Insulators of higher eukaryotes: Properties, mechanisms of action, and role in transcriptional regulation

Russian Journal of Genetics

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 845-857

  Maksimenko, O G ^a   Chetverina, D A ^a   Georgiev, P G ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GENE BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUKARYOTA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 33747873071     PISSN: 10227954     EISSN: 16083369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1134/S1022795406080023     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Bondarenko, V.A., Liu, Y.V., Jiang, Y.I., et al., Communication Over a Large Distance: Enhancers and Insulators, Biochem. Cell Biol., 2003, vol. 81, pp. 241-251.
2. Dorsett, D., Distant Liaisons: Long Range Enhancer-Promoter Interactions in Drosophila, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 1999, vol. 9, pp. 505-514.
3. De Laat, W. and Grosveld, F., Spatial Organization of Gene Expression: The Active Chromatin Hub, Chromosome Res., 2003, vol. 11, pp. 447-459.
4. Sipos, L., and Gyurkovics, H., Long-Distance Interactions between Enhancers and Promoters, FEBS J, 2005, vol. 272, pp. 3253-3259.
5. West, A.G., Gaszner, M., and Felsenfeld, G., Insulators: Many Functions, Many Mechanisms, Genes Dev., 2002, vol. 16, pp. 271-288.
6. West, A.G. and Fraser, P., Remote Control of Gene Transcription, Hum. Mol. Genet., 2005, vol. 14, pp. 101-111.
7. Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R.J., Splinter, E., et al., Looping and Interaction between Hypersensitive Sites in the Active Beta-Globin Locus, Mol. Cell., 2002, vol. 10, pp. 1453-1465.
8. Capelson, M. and Corces, V.G., Boundary Elements and Nuclear Organization, Biol. Cell., 2004, vol. 96, pp. 617-629.
9. Geyer, P.K. and Clark, I., Protecting Against Promiscuity: The Regulatory Role of Insulators, Cell Mol. Life Sci., 2002, vol. 59, pp. 2112-2127.
10. Kuhn, E.J. and Geyer, P.K., Genomic Insulators: Connecting Properties to Mechanism, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 2003, vol. 15, pp. 259-265.
11. Kellum, R. and Schedl, P., A Position-Effect Assay for Boundaries of Higher Order Chromosomal Domains, Cell, 1991, vol. 64, pp. 941-950.
12. Kellum, R. and Schedl, P., A Group of ses Elements Function As Domain Boundaries in An Enhancer-Blocking Assay, Mol. Cell. Biol., 1992, vol. 12, pp. 2424-2431.
13. Kuhn, E., Hart, C., and Geyer, P., Studies of the Role of the Drosophila ses and ses' Insulators in Defining Boundaries of a Chromosome Puff, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2004, vol. 24, pp. 1470-1480.
14. Gaszner, M., Vazquez, J., and Schedl, P., The Zw5 Protein, a Component of the ses Chromatin Domain Boundary, Is Able to Block Enhancer-Promoter Interaction, Genes Dev., 1999, vol. 13, pp. 2098-2107.
15. Vazquez, J. and Schedl, P., Sequences Required for Enhancer Blocking Activity of ses are Located within Two Nuclease-Hypersensitive Regions, EMBO J., 1994, vol. 13, pp. 5984-5993.
16. Zhao, K., Hart, C.M., and Laemmli, U.K., Visualization of Chromosomal Domains with Boundary Element-Associated Factor BEAF-32, Cell, 1995, vol. 81, pp. 879-889.
17. Hart, C.M., Cuvier, O., and Laemmli, U.K., Evidence for an Antagonistic Relationship between the Boundary Element-Associated Factor BEAF and the Transcription Factor DREF, Chromosoma, 1999, vol. 108, pp. 375-383.
18. Cuvier, O., Hart, C.M., and Laemmli, U.K., Identification of a Class of Chromatin Boundary Elements, Mol. Cell. Biol., 1998, vol. 18, pp. 7478-7486.
19. Cuvier, O., Hart, C.M., Kas, E., and Laemmli, U.K., Identification of a Multicopy Chromatin Boundary Element at the Borders of Silenced Chromosomal Domains, Chromosoma, 2002, vol. 110, pp. 519-531.
20. Udvardy, A., Maine, E., and Schedl, P., The 87A7 Chromomere. Identification of Novel Chromatin Structures Flanking the Heat Shock Locus That May Define the Boundaries of Higher Order Domains, J. Mol. Biol., 1985, vol. 185, pp. 341-358.
21. Blanton, J., Gaszner, M., and Schedl, P., Protein: Protein Interactions and the Pairing of Boundary Elements in Vivo, Genes Dev., 2003, vol. 17, pp. 664-675.
22. Mallin, D.R., Myung, J.S., Patton, J.S., and Geyer, P.K., Polycomb Group Repression Is Blocked by the Drosophila Suppressor of Hairy-Wing [Su(Hw)] Insulator, Genetics, 1998, vol. 148, pp. 331-339.
23. Sigrist, C.J.A. and Pirrotta, V., Chromatin Insulator Elements Block the Silencing of a Target Gene by the Drosophila Polycomb Response Element (PRE) But Allow Trans Interactions between PREs on Different Chromosomes, Genetics, 1997, vol. 147, pp. 209-221.
24. Mazo, A.M., Mizrokhi, L.J., Karavanov, A.A., et al., Suppression in Drosophila: su(Hw) and su(f) Gene Products Interact with a Region gypsy (mdg4) Regulating Its Transcriptional Activity, EMBO J., 1989, vol. 8, pp. 903-911.
25. Parkhurst, S.M., Harrison, D.A., Remington, M.P., et al., The Drosophila su(Hw) Gene, Which Controls the Phenotypic Effect of the gypsy Transposable Element, Encodes a Putative DNA-Binding Protein, Genes Dev., 1988, vol. 2, pp. 1205-1215.
26. Harrison, D.A., Gdula, D.A., Coyne, R.S., and Corces, V.G., A Leucine Zipper Domain of the Suppressor of Hairy-Wing Protein Mediates its Repressive Effect on Enhancer Function, Genes Dev., 1993, vol. 7, pp. 1966-1978.
27. Kim, J., Shen, B., Rosen, C., and Dorsett, D., The DNA-Binding and Enhancer-Blocking Domains of the Drosophila Suppressor of Hairy-Wing Protein, Mol. Cell. Biol., 1996, vol. 16, pp. 3381-3392.
28. Nabirochkin, S., Ossokina, M., and Heidmann, T., A Nuclear Matrix/Scaffold Attachment Region Co-Localizes with the gypsy Retrotransposon Insulator Sequence, J. Biol. Chem., 1998, vol. 273, pp. 2473-2479.
29. Scott, K.S., Taubman, A.D., and Geyer, P.K., Enhancer Blocking by the Drosophila gypsy Insulator Depends Upon Insulator Anatomy and Enhancer Strength, Genetics, 1999, vol. 153, pp. 787-798.
30. Golovnin, A., Birukova, I., Romanova, O., Silicheva, M., et al., An Endogenous Su(Hw) Insulator Separates the Yellow Gene from the Achaete-Scute Gene Complex in Drosophila, Development, 2003, vol. 130, pp. 3249-3258.
31. Parnell, T.J., Viering, M.M., Skjesol, A., et al., An Endogenous Suppressor of Hairy-Wing Insulator Separates Regulatory Domains in Drosophila, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2003, vol. 100, pp. 13436-13441.
32. Ramos, E., Ghosh, D., Baxter, E., and Corces, V., Genomic Organization of gypsy-Like Chromatin Insulators in Drosophila Melanogaster, Genetics, 2006, vol. 172, no. 4, pp. 2337-2349.
33. Torigoi, E., Bennani-Baiti, I.M., Rosen, C., et al., Chip Interacts with Diverse Homeodomain Proteins and Potentiates Bicoid Activity in Vivo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2000, vol. 97, pp. 2686-2691.
34. Gdula, D.A. and Corces, V.G., Characterization of Functional Domains of the Su(Hw) Protein That Mediate the Silencing Effect of mod(mdg4) Mutations, Genetics, 1997, vol. 145, pp. 153-161.
35. Gause, M., Morcillo, P., and Dorsett, D., Insulation of Enhancer-Promoter Communication by a gypsy Transposon Insert in the Drosophila cut Gene: Cooperation between Suppressor of Hairy-Wing and Modifier of Mdg4 Proteins, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2001, vol. 21, pp. 4807-4817.
36. Ghosh, D., Gerasimova, T.I., and Corces, V.G., Interactions between the Su(Hw) and mod(mdg4) Proteins Required for gypsy Insulator Function, EMBO J., 2001, vol. 20, pp. 2518-2527.
37. Buchner, K., Roth, P., Schotta, G., et al., Genetic and Molecular Complexity of the Position Effect Variegation Modifier mod(mdg4) in Drosophila, Genetics, 2000, vol. 155, pp. 141-157.
38. Stogios, P.J., Downs, G.S., Jauhal, J.J.S., et al., Sequence and Structural Analysis of BTB Domain Proteins, Genome Biol., 2005, vol. 6, p. R82.
39. Gerasimova, T.I. and Corces, V.G., Polycomb and Trithorax Group Proteins Mediate the Function of a Chromatin Insulator, Cell, 1998, vol. 92, pp. 511-521.
40. Pai, C., Lei, C., Ghosh, D., and Corces, V., The Centrosomal Protein CP190 Is a Component of the gypsy Chromatin Insulator, Mol. Cell, 2004, vol. 16, pp. 737-748.
41. Capelson, M. and Corces, V., The Ubiquitin Ligase dTopors Directs the Nuclear Organization of a Chromatin Insulator, Mol. Cell., 2005, vol. 20, pp. 105-116.
42. Gerasimova, T.I., Byrd, K., and Corces, V.G., A Chromatin Insulator Determines the Nuclear Localization of DNA, Mol. Cell., 2000, vol. 6, pp. 1025-1035.
43. Mihaly, J., Hogga, I., Barges, S., et al., Chromatin Domain Boundaries in the Bithorax Complex, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 1998, vol. 54, pp. 60-70.
44. Barges, S., Mihaly, J., Galloni, M., et al., The Fab-8 Boundary Defines the Distal Limit of the bithorax Complex iab-7 Domain and Insulated iab-7 from Initiation Elements and a PRE in the Adjacent iab-8 Domain, Development, 2000, vol. 127, pp. 779-790.
45. Zhou, J., Ashe, H., Burks, C., et al., Characterization of the Transvection Mediating Region of the Abdominal-B Locus in Drosophila, Development, 1999, vol. 126, pp. 3057-3065.
46. Gruzdeva, N., Kyrchanova, O., Parshikov, A., et al., The Mcp Element from the bithorax Complex Contains an Insulator that Is Capable of Pairwise Interactions and Can Facilitate Enhancer-Promoter Communication, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2005, vol. 25, pp. 3682-3689.
47. Hagstrom, K., Muller, M., and Schedl, P., Fab-7 Functions As a Chromatin Domain Boundary to Ensure Proper Segment Specification by the Drosophila Bithorax Complex, Genes Dev., 1996, vol. 10, pp. 3202-3215.
48. Zhou, J., Barolo, S., Szymanski, P., et al., The Fab-7 Element of the Bithorax Complex Attenuates Enhancer-Promoter Interactions in the Drosophila Embryo, Genes Dev., 1996, vol. 10, pp. 3195-3201.
49. Chen, Q., Lin, L., Smith, S., et al., Multiple Promoter Targeting Sequences Exist in Abdominal-B to Regulate Long-Range Gene Activation, Dev. Biol., 2005, vol. 286, pp. 629-636.
50. Lin, Q., Chen, Q., Lin, L., and Zhou, J., The Promoter Targeting Sequence Mediates Epigenetically Heritable Transcription Memory, Genes Dev., 2004, vol. 18, pp. 2639-2651.
51. Bantignies, F., Grimaud, C., Lavrov, S., et al., Inheritance of Polycomb-Dependent Chromosomal Interactions in Drosophila, Genes Dev., 2003, vol. 17, pp. 2406-2420.
52. Muller, M., Hangstrom, K., Gyurkovics, H., et al., The Mcp Element from the Drosophila melanogaster bithorax Complex Mediates Long-Distance Regulatory Interactions, Genetics, 1999, vol. 153, pp. 1333-1356.
53. Moon, H., Filippova, G., Loukinov, D., et al., CTCF Is Conserved from Drosophila to Humans and Confers Enhancer Blocking of the Fab-8 Insulator, EMBO Rep., 2005, vol. 2, pp. 165-170.
54. Conte, C., Dastugue, B., and Vaury, C., Coupling of Enhancer and Insulator Properties Identified in Two Retrotransposons Modulates Their Mutagenic Impact on Nearby Genes, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2002, vol. 22, pp. 1767-1777.
55. Vazquez, J. and Schedl, P., Deletion of an Insulator Element by the Mutation Facet-Strawberry in Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, 2000, vol. 155, pp. 1297-1311.
56. Belozerov, V.E., Majumder, P., Shen, P., and Cai, H.N., A Novel Boundary Element May Facilitate Independent Gene Regulation in the Antennapedia Complex of Drosophila, EMBO J., 2003, vol. 22, pp. 3113-3121.
57. Melnikova, L., Juge, F., Gruzdeva, N., et al., Interaction between the GAGA Factor and mod(mdg4) Proteins Promotes Insulator Bypass in Drosophila, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, vol. 101, pp. 14806-14811.
58. Bell, A.C., West, A.G., and Felsenfeld, G., The Protein CTCF Is Required for the Enhancer Blocking Activity of Vertebrate Insulators, Cell, 1999, vol. 98, pp. 387-396.
59. Bell, A.C. and Felsenfeld, G., Stopped at the Border: Boundaries and Insulators, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 1999, vol. 9, pp. 191-198.
60. Chung, J.H., Bell, A.C., and Felsenfeld, G., Characterization of the Chicken β-Globin Insulator, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, vol. 94, pp. 575-580.
61. Hebbes, T.R., Clayton, A.L., Thorne, A.W., and Crane-Robinson, C., Core Histone Hyperacetilation Comaps with Generalized DNAse I Sensitivity in the Chicken β-Globin Chromosomal Domain, EMBO J., 1994, vol. 13, pp. 1823-1830.
62. Prioleau, M.-N., Nony, P., Simpson, M., and Felsenfeld, G., An Insulator Element and Condensed Chromatin Region Separate the Chicken β-Globin Locus from An Independently Regulated Erythroid-Specific Folate Receptor Gene, EMBO J., 1999, vol. 18, pp. 4035- 4048.
63. Burgess-Beusse, B., Farrell, C., Gaszner, M., et al., The Insulation of Genes from External Enhancers and Silencing Chromatin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2002, vol. 99, pp. 16433-16437.
64. Recillas-Targa, F., Pikaart, M.J., Burgess-Beusse, B., et al., Position-Effect Protection and Enhancer Blocking by the Chicken β-Globin Insulator Are Separable Activities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2002, vol. 99, pp. 6883-6888.
65. Gombert, W.M., Farris, S.D., Rubio, E.D., et al., The c-myc Insulator Element and Matrix Attachment Regions Define the c-myc Chromosomal Domain, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2003, vol. 23, pp. 9338-9348.
66. West, A.G., Huang, S., Gaszner, M., et al., Recruitment of Histone Modifications by USF Proteins at a Vertebrate Barrier Element, Mol. Cell., 2004, vol. 16, pp. 453-463.
67. Saitoh, N., Bell, A.C., and Recillas-Targa, F., Structural and Functional Conservation at the Boundaries of the Chicken β-Globin Domain, EMBO J., 2000, vol. 19, pp. 2315-2322.
68. Bender, M.A., Reik, A., Close, J., et al., Description and Targeted Deletion of 5′ Hypersensitive Site 5 and 6 of the Mouse β-Globin Locus Control Region, Blood, 1998, vol. 92, pp. 4394-4403.
69. Epner, E., Reik, A., Cimbora, D., et al., The β-Globin LCR Is not Necessary for an Open Chromatin Structure or Developmentally Regulated Transcription of the Native Mouse β-Globin Locus, Mol. Cell., 1998, vol. 2, pp. 447-455.
70. Farrell, C.M., West, A.G., and Felsenfeld, G., Conserved CTCF Insulator Elements Flank the Mouse and Human β-Globin Loci, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2002, vol. 22, pp. 3820-3831.
71. Wai, A.W.K., Gillemans, N., Raguz-Bolognesi, S., et al., HS5 of the Human β-Globin Locus Control Region: A Developmental Stage-Specific Border in Erythroid Cells, EMBO J., 2003, vol. 22, pp. 4489-4500.
72. Drewell, R.A., Goddard, C.J., Thomas, J.O., and Surani, M.A., Methylation-Dependent Silencing at the H19 Imprinting Control Region by MeCP2, Nucleic Acids Res., 2002, vol. 30, pp. 1139-1144.
73. Kaffer, C.R., Srivastava, M., Park, K.Y., et al., A Transcriptional Insulator at the Imprinted H19/Igf2 Locus, Genes Dev., 2000, vol. 14, pp. 1908-1919.
74. Szabo, P.E., Tang, S.-H.E., Silva, F.J., et al., Role of CTCF Binding Sites in the Igf2/H19 Imprinting Control Region, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2004, vol. 24, pp. 4791-4800.
75. Lutz, M., Burke, L.J., and Barreto, G., Transcriptional Repression by the Insulator Protein CTCF Involves Histone Deacetylases, Nucleic Acids Res., 2000, vol. 28, pp. 1707-1713.
76. Lutz, M., Burke, L.J., LeFevre, P., et al., Thyroid Hormone-Regulated Enhancer Blocking: Cooperation of CTCF and Thyroid Hormone Receptor, EMBO J., 2003, vol. 22, pp. 1579-1587.
77. Yu, W., Ginjala, V., Pant, V., et al., Poly(ADP-Ribosyl)Ation Regulates CTCF-Dependent Chromatin Insulation, Nat. Genet., 2004, vol. 36, pp. 1105-1110.
78. Defossez, P.-A., Kelly, K.F., Filion, G., et al., The Human Enhancer-Blocker CTCF Interacts with the Transcription Factor Kaiso, J. Biol. Chem., 2005, vol. 280, pp. 43017-43023.
79. Burke, L.J., Zhang, R., Bartkuhn, M., et al., CTCF Binding and Higher Order Chromatin Structure of the H19 Locus Are Maintained in Mitotic Chromatin, EMBO J., 2005, vol. 24, pp. 3291-3300.
80. Dunn, K.L., Zhao, H., and Davie, J.R., The Insulator Binding Protein CTCF Associates with the Nuclear Matrix, Exp. Cell Res., 2003, vol. 288, pp. 218-223.
81. Yusufzai, T.M. and Felsenfeld, G., The 5′-HS4 Chicken β-Globin Insulator Is a CTCF-Dependent Nuclear Matrix-Associated Element, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, vol. 101, pp. 8620-8624.
82. Yusufzai, T.M., Tagami, H., Nakatani, Y., and Felsenfeld, G., CTCF Tethers An Insulator To Subnuclear Sites, Suggesting Shared Insulator Mechanisms Across Species, Mol. Cell, 2004, vol. 13, pp. 291-298.
83. Byrd, K. and Corces, V.G., Visualization of Chromatin Domains Created by the Gypsy Insulator of Drosophila, J. Cell Biol., 2003, vol. 162, pp. 565-574.
84. Xu, Q., Li, M., Adams, J., and Cai, H.N., Nuclear Location of a Chromatin Insulator in Drosophila melanogaster, J. Cell Sci., 2004, vol. 117, pp. 1025-1032.
85. Savitskaya, E., Melnikova, L., Kostuchenko, M., et al., Study of Long-Distance Functional Interactions between Su(Hw) Insulators That Can Regulate Enhancer-Promoter Communication in Drosophila melanogaster, Mol. Cell Biol., 2006, vol. 26, pp. 754-761.
86. Cai, H.N. and Shen, P., Effects of cis-Arrangement of Chromatin Insulators on Enhancer-Blocking Activity, Science, 2001, pp. 493-495.
87. Muravyova, E., Golovnin, A., Gracheva, E., et al., Loss of Insulator Activity by Paired Su(Hw) Chromatin Insulators, Science, 2001, vol. 291, pp. 495-498.
88. Kravchenko, E., Kravchuk, O., Savitskaya, E., et al., The Pairing Between gypsy Insulators Located in Homologous Chromosomes Facilitates Enhancer Action in Trans Throughout the Drosophila Genome, Mol Cell. Biol., 2005, vol. 25, pp. 9283-9291.
89. Kuhn, E.J., Viering, M.M., Rhodes, K.M., and Geyer, P.K., A Test of Insulator Interactions in Drosophila, EMBO J., 2003, vol. 22, pp. 2463-2471.
90. Majumder, P., and Cai, H.N., The Functional Analysis of Insulator Interactions in the Drosophila Embryo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA, 2003, vol. 100, pp. 5223-5228.
91. Rodin, S. and Georgiev, P., Handling Three Regulatory Elements in One Transgene: A New I-SceI Recombination System to Supplement the Cre/LOX and Flp/FRT, BioTechniques, 2005, vol. 39, pp. 871-876.
92. Ameres, S.L., Drueppel, L., Pfleiderer, K., et al., Inducible DNA-Loop Formation Blocks Transcriptional Activation by An SV40 Enhancer, EMBO J., 2005, vol. 24, pp. 358-367.
93. Bondarenko, V.A., Jiang, Y.I., and Studitsky, V.M., Rationally Designed Insulator-Like Elements Can Block Enhancer Action in vitro, EMBO J., 2003, vol. 22, pp. 4728-4737.
94. Golovnin, A., Melnick, E., Mazur, A., and Georgiev, P., Drosophila Su(Hw) Insulator Can Stimulate Transcription of a Weakened Yellow Promoter Over a Distance, Genetics, 2005, vol. 170, pp. 1133-1142.
95. Oki, M. and Kamakaka, R.T., Blockers and Barriers To Transcription: Competing Activities?, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol, 2002, vol. 14, pp. 299-304.
96. Mukhopadhyay, R., Yu, W.-Q., Whitehead, J., et al., The Binding Sites for the Chromatin Insulator Protein CTCF Map To DNA Methylation-Free Domains Genome-Wide, Genet. Res., 2004, vol. 14, pp. 1594-1602.
97. Smith, P.A. and Corces, V.G., The Suppressor of Hairy-Wing Protein Regulates the Tissue-Specific Expression of the Drosophila gypsy Retrotransposon, Genetics, 1995, vol. 139, pp. 215-228.
98. Wei, W. and Brennan, M.D., The gypsy Insulator Can Act as a Promoter-Specific Transcriptional Stimulator, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2001, vol. 21, pp. 7714-7720.
99. Yang, Y., Quitschke, W.W., Vostrov, A.A., and Brewer, G.J., CTCF Is Essential for Up-Regulating Expression from the Amyloid Precursor Protein Ptomoter during Differentiation of Primary Hippocampal Neurons, J. Neurochem., 1999, vol. 73, pp. 2286-2298.
100. Renaud, S., Loukinov, D., and Bosman, F.T., CTCF Binds the Proximal Exonic Region of hTERTand Inhibits its Transcription, Nucleic Acids Res., 2005, vol. 33, pp. 6850-6860.
101. Klochkov, D., Rincon-Arano, H., Ioudinkova, E.S., et al., A CTCF-Dependent Silencer Located in the Differentially Methylated Area May Regulate Expression of a Housekeeping Gene Overlapping a Tissue-Specific Gene Domain, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2006, vol. 26, pp. 1589-1597.