2001) 108-124
25. Bordner A.J., and Abagyan R. Statistical analysis and prediction of protein-protein interfaces. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 60 (2005) 353-366
26. Caffrey D.R., Somaroo S., Hughes J.D., Mintseris J., and Huang E.S. Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface?. Protein Sci. 13 (2004) 190-202
27. Grishin N.V., and Phillips M.A. The subunit interfaces of oligomeric enzymes are conserved to a similar extent to the overall protein sequences. Protein Science 3 (1994) 2455-2458
28. Bradford J.R., and Westhead D.R. Asymmetric mutation rates at enzyme-inhibitor interfaces: implications for the protein-protein docking problem. Protein Sci. 12 (2003) 2099-2103
29. Lichtarge O., Bourne H.R., and Cohen F.E. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 257 (1996) 342-358
30. Aloy P., Querol E., Aviles F.X., and Sternberg M.J.E. Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 311 (2001) 395-408
31. Guharoy M., and Chakrabarti P. Conservation and relative importance of residues across protein-protein interfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 15447-15452
32. Jones S., and Thornton J.M. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 272 (1997) 133-143
33. Neuvirth H., Raz R., and Schreiber G. ProMate: A structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites. J. Mol. Biol. 338 (2004) 181-199
34. Zhou H.-X., and Shan Y. Prediction of protein interaction sites from sequence profile and residue neighbour list. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 44 (2001) 336-343
35. Zhou H.-X., and Shan Y. Prediction of interface residues in protein-protein complexes by a consensus neural network method: test against NMR data. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 61 (2005) 21-35
36. Fariselli P., Pazos F., Valencia A., and Casadio R. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites in heterocomplexes with neural networks. Eur. J. Biochem. 269 (2002) 1356-1361
37. Ofran Y., and Rost B. Predicted protein-protein interaction sites from local sequence information. FEBS Letters 544 (2003) 236-239
38. Bradford J.R., and Westhead D.R. Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 1487-1494
39. Chung J.-L., Wang W., and Bourne P.E. Exploiting sequence and structure homologs to identify protein-protein binding sites. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 62 (2006) 630-640
40. Yan C., Dobbs D., and Honavar V. A two stage classifier for identification of protein-protein interface residues. Bioinformatics 20 (2004) I371-I378
41. Reš I., Mihalek I., and Lichtarge O. An evolution based classifier for prediction of protein interfaces without using protein structures. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 2496-2501
42. Gunasekaran K., Tsai C.-J., and Nussinov R. Analysis of ordered and disordered protein complexes reveals structural features discriminating between stable and unstable monomers. J. Mol. Biol. 341 (2004) 1327-1341
43. De S., Krishnadev O., Srinivasan N., and Rekha N. Interaction preferences across protein-protein interfaces of obligatory and non-obligatory components are different. BMC Struct. Biol. 5 (2005) 15
44. Mintseris J., and Weng Z. Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 10930-10935
45. Mintseris J., and Weng Z. Atomic contact vectors in protein-protein recognition. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 53 (2003) 629-639
46. Needham C.J., Bradford J.R., Bulpitt A.J., and Westhead D.R. Inference in Bayesian networks. Nature Biotech. 24 (2006) 51-53
47. Husmeier D., Dybowski R., and Roberts S. Editors of Probabilistic Modelling in Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics (2005), Springer, London
48. Beaumont M.A., and Rannala B. The Bayesian revolution in genetics. Nature Rev. Genet. 5 (2004) 251-261
49. Friedman N., Linial M., Nachman I., and Pe'er D. Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J. Comput. Biol. 7 (2000) 601-620
50. Hartemink A.J., Gifford D., Jaakkola T., and Young R. Using graphical models and genomic expression data to statistically validate models of genetic regulatory networks. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 6 (2001) 422-433
51. Hartemink A.J., Gifford D., Jaakkola T., and Young R. Combining location and expression data for principled discovery of genetic regulatory network models. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 7 (2002) 437-449
52. Pe'er D., Regev A., Elidan G., and Friedman N. Inferring subnetworks from perturbed expression profiles. Bioinformatics 17 (2001) S215-S224
53. Yoo C., Thorsson V., and Cooper G. Discovery of causal relationships in a gene regulation pathway from a mixture of experimental and observational DNA microarray data. Procedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (2002), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore 498-509
54. Tamada Y., Kim S., Bannai H., Imoto S., Tashiro K., Kuhara S., and Miyano S. Estimating gene networks from gene expression data by combining Bayesian network model with promoter element detection. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) ii227-ii236
55. Husmeier D. Sensitivity and specificity of inferring genetic regulatory interactions from microarray experiments with dynamic Bayesian networks. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 2271-2282
56. Friedman N. Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science 303 (2004) 799-805
57. Lee P.H., and Lee D. Modularized learning of genetic interaction networks from biological annotations and mRNA expression data. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 2739-2747
58. Nariai N., Tamada Y., Imoto S., and Miyano S. Estimating gene regulatory networks and protein-protein interactions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from multiple genome-wide data. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) ii206-ii212
59. Cai D., Delcher A., Kao B., and Kasif S. Modelling splice sites with Bayes networks. Bioinformatics 16 (2000) 152-158
60. Castelo R., and Guigo R. Splice site identification by idlBNs. Bioinformatics 20 (2004) i69-i76
61. Ben-Gal I., Shani A., Gohr A., Grau J., Arviv S., Shmilovici A., et al. Identification of transcription factor binding sites with variable-order Bayesian networks. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 2657-2666
62. Pudimat R., Schukat-Talamazzini E.-G., and Backofen R. A multiple-feature framework for modelling and predicting transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 3082-3088
63. Drawid A., and Gerstein M. A Bayesian system integrating expression data with sequence patterns for localizing proteins: comprehensive application to the yeast genome. J. Mol. Biol. 301 (2000) 1059-1075
64. Klinger T.M., and Brutlag D.L. Discovering structural correlations in a-helices. Protein Sci. 3 (1994) 1847-1857
65. Jansen R., Yu H., Greenbaum D., Kluger Y., Krogan N.J., Chung S., et al. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science 302 (2003) 449-453
66. Troyanskaya O.G., Dolinski K., Owen A.B., Altman R.B., and Botstein D. A Bayesian framework for combining heterogeneous data sources for gene function prediction (in Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003) 8348-8353
67. Cohen P.R., and Jensen D. Overfitting explained. Preliminary Papers: Sixth Intl. Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (1997) 115-122
68. Salzberg S.L. On comparing classifiers: pitfalls to avoid and a recommended approach. Data Mining Knowledge Discov. 1 (1997) 317-327
69. Matthews B.W. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 405 (1975) 442-451
70. Kimura S.R., Brower R.C., Vajda S., and Camacho C.J. Dynamical view of the positions of key side chains in protein-protein recognition. Biophys. J. 80 (2001) 635-642
71. Smith G.R., Sternberg M.J.E., and Bates P.A. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. J. Mol. Biol. 347 (2005) 1077-1101
72. Burgoyne N.J., and Jackson R.M. Predicting protein interaction sites: Binding hot-spots in protein-protein and protein-ligand interfaces. Bioinformatics 22 (2006) 1335-1342
73. Lejeune D., Delsaux N., Charloteaux B., Thomas A., and Brasseur R. Protein-nucleic acid recognition: statistical analysis of atomic interactions and influence of DNA structure. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 61 (2005) 258-271
74. Ahmad S., Gromiha M.M., and Sarai A. Analysis and prediction of DNA-binding proteins and their binding residues based on composition, sequence and structural information. Bioinformatics 20 (2004) 477-486
75. Djinovic Carugo K., Battistoni A., Carr M.T., Polticelli F., Desideri A., Rotilio G., et al. Three-dimensional structure of Xenopus laevis Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase B determined by X-ray crystallography at 1.5 angstroms resolution. Acta Crystallog. sect. D 52 (1996) 176-188
76. Stamper C.C., Zhang Y., Tobin J.F., Erbe D.V., Ikemizu S., Davis S.J., et al. Crystal structure of the B7-1/CTLA-4 complex that inhibits human immune responses. Nature 410 (2001) 608-611
77. Murzin A.G., Brenner S.E., Hubbard T., and Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247 (1995) 536-540
78. Oki M., and Nishimoto T. A protein required for nuclear-protein import, Mog1p, directly interacts with GTP-Gsp1p, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ran homologue. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998) 15388-15393
79. Stewart M., and Baker R.P. 1.9 Å resolution crystal structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ran binding protein Mog1p. J. Mol. Biol. 299 (2000) 213-223
80. Lu J.M.-Y., Deschenes R.J., and Fassler J.S. Role for the Ran binding protein, Mog1p, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae SLN1-SKN7 signal transduction. Eukaryotic Cell 3 (2004) 1544-1556
81. Ifuku1 K., Nakatsu T., Kato H., and Sato F. Crystal structure of the PsbP protein of photosystem II from Nicotiana tabacum. EMBO Rep. 5 (2004) 362-367
82. Wu C.H., Apweiler R., Bairoch A., Natale D.A., Barker W.C., Boeckmann B., et al. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): an expanding universe of protein information. Nucl. Acids Res. 34 (2006) D187-D191
83. Glaser F., Pupko T., Paz I., Bell R.E., Bechor-Shental D., Martz E., and Ben-Tal N. ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 163-164
84. Baker R.P., Harreman M.T., Eccleston J.F., Corbett A.H., and Stewart M. Interaction between Ran and Mog1 is required for efficient nuclear protein import. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 41255-41262
85. Michalopoulos I., Torrance G.M., Gilbert D.R., and Westhead D.R. TOPS: An enhanced database of protein structural topology. Nucl. Acids Res. 32 (2004) D251-D254
86. Krissinel E., and Henrick K. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallor. sect. D 60 (2004) 2256-2268
87. Pupko T., Bell R.E., Mayrose I., Glaser F., and Ben-Tal N. Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues. Bioinformatics 18 (2002) S71-S77
88. Stewart M., Kent H.M., and McCoy A.J. Structural basis for molecular recognition between nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2) and the GDP-bound form of the Ras-family GTPase Ran. J. Mol. Biol. 277 (1998) 635-646
89. Vetter I.R., Arndt A., Kutay U., Gorlich D., and Wittinghofer A. Structural view of the Ran-Importin beta interaction at 2.3 Å resolution. Cell 97 (1999) 635-646
90. Zhao L., and Chmielewski J. Inhibiting protein-protein interactions using designed molecules. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15 (2005) 31-34
91. Pagliaro L., Felding J., Audouze K., Nielsen S.J., Terry R.B., Krog-Jensen C., and Butcher S. Emerging classes of protein-protein interaction inhibitors and new tools for their development. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8 (2004) 442-449
92. Ryan D.P., and Matthews J.M. Protein-protein interactions in human disease. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15 (2005) 441-446
93. zur Hausen H. Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nature Rev. Cancer 2 (2002) 342-350
94. Baseman J.G., and Koutsky L.A. The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infections. J. Clin. Virol. 32 (2005) S16-S24
95. Kim S.S., Tam J.K., Wang A.F., and Hegde R.S. The structural basis of DNA target discrimination by papillomavirus E2 proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 275 (2000) 31245-31254
96. Abbate E.A., Berger J.M., and Botchan M.R. The X-ray structure of the papillomavirus helicase in complex with its molecular matchmaker E2. Genes Dev. 18 (2004) 1981-1996
97. You J., Croyle J.L., Nishimura A., Ozato K., and Howley P.M. Interaction of the bovine papillomavirus E2 protein with Brd4 tethers the viral DNA to host mitotic chromosomes. Cell 117 (2004) 349-360
98. Brannon A.R., Maresca J.A., Boeke J.D., Basrai M.A., McBride A.A., McPhillips M.G., and Oliveira J.G. Reconstitution of papillomavirus E2-mediated plasmid maintenance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the Brd4 bromodomain protein Brd4: tethering, segregation and beyond. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 2998-3003
99. Wang Y., Coulombe R., Cameron D.R., Thauvette L., Massariol M.-J., Amon L.M., et al. Crystal structure of the E2 transactivation domain of human papillomavirus type 11 bound to a protein interaction inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 6976-6985
100. White P.W., Titolo S., Brault K., Thauvette L., Pelletier A., Welchner E., et al. Inhibition of human papillomavirus DNA replication by small molecule antagonists of the E1-E2 protein interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 26765-26772
101. Frishman D., and Argos P. Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23 (1995) 566-579
102. Liu S., Zhang C., Zhou H., and Zhou Y. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 56 (2004) 93-101
103. Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucl. Acids Res. 28 (2000) 235-242
104. Sanner M.F., and Olson A.J. Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. Biopolymers 38 (1996) 305-320
105. Murphy K.P. The Bayes Net Toolbox for Matlab. Comput. Sci. Stat. 33 (2001)
106. Leray, P. & Francois, O. (2004). BNT structure learning package: documentation and experiments. Technical report, Laboratoire PSI, Université et INSA de Rouen.
107. Fauchère J.L., and Pliska V. Hydrophobic parameters of amino-acid side chains from the partitioning of N-acetyl-amino-acid amides. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 18 (1983) 369-375
108. Duncan B.S., and Olson A.J. Shape analysis of molecular surfaces. Biopolymers 33 (1993) 231-238
109. Koenderink J.J. Solid Shape (1991), Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
110. Rocchia W., Alexov E., and Honig B. Extending the applicability of the non-linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation: multiple dielectric constants and multivalent ions. J. Phys. Chem. ser. B 105 (2001) 6507-6514
111. Rocchia W., Sridharan S., Nicholls A., Alexov E., Chiabrera A., and Honig B. Rapid grid-based construction of the molecular surface for both molecules and geometric objects: applications to the finite difference Poisson-Boltzmann method. J. Comp. Chem. 23 (2002) 128-137
112. Valdar W.S. Scoring residue conservation. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 48 (2002) 227-241